AzTrials
AzTrials

Vital SignsMAKERNCT04725747

Exploring Sedation Types During Cataract Surgery

An observational study of Vital Signs, run by Vance Thompson Vision at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is designed to explore the sedative and analgesic effectiveness of the Midazolam/Ketamine melt compared to IV sedation in subjects undergoing intraocular surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Vital Signs
What is being tested?
Midazolam/Ketamine HCl 3mg-50mg sublingual and Intravenous Sedatives with or Without Analgesia
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
1,111 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
25 Jan 2021to 30 Jun 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects requiring cataract removal

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects must be male or female, and between the ages of 55-80 years old.
  • Subjects willing and able to sign the informed consent and capable of committing to the duration of the study.
  • Subjects undergoing uncomplicated stand-alone cataract surgery without planned use of Omidria or intra-operative lidocaine.
  • Subjects that are willing to have an IV placed prior to intraocular surgery
  • Subjects undergoing first eye cataract surgery
  • Subjects that in the opinion of the investigator can tolerate 1 dose of MK 3/50 Melt.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who have undergone sedation in the past 90 days.
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating at the time of the study.
  • Subjects who do not wish to or cannot comply with study procedures.
  • Subject with any cognitive impairment (i.e: Alzheimer's, dementia, etc.) that in the opinion of the investigator may confound the study results.
  • Subjects with history of substance abuse.
  • Subjects that are currently taking a prescription pain medication.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Subjects that are not willing to abstain from all over-the-counter pain medication with the exception of 500-1000mg acetaminophen for 24 hours prior to surgery.
  • Subjects that are not willing to abstain from NSAID or steroid eye drops prior to surgery.
  • Subjects with planned use of femtosecond laser, zepto, iris hooks or a malyugin ring during cataract surgery.
  • Subjects with chronic pain rated moderate to severe within the past week.
  • Subjects that have a psychiatric disorder that is currently uncontrolled.
  • Subjects scheduled for same day bilateral or second eye cataract surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Vance Thompson Vision Clinic

    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108

  • Vance Thompson Vision

    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Retrospective Study Exploring Midazolam/Ketamine Melt vs IV Sedation in Subjects Undergoing Intraocular Surgery

This study is designed to explore the sedative and analgesic effectiveness of the Midazolam/Ketamine melt compared to IV sedation in subjects undergoing intraocular surgery.

Read the detailed description

Cataract surgery today is a highly effective and efficient procedure, with average times for completion ranging around 15 minutes in duration. Patients undergoing cataract surgery are typically given sedatives and often times pain medication (e.g. opioids) just prior to and during the procedure. The overwhelming majority of patients are given these medications via intravenous administration. The insertion of an IV line has been associated with patient complaints of pain and bruising, and can increase the administrative burden on the clinical staff. In addition to the national crisis surrounding opioid abuse, opioids have many negative side effects during cataract surgery such as respiratory depression, dizziness, nausea, and post- operative vomiting.

To reduce the side effects, improve patient satisfaction, and help surgical center flow the Midazolam/Ketamine melt (MK Melt) has been suggested as an alternative to provide sedation and analgesia in subjects undergoing minor outpatient surgery, such as cataract surgery. The addition of ketamine should provide enough analgesia for the mild discomfort reported during cataract surgery. This study is intended to evaluate the MK Melt and its ability to provide an adequate level of both sedation and intraoperative pain control vs an active control.

Conditions
Vital Signs
Being tested
Midazolam/Ketamine HCl 3mg-50mg sublingual, Intravenous Sedatives with or Without Analgesia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Midazolam/Ketamine HCl 3mg-50mg sublingualDrug

    Single sublingual administration of Midazolam/Ketamine HCl 3mg-50mg sublingually prior to surgery

  • Intravenous Sedatives with or Without AnalgesiaDrug

    Also called IV Sedation

    Standard of Care

Study groups in NCT04725747
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cataract SurgeryIndividuals undergoing cataract surgical intervention
Receives: Drug: Midazolam/Ketamine HCl 3mg-50mg sublingual; Drug: Intravenous Sedatives with or Without Analgesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Level of Sedation

    The Doctor/Nurse Anesthetist will evaluate the subject's level of sedation on the

    Ramsey Sedation Scale. Adequate sedation demonstrated by a score of 2 or higher on the Ramsey Scale:

    • Upon entering operative room (before being prepped and draped)
    • Immediately post-op upon entering the PACU

    The Ramsey scale is:

    1. Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both
    2. Patient is co-operative, oriented, and tranquil
    3. Patient responds to commands only
    4. Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
    5. Patient exhibits a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
    6. Patient exhibits no response

    Source: Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxolone-alphadalone. BMJ. 1974;2:656-659.

    Measured: Duration of surgery

  2. Level of Pain

    Adequate pain control demonstrated by a score of 3 or below on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) by asking the following questions at the following times:

    1. "How painful was that on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=extreme pain?" will be asked:
    • Upon insertion of the speculum
    • Upon first incision
    • Upon insertion of phacoemulsification probe
    • Upon Lens insertion
    • Upon removal of sterile drape
    1. "How would you rate your worst pain during surgery on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=extreme pain?" will be asked:
    • Immediately after surgery in the OR
    • 10-15 mins after the subject reaches the PACU
    1. "On a scale of 0=no pain to 10=extreme pain what number best describes your overall pain during the surgery?" Will be asked:
    • Immediately after surgery in the OR
    • 10-15 mins after the subject reaches the PACU

    Measured: Duration of surgery

  3. Need for Rescue Medication

    Percentage of patients requiring rescue medication (IV Fentanyl) for pain. Rescue medication will only be giving if a subject reports a pain level of 4 or higher on the NPRS.

    Measured: Duration of surgery

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Eye Movement During Surgery

    Eye movement during surgery (evaluated by a masked evaluator by reviewing operative recording).

    Measured: Duration of surgery

  2. Clinician's Global Impression

    Clinician's impression of patient's sedation during surgery

    Measured: Duration of surgery

  3. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfactions, determined by asking the patient "How satisfied were you with your overall experience?" at the one-day post-op or via phone call one-day post-op.

    Measured: 1 day post operatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2021
  2. Study start25 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion30 May 2021
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
1,111 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04725747
Sponsor's protocol ID
MAKER
Acronym
MAKER
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
19 Jan 2021
Last updated
4 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vital Signs, run by Vance Thompson Vision at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Level of Sedation (time frame: Duration of surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in