Colorectal Cancer#iBeatCRCNCT04715074
#iBeatCRC: A Community-based Intervention to Increase Early-onset Colorectal Cancer Awareness
A study testing Interviews and Pilot in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Dr. Rogers' long-term goal is to better understand the etiology of an early-onset colorectal (CRC) diagnosis and to improve long-term survivorship and quality of life for early-onset CRC (EOCRC) survivors globally by studying the burdens accompanying this condition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Interviews and Pilot
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 235 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 May 2023to 14 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Aim 1: No recruitment took place (secondary data analysis). These records were used to determine early-onset colorectal cancer hotspots in Utah.
- Aim 2: 30 one-hour interviews were conducted with EOCRC patients and survivors who (1) resided in the United States, (2) were diagnosed with CRC at 18-49 years of age, (3) had a telephone, and (4) spoke English.
- Aim 3: Individuals must: (1) reside in Utah or Wisconsin, (2) were diagnosed with CRC at 18-49 years of age, (3) have a telephone, and (4) speak English.
Who cannot join
- Aim 1: No recruitment took place (secondary data analysis).
- Aim 2: Individuals were excluded if they (1) did not reside in the United States, (2) were not diagnosed with CRC between 18-49 years of age, (3) did not have a telephone, and (4) did not speak English.
- Aim 3: Individuals will be excluded if they (1) do not reside in the Utah or Wisconsin, (2) were not diagnosed with CRC between 18-49 years of age, (3) do not have a telephone, and (4) do not speak English.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
About this study
Official title: #iBeatCRC: A Community-based Intervention to Increase Early-onset Colorectal Cancer Awareness Using a Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Approach
Dr. Rogers' long-term goal is to better understand the etiology of an early-onset colorectal (CRC) diagnosis and to improve long-term survivorship and quality of life for early-onset CRC (EOCRC) survivors globally by studying the burdens accompanying this condition. The goal of this study is to better understand the reasons why people under age 50 in Utah and Wisconsin are being diagnosed with CRC. As a first step, the researchers identified the specific places in Utah and Wisconsin where diagnoses of CRC among younger people are increasing the most. Next, they conducted 1-hour recorded Zoom interviews over phone and/or video with 27 people across the United States diagnosed with CRC when they were under age 50. Thirdly, the researchers plan to create and test a program that will raise the awareness of residents in Utah and Wisconsin of the increasing risk of CRC among residents of the state who are aged under 50. This study is unique as CRC survivors are key to helping drive the study forward.
Read the detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is preventable when detected early. Because of effective screening, fewer Americans aged 50 and older are now being diagnosed with CRC or dying from it. Over the past 20 years, however, the number of Americans under age 50 who are diagnosed with CRC has doubled. Health experts estimate that the numbers of younger Americans with CRC will continue to increase rapidly over the next 10 years. The reasons for this increase are poorly understood. In addition, younger people are less likely to be diagnosed with CRC when the disease is still at an early stage. Also, of concern is that among men and women of all ages and all races, African-American men are the most likely to die of CRC.
Central hypotheses were: (1) Patients residing in hotspots-counties with high EOCRC incidence/mortality rates-will have significantly worse EOCRC survival juxtaposed to those in other Utah areas, specifically. (2) Rurality and county-level access to health care will contribute to an explanation of EOCRC incidence and survival.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Interviews, Pilot
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
InterviewsBehavioural
We will understand the impact psychosocial, lifestyle, and familial aspects play on an EOCRC diagnosis through 20 one-hour interviews with EOCRC patients and survivors.
PilotBehavioural
Utilizing the Behaviour Change Wheel in conjunction with results gathered from Aims 1 and 2 we will develop a theory-driven, multi-media campaign intervention to increase awareness of EOCRC, risk factors, and early detection benefit.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Develop and Pilot #iBeatCRC | Experimental | 1. Intervention development will be informed by (1) integrating Aims 1 and 2 findings, (2) Community Action Board [CAB] input, and (3) the Behaviour Change Wheel,48 a step-by-step intervention development approach that identifies and addresses barriers using theory and evidence-based methods.
