Lung CancerNCT04712149
Pilot Digital Follow-up of Lung Cancer
A study testing Weekly digital follow up in people with Lung Cancer, run by Hasselt University at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
In the pilot study, 30 patients with metastatic lung cancer (stage IV) will be recruited at the start of their stage IV treatment from February 2019. The study period per patient will last six months, from the start of the stage IV treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Weekly digital follow up
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 31 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- stage IV lung cancer,
- speak sufficient Dutch
- willing to participate
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study - Measurement of Cost, Outcome and Patient Experience of a Digital Weekly Follow up of Lung Cancer Patients
In the pilot study, 30 patients with metastatic lung cancer (stage IV) will be recruited at the start of their stage IV treatment from February 2019. The study period per patient will last six months, from the start of the stage IV treatment. Patients are eligible if they are diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer, speak sufficient Dutch, and are willing to participate. Patients are randomly assigned to two arms by simple randomization. In the intervention arm, 15 patients will receive a weekly questionnaire. Alerts will be sent to the multidisciplinary care team, who will undertake follow-up actions. In the control arm, 15 patients will receive the standard care pathway without weekly questionnaire and without automatic alerts to the care team. The standard care pathways and the care team are the same in both groups. In this pilot study, the weekly follow-up will be evaluated by a validation questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with patients (n=5) and the care team (n=5), and workload registration of the care team during a six-month period for all included patients in the pilot.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Weekly digital follow up
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Weekly digital follow upDevice
weekly digital follow-up by sending a questionnaire to patients and sending alerts based on the questionnaire to the care team
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention arm | Experimental | In the intervention arm, 15 patients will receive a weekly questionnaire. Alerts will be sent to the multidisciplinary care team, who will undertake follow-up actions. In the control arm, 15 patients will receive the standard care pathway without weekly questionnaire and without automatic alerts to the care team. The standard care pathways and the care team are the same in both groups. In this pilot study, the weekly follow-up will be evaluated by a validation questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with patients and the care team, and workload registration of the care team during a six-month period. Receives: Device: Weekly digital follow up |
| Control arm | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assess the response rates on the digital weekly questionnaire
In the weekly digital questionnaire the patient reports adverse events and psychosocial support needs. Based on this questionnaire alerts are generated to the care team
Measured: up to 26 weeks
Assess the Response on the validation questionnaire at Baseline and at Week 26
In the validation questionnaire the patient evaluates the online system, the relevance and difficulty of the questions
Measured: up to 26 weeks
Assess the workload of responding to the alerts on the weekly questionnaire for the care team
the workload is assessed by daily registration of the workload (in minutes) per patient during the six-month registration period by the care team: 2 MD pulmonologists, oncology nurse, psychologist, palliative support, and dietician
Measured: up to 26 weeks
Assess the clinical utility of the alerts for the care team
In semi-structured interviews with the multidisciplinary care team, the clinical utility of receiving and responding to alerts is assessed with every care giver: an MD pulmonologist, oncology nurse, psychologist, palliative support, and dietician
Measured: month 6
Secondary outcomes (13)
Validation questionnaire
Measured: Baseline
Validation questionnaire
Measured: month 6
Weekly questionnaire based on PRO CTC-AE
As individuals go through treatment for their cancer they sometimes experience different symptoms and side effects. For each question, please select the one response that best describes your experiences over the past 7 days…
Measured: up to 26 weeks
EORTC QLQ-C30
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline
EORTC QLQ-C30
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
Measured: week 6
EORTC QLQ-C30
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
Measured: week 12
EORTC QLQ-C30
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
Measured: week 18
EORTC QLQ-C30
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
Measured: week 24
QLQ-LC13
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
Measured: baseline
QLQ-LC13
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
Measured: week 6
QLQ-LC13
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
Measured: week 12
QLQ-LC13
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
Measured: week 18
QLQ-LC13
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
Measured: week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2021
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion31 Jul 2020
- Study completion31 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hasselt University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AZ Delta
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, prof. dr. Wim Marneffe, Hasselt University
- Investigators
- Wim Marneffe, prof. dr., Principal investigator, Hasselt UniversityVeerle Ross, dr., Study chair, Hasselt University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04712149
