Pediatric ObesityNECORDNCT04719442
Packaging Building Healthy Families for Community Implementation
A study testing Building Healthy Families in people with Pediatric Obesity, run by University of Nebraska.
Trial summary
There is a large body of literature regarding efficacious intervention strategies for treating childhood obesity. Unfortunately, the degree to which efficacious programs have been packaged for translation in micropolitan and surrounding rural areas is unclear-an important issue when considering the prevalence of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Obesity
- What is being tested?
- Building Healthy Families
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2021to 1 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Child 6 to 12 years of age
- Child with BMI percentile at or above the 95th percentile
- parents and/or guardian of child who meets the inclusion criteria
Who cannot join
- Child with major cognitive or physical impairments
- Child or parents/guardians with a contraindication for physical activity
- Families participating in a concurrent pediatric weight management intervention
About this study
Official title: Translating Efficacious Pediatric Weight Management Interventions Into Rural & Micropolitan Communities
There is a large body of literature regarding efficacious intervention strategies for treating childhood obesity. Unfortunately, the degree to which efficacious programs have been packaged for translation in micropolitan and surrounding rural areas is unclear-an important issue when considering the prevalence of obesity is higher in rural areas when compared to urban areas. Epstein's Traffic Light Diet (TLD) is likely the most studied pediatric weight management intervention (PWMI) and has demonstrated efficacy across a wide range of randomized controlled trials in children 6-12 years of age. Building Healthy Families (BHF) is an adaptation of the TLD and has been implemented in a micropolitan city and achieved clinically and statistically significant reductions in child BMI z-score (-0.27±0.22)-a similar magnitude of effect relative to previous efficacy trials. The investigators have created online resources for organizations interested in delivering PWMIs, training modules for related interventions, and participant-facing program materials that could be combined into a 'turn-key' approach for communities interested in reducing childhood obesity to adopt, adapt and sustain it in other micropolitan/rural communities. The primary aim is to collaboratively refine and develop an intervention package for the BHF that includes materials necessary for others to implement the intervention in new metropolitan/rural locations. The second aim is to perform a rigorous, mixed-methods pilot implementation study using an innovative community application process to identify 4 to 8 new communities to pilot test the utility of the packaged PWMI and training materials while determining factors that predict adoption, implementation and sustainability. The investigators will also use a learning collaborative implementation strategy to improve implementation fidelity and local context and facilitation capacity in communities interested in delivering BHF. The third aim is to use the pilot evaluation data and results of the sustainability action plan to refine program and training materials and develop a dissemination plan to move the program to other communities. The approach will use an implementation research explanatory process and outcome model to test hypotheses related to implementation and sustainability, engaging community/ clinical partners in the implementation and sustainability process, and evaluate outcomes at both the individual and organizational level.
Read the detailed description
Since the early 1980s, a number of efficacious pediatric weight management interventions (PWMI) have been developed to reduce child weight status. Epstein's Traffic Light Diet (TLD) is likely the most studied PWMI and has demonstrated efficacy across a wide range of randomized controlled trials in children up to and older than 12 years of age. This work and the majority of efficacious PWMI have been based in large urban areas delivered through a hospital or medical center and the most recent childhood obesity treatment recommendations do not address geographically underserved audiences or settings where all members of an interdisciplinary team may not exist. As a result, there is no information on the degree to which evidence-based PWMIs have been translated into micropolitan (cities<50,000) and rural settings. This is an important issue when considering the prevalence of obesity is higher, socioeconomic status and access to preventive healthcare is lower, and 20% of the nation's populations reside in rural areas based on the most recent census data. A related issue is the potential mismatch between the resources and expertise used to deliver research and hospital-based PWMIs in urban, when compared to micropolitan and rural, areas. Thus, adoption, implementation, and sustainability may be limited in micropolitan and surrounding rural areas unless adaptations are made that leverage multiple systems within the community that interact with families and children and strategies include a balanced focus on reach and effectiveness to increase the likelihood of having a public health impact. To address these issues the research team has implemented an adapted version of the TLD in Kearney, Nebraska, developed and used training approaches for PWMI for underserved micropolitan settings, and conducted a number of implementation trials focused on planning for, and evaluating, PWMI reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM). This includes research examining models of participant identification and engagement within settings where a large proportion of children are screened for obesity-schools and primary care pediatric clinics. Building Healthy Families (BHF), the investigators' TLD adaptation, includes the required or more contact hours through regular and frequent in-person contact with families and leverages the expertise and time of health professionals from a variety of local organizations. BHF has been implemented locally and successfully achieved clinically and statistically significant reductions in child BMI z-score (-0.27±0.22). Through collaborative efforts the research team has developed online resources for organizations interested in delivering PWMIs, training modules for related interventions, and participant-facing program materials that could be combined into a 'turn-key' approach for communities interested in reducing childhood obesity. The investigators preliminary work demonstrates that the adapted TLD intervention can achieve a similar magnitude of effect relative to previous efficacy trials, that the associated training materials and approaches can result in a high level of implementation fidelity, and that ongoing program adaptations to address local needs can be made. To date, the research team has not combined all of these approaches and materials as a turn-key package that could be adopted, adapted, and sustained in other micropolitan/rural communities.