2. The intervention pilot may be based on a multicomponent media campaign, as endorsed by the Community Preventive Services Taskforce for promoting CRC screening among individuals ≥ age 50. #iBeatCRC may entail both outdoor mass media and online social media. #iBeatCRC will target Utah and Wisconsin hotspots and non-hotspots for comparison, with pre-post-assessment among 17 individuals in each group for both sites. Receives: Behavioral: Interviews; Behavioral: Pilot |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
EOCRC Survival Assessed by Geographic Location
We used quantitative methods to link incidence and mortality data for the years 2000 to 2020 from the Utah Cancer Registry (UCR) and the Utah Population Database (UPDB) to derive county-level estimates of hotspots for early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence and mortality among Utahns aged 18 to 49 years and obtain county-level estimates using our previous geospatial methods. Twenty-nine counties in each state with high EOCRC incidence and/or mortality rates were identified as hotspots. Next, we used UCR-UPDB linked data to determine the independent contributions of (1) geographical, (2) personal, and (3) county-level factors to EOCRC incidence and survival. We performed hierarchical Cox regression models and implemented a generalized R-square analysis to determine the variance explained by each factor.
Measured: Year 1
Impact of Psychosocial, Lifestyle, and Familial Aspects on an EOCRC Diagnosis Assessed by Interviews
For Outcome 2, we drew on factors associated with hotspots identified in Objective 1 and our team's prior research to develop an interview guide with six EOCRC advocate-survivors. Using the interview guide, we conducted one-on-one interviews with 27 individuals who received a first diagnosis of CRC at age 18 to 49 years to yield a richer understanding of the impact of psychosocial, lifestyle, and familial aspects on an EOCRC diagnosis. The qualitative data obtained from these interviews was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Hatch's methods.
Measured: Years 2-3
Impact of #iBeatCRC Mass Media Campaign on general EOCRC Awareness
Mean knowledge index score difference of EOCRC general Awareness
The intervention will be assessed with a post-test questionnaire among the 17 hotspot and 17 coldspot participants in each state. Preintervention and postintervention mean score differences will be tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Preintervention and postintervention EOCRC awareness change will be analyzed by McNemar's test. P≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Measured: Years 3-4
Impact of #iBeatCRC Mass Media Campaign on EOCRC risk factors
Mean knowledge index score difference of EOCRC risk factors
The intervention will be assessed with a post-test questionnaire among the above-mentioned 17 hotspot and 17 coldspot participants in each state. Preintervention and postintervention mean score differences will be tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Preintervention and postintervention EOCRC awareness of risk factors change will be analyzed by McNemar's test. P≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Measured: Years 3-4
Impact of #iBeatCRC Mass Media Campaign on EOCRC early detection benefit.
Mean knowledge index score difference of EOCRC early detection benefit.
The intervention will be assessed with a post-test questionnaire among the above-mentioned 17 hotspot and 17 coldspot participants in each state. Preintervention and postintervention mean score differences will be tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Preintervention and postintervention EOCRC awareness of early detection benefit change will be analyzed by McNemar's test. P≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant
Measured: Years 3-4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2021
- Study start27 May 2023
- Primary completion14 Sep 2023
- Study completion14 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical College of WisconsinThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Explanatory Mixed Methods Approach
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 235 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Charles R. Rogers, Medical College of Wisconsin
- Investigators
- Charles R. Rogers, PhD, MPH, MS, Principal investigator, Medical College of Wisconsin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04715074
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00138357
- Acronym
- #iBeatCRC
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Sharing de-identified participant data stemming from cognitive interviews, surveys, intervention arms, and post trial interviews.
