Arthritis, RheumatoidNCT04721808
A Study To Investigate And Describe The Treatment Patterns And Effect Of Tofacitinib Indicators For Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
An observational study of Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is to investigate and describe the treatment patterns and effect of tofacitinib indicators for patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) assessing real world patient data entered in the Corrona RA Registry on or after November 2012 Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- How many people
- 1,712 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Jan 2021to 24 Nov 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Data will be collected from the Corrona RA Registry. The Corrona registry is a prospective, multicenter, observational disease-based registry launched in 2001.
Who may be able to join
- Enrolled in the Corrona RA Registry and initiated tofacitinib on or after November 2012
- Initiate tofacitinib (defined as first ever use of tofacitinib) at the Corrona enrollment visit or at a Corrona follow-up visit from November 2012 onward.
- Have CDAI measured at baseline
- Have at least a 6-month follow-up visit and CDAI measured at the 6-month follow-up visit
Who cannot join
- There are no exclusion criteria for this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Treatment Patterns and 6 and 12-Month Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in the Corrona Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry
This study is to investigate and describe the treatment patterns and effect of tofacitinib indicators for patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) assessing real world patient data entered in the Corrona RA Registry on or after November 2012
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | Patients receiving tofacitinib from the Corrona RA Registry from November 2012 onward |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] <=10) at 6 Months: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: tender joint count and swollen joint count (both out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm); higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores=lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 12 Months: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count ([SJC] both out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: At 12 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 6 Months: by Line of Therapy
CDAI=composite index for assessing disease activity (DA) based on summation of four components: TJC and SJC (both out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of DA and physician global assessment of DA, both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76 where lower scores=lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate DA and score >22 indicated high DA. Data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy (first line: no prior use of any disease modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD]) and by each line of therapy, second line: participants with prior use of at least 1 conventional synthetic (cs) DMARD and no prior use of any biologic; third line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and 1 biologic and fourth line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and more than 2 biologics.
Measured: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 12 Months: by Line of Therapy
CDAI=composite index for assessing DA based on numerical summation of four components: TJC and SJC (both out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of DA and physician global assessment of DA, both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76 where lower scores=lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate DA and score >22 indicated high DA. Data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy (first line: no prior use of any DMARD) and by each line of therapy, second line: participants with prior use of at least 1 csDMARD and no prior use of any biologic; third line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and 1 biologic and fourth line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and more than 2 biologics.
Measured: At 12 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 6 Months: by Tofa Dose
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported by dose of tofacitinib at initiation i.e. 5 mg twice daily (BID) or 11 mg once daily (QD).
Measured: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 12 Months: by Tofa Dose
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported by dose of tofacitinib at initiation i.e. 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: At 12 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 6 Months: by Time Periods of Initiation
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported by year of tofacitinib initiation (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020).
Measured: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 12 Months: by Time Periods of Initiation
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported by year of tofacitinib initiation (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020).
Measured: At 12 months after tofacitinib initiation (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Secondary outcomes (40)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=2.8 indicated remission. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: At Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
HAQ is a self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. The 20-question instrument assessed ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 functional areas:dressing,arising,eating,walking,reaching,gripping,hygiene,and carrying out daily activities. Responses in each functional area were scored from 0=no difficulty to 3=inability to perform a task in that area. Total score=sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total scores range from 0 to 3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Higher scores indicated worse functioning. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. Higher scores indicated worsening of pain. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Participants were asked to assess the level of fatigue by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Higher scores indicated worsening of fatigue. In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofa initiators and participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (mACR20) Response at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
mACR20 response: >= 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 50% (mACR50) Response at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
mACR50 response: >= 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 50% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 70% (mACR70) Response at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
mACR70 response: >= 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 70% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity or Remission Defined by Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR]) <= 3.2 at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, derived using differential weighting given to each of the four components. Components included: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, ESR (mm per hour) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity]), higher scores=more disease activity. DAS28 (ESR) was calculated as 0.56*sqrt (TJC28)+0.28*sqrt (SJC28)+0.70*ln (ESR [mm/hour]+0.014*PtGA [mm]; where, ln=natural logarithm, sqrt=square root of. Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28(ESR) score of <=3.2 indicated LDA or remission. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy, participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants With Mild Pain at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy
Participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. Higher scores indicated worsening of pain. Mild pain was defined as <=20 mm on 100 mm VAS scale in those participants who had pain >20 mm on 100 mm VAS at the initiation visit. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=2.8 indicated remission. Data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy (first line: no prior use of any DMARD) and by each line of therapy including second line: participants with prior use of at least 1 csDMARD and no prior use of any biologic; third line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and 1 biologic and fourth line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and more than 2 biologics.
