Motor ActivityNCT04714580
The Animal Fun Program to Support the Motor Development of the Italian Pre-schoolers: a Case-Control Study
A study testing Animal Fun Program in people with Motor Activity, run by University of Trieste at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The present literature supports the importance of the motor activity since the early stages of the human development. The children with poor motor skills are at greater risk for psychosocial, internalizing, and metabolic diseases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 6 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Motor Activity
- What is being tested?
- Animal Fun Program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 119 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 7 Jan 2019to 31 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 6 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- parents written informed consent
- attending one of the three involved kindergartens
- 3-6 years old.
Who cannot join
- not-typically developing children
- children with specific sickness
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Traduzione e Validazione Italiana Del Protocollo di Esercizi Animal Fun
The present literature supports the importance of the motor activity since the early stages of the human development. The children with poor motor skills are at greater risk for psychosocial, internalizing, and metabolic diseases. In Italy data about obesity and inactivity are increasing, anyway there is lack of motor program for pre-schoolers. The movement program Animal Fun seems to be a valid tool to support these children. The aim of this study is to verify the feasibility of using Animal Fun with Italian pre-schoolers.
119 preschool children (3-6 years old) from 3 Italian kindergartens were included in this study. The schools were randomly allocated to intervention and control group. Movement Assessment Battery for Children - 2 (MABC-2) was administered to all the children at the baseline and at one-month follow-up. During this month, the schools assigned to the control group followed the normal curriculum; the schools assigned to the Animal Fun group, followed the Animal Fun activity (thirty minutes, thrice a week).
The investigators expect that the Animal Fun program demonstrates valid and feasible even in the Italian context, where there is lack of movement program supporting the development of the pre-school children.
Read the detailed description
Rationale and Background:
Motor skills and physical activity are strongly related to the cognitive, physical, social and psychological development of children. They are also crucial in the prevention of cardiovascular or metabolic diseases, such as obesity or diabetes. There is growing evidence indicating that children with poor motor coordination may be at significant risk for psychosocial and internalizing problems. Other research has found significant levels of anxiety and depression even in 4-5-years-old-children.
Due to fear of failure, or of peer bullying, children with motor difficulties often limit their opportunity to practice motor activities, thus creating a vicious cycle. In this continuous negative loop, the child has low motor competency, develops low fitness training and tends towards hypo-activity. In contrast, if children are confident with their motor skills, they are more likely to participate in activities such as sports or dancing. Literature also relates the motor ability of preschool children to their scholastic adaptation and to the social adjustment in the first year of school.
Preschool is an essential period in a child's life because Fundamental Movement Skills are developing at this stage, for both gross and fine motor tasks.
Some investigators have demonstrated that most pre-schoolers don't practice the recommended amount of daily physical activity. Unfortunately, there is a lack of movement programs to engage pre-school children in motor activities. In 2010, the Curtin University developed the "Animal Fun" program. This program was designed to provide developmentally appropriate activities that would be fun and engaging for all children aged 3-6 years whilst targeting specific areas of development. They created a protocol, which will benefit all children in the group - those with and without motor difficulties. By referring to all the members of a class, Animal Fun avoids the stigma associated with "special programs". This is an ecological program for use in schools during the ordinary activities. Animal Fun is an imaginative program of movement, in which the children imitate animals' movements. It is flexible and doesn't provide a rigid structure to follow, but it adapts to children's interests and abilities. Evidence demonstrates, that Animal Fun supports the development of overall motor ability, particularly throwing and balance skills, and significantly improves social skills in young children.
In Italy there is a lack of motor programs for pre-schooler children. Furthermore, children with poor motor skills are not recognized, therefore no specific support is provided. The need to identify an inclusive and flexible motor program has led us to Animal Fun. Considering the socio-cultural differences between Western Australia and Italy, the purpose of this study is to verify the feasibility of the Animal Fun program for Italian pre-schoolers. Study goals and objectives:
In Italy there is lack of motor program for pre-schoolers, like Animal Fun. The first aim of this study is understanding the feasibility of this activity in the Italian kindergartens. Second, this study would understand the validity of the results of one month of Animal Fun practice. Using the gold standard assessment for motor skills in children, Movement Assessment Battery for Children - 2 (MABC-2), the main objective is to verify the motor improvements in children who practiced Animal Fun, compared to a control group. This assessment provides score about the manual dexterity, the balance and the aiming and catching skills. A sum of these scores provides a total score about the motor skills, in general. Through this test, understanding the motor competences of the pre-schoolers is affordable.
