AzTrials
AzTrials

Ulcerative ColitisFUNCTIonNCT04722757

Comparison of Functional Outcomes Between Transanal and Laparoscopic vs Open Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

A study testing ta-IPAA and tabd-IPAA in people with Ulcerative Colitis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, run by Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel unclassified (IBDu) are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) involving the colon and rectum. It is a chronic disease occurring in young people with a high burden on social and professional life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
What is being tested?
ta-IPAA and tabd-IPAA
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with UC or IBD-U refractory to medical therapy or with dysplasia
  • Patients undergoing a 1-, 2-stage, 3-stage approach
  • Between 18 years old and 60 years old.
  • Speak English and/or primary language of recruiting center.
  • Provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP);
  • Patients with contraindications for laparoscopic surgery including previous laparotomy, toxic megacolon and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Gold III or higher;
  • Patients still taking steroids at the time of proctectomy and IPAA construction. A wash-out period of 8 weeks will be considered for all treatments before performing the pouch construction.
  • Patients with confirmed or suspected colorectal cancer;
  • Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
  • Patients needing a hand-sewn anastomosis;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Redo-pouch surgery
  • Pregnancy and lactation (tested by a urinary pregnancy test)
  • Patients undergoing an urgent or emergent proctocolectomy. Those patients are still eligible if they undergo a subtotal colectomy first and a completion proctectomy in a second stage.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X5

    Anthony de Buck, MD, MSc, 4165864800 ext. 6600, anthony.debuck@sinaihealth.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Functional Outcomes of Transanal Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Compared to Laparoscopic or Open Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: a Multi-Center, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Non-Inferiority Trial

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel unclassified (IBDu) are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) involving the colon and rectum. It is a chronic disease occurring in young people with a high burden on social and professional life. Although treated medically by immunomodulatory drugs, about 15 - 20% of UC patients will need an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). In primary cases, this procedure is usually performed laparoscopically (further called transabdominal IPAA or tabd-IPAA). More recently even less invasive surgical techniques have emerged, using a trans-anal access, facilitating dissection of the distal rectum. Although transanal access is associated with a good postoperative outcome profile, there is very limited data on functional outcome in patients with a trans-anal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery (ta-IPAA).

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine if functional outcome following ta-IPAA is the same as or better than postoperative function after tabd-IPAA with UC and IBDu.

Read more

Study design: The FUNCTIon trial is a non-inferiority randomized, controlled trial that will involve 3 hospitals across North-America and Europe.

Patient population: All patients with UC and IBDu eligible for pelvic pouch procedure will be randomized to either ta-IPAA or tabd-IPAA. Prior to the start of the study REB will be obtained at all centres and informed consent will be obtained from all patients. The inclusion criteria for the study are: patients between 18 and 60 years old with UC or IBD unclassified (IBDu) eligible for surgery. They will need to speak either English or the primary language of the center they are treated at. The exclusion criteria for the study are: contraindication for laparoscopy, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), colorectal cancer, presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), a hand-sewn ileo-anal anastomosis, immunomodulating therapy including steroids, pregnancy and lactating, urgent indication.

Intervention: ta-IPAA or tabd-IPAA. Outcomes: Primary outcome is the functional outcome at one year after pelvic pouch surgery. This will be measured using the validated Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are functional outcome at 3 and 6 months, male and female sexual function, perioperative measures and clinical measures.

Sample Size: A sample of 48 (24 per group) is required to detect a between-group non-inferiority margin of 7.05 in COREFO score with a 1-sided α of 0.05 and a power of 80%, allowing for 20% attrition. A participation rate of 50% is anticipated.

Analysis: All continuous variable outcomes will be compared using analysis of covariance. Categorical variable outcomes will be analyzed using repeated measures logistic regression. Proportional outcomes will be analyzed with the chi-square or Fisher's exact test and continuous variables will be analyzed with student's t-test.

Follow-up: Each participant will be followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention to assess functional scores and clinical events. Perioperative events (including postoperative complications) will be assessed during the intervention hospitalization period.

Being tested
ta-IPAA, tabd-IPAA
Keywords
transanal surgery, pouch function
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ta-IPAAProcedure or surgery

    A trans-anal port (gelpoint path, Applied Medical®) will be used for transanal acces and pneumopelvis will be created. The initial purse string is to be placed approximately 3cm above the dentate line, followed by a rectotomy. The perirectal dissection is then continued and should be pursued for at least 5cm. More proximal dissection can be done by transabdominal access. After completion of the proctectomy, a double purse string anastomosis is performed after creation of the J-pouch. A defunctioning loop ileostomy can be placed according to surgeon's preference.