Measured: At Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in HAQ Score at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
HAQ is a self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. The 20-question instrument assessed ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 functional areas: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. Responses in each functional area were scored from 0=no difficulty to 3=inability to perform a task in that area. Total score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total scores range from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher scores indicated worse functioning. In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. Higher scores indicated worsening of pain. In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Participants were asked to assess the level of fatigue by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Higher scores indicated worsening of fatigue. In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR20 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
mACR20 response: >= 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR50 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
mACR50 response: >= 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 50% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR70 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
mACR70 response: >= 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 70% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity or Remission Defined by DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, derived using differential weighting given to each of the four components. The components of the DAS28 (ESR) assessment included: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, ESR (mm per hour) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity]), higher scores indicated more disease activity. DAS28 (ESR) was calculated as 0.56*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70*ln (ESR [mm/hour] + 0.014*PtGA [mm]; where, ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of. Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28(ESR) score of <=3.2 indicated LDA or remission. In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants With Mild Pain at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. Higher scores indicated worsening of pain. Mild pain was defined as <=20 mm on 100 mm VAS scale in those participants who had pain >20 mm on 100 mm VAS at the initiation visit. In this outcome measure, data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy and by each line of therapy including second line, third line and fourth line of therapy.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=2.8 indicated remission. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: At Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in HAQ Score at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
HAQ is a self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. The 20-question instrument assessed ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 functional areas: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. Responses in each functional area were scored from 0=no difficulty to 3=inability to perform a task in that area. Total score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total scores range from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher scores indicated worse functioning. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. Higher scores indicated worsening of pain. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Participants were asked to assess the level of fatigue by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Higher scores indicated worsening of fatigue. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR20 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
mACR20 response: >= 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR50 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
mACR50 response: >= 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 50% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR70 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
mACR70 response: >= 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 70% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity or Remission Defined by DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, derived using differential weighting given to each of the four components. The components of the DAS28 (ESR) assessment included: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, ESR (mm per hour) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity]), higher scores indicated more disease activity. DAS28 (ESR) was calculated as 0.56*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70*ln (ESR [mm/hour] + 0.014*PtGA [mm]; where, ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of. Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28(ESR) score of <=3.2 indicated LDA or remission. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants With Mild Pain at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. Higher scores indicated worsening of pain. Mild pain was defined as <=20 mm on 100 mm VAS scale in those participants who had pain >20 mm on 100 mm VAS at the initiation visit. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who administered tofacitinib dose as either 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=2.8 indicated remission. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: At Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in HAQ Score at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
HAQ is a self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. The 20-question instrument assessed ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 functional areas: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. Responses in each functional area were scored from 0=no difficulty to 3=inability to perform a task in that area. Total score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total scores range from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher scores indicated worse functioning. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. Higher scores indicated worsening of pain. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Participants were asked to assess the level of fatigue by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Higher scores indicated worsening of fatigue. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR20 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
mACR20 response: >= 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR50 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
mACR50 response: >= 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 50% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR70 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
mACR70 response: >= 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 70% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain); 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the HAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function). In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity or Remission Defined by DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, derived using differential weighting given to each of the four components. The components of the DAS28 (ESR) assessment included: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, ESR (mm per hour) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity]), higher scores indicated more disease activity. DAS28 (ESR) was calculated as 0.56*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70*ln (ESR [mm/hour] + 0.014*PtGA [mm]; where, ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of. Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28(ESR) score of <=3.2 indicated LDA or remission. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants With Mild Pain at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. Higher scores indicated worsening of pain. Mild pain was defined as <=20 mm on 100 mm VAS scale in those participants who had pain >20 mm on 100 mm VAS at the initiation visit. In this outcome measure, data is reported for participants who initiated tofacitinib in different initiation years (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020), were reported.
Measured: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2021
- Study start22 Jan 2021
- Primary completion24 Nov 2021
- Study completion24 Nov 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 1,712 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04721808
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921379
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Pappas DA, O'Brien J, Moore PC, Dodge R, Germino R, Masri KR, Bingham CO 3rd, Cappelli LC. Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in Patients Initiating Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From the CorEvitas Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry. J Rheumatol. 2024 May 1;51(5):452-461. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0752.