Study design:
This study is a longitudinal randomized controlled trial, and it is participants' blinded.
It has been approved from the Ethics Committee of the University of Trieste. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, especially the Helsinki Declaration.
As first, kindergartens' directors gave the consent to participate in the study.
3 Kindergartens of the province of Trieste have been recruited and randomly allocated to Animal Fun intervention (1), and control group (2). From the three schools, we recruited 119 pre-schoolers. The parents previously read and signed the written informed consent, to let the child participating.
Inclusion criteria: written informed consent, attending one of the three involved kindergartens, 3-6 years old.
Exclusion criteria: not-typically developing children and children with specific sickness.
The duration of the study is two months.
Methodology:
As first, all the parents informed the investigators about the specific age of the child, the hand preference, and the presence of such a deficit or disease. These data were necessary to set up the assessment for each child. In fact, some administration-differences exist, especially between ages.
Intervention group: baseline assessment with MABC-2; Animal Fun activity with a certified trainer (physiotherapist) for one month, three times a week, for 30 minutes; one-month follow-up assessment with MABC-2.
Control group: baseline assessment with MABC-2; normal curricular activity at school with the teachers; one-month follow-up assessment with MABC-2
Animal Fun activity was carried out following all the instructions given by the authors in the published book. This program permits the operators to propose different activities, by following the needing of the children. The proposed activities are entirely described in the nine modules of this tool.
Before the assessment, the investigators decided to use 30 motor activities (on 97 available) with the intervention group. As the name of this program suggests, all the activities involve an animal, and ask the children to move like this animal, in a proper, correct and supervised way.
After the assessment, considering the mean-scores of the children and their percentiles, the investigators decided to focus especially on the activities for improving the balance, and the aiming and catching skills. In fact, the children scored lower in these activities then in the manual dexterity test. For this, most of the activities of the first modules of Animal Fun have been proposed, which focus on the balance on two/one foot, on the locomotion, on the balance during a throw, on the aim. The animals involved were, for instance, the flamingo, the elephant, the dog, the monkey, and more.
To the teachers of the control group, the investigators gave no additional information about what to do during the curricular activities, in order no to create a bias. Even the teachers of this group were blinded about the study.
Safety considerations:
In this study, the safety of the participants was guarantee. All the activities of the intervention group were coordinated and managed by a certified trainer, who could control the safety of the children during Animal Fun. Every possibile accident during the motor activity was considered as normal accident during the kindergarten time, and consequently managed by the teachers. The parents were previously informed about this issue, in the written informed consent.
Follow-up:
After the second assessment with the MABC- 2 at one-month follow-up, the participants are followed no more from the researchers of the present study.
Data management and statistical analysis:
Analysis was conducted in R (R Core Team, 2017) and graphs were produced using the package Rcmdr and its plug-ins.
Normality of the variables was assessed through Shapiro-Wilk test. Intervention and control groups were compared at the baseline through Fisher test for the qualitative variables, and through the t-test for the quantitative ones. The time Δt was created to define the difference between the final and the basal scores. The two groups were compared considering Δt through the Mann-Whitney test. Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median, and 95% confidence interval were reported for each variable at Δt.
Expected outcomes of the study:
The outcomes of this study could be very significant considering the possibility of introducing Animal Fun in the Italian kindergartens, as curricular motor activity. The impact of this program of movement on the quality of the life of the pre-schoolers can be huge. Furthermore, giving the possibility to these children to move, and learn, can also give a benefit considering the prevention of metabolic, cardio-vascular, postural and psycho-social diseases.
This project didn't received any fund, budget or sponsor's support.
- Conditions
- Motor Activity
- Being tested
- Animal Fun Program
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Animal Fun ProgramOther
This program permits the operators to propose different activities, by following the needing of the children. As the name of this program suggests, all the activities involve an animal description, and ask the children to move like this animal, in a proper, correct and supervised way.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Animal Fun Group | Experimental | Baseline assessment with MABC-2; Animal Fun activity with a certified trainer (physiotherapist) for one month, three times a week, for 30 minutes; one-month follow-up assessment with MABC-2. Receives: Other: Animal Fun Program |
| Control Group | No intervention | Baseline assessment with MABC-2; normal curricular activity at school with the teachers; one-month follow-up assessment with MABC-2. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change form Baseline Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 at 1 month follow-up
This test is suitable for children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years, and assesses the motor skills of children in the following domains: Aiming and Catching (AC), Balance (Bal), and Manual Dexterity (MD). Cluster and total standard scores for children are provided, with higher scores demonstrating better performance. A total test score (Tot MABC-2) at or below the 5th percentile indicates significant movement difficulty, while a score between the 5th and 15th percentile indicates that a child is "at risk".