Publications
Rogers CR, Brooks E, Curtin K, De Vera MA, Qeadan F, Rogers TN, Petersen E, Gallagher P, Pesmen C, Johnson W, Henley C, Hickman W, Newcomb E, Korous KM, Handley MA. Protocol for #iBeatCRC: a community-based intervention to increase early-onset colorectal cancer awareness using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach. BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e048959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048959.
PubMed 34862279
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- #iBeatCRC: A Community-based Intervention to Increase Early-onset Colorectal Cancer Awareness Using a Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Approach
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04715074
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- #iBeatCRC / 00138357
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 235 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of WisconsinUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dr. Rogers' long-term goal is to better understand the etiology of an early-onset colorectal (CRC) diagnosis and to improve long-term survivorship and quality of life for early-onset CRC (EOCRC) survivors globally by studying the burdens accompanying this condition. The goal of this study is to better understand the reasons why people under age 50 in Utah and Wisconsin are being diagnosed with CRC. As a first step, the researchers identified the specific places in Utah and Wisconsin where diagnoses of CRC among younger people are increasing the most. Next, they conducted 1-hour recorded Zoom interviews over phone and/or video with 27 people across the United States diagnosed with CRC when they were under age 50. Thirdly, the researchers plan to create and test a program that will raise the awareness of residents in Utah and Wisconsin of the increasing risk of CRC among residents of the state who are aged under 50. This study is unique as CRC survivors are key to helping drive the study forward.
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is preventable when detected early. Because of effective screening, fewer Americans aged 50 and older are now being diagnosed with CRC or dying from it. Over the past 20 years, however, the number of Americans under age 50 who are diagnosed with CRC has doubled. Health experts estimate that the numbers of younger Americans with CRC will continue to increase rapidly over the next 10 years. The reasons for this increase are poorly understood. In addition, younger people are less likely to be diagnosed with CRC when the disease is still at an early stage. Also, of concern is that among men and women of all ages and all races, African-American men are the most likely to die of CRC.
Central hypotheses were: (1) Patients residing in hotspots-counties with high EOCRC incidence/mortality rates-will have significantly worse EOCRC survival juxtaposed to those in other Utah areas, specifically. (2) Rurality and county-level access to health care will contribute to an explanation of EOCRC incidence and survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Explanatory Mixed Methods Approach
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Develop and Pilot #iBeatCRC | Experimental | Behavioral: Interviews, Behavioral: Pilot1. Intervention development will be informed by (1) integrating Aims 1 and 2 findings, (2) Community Action Board [CAB] input, and (3) the Behaviour Change Wheel,48 a step-by-step intervention development approach that identifies and addresses barriers using theory and evidence-based methods. 2. The intervention pilot may be based on a multicomponent media campaign, as endorsed by the Community Preventive Services Taskforce for promoting CRC screening among individuals ≥ age 50. #iBeatCRC may entail both outdoor mass media and online social media. #iBeatCRC will target Utah and Wisconsin hotspots and non-hotspots for comparison, with pre-post-assessment among 17 individuals in each group for both sites. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 49 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aim 1: No recruitment took place (secondary data analysis). These records were used to determine early-onset colorectal cancer hotspots in Utah.
- Aim 2: 30 one-hour interviews were conducted with EOCRC patients and survivors who (1) resided in the United States, (2) were diagnosed with CRC at 18-49 years of age, (3) had a telephone, and (4) spoke English.
- Aim 3: Individuals must: (1) reside in Utah or Wisconsin, (2) were diagnosed with CRC at 18-49 years of age, (3) have a telephone, and (4) speak English.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aim 1: No recruitment took place (secondary data analysis).
- Aim 2: Individuals were excluded if they (1) did not reside in the United States, (2) were not diagnosed with CRC between 18-49 years of age, (3) did not have a telephone, and (4) did not speak English.
