AzTrials
AzTrials

Plantar FasciitisNCT04709484

Comparison of the Effectiveness of USG and Palpation Guidance Steroid Injection in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis

A study testing USG-guided steroid injection and Palpation-guided steroid injection in people with Plantar Fasciitis, run by Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Plantar fasciitis, often described as overloading of the plantar fascia, is the most common cause of heel pain in adults. It is characterized by a sharp pain along the medial aspect of the heel, which is worse with the first step taken in the morning or at the beginning of an activity and decreases as the person warms… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Plantar Fasciitis
What is being tested?
USG-guided steroid injection and Palpation-guided steroid injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
11 Mar 2021to 1 Aug 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis
  • Between the ages of 18-75
  • Who have failed conservative treatment (stretching exercises, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and heel pads) for at least 3 months
  • Visual Anolog Scale value of 5 and above will be included in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Having received any local injection therapy and physical therapy for heel pain within the last 4 months,
  • Any history of surgery for heel pain, tarsal tunnel syndrome, calcaneal fracture, Achilles tendinopathy, any deformity of the foot and ankle including pes, planus or pes cavus deformity
  • with systemic disorders such as diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, hematological disease, or gout
  • Pregnancy
  • A recent history of aspirin or aspirin-like medication
  • mental disability

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Adem ERBİROL

    Isparta

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Plantar fasciitis, often described as overloading of the plantar fascia, is the most common cause of heel pain in adults. It is characterized by a sharp pain along the medial aspect of the heel, which is worse with the first step taken in the morning or at the beginning of an activity and decreases as the person warms up. The etiology of plantar fasciitis is multifactorial and not well understood. Poor biomechanics and changes in the structure of the foot can lead to repeated micro-trauma at the beginning of the plantar fascia, causing inflammation and degeneration. Plantar fasciitis is more common in sedentary individuals and athletes and those participating in running sports. Other risk factors associated with plantar fasciitis include reduced ankle dorsiflexion, increased body mass index (BMI), and work-related weight loss activities.

Current treatments for plantar fasciitis, such as plantar fascia stretching exercises, strapping, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), arch braces, and heel pads are mainly aimed at reducing inflammation. Corticosteroid injections are usually reserved for refractory plantar fasciitis after conservative noninvasive attempts have failed. It has been shown to effectively reduce heel pain in patients with plantar fasciitis. The strong anti-inflammatory effect of corticosteroids can speed up the process of pain relief.

In our study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of USG and palpation guidance blind steroid injection in patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis.

Read the detailed description

It is planned to enroll 60 (sixty) patients in the study. Patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis, between the ages of 18-75, who have failed conservative treatment (stretching exercises, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and heel pads) for at least 3 months, and those with a Visual Anolog Scale value of 5 and above will be included in the study. Any local injection therapy and physical therapy for heel pain in the last 4 months, any surgery history for heel pain, history of tarsal tunnel syndrome, ankle effusion showing intra-articular disease, healed calcaneal fracture, Achilles tendinopathy, foot including pes and any deformity of the ankle, planus or pes cavus deformity; Patients with systemic disorders such as diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, hematological disease or gout, pregnancy, history of aspirin or aspirin-like medication, and mental insufficiency will be excluded from the study.

In the study, the patients will be filled in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Foot Function Indez (FFI) questionnaires. Patients will be randomized into 2 groups according to the Random Number Generation. The first group will be the USG-guided steroid injection group, and the second group will be the palpation-guided steroid injection group. In the USG-guided group, steroid injection will be made to the area where the fascia is thickened under the guidance of USG. In the palpation-guided group, the most painful point will be found by palpation on the calcaneus bone and steroid injection will be made to that part. The content of the steroid solution will be 1 ml of 1% Lidocaine + 1 ml (40 mg) methylprednisolone. There will be pre-injection, 1st month and 3rd month controls after injection.

Being tested
USG-guided steroid injection, Palpation-guided steroid injection
Keywords
Plantar Fasciitis, USG, Steroid, Injection
Medical subject headings
Fasciitis, Plantar

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • USG-guided steroid injectionDrug

    Also called no other names

    In the palpation-guided group, the most painful point will be found by palpation on the calcaneus boIn the USG-guided group, steroid injection will be made to the area where the fascia is thickened under USG guidance. The content of the steroid solution will be 1 ml of 1% Lidocaine + 1 ml (40 mg) methylprednisolone.ne and steroid injection will be made to that part. The content of the steroid solution will be 1 ml of 1% Lidocaine + 1 ml (40 mg) methylprednisolone.

  • Palpation-guided steroid injectionDrug

    Also called no other names

    In the palpation-guided group, the most painful point will be found by palpation on the calcaneus bone and steroid injection will be made to that part. The content of the steroid solution will be 1 ml of 1% Lidocaine + 1 ml (40 mg) methylprednisolone.

Study groups in NCT04709484
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
USG-guided steroid injection groupExperimentalIn the USG-guided group, steroid injection will be made to the area where the fascia is thickened under USG guidance. The content of the steroid solution will be 1 ml of 1% Lidocaine + 1 ml (40 mg) methylprednisolone.
Receives: Drug: USG-guided steroid injection
Palpation-guided steroid injection groupExperimentalIn the palpation-guided group, the most painful point will be found by palpation on the calcaneus bone and steroid injection will be made to that part. The content of the steroid solution will be 1 ml of 1% Lidocaine + 1 ml (40 mg) methylprednisolone.
Receives: Drug: Palpation-guided steroid injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Severity

    visual analog scale (0-10) minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: day 0 (before intervention)

  2. Pain Severity

    visual analog scale (0-10) minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: 1 month after intervention

  3. Pain Severity

    visual analog scale (0-10) minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: 3 month after intervention

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Foot Function Index

    Foot Function Index(FFI) is a self-report questionnaire concerning foot function and pain. The FFI consists of 23 questions with scores 0-10 in three domains concerning foot pain, function and disability resulting in a total score range from 0 to 230. The score is validated for patients with plantar fasciitis with a minimal clinical important difference being 7 points. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: day 0 (before intervention)

  2. Foot Function Index

    Foot Function Index(FFI) is a self-report questionnaire concerning foot function and pain. The FFI consists of 23 questions with scores 0-10 in three domains concerning foot pain, function and disability resulting in a total score range from 0 to 230. The score is validated for patients with plantar fasciitis with a minimal clinical important difference being 7 points. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: 1 month after intervention

  3. Foot Function Index

    Foot Function Index(FFI) is a self-report questionnaire concerning foot function and pain. The FFI consists of 23 questions with scores 0-10 in three domains concerning foot pain, function and disability resulting in a total score range from 0 to 230. The score is validated for patients with plantar fasciitis with a minimal clinical important difference being 7 points. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: 3 month after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jan 2021
  2. Study start11 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
66 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04709484
Sponsor's protocol ID
dr.ademerbirol
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
12 Jan 2021
Last updated
20 Oct 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: other researchers would get information from the main researcher. therefore it was not shared.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing USG-guided steroid injection and Palpation-guided steroid injection in people with Plantar Fasciitis, run by Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Severity (time frame: day 0 (before intervention)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in