In these tests, the items and the scores were compared to the normative data of the uploaded version of the Italian MABC-2.
Measured: One month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2021
- Study start7 Jan 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2019
- Study completion31 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Motor ActivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 119 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Trieste
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francesca Policastro, University of Trieste
- Investigators
- Francesca Policastro, PhD, Principal investigator, Univerisity of Trieste
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04714580
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 86-7/3/2018 pg 6
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 19 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Each family will receive a summary of the results of assessment, in order to make them aware of the motor skills. Other researcher will be able to consult the complete results of the study and the study protocol.
Publications
Piek JP, Straker LM, Jensen L, Dender A, Barrett NC, McLaren S, Roberts C, Reid C, Rooney R, Packer T, Bradbury G, Elsley S. Rationale, design and methods for a randomised and controlled trial to evaluate "Animal Fun"--a program designed to enhance physical and mental health in young children. BMC Pediatr. 2010 Nov 4;10:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-78.
PubMed 21050483Piek JP, Kane R, Rigoli D, McLaren S, Roberts CM, Rooney R, Jensen L, Dender A, Packer T, Straker L. Does the Animal Fun program improve social-emotional and behavioural outcomes in children aged 4-6 years? Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Oct;43:155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
PubMed 26298689Piek JP, McLaren S, Kane R, Jensen L, Dender A, Roberts C, Rooney R, Packer T, Straker L. Does the Animal Fun program improve motor performance in children aged 4-6 years? Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Oct;32(5):1086-96. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
PubMed 23186610De Oliveira JA, Rigoli D, Kane R, McLaren S, Goulardins JB, Straker LM, Dender A, Rooney R, Piek JP. Does 'Animal Fun' improve aiming and catching, and balance skills in young children? Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Jan;84:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
PubMed 30087016
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Traduzione e Validazione Italiana Del Protocollo di Esercizi Animal Fun
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04714580
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 86-7/3/2018 pg 6
- Conditions
- Motor Activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 119 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of TriesteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present literature supports the importance of the motor activity since the early stages of the human development. The children with poor motor skills are at greater risk for psychosocial, internalizing, and metabolic diseases. In Italy data about obesity and inactivity are increasing, anyway there is lack of motor program for pre-schoolers. The movement program Animal Fun seems to be a valid tool to support these children. The aim of this study is to verify the feasibility of using Animal Fun with Italian pre-schoolers.
119 preschool children (3-6 years old) from 3 Italian kindergartens were included in this study. The schools were randomly allocated to intervention and control group. Movement Assessment Battery for Children - 2 (MABC-2) was administered to all the children at the baseline and at one-month follow-up. During this month, the schools assigned to the control group followed the normal curriculum; the schools assigned to the Animal Fun group, followed the Animal Fun activity (thirty minutes, thrice a week).
The investigators expect that the Animal Fun program demonstrates valid and feasible even in the Italian context, where there is lack of movement program supporting the development of the pre-school children.
Detailed description
Rationale and Background:
Motor skills and physical activity are strongly related to the cognitive, physical, social and psychological development of children. They are also crucial in the prevention of cardiovascular or metabolic diseases, such as obesity or diabetes. There is growing evidence indicating that children with poor motor coordination may be at significant risk for psychosocial and internalizing problems. Other research has found significant levels of anxiety and depression even in 4-5-years-old-children.
Due to fear of failure, or of peer bullying, children with motor difficulties often limit their opportunity to practice motor activities, thus creating a vicious cycle. In this continuous negative loop, the child has low motor competency, develops low fitness training and tends towards hypo-activity. In contrast, if children are confident with their motor skills, they are more likely to participate in activities such as sports or dancing. Literature also relates the motor ability of preschool children to their scholastic adaptation and to the social adjustment in the first year of school.
Preschool is an essential period in a child's life because Fundamental Movement Skills are developing at this stage, for both gross and fine motor tasks.