The first aim is to collaboratively refine and develop an intervention package for the TLD that includes all of the materials necessary for others to implement the intervention in new micropolitan and rural locations. The second aim is to perform a rigorous, mixed-methods pilot implementation research study using an innovative community application process to identify 4 to 8 new communities to pilot test the utility of the packaged PWMI and training materials when coupled with a learning collaborative facilitation strategy and sustainability action planning process in supporting PWMI adoption, implementation, and sustainability when compared to receiving access to the packaged program and training materials alone. Additional outcomes will include start-up and ongoing costs while tracking intervention reach, representativeness, and effectiveness in reducing and maintaining child weight status relative to a matched cohort. The third aim is to use the pilot evaluation data and results of the sustainability action plan to refine program and training materials and develop a dissemination plan to move the program to other communities.
To complete these aims the investigators will engage an existing partnerships that includes local schools and pediatricians in Kearney, NE and the Great Plains IDeA Clinical and Translational Research Network Community Advisory Board who has identified childhood obesity treatment, particularly in rural areas, across North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska as a priority. As is recommended, the approach will use an implementation research explanatory process, and outcome model to test hypotheses related to implementation and sustainability, engaging community/clinical partners in the implementation and sustainability process, and evaluate outcomes at both the individual and organizational level. Specifically, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) Framework will be used as the explanatory model and the RE-AIM framework to track individual reach, representativeness, effectiveness and organizational cost, adoption, implementation, and sustainability.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Obesity
- Being tested
- Building Healthy Families
- Keywords
- Obesity, Type III Hybrid Effectiveness Implementation, Rural
- Medical subject headings
- Pediatric Obesity, Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Building Healthy FamiliesBehavioural
Also called Building Healthy Families-Program Only
Building Healthy Families (BHF) is a family based obesity treatment program which includes key behavior change strategies including goal setting for both behavior change and weight loss, self-monitoring, rewards/contingency management, role modeling, and stimulus control/ modifying the environment. BHF includes a minimum of 32 contact hours consisting of three main program components: nutrition education, behavior modification, and physical activity. Participants and parents are expected to attend 12 continuous weeks of education (2 hours/session) followed by 12 weeks of relapse prevention refresher courses. Relapse prevention refresher sessions are every three weeks for one hour to re-evaluate goals, discuss rewards/contingency management and changes in stimulus control with seasonal changes and holidays. A final follow-up check-in session is conducted at 12 months for approximately 1 hour.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BHF-LC | Experimental | To test an innovative implementation strategy, four communities will be assigned to pilot test the packaged PWMI and training materials when coupled with a learning collaborative facilitation strategy and sustainability action planning process to support PWMI adoption, implementation, and sustainability (BHF-LC). Receives: Behavioral: Building Healthy Families |
| BHF-Program Only | Active comparator | Four other communities will be assigned to receive the packaged PWMI and training program only. Receives: Behavioral: Building Healthy Families |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Program Implementation
% of objectives met during intervention sessions
Measured: up to 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Body Mass Index percentile ranking
Using standardized calculation for degree of childhood obesity as a function of height, weight, age and gender
Measured: Calculated four times, baseline, 3-months, 6-months and 12 months
Reach
number of children enrolled
Measured: measured once at enrollment
Height in Meters
Measured in adults using a standard stadiometer
Measured: Measured once at baseline
Weight in Kilograms
Measured in adults using a research grade scale
Measured: Measured 4 times; baseline, 3 months, 6-months and 12 months.
