AnesthesiaNCT04712162
The Quality of Recovery After General Anesthesia With Desflurane and Sevoflurane in Endoscopic Ureteral Lithotripsy
A study testing Other in people with Anesthesia, run by Gia Dinh People Hospital at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
The good quality of recovery after general anesthesia is one of goals for short procedures and ambulatory surgeries. The study's objective was to compare the quality of recovery after general anesthesia with desflurane and sevoflurane with laryngeal mask airway for endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Other
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- 19 Nov 2019to 7 May 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All eligible subjects who underwent endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy under general anesthesia
- ASA I and II
Who cannot join
- Contraindication to laryngeal mask airway.
- Indication for conversion to tracheal intubation during surgery.
- History of malignant hyperthermia.
- Pregnancy.
- Obese (BMI >25 kg/m2).
- Substances abuse.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Vietnam1 site
Anesthesiology Department of Gia Dinh People Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, 700000
About this study
The good quality of recovery after general anesthesia is one of goals for short procedures and ambulatory surgeries. The study's objective was to compare the quality of recovery after general anesthesia with desflurane and sevoflurane with laryngeal mask airway for endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized controlled trial. There were 60 cases of endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy under general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway were enrolled. All cases were randomly divided into two group (desflurane or sevoflurane). Each group had 30 cases. Primary outcome was time to awakening. Secondary outcomes were time to wash-out of volatile anesthetics, time to extubation, irritation after awakening, and modified Aldrete score.
Statistical analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meieir curve and log-rank test for time to adequate depth of anesthesia and time to awakening; t-test for time to wash-out of volatile anesthetics; chi-square test for depth of anesthesia by PRST score, irritation after awakening and Aldrete score; Fisher test for adverse effects of volatile anesthetics.
The research was approved by Gia Dinh People Hospital ethics committee
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Other
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OtherOther
Compare time to awakening and quality of recovery after general anesthesia between two groups.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| D: maintain anesthesia with desflurane | Other | D: maintain anesthesia with Suprane® (Desflurane) at 6%. Volatile concentration was titrated according to end-tidal MAC to maintain 0.7-1.3 MAC using end-tidal monitor of Dräger Primus anesthesia machine. Receives: Other: Other |
| S: maintain anesthesia with sevoflurane. | Other | S: maintain anesthesia with Sevorane® (Sevoflurane) at 2%. Volatile concentration was titrated according to end-tidal MAC to maintain 0.7-1.3 MAC using end-tidal monitor of Dräger Primus anesthesia machine. Receives: Other: Other |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to awakening
Time required for awakening
Measured: After stopping volatile anesthetics to patient awakening, up to 30 minutes.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to wash-out of volatile anesthetics
Time required for washing out volatile anesthetics
Measured: After stopping volatile anesthetics to complete wash-out of volatile anesthetics, up to 30 minutes
Time to extubation
Time required for successful extubation.
Measured: After stopping volatile anesthetics to readiness for extubation, up to 30 minutes
Irritation after awakening
Aono score >2
Measured: After awakening to eligible discharge, up to 2 hours.
Adverse effects of volatile anesthetics
Hypotension, cough, nausea and vomitting.
Measured: After providing volatile anesthetics until they were stopped, up to 90 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2021
- Study start19 Nov 2019
- Primary completion7 May 2020
- Study completion7 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gia Dinh People Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thanh T. Nguyen, PhD, Study chair, Gia Dinh People Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04712162
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 81/CN-HĐĐĐ
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Bruhn J, Bouillon TW, Shafer SL. Bispectral index (BIS) and burst suppression: revealing a part of the BIS algorithm. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16(8):593-6. doi: 10.1023/A:1012216600170.
PubMed 12580235Drover DR, Lemmens HJ, Pierce ET, Plourde G, Loyd G, Ornstein E, Prichep LS, Chabot RJ, Gugino L. Patient State Index: titration of delivery and recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jul;97(1):82-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00012.
PubMed 12131107Eger EI 2nd, Saidman LJ, Brandstater B. Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration: a standard of anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology. 1965 Nov-Dec;26(6):756-63. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196511000-00010. No abstract available.
PubMed 5844267Katoh T, Ikeda K. The effects of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for loss of consciousness and skin incision. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jan;88(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199801000-00006.
