AzTrials
AzTrials

Abdominal InjuryPhase 1/2NCT04718441

Contrast Ultrasound for Pediatric Trauma - Comparative Evaluation (CAPTURE Study)

A Phase 1/2 study testing Lumason in people with Abdominal Injury, run by David Mooney at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This multicenter study aims to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing abdominal solid organ injuries in pediatric patients. Up to 130 subjects will complete the study across approximately 5-10 sites in the US, with up to 30 patients in the training phase (3 per site) and 100… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Abdominal Injury
What is being tested?
Lumason
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
10 May 2021to 30 Jul 2025
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hemodynamically stable, as determined by the trauma team
  • Age 8 through 18 years (inclusive)
  • Interpretable CT of the abdomen and pelvis that demonstrates at least one solid organ injury among the liver, spleen, pancreas, and kidneys
  • Plan for observation or admission to the hospital
  • Candidate for abdominal ultrasound based on body habitus, as determined by the investigator
  • Glasgow Coma Score of 15
  • Able to complete the study procedures within 48 hours of injury

Who cannot join

  • Known cardiac abnormality
  • Pulmonary Hypertension
  • Known sensitivity to any Lumason components - including sulfur hexafluoride, polyethylene glycol 4000, distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC), dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol sodium (DPPG-Na), or palmitic acid
  • Unable to be rolled onto side to allow lateral ultrasound windows if necessary
  • Unable to assent or consent
  • Pregnant
  • Lactating
  • CT images not available for transmission to central image repository

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Boston Children's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02118

  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Phoenix Children's Hospital

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85016

  • University of Utah

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84113

Other trials in United States

About this study

This multicenter study aims to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing abdominal solid organ injuries in pediatric patients. Up to 130 subjects will complete the study across approximately 5-10 sites in the US, with up to 30 patients in the training phase (3 per site) and 100 patients in the treatment phase of the study. All subjects will have had a CT scan as part of standard of care, confirming at least one solid organ abdominal injury. The study procedure will occur within 48 hours from time of injury. All subjects will have an abdominal ultrasound without contrast, followed by a contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the contrast agent Lumason. Ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound results will be compared to the CT scan results. The CT and ultrasound scans will be read locally and will undergo central review.

Read the detailed description

This is an interventional study which proposes to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing abdominal solid organ injuries in pediatric trauma patients. Up to 130 subjects will be enrolled across approximately 5 to 10 sites in the US. Each site, including the coordinating center, will undergo the training phase; each site will enroll 3 participants in this phase successfully prior to entering the treatment phase. All subjects will have had a Computerized Tomography (CT) scan as part of standard of care, confirming at least one solid organ abdominal injury. All subjects will have an abdominal ultrasound without contrast, followed by a contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the contrast agent Lumason. Ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound results will be compared to the CT scan results. The study procedures will take place within 48 hours of injury. At conclusion of enrollment of all subjects a centralized review of CT vs. CEUS will occur to compare to real-time readings.

Being tested
Lumason
Keywords
Solid Organ Injury
Medical subject headings
Abdominal Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LumasonDrug

    Also called SonoVue

    Lumason will be administered at a dose of 0.03 mL/kg up to a maximum dose of 2.4mL injected into a peripheral intravenous catheter. An abdominal contrast enhanced ultrasound will be performed to look for solid organ injury. The will be given twice during the intervention, for a total maximum dose per subject of 4.8mL.

Study groups in NCT04718441
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
All Study ParticipantsExperimentalAll subjects will have an abdominal non-contrast ultrasound performed. Lumason will then be administered at a dose of 0.03mL/kg up to a maximum dose of 2.4mL and a contrast-enhanced ultrasound will be performed. The dose will be given twice, for a total maximum dose per subject of 4.8mL
Receives: Drug: Lumason

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall CEUS/CT Concordance for all study participants

    A patient is classified as having a "concordant" assessment if each organ identified by CT with injuries is exactly identified by CEUS, regardless of injury grade, by the local study site reviewer. Otherwise, a patient is classified as having a "discordant" assessment.

    Measured: At the time the CEUS is performed, within 48 hours of injury

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Organ-specific CEUS/CT Concordance

    For each organ, a patient's organ is classified as having a "concordant" assessment if the presence or absence of an injury as identified by CT is exactly identified by CEUS. Otherwise, a patient is classified as having a "discordant" assessment.

    Measured: At the time the CEUS is performed, within 48 hours of injury

  2. Grade-specific Overall CEUS/CT Concordance

    A patient is classified as having a "concordant" assessment if each organ identified by CT with injuries is exactly identified by CEUS, AND within 1 grade of the injury as identified by CT. Otherwise, a patient is classified as having a "discordant" assessment.

    Measured: At the time the CEUS is performed, within 48 hours of injury

  3. Peritoneal Fluid CEUS/CT Concordance

    A patient is classified as having a "concordant" assessment if the absence or presence of peritoneal fluid identified by CT is also exactly identified by CEUS. Otherwise, a patient is classified as having a "discordant" assessment.

    Measured: At the time the CEUS is performed, within 48 hours of injury.

  4. Real-time/Centralized CEUS Concordance

    A patient is classified as having a "concordant" assessment if the absence or presence of injury for each organ identified by 'real-time' CEUS with injuries is also exactly identified by centralized interpretation of CEUS images.

    Measured: At the time the CEUS is performed, within 48 hours of injury.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2021
  2. Study start10 May 2021
  3. Primary completion9 May 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04718441
Sponsor's protocol ID
P00035263
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
16 Jan 2021
Last updated
3 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Lumason in people with Abdominal Injury, run by David Mooney at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall CEUS/CT Concordance for all study participants (time frame: At the time the CEUS is performed, within 48 hours of injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in