Body Mass Index
Calculated for adults from height and weight.
Measured: Calculated 4 times; baseline, 3-months, 6-months and 12 months
Community Adoption
Number of communities and community organizations that respond to a call for applications
Measured: 1 time at 3 months
Cohort Adoption
The number of cohorts initiated in each community
Measured: up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2021
- Study start1 Jun 2021
- Primary completion1 Jun 2021
- Study completion1 Jun 2021
Why it stopped: Started record under wrong IRB account. Registered under UNMC, but actually at UNKearney.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nebraska
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennie Hill, PhD, Principal investigator, University of NebraskaKate Heelan, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Nebraska at Kearney
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04719442
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 121919-1
- Other IDs
- 1U18DP006431
- Acronym
- NECORD
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All individual participant data collected during the trial after deidentification.
Publications
Michaud TL, Hill JL, Heelan KA, Bartee RT, Abbey BM, Malmkar A, Masker J, Golden C, Porter G, Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PA. Understanding implementation costs of a pediatric weight management intervention: an economic evaluation protocol. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Apr 5;3(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00287-1.
PubMed 35382891Hill JL, Heelan KA, Bartee RT, Wichman C, Michaud T, Abbey BM, Porter G, Golden C, Estabrooks PA. A Type III Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Trial Testing Dissemination and Implementation Strategies for a Pediatric Weight Management Intervention: The Nebraska Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration Project. Child Obes. 2021 Sep;17(S1):S70-S78. doi: 10.1089/chi.2021.0170.
PubMed 34569848
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Translating Efficacious Pediatric Weight Management Interventions Into Rural & Micropolitan Communities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04719442
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NECORD / 121919-1
- Conditions
- Pediatric Obesity
- Keywords
- Obesity, Type III Hybrid Effectiveness Implementation, Rural
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Started record under wrong IRB account. Registered under UNMC, but actually at UNKearney.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of NebraskaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is a large body of literature regarding efficacious intervention strategies for treating childhood obesity. Unfortunately, the degree to which efficacious programs have been packaged for translation in micropolitan and surrounding rural areas is unclear-an important issue when considering the prevalence of obesity is higher in rural areas when compared to urban areas. Epstein's Traffic Light Diet (TLD) is likely the most studied pediatric weight management intervention (PWMI) and has demonstrated efficacy across a wide range of randomized controlled trials in children 6-12 years of age. Building Healthy Families (BHF) is an adaptation of the TLD and has been implemented in a micropolitan city and achieved clinically and statistically significant reductions in child BMI z-score (-0.27±0.22)-a similar magnitude of effect relative to previous efficacy trials. The investigators have created online resources for organizations interested in delivering PWMIs, training modules for related interventions, and participant-facing program materials that could be combined into a 'turn-key' approach for communities interested in reducing childhood obesity to adopt, adapt and sustain it in other micropolitan/rural communities. The primary aim is to collaboratively refine and develop an intervention package for the BHF that includes materials necessary for others to implement the intervention in new metropolitan/rural locations. The second aim is to perform a rigorous, mixed-methods pilot implementation study using an innovative community application process to identify 4 to 8 new communities to pilot test the utility of the packaged PWMI and training materials while determining factors that predict adoption, implementation and sustainability. The investigators will also use a learning collaborative implementation strategy to improve implementation fidelity and local context and facilitation capacity in communities interested in delivering BHF. The third aim is to use the pilot evaluation data and results of the sustainability action plan to refine program and training materials and develop a dissemination plan to move the program to other communities. The approach will use an implementation research explanatory process and outcome model to test hypotheses related to implementation and sustainability, engaging community/ clinical partners in the implementation and sustainability process, and evaluate outcomes at both the individual and organizational level.