Some investigators have demonstrated that most pre-schoolers don't practice the recommended amount of daily physical activity. Unfortunately, there is a lack of movement programs to engage pre-school children in motor activities. In 2010, the Curtin University developed the "Animal Fun" program. This program was designed to provide developmentally appropriate activities that would be fun and engaging for all children aged 3-6 years whilst targeting specific areas of development. They created a protocol, which will benefit all children in the group - those with and without motor difficulties. By referring to all the members of a class, Animal Fun avoids the stigma associated with "special programs". This is an ecological program for use in schools during the ordinary activities. Animal Fun is an imaginative program of movement, in which the children imitate animals' movements. It is flexible and doesn't provide a rigid structure to follow, but it adapts to children's interests and abilities. Evidence demonstrates, that Animal Fun supports the development of overall motor ability, particularly throwing and balance skills, and significantly improves social skills in young children.
In Italy there is a lack of motor programs for pre-schooler children. Furthermore, children with poor motor skills are not recognized, therefore no specific support is provided. The need to identify an inclusive and flexible motor program has led us to Animal Fun. Considering the socio-cultural differences between Western Australia and Italy, the purpose of this study is to verify the feasibility of the Animal Fun program for Italian pre-schoolers. Study goals and objectives:
In Italy there is lack of motor program for pre-schoolers, like Animal Fun. The first aim of this study is understanding the feasibility of this activity in the Italian kindergartens. Second, this study would understand the validity of the results of one month of Animal Fun practice. Using the gold standard assessment for motor skills in children, Movement Assessment Battery for Children - 2 (MABC-2), the main objective is to verify the motor improvements in children who practiced Animal Fun, compared to a control group. This assessment provides score about the manual dexterity, the balance and the aiming and catching skills. A sum of these scores provides a total score about the motor skills, in general. Through this test, understanding the motor competences of the pre-schoolers is affordable.
Study design:
This study is a longitudinal randomized controlled trial, and it is participants' blinded.
It has been approved from the Ethics Committee of the University of Trieste. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, especially the Helsinki Declaration.
As first, kindergartens' directors gave the consent to participate in the study.
3 Kindergartens of the province of Trieste have been recruited and randomly allocated to Animal Fun intervention (1), and control group (2). From the three schools, we recruited 119 pre-schoolers. The parents previously read and signed the written informed consent, to let the child participating.
Inclusion criteria: written informed consent, attending one of the three involved kindergartens, 3-6 years old.
Exclusion criteria: not-typically developing children and children with specific sickness.
The duration of the study is two months.
Methodology:
As first, all the parents informed the investigators about the specific age of the child, the hand preference, and the presence of such a deficit or disease. These data were necessary to set up the assessment for each child. In fact, some administration-differences exist, especially between ages.
Intervention group: baseline assessment with MABC-2; Animal Fun activity with a certified trainer (physiotherapist) for one month, three times a week, for 30 minutes; one-month follow-up assessment with MABC-2.
Control group: baseline assessment with MABC-2; normal curricular activity at school with the teachers; one-month follow-up assessment with MABC-2
Animal Fun activity was carried out following all the instructions given by the authors in the published book. This program permits the operators to propose different activities, by following the needing of the children. The proposed activities are entirely described in the nine modules of this tool.
Before the assessment, the investigators decided to use 30 motor activities (on 97 available) with the intervention group. As the name of this program suggests, all the activities involve an animal, and ask the children to move like this animal, in a proper, correct and supervised way.
After the assessment, considering the mean-scores of the children and their percentiles, the investigators decided to focus especially on the activities for improving the balance, and the aiming and catching skills. In fact, the children scored lower in these activities then in the manual dexterity test. For this, most of the activities of the first modules of Animal Fun have been proposed, which focus on the balance on two/one foot, on the locomotion, on the balance during a throw, on the aim. The animals involved were, for instance, the flamingo, the elephant, the dog, the monkey, and more.
To the teachers of the control group, the investigators gave no additional information about what to do during the curricular activities, in order no to create a bias. Even the teachers of this group were blinded about the study.
Safety considerations:
In this study, the safety of the participants was guarantee. All the activities of the intervention group were coordinated and managed by a certified trainer, who could control the safety of the children during Animal Fun. Every possibile accident during the motor activity was considered as normal accident during the kindergarten time, and consequently managed by the teachers. The parents were previously informed about this issue, in the written informed consent.
Follow-up:
After the second assessment with the MABC- 2 at one-month follow-up, the participants are followed no more from the researchers of the present study.