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FU- Lung cancer - 001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Misplon S, Marneffe W, Himpe U, Hellings J, Demedts I. Evaluation of the implementation of Value-Based Healthcare with a weekly digital follow-up of lung cancer patients in clinical practice. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13653. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13653. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
PubMed 35819130
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study - Measurement of Cost, Outcome and Patient Experience of a Digital Weekly Follow up of Lung Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04712149
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FU- Lung cancer - 001
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hasselt UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AZ Delta
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the pilot study, 30 patients with metastatic lung cancer (stage IV) will be recruited at the start of their stage IV treatment from February 2019. The study period per patient will last six months, from the start of the stage IV treatment. Patients are eligible if they are diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer, speak sufficient Dutch, and are willing to participate. Patients are randomly assigned to two arms by simple randomization. In the intervention arm, 15 patients will receive a weekly questionnaire. Alerts will be sent to the multidisciplinary care team, who will undertake follow-up actions. In the control arm, 15 patients will receive the standard care pathway without weekly questionnaire and without automatic alerts to the care team. The standard care pathways and the care team are the same in both groups. In this pilot study, the weekly follow-up will be evaluated by a validation questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with patients (n=5) and the care team (n=5), and workload registration of the care team during a six-month period for all included patients in the pilot.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention arm | Experimental | Device: Weekly digital follow upIn the intervention arm, 15 patients will receive a weekly questionnaire. Alerts will be sent to the multidisciplinary care team, who will undertake follow-up actions. In the control arm, 15 patients will receive the standard care pathway without weekly questionnaire and without automatic alerts to the care team. The standard care pathways and the care team are the same in both groups. In this pilot study, the weekly follow-up will be evaluated by a validation questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with patients and the care team, and workload registration of the care team during a six-month period. |
| Control arm | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- stage IV lung cancer,
- speak sufficient Dutch
- willing to participate
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly digital follow upweekly digital follow-up by sending a questionnaire to patients and sending alerts based on the questionnaire to the care team | Device | intervention arm |
Primary outcome
Assess the response rates on the digital weekly questionnaire
Time frame: up to 26 weeks
In the weekly digital questionnaire the patient reports adverse events and psychosocial support needs. Based on this questionnaire alerts are generated to the care team
Assess the Response on the validation questionnaire at Baseline and at Week 26
Time frame: up to 26 weeks
In the validation questionnaire the patient evaluates the online system, the relevance and difficulty of the questions
Assess the workload of responding to the alerts on the weekly questionnaire for the care team
Time frame: up to 26 weeks
the workload is assessed by daily registration of the workload (in minutes) per patient during the six-month registration period by the care team: 2 MD pulmonologists, oncology nurse, psychologist, palliative support, and dietician
Assess the clinical utility of the alerts for the care team
Time frame: month 6
In semi-structured interviews with the multidisciplinary care team, the clinical utility of receiving and responding to alerts is assessed with every care giver: an MD pulmonologist, oncology nurse, psychologist, palliative support, and dietician
13 secondary outcomes
Validation questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline
Validation questionnaire
Time frame: month 6
Weekly questionnaire based on PRO CTC-AE
Time frame: up to 26 weeks
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time frame: Baseline
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time frame: week 6
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time frame: week 12
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time frame: week 18
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time frame: week 24
QLQ-LC13
Time frame: baseline
QLQ-LC13
Time frame: week 6
QLQ-LC13
Time frame: week 12
QLQ-LC13
Time frame: week 18
QLQ-LC13
Time frame: week 24
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35819130Misplon S, Marneffe W, Himpe U, Hellings J, Demedts I. Evaluation of the implementation of Value-Based Healthcare with a weekly digital follow-up of lung cancer patients in clinical practice. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13653. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13653. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wim Marneffe, prof. dr. principal investigator
Hasselt University
Veerle Ross, dr. study chair
Hasselt University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Weekly digital follow up in people with Lung Cancer, run by Hasselt University at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assess the response rates on the digital weekly questionnaire (time frame: up to 26 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04712149, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2021.