Detailed description
Since the early 1980s, a number of efficacious pediatric weight management interventions (PWMI) have been developed to reduce child weight status. Epstein's Traffic Light Diet (TLD) is likely the most studied PWMI and has demonstrated efficacy across a wide range of randomized controlled trials in children up to and older than 12 years of age. This work and the majority of efficacious PWMI have been based in large urban areas delivered through a hospital or medical center and the most recent childhood obesity treatment recommendations do not address geographically underserved audiences or settings where all members of an interdisciplinary team may not exist. As a result, there is no information on the degree to which evidence-based PWMIs have been translated into micropolitan (cities<50,000) and rural settings. This is an important issue when considering the prevalence of obesity is higher, socioeconomic status and access to preventive healthcare is lower, and 20% of the nation's populations reside in rural areas based on the most recent census data. A related issue is the potential mismatch between the resources and expertise used to deliver research and hospital-based PWMIs in urban, when compared to micropolitan and rural, areas. Thus, adoption, implementation, and sustainability may be limited in micropolitan and surrounding rural areas unless adaptations are made that leverage multiple systems within the community that interact with families and children and strategies include a balanced focus on reach and effectiveness to increase the likelihood of having a public health impact. To address these issues the research team has implemented an adapted version of the TLD in Kearney, Nebraska, developed and used training approaches for PWMI for underserved micropolitan settings, and conducted a number of implementation trials focused on planning for, and evaluating, PWMI reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM). This includes research examining models of participant identification and engagement within settings where a large proportion of children are screened for obesity-schools and primary care pediatric clinics. Building Healthy Families (BHF), the investigators' TLD adaptation, includes the required or more contact hours through regular and frequent in-person contact with families and leverages the expertise and time of health professionals from a variety of local organizations. BHF has been implemented locally and successfully achieved clinically and statistically significant reductions in child BMI z-score (-0.27±0.22). Through collaborative efforts the research team has developed online resources for organizations interested in delivering PWMIs, training modules for related interventions, and participant-facing program materials that could be combined into a 'turn-key' approach for communities interested in reducing childhood obesity. The investigators preliminary work demonstrates that the adapted TLD intervention can achieve a similar magnitude of effect relative to previous efficacy trials, that the associated training materials and approaches can result in a high level of implementation fidelity, and that ongoing program adaptations to address local needs can be made. To date, the research team has not combined all of these approaches and materials as a turn-key package that could be adopted, adapted, and sustained in other micropolitan/rural communities.
The first aim is to collaboratively refine and develop an intervention package for the TLD that includes all of the materials necessary for others to implement the intervention in new micropolitan and rural locations. The second aim is to perform a rigorous, mixed-methods pilot implementation research study using an innovative community application process to identify 4 to 8 new communities to pilot test the utility of the packaged PWMI and training materials when coupled with a learning collaborative facilitation strategy and sustainability action planning process in supporting PWMI adoption, implementation, and sustainability when compared to receiving access to the packaged program and training materials alone. Additional outcomes will include start-up and ongoing costs while tracking intervention reach, representativeness, and effectiveness in reducing and maintaining child weight status relative to a matched cohort. The third aim is to use the pilot evaluation data and results of the sustainability action plan to refine program and training materials and develop a dissemination plan to move the program to other communities.