- Aim 3: Individuals will be excluded if they (1) do not reside in the Utah or Wisconsin, (2) were not diagnosed with CRC between 18-49 years of age, (3) do not have a telephone, and (4) do not speak English.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| InterviewsWe will understand the impact psychosocial, lifestyle, and familial aspects play on an EOCRC diagnosis through 20 one-hour interviews with EOCRC patients and survivors. | Behavioural | Develop and Pilot #iBeatCRC |
| PilotUtilizing the Behaviour Change Wheel in conjunction with results gathered from Aims 1 and 2 we will develop a theory-driven, multi-media campaign intervention to increase awareness of EOCRC, risk factors, and early detection benefit. | Behavioural | Develop and Pilot #iBeatCRC |
Primary outcome
EOCRC Survival Assessed by Geographic Location
Time frame: Year 1
We used quantitative methods to link incidence and mortality data for the years 2000 to 2020 from the Utah Cancer Registry (UCR) and the Utah Population Database (UPDB) to derive county-level estimates of hotspots for early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence and mortality among Utahns aged 18 to 49 years and obtain county-level estimates using our previous geospatial methods. Twenty-nine counties in each state with high EOCRC incidence and/or mortality rates were identified as hotspots. Next, we used UCR-UPDB linked data to determine the independent contributions of (1) geographical, (2) personal, and (3) county-level factors to EOCRC incidence and survival. We performed hierarchical Cox regression models and implemented a generalized R-square analysis to determine the variance explained by each factor.
Impact of Psychosocial, Lifestyle, and Familial Aspects on an EOCRC Diagnosis Assessed by Interviews
Time frame: Years 2-3
For Outcome 2, we drew on factors associated with hotspots identified in Objective 1 and our team's prior research to develop an interview guide with six EOCRC advocate-survivors. Using the interview guide, we conducted one-on-one interviews with 27 individuals who received a first diagnosis of CRC at age 18 to 49 years to yield a richer understanding of the impact of psychosocial, lifestyle, and familial aspects on an EOCRC diagnosis. The qualitative data obtained from these interviews was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Hatch's methods.
Impact of #iBeatCRC Mass Media Campaign on general EOCRC Awareness
Time frame: Years 3-4
Mean knowledge index score difference of EOCRC general Awareness The intervention will be assessed with a post-test questionnaire among the 17 hotspot and 17 coldspot participants in each state. Preintervention and postintervention mean score differences will be tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Preintervention and postintervention EOCRC awareness change will be analyzed by McNemar's test. P≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Impact of #iBeatCRC Mass Media Campaign on EOCRC risk factors
Time frame: Years 3-4
Mean knowledge index score difference of EOCRC risk factors The intervention will be assessed with a post-test questionnaire among the above-mentioned 17 hotspot and 17 coldspot participants in each state. Preintervention and postintervention mean score differences will be tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Preintervention and postintervention EOCRC awareness of risk factors change will be analyzed by McNemar's test. P≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Impact of #iBeatCRC Mass Media Campaign on EOCRC early detection benefit.
Time frame: Years 3-4
Mean knowledge index score difference of EOCRC early detection benefit. The intervention will be assessed with a post-test questionnaire among the above-mentioned 17 hotspot and 17 coldspot participants in each state. Preintervention and postintervention mean score differences will be tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Preintervention and postintervention EOCRC awareness of early detection benefit change will be analyzed by McNemar's test. P≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34862279Rogers CR, Brooks E, Curtin K, De Vera MA, Qeadan F, Rogers TN, Petersen E, Gallagher P, Pesmen C, Johnson W, Henley C, Hickman W, Newcomb E, Korous KM, Handley MA. Protocol for #iBeatCRC: a community-based intervention to increase early-onset colorectal cancer awareness using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach. BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e048959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048959.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Sharing de-identified participant data stemming from cognitive interviews, surveys, intervention arms, and post trial interviews.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charles R. Rogers, PhD, MPH, MS principal investigator
Medical College of Wisconsin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interviews and Pilot in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
EOCRC Survival Assessed by Geographic Location (time frame: Year 1). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04715074, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2024.