AzTrials
AzTrials

Visual Analogue ScoreNCT04718090

Comparison of Interscalene and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Shoulder Surgery

A study testing PENG Block in people with Visual Analogue Score, run by Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Early postoperative pain after shoulder surgery is a major concern and distress for patients and orthopedic surgeons. Adequate pain control; It is vital for all aspects of patient recovery, including mental state, nutrition, cost of care period, rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall post-surgery… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Visual Analogue Score
What is being tested?
PENG Block
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 31 Jul 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years and over
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2
  • shoulder surgery

Who cannot join

  • under 18 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 and above
  • who are allergic to local anesthetics
  • patients with infection at the injection site
  • pregnant women

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Merve Yazici Kara, M.D. contact

+90 533 686 0156

merreset@hotmail.com

İlke Kupeli, M.D. contact

+90 555 548 5632

ilkeser2004@gmail.com

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Consumption and Pain in Shoulder Surgery Patients Undergoing Interscalene and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Blocks

Early postoperative pain after shoulder surgery is a major concern and distress for patients and orthopedic surgeons. Adequate pain control; It is vital for all aspects of patient recovery, including mental state, nutrition, cost of care period, rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall post-surgery outcomes.Single analgesic regimens are not always effective in controlling moderate to severe postoperative pain.Therefore, multimodal pain management is preferred and is currently recommended for early postoperative pain control.Regional anesthesia is preferred in shoulder surgery as an effective way to provide anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.To ensure adequate postoperative pain control, nerve supply to the synovium, capsule, joint surfaces, ligaments, periosteum and shoulder muscles must be blocked.Interscalene blocks are well studied and established means of providing analgesia following shoulder surgery and are considered the gold standard mode of regional anesthesia.Pericapsular nerve group block is a new block that provides a pericapsular distribution with local anesthetic infiltration around the glenohumeral joint and provides analgesia without motor blockage by reaching the sensory nerve branches of the glenohumeral joint.The aim of this study was to compare the results between interscalene block and pericapsular nerve group block in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.

Being tested
PENG Block

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PENG BlockProcedure or surgery

    Pericapsular nerve group block in shoulder surgery.

Study groups in NCT04718090
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
interscalene blockActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: PENG Block
PENG blockActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: PENG Block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analogue Scale

    Visual Analogue Scale

    Measured: 5 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
34 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04718090
Sponsor's protocol ID
MYaziciKara-1
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
17 Jan 2021
Last updated
22 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Patel MS, Abboud JA, Sethi PM. Perioperative pain management for shoulder surgery: evolving techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov;29(11):e416-e433. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.049. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

    PubMed 32844751
  • Sripada R, Bowens C Jr. Regional anesthesia procedures for shoulder and upper arm surgery upper extremity update--2005 to present. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2012 Winter;50(1):26-46. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31821a0284.

    PubMed 22227421
  • Yamak Altinpulluk E, Teles AS, Galluccio F, Simon DG, Olea MS, Salazar C, Fajardo Perez M. Pericapsular nerve group block for postoperative shoulder pain: A cadaveric radiological evaluation. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Dec;67:110058. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110058. Epub 2020 Sep 26. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32987232
  • Tran J, Peng PWH, Agur AMR. Anatomical study of the innervation of glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joint capsules: implications for image-guided intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan 11:rapm-2018-100152. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100152. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 30635516

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PENG Block in people with Visual Analogue Score, run by Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Merve Yazici Kara, M.D. (+90 533 686 0156, merreset@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analogue Scale (time frame: 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04718090, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in