To complete these aims the investigators will engage an existing partnerships that includes local schools and pediatricians in Kearney, NE and the Great Plains IDeA Clinical and Translational Research Network Community Advisory Board who has identified childhood obesity treatment, particularly in rural areas, across North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska as a priority. As is recommended, the approach will use an implementation research explanatory process, and outcome model to test hypotheses related to implementation and sustainability, engaging community/clinical partners in the implementation and sustainability process, and evaluate outcomes at both the individual and organizational level. Specifically, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) Framework will be used as the explanatory model and the RE-AIM framework to track individual reach, representativeness, effectiveness and organizational cost, adoption, implementation, and sustainability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BHF-LC | Experimental | Behavioral: Building Healthy FamiliesTo test an innovative implementation strategy, four communities will be assigned to pilot test the packaged PWMI and training materials when coupled with a learning collaborative facilitation strategy and sustainability action planning process to support PWMI adoption, implementation, and sustainability (BHF-LC). |
| BHF-Program Only | Active comparator | Behavioral: Building Healthy FamiliesFour other communities will be assigned to receive the packaged PWMI and training program only. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Child 6 to 12 years of age
- Child with BMI percentile at or above the 95th percentile
- parents and/or guardian of child who meets the inclusion criteria
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Child with major cognitive or physical impairments
- Child or parents/guardians with a contraindication for physical activity
- Families participating in a concurrent pediatric weight management intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Building Healthy FamiliesAlso: Building Healthy Families-Program OnlyBuilding Healthy Families (BHF) is a family based obesity treatment program which includes key behavior change strategies including goal setting for both behavior change and weight loss, self-monitoring, rewards/contingency management, role modeling, and stimulus control/ modifying the environment. BHF includes a minimum of 32 contact hours consisting of three main program components: nutrition education, behavior modification, and physical activity. Participants and parents are expected to attend 12 continuous weeks of education (2 hours/session) followed by 12 weeks of relapse prevention refresher courses. Relapse prevention refresher sessions are every three weeks for one hour to re-evaluate goals, discuss rewards/contingency management and changes in stimulus control with seasonal changes and holidays. A final follow-up check-in session is conducted at 12 months for approximately 1 hour. | Behavioural | BHF-LC, BHF-Program Only |
Primary outcome
Program Implementation
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
% of objectives met during intervention sessions
7 secondary outcomes
Body Mass Index percentile ranking
Time frame: Calculated four times, baseline, 3-months, 6-months and 12 months
Reach
Time frame: measured once at enrollment
Height in Meters
Time frame: Measured once at baseline
Weight in Kilograms
Time frame: Measured 4 times; baseline, 3 months, 6-months and 12 months.
Body Mass Index
Time frame: Calculated 4 times; baseline, 3-months, 6-months and 12 months
Community Adoption
Time frame: 1 time at 3 months
Cohort Adoption
Time frame: up to 24 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Sep 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35382891Michaud TL, Hill JL, Heelan KA, Bartee RT, Abbey BM, Malmkar A, Masker J, Golden C, Porter G, Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PA. Understanding implementation costs of a pediatric weight management intervention: an economic evaluation protocol. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Apr 5;3(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00287-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34569848Hill JL, Heelan KA, Bartee RT, Wichman C, Michaud T, Abbey BM, Porter G, Golden C, Estabrooks PA. A Type III Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Trial Testing Dissemination and Implementation Strategies for a Pediatric Weight Management Intervention: The Nebraska Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration Project. Child Obes. 2021 Sep;17(S1):S70-S78. doi: 10.1089/chi.2021.0170.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All individual participant data collected during the trial after deidentification.
Related trials for Pediatric Obesity
Active, not recruiting
Growing Healthy Children and Families in Rural Arkansas
Pediatric Obesity, Health Behavior, Risky
Recruiting
Cities for Better Health Childhood Obesity Prevention Initiative in JAPAN
Quality of Life (QOL), Nutrition
Not yet recruiting
Weight Gain in Pediatric Leukemia Survivors
Leukemia, Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 3
Fiber and Metformin Combination Therapy in Adolescents With Severe Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Obesity, Childhood, Insulin Resistance
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Children With Endocrine and Metabolic-Related Conditions
Adrenal Insufficiency, Growth Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennie Hill, PhD principal investigator
University of Nebraska
Kate Heelan, PhD principal investigator
University of Nebraska at Kearney
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Building Healthy Families in people with Pediatric Obesity, run by University of Nebraska.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Program Implementation (time frame: up to 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04719442, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2024.