Data management and statistical analysis:
Analysis was conducted in R (R Core Team, 2017) and graphs were produced using the package Rcmdr and its plug-ins.
Normality of the variables was assessed through Shapiro-Wilk test. Intervention and control groups were compared at the baseline through Fisher test for the qualitative variables, and through the t-test for the quantitative ones. The time Δt was created to define the difference between the final and the basal scores. The two groups were compared considering Δt through the Mann-Whitney test. Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median, and 95% confidence interval were reported for each variable at Δt.
Expected outcomes of the study:
The outcomes of this study could be very significant considering the possibility of introducing Animal Fun in the Italian kindergartens, as curricular motor activity. The impact of this program of movement on the quality of the life of the pre-schoolers can be huge. Furthermore, giving the possibility to these children to move, and learn, can also give a benefit considering the prevention of metabolic, cardio-vascular, postural and psycho-social diseases.
This project didn't received any fund, budget or sponsor's support.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Animal Fun Group | Experimental | Other: Animal Fun ProgramBaseline assessment with MABC-2; Animal Fun activity with a certified trainer (physiotherapist) for one month, three times a week, for 30 minutes; one-month follow-up assessment with MABC-2. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Baseline assessment with MABC-2; normal curricular activity at school with the teachers; one-month follow-up assessment with MABC-2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 6 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- parents written informed consent
- attending one of the three involved kindergartens
- 3-6 years old.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- not-typically developing children
- children with specific sickness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Animal Fun ProgramThis program permits the operators to propose different activities, by following the needing of the children. As the name of this program suggests, all the activities involve an animal description, and ask the children to move like this animal, in a proper, correct and supervised way. | Other | Animal Fun Group |
Primary outcome
Change form Baseline Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 at 1 month follow-up
Time frame: One month
This test is suitable for children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years, and assesses the motor skills of children in the following domains: Aiming and Catching (AC), Balance (Bal), and Manual Dexterity (MD). Cluster and total standard scores for children are provided, with higher scores demonstrating better performance. A total test score (Tot MABC-2) at or below the 5th percentile indicates significant movement difficulty, while a score between the 5th and 15th percentile indicates that a child is "at risk". In these tests, the items and the scores were compared to the normative data of the uploaded version of the Italian MABC-2.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jan 2021.
- Background: PubMed 21050483Piek JP, Straker LM, Jensen L, Dender A, Barrett NC, McLaren S, Roberts C, Reid C, Rooney R, Packer T, Bradbury G, Elsley S. Rationale, design and methods for a randomised and controlled trial to evaluate "Animal Fun"--a program designed to enhance physical and mental health in young children. BMC Pediatr. 2010 Nov 4;10:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-78.
- Background: PubMed 26298689Piek JP, Kane R, Rigoli D, McLaren S, Roberts CM, Rooney R, Jensen L, Dender A, Packer T, Straker L. Does the Animal Fun program improve social-emotional and behavioural outcomes in children aged 4-6 years? Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Oct;43:155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
- Background: PubMed 23186610Piek JP, McLaren S, Kane R, Jensen L, Dender A, Roberts C, Rooney R, Packer T, Straker L. Does the Animal Fun program improve motor performance in children aged 4-6 years? Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Oct;32(5):1086-96. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
- Background: PubMed 30087016De Oliveira JA, Rigoli D, Kane R, McLaren S, Goulardins JB, Straker LM, Dender A, Rooney R, Piek JP. Does 'Animal Fun' improve aiming and catching, and balance skills in young children? Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Jan;84:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
- Website of Animal Fun ProgramLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Each family will receive a summary of the results of assessment, in order to make them aware of the motor skills. Other researcher will be able to consult the complete results of the study and the study protocol.
Related trials for Motor Activity
Active, not recruiting
Measuring Impact of Computer Gaming on Arm Use in Rett Syndrome
Rett Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of SRN-101 Gene Therapy in Adults With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma (ALERT-1)
Recurrent High Grade Gliomas, Glioblastoma (GBM)
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Physical Activity in Adults With Acquired Brain Injury
Acquired Brain Injury
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors
Liposarcoma, Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
The BANYAN Trial, an ALS MyMatch Trial Evaluating Safety, Biomarker Activity, and Microglial Activation of Nasal Foralumab
ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis), ALS - Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francesca Policastro, PhD principal investigator
Univerisity of Trieste
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Animal Fun Program in people with Motor Activity, run by University of Trieste at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change form Baseline Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 at 1 month follow-up (time frame: One month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04714580, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2021.