  • tabd-IPAAProcedure or surgery

    Patients in the control group will undergo a rectal dissection by laparotomy, Pfannenstiel incision, (hand-assisted) laparoscopy, single port laparoscopy or robotic surgery, but performed from the abdominal side (tabd-IPAA). Dissection will be performed down to the pelvic floor and include the distal rectum. It is anticipated that most dissection will occur using the TME plane, however, close rectal dissection is also acceptable. Transection of the distal rectum approximately 2 cm above the dentate line will be performed using a linear stapler of the surgeon's choice. After placing the anvil in the J-pouch, a circular stapler will be introduced through the sphincter and a circular anastomosis will be performed. A defunctioning loop ileostomy can be placed according at the surgeon's discretion.

Study groups in NCT04722757
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
transanal IPAAExperimentalIn the experimental arm, patients will undergo transanal dissection of the distal part of the rectum. After proctectomy, an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) will be created. A Gelpoint Path will be used to create access through the anus. Postoperative care will occur following the hospital specific protocols.
Receives: Procedure: ta-IPAA
transabdominal IPAAActive comparatorIn the control group, proctectomy will occur through abdominal dissection (laparoscopy, single port laparoscopy, robotic or open). Postoperative care will occur following the hospital specific protocols.
Receives: Procedure: tabd-IPAA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pouch function

    The primary outcome measure is the difference in functional outcome between the ta-IPAA and tabd-IPAA, measured by the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire at 12 months after pouch surgery. Since this is a non-inferiority study, the hypothesis is that functional outcome 12 months after ta-IPAA is not worse than after tabd-IPAA. COREFO is a validated functional score used to assess colorectal function, divided in 5 domains (Incontinence, social impact, frequency, stool related aspects and need for medication) with a total of 27 questions and a result expressed between 0 and 100, increasing with a worse function.

    Measured: 12 months after pouch construction or stoma closure

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Pouch function

    Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO). The score ranges between 0 and 100, increasing with a worse function

    Measured: 3 and 6 months after pouch construction or stoma closure

  2. Anastomotic Leak Rate

    Diagnostic assessment will occur by either a contrast enema or CT with both intravenous contrast and anal contrast enema in patients in which leaks are clinically suspected. In defunctioned pouches, a contrast enema will be performed before stoma closure. This will be organized at 6 weeks.

    Measured: 6 weeks after pouch construction

  3. Postoperative Morbidity

    Thirty-day morbidity of the index surgery will be reported and expressed using the Dindo-Clavien classification. The main advantage of this scoring system is that it takes all complications into account instead of considering only the most severe complication.

    Measured: 30 days after pouch construction

  4. Readmission

    Readmission to hospital

    Measured: 30-day after pouch construction

  5. Patient's Quality of Life

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health (PROMIS GLOBAL-10)

    Measured: 3,6 and 12 months after pouch construction

  6. Sexual function

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sexual Function and Satisfaction (PROMIS-SexFS)

    Measured: 3,6 and 12 months after pouch construction

  7. Urinary Function

    International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). The score ranges between 1 and 35, increasing with a worse symptom (Mild: 1-7, Moderate: 8-19, Severe: 20-35)

    Measured: 3,6 and 12 months after pouch construction

  8. Fecal Incontinence

    Wexner incontinence score. The score ranges between 0 and 20, where 0 is perfect continence and 20 is complete incontinence.

    Measured: 3,6 and 12 months after pouch construction

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jan 2021
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The FUNCTIon trial is designed as a multicenter, open-label, 2-arm parallel-group, non-inferiority randomized multicenter international trial. Randomization will be stratified by center, with permuted blocks and balanced allocation (1:1). Neither participants nor treating physicians will be blinded to treatment allocation.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04722757
Sponsor's protocol ID
20-0260-A
Acronym
FUNCTIon
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
20 Jan 2021
Last updated
6 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ta-IPAA and tabd-IPAA in people with Ulcerative Colitis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, run by Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Anthony de Buck, MD, MSc (4165864800 ext. 6600, anthony.debuck@sinaihealth.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pouch function (time frame: 12 months after pouch construction or stoma closure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in