PubMed 9447851Katoh T, Kobayashi S, Suzuki A, Iwamoto T, Bito H, Ikeda K. The effect of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for somatic and sympathetic responses to surgical incision. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):398-405. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00012.
PubMed 9952144Rampil IJ, Lockhart SH, Zwass MS, Peterson N, Yasuda N, Eger EI 2nd, Weiskopf RB, Damask MC. Clinical characteristics of desflurane in surgical patients: minimum alveolar concentration. Anesthesiology. 1991 Mar;74(3):429-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199103000-00007.
PubMed 2001020Whitlock EL, Villafranca AJ, Lin N, Palanca BJ, Jacobsohn E, Finkel KJ, Zhang L, Burnside BA, Kaiser HA, Evers AS, Avidan MS. Relationship between bispectral index values and volatile anesthetic concentrations during the maintenance phase of anesthesia in the B-Unaware trial. Anesthesiology. 2011 Dec;115(6):1209-18. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182395dcb.
PubMed 22037642Aldrete JA. Post-anesthetic recovery score. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Nov;205(5):e3-4; author reply e4-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.034. No abstract available.
PubMed 17964430Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg. 1970 Nov-Dec;49(6):924-34. No abstract available.
PubMed 5534693Choi GJ, Baek CW, Kang H, Park YH, Yang SY, Shin HY, Jung YH, Woo YC, Lee UL. Emergence agitation after orthognathic surgery: a randomised controlled comparison between sevoflurane and desflurane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Feb;59(2):224-31. doi: 10.1111/aas.12435. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
PubMed 25395384De Oliveira GS Jr, Fitzgerald PC, Ahmad S, Marcus RJ, McCarthy RJ. Desflurane/fentanyl compared with sevoflurane/fentanyl on awakening and quality of recovery in outpatient surgery using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Dec;25(8):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
PubMed 24095885Dogru K, Yildiz K, Madenoglu H, Boyaci A. Early recovery properties of sevoflurane and desflurane in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 May;64(5):301-9. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00086-9.
PubMed 24944378Green MS, Green P, Neubert L, Voralu K, Saththasivam P, Mychaskiw G. Recovery following desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia for outpatient urologic surgery in elderly females. Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Feb 1;5(1):e22271. doi: 10.5812/aapm.22271. eCollection 2015 Feb.
PubMed 25789236Kaur A, Jain AK, Sehgal R, Sood J. Hemodynamics and early recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane in bariatric surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;29(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.105792.
PubMed 23493107La Colla L, Albertin A, La Colla G, Mangano A. Faster wash-out and recovery for desflurane vs sevoflurane in morbidly obese patients when no premedication is used. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):353-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem197. Epub 2007 Jul 9.
PubMed 17621601
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Quality of Recovery After General Anesthesia With Desflurane and Sevoflurane in Endoscopic Ureteral Lithotripsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04712162
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 81/CN-HĐĐĐ
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gia Dinh People HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The good quality of recovery after general anesthesia is one of goals for short procedures and ambulatory surgeries. The study's objective was to compare the quality of recovery after general anesthesia with desflurane and sevoflurane with laryngeal mask airway for endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy.
Detailed description
This is a randomized controlled trial. There were 60 cases of endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy under general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway were enrolled. All cases were randomly divided into two group (desflurane or sevoflurane). Each group had 30 cases. Primary outcome was time to awakening. Secondary outcomes were time to wash-out of volatile anesthetics, time to extubation, irritation after awakening, and modified Aldrete score.
Statistical analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meieir curve and log-rank test for time to adequate depth of anesthesia and time to awakening; t-test for time to wash-out of volatile anesthetics; chi-square test for depth of anesthesia by PRST score, irritation after awakening and Aldrete score; Fisher test for adverse effects of volatile anesthetics.
The research was approved by Gia Dinh People Hospital ethics committee
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| D: maintain anesthesia with desflurane | Other | Other: OtherD: maintain anesthesia with Suprane® (Desflurane) at 6%. Volatile concentration was titrated according to end-tidal MAC to maintain 0.7-1.3 MAC using end-tidal monitor of Dräger Primus anesthesia machine. |
| S: maintain anesthesia with sevoflurane. | Other | Other: OtherS: maintain anesthesia with Sevorane® (Sevoflurane) at 2%. Volatile concentration was titrated according to end-tidal MAC to maintain 0.7-1.3 MAC using end-tidal monitor of Dräger Primus anesthesia machine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All eligible subjects who underwent endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy under general anesthesia
- ASA I and II
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Contraindication to laryngeal mask airway.