PubMed 38359941
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment Patterns and 6 and 12-Month Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in the Corrona Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04721808
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A3921379
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,712 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Nov 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Sep 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to investigate and describe the treatment patterns and effect of tofacitinib indicators for patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) assessing real world patient data entered in the Corrona RA Registry on or after November 2012
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | – | –Patients receiving tofacitinib from the Corrona RA Registry from November 2012 onward |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Data will be collected from the Corrona RA Registry. The Corrona registry is a prospective, multicenter, observational disease-based registry launched in 2001.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Enrolled in the Corrona RA Registry and initiated tofacitinib on or after November 2012
- Initiate tofacitinib (defined as first ever use of tofacitinib) at the Corrona enrollment visit or at a Corrona follow-up visit from November 2012 onward.
- Have CDAI measured at baseline
- Have at least a 6-month follow-up visit and CDAI measured at the 6-month follow-up visit
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There are no exclusion criteria for this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] <=10) at 6 Months: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: tender joint count and swollen joint count (both out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm); higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores=lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 12 Months: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: At 12 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count ([SJC] both out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported separately for overall number of participants who initiated tofacitinib as either monotherapy or as combination therapy (i.e. tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate, arava, azulfidine, plaquenil, or cyclosporine), participants who initiated tofacitinib as monotherapy and participants who initiated tofacitinib as combination therapy.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 6 Months: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
CDAI=composite index for assessing disease activity (DA) based on summation of four components: TJC and SJC (both out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of DA and physician global assessment of DA, both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76 where lower scores=lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate DA and score >22 indicated high DA. Data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy (first line: no prior use of any disease modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD]) and by each line of therapy, second line: participants with prior use of at least 1 conventional synthetic (cs) DMARD and no prior use of any biologic; third line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and 1 biologic and fourth line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and more than 2 biologics.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 12 Months: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: At 12 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
CDAI=composite index for assessing DA based on numerical summation of four components: TJC and SJC (both out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of DA and physician global assessment of DA, both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76 where lower scores=lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate DA and score >22 indicated high DA. Data is reported for overall tofacitinib initiators who initiated tofacitinib as first, second, third or fourth line of therapy (first line: no prior use of any DMARD) and by each line of therapy, second line: participants with prior use of at least 1 csDMARD and no prior use of any biologic; third line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and 1 biologic and fourth line: participants with prior use of any csDMARDs and more than 2 biologics.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 6 Months: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported by dose of tofacitinib at initiation i.e. 5 mg twice daily (BID) or 11 mg once daily (QD).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 12 Months: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: At 12 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported by dose of tofacitinib at initiation i.e. 5 mg BID or 11 mg QD.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 6 Months: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported by year of tofacitinib initiation (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA (CDAI <=10) at 12 Months: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: At 12 months after tofacitinib initiation (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the numerical summation of four components: TJC (out of 28 evaluated joints) and SJC (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity and physician global assessment of disease activity both measured on a VAS from 0 to 100 mm; higher scores=higher disease activity. CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A score of <=10 indicated LDA; score between >10 and <=22 indicated moderate disease activity and score >22 indicated high disease activity. In this outcome measure, data is reported by year of tofacitinib initiation (2012-2014, 2015-2017, 2018-2020).
40 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: At Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (mACR20) Response at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 50% (mACR50) Response at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 70% (mACR70) Response at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity or Remission Defined by Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR]) <= 3.2 at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants With Mild Pain at Month 6 and 12: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: At Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in HAQ Score at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR20 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR50 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR70 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity or Remission Defined by DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants With Mild Pain at Month 6 and 12: by Line of Therapy
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: At Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in HAQ Score at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR20 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR50 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR70 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity or Remission Defined by DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants With Mild Pain at Month 6 and 12: by Tofa Dose
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: At Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in HAQ Score at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue VAS Score at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Baseline (Corrona visit with first reported use of tofacitinib), Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR20 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR50 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving mACR70 Response at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity or Remission Defined by DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Percentage of Participants With Mild Pain at Month 6 and 12: by Time Periods of Initiation
Time frame: Month 6 and 12 (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38359941Pappas DA, O'Brien J, Moore PC, Dodge R, Germino R, Masri KR, Bingham CO 3rd, Cappelli LC. Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in Patients Initiating Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From the CorEvitas Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry. J Rheumatol. 2024 May 1;51(5):452-461. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0752.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Sep 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] <=10) at 6 Months: by Overall Tofa Initiators, Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Initiators (time frame: At 6 months after initiation of tofacitinib (from the data retrieved and observed for approximately 10 months of this retrospective study)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04721808, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2023.