- Indication for conversion to tracheal intubation during surgery.
- History of malignant hyperthermia.
- Pregnancy.
- Obese (BMI >25 kg/m2).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OtherCompare time to awakening and quality of recovery after general anesthesia between two groups. | Other | D: maintain anesthesia with desflurane, S: maintain anesthesia with sevoflurane. |
Primary outcome
Time to awakening
Time frame: After stopping volatile anesthetics to patient awakening, up to 30 minutes.
Time required for awakening
4 secondary outcomes
Time to wash-out of volatile anesthetics
Time frame: After stopping volatile anesthetics to complete wash-out of volatile anesthetics, up to 30 minutes
Time to extubation
Time frame: After stopping volatile anesthetics to readiness for extubation, up to 30 minutes
Irritation after awakening
Time frame: After awakening to eligible discharge, up to 2 hours.
Adverse effects of volatile anesthetics
Time frame: After providing volatile anesthetics until they were stopped, up to 90 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2021.
- Background: PubMed 12580235Bruhn J, Bouillon TW, Shafer SL. Bispectral index (BIS) and burst suppression: revealing a part of the BIS algorithm. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16(8):593-6. doi: 10.1023/A:1012216600170.
- Background: PubMed 12131107Drover DR, Lemmens HJ, Pierce ET, Plourde G, Loyd G, Ornstein E, Prichep LS, Chabot RJ, Gugino L. Patient State Index: titration of delivery and recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jul;97(1):82-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00012.
- Background: PubMed 5844267Eger EI 2nd, Saidman LJ, Brandstater B. Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration: a standard of anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology. 1965 Nov-Dec;26(6):756-63. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196511000-00010. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 9447851Katoh T, Ikeda K. The effects of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for loss of consciousness and skin incision. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jan;88(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199801000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 9952144Katoh T, Kobayashi S, Suzuki A, Iwamoto T, Bito H, Ikeda K. The effect of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for somatic and sympathetic responses to surgical incision. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):398-405. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00012.
- Background: PubMed 2001020Rampil IJ, Lockhart SH, Zwass MS, Peterson N, Yasuda N, Eger EI 2nd, Weiskopf RB, Damask MC. Clinical characteristics of desflurane in surgical patients: minimum alveolar concentration. Anesthesiology. 1991 Mar;74(3):429-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199103000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 22037642Whitlock EL, Villafranca AJ, Lin N, Palanca BJ, Jacobsohn E, Finkel KJ, Zhang L, Burnside BA, Kaiser HA, Evers AS, Avidan MS. Relationship between bispectral index values and volatile anesthetic concentrations during the maintenance phase of anesthesia in the B-Unaware trial. Anesthesiology. 2011 Dec;115(6):1209-18. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182395dcb.
- Results publication: PubMed 17964430Aldrete JA. Post-anesthetic recovery score. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Nov;205(5):e3-4; author reply e4-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.034. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 5534693Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg. 1970 Nov-Dec;49(6):924-34. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 25395384Choi GJ, Baek CW, Kang H, Park YH, Yang SY, Shin HY, Jung YH, Woo YC, Lee UL. Emergence agitation after orthognathic surgery: a randomised controlled comparison between sevoflurane and desflurane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Feb;59(2):224-31. doi: 10.1111/aas.12435. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 24095885De Oliveira GS Jr, Fitzgerald PC, Ahmad S, Marcus RJ, McCarthy RJ. Desflurane/fentanyl compared with sevoflurane/fentanyl on awakening and quality of recovery in outpatient surgery using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Dec;25(8):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 24944378Dogru K, Yildiz K, Madenoglu H, Boyaci A. Early recovery properties of sevoflurane and desflurane in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 May;64(5):301-9. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00086-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thanh T. Nguyen, PhD study chair
Gia Dinh People Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Other in people with Anesthesia, run by Gia Dinh People Hospital at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to awakening (time frame: After stopping volatile anesthetics to patient awakening, up to 30 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04712162, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2021.