EpilepsyNCT04727892
Complications After Epilepsy Surgery
An observational study of Epilepsy and Surgery--Complications, run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University.
Trial summary
Epilepsy surgery is effective for refractory epilepsy, particularly focal epilepsy, but is still underutilized worldwide. In the United States, the annual percentage of surgical procedures for refractory epilepsy was low (range: 0.35%-0.63%) from 2003 to 2012. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Epilepsy, Surgery--Complications
- What is being tested?
- epilepsy surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 2,026 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2003to 1 May 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: This is a large-scale retrospective study of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery performed by a single neurosurgeon, Dr. Zhang, at the single epilepsy centre from.
Who may be able to join
- (i) medically refractory epilepsy defined by the International League Against Epilepsyc; (ii) epilepsy surgery performed by a single neurosurgeon, Dr. H.Z.; (iii) surgical procedure performed via craniotomy.
Who cannot join
- Patients with neuromodulation therapy were excluded in this study.
About this study
Official title: Severity Grading, Risk Factors and Prediction Model of Complications After Epilepsy Surgery: a Single-center, Large-scale and Retrospective Study
Epilepsy surgery is effective for refractory epilepsy, particularly focal epilepsy, but is still underutilized worldwide. In the United States, the annual percentage of surgical procedures for refractory epilepsy was low (range: 0.35%-0.63%) from 2003 to 2012. Fear associated with the risks of invasive procedures may be the reason for the cautious attitude towards epilepsy surgery. Therefore, the risks of epilepsy surgery in the modern age need to be evaluated thoroughly and precisely to improve epilepsy surgery outcomes.
The safety of epilepsy surgery has been confirmed in several studies. Studies on this topic with large sample sizes (> 500 patients) were either multicenter or covered a long study period. In addition, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not used in the early stage in these studies. Differences in medical environment among epilepsy centers and advancements in presurgical evaluations and surgical techniques over time may have caused heterogeneity and biases, thereby limiting the quality of these studies. Over the past two decades, there was no large-scale studies on post-epilepsy surgery complications performed at a single center. Moreover, surgery-related complications are seldom graded according to severity. Especially, the risk factors for these complications remain unclear.
Read the detailed description
Epilepsy, involving a persistent predisposition to seizure, is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders, affecting more than 65million people worldwide. Epilepsy not only negatively impacts patients'education, employment, and social contact, but also imposes a serious burden on patients'families and on society. Notably, epilepsy is the second most burdensome neurological disorder, accounting for 0.7% of disability-adjusted life years worldwide, according to the World Health Organization's 2010 Global Burden of Disease study, making it a global public health issue.
Furthermore, about 40% of patients respond poorly to the first 2 antiepileptic drugs and have medically refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy surgery is effective for refractory epilepsy, particularly focal epilepsy, but is still underutilized worldwide. In the United States, the annual percentage of surgical procedures for refractory epilepsy was low (range: 0.35%-0.63%) from 2003 to 2012. Moreover, the number of surgical procedures for mesial temporal sclerosis (the most common type of refractory epilepsy) declined by more than half from 2006 to 2010. Fear associated with the risks of invasive procedures may be the reason for the cautious attitude towards epilepsy surgery. Therefore, the risks of epilepsy surgery in the modern age need to be evaluated thoroughly and precisely to improve epilepsy surgery outcomes.
The safety of epilepsy surgery has been confirmed in several studies. From 1980 to 2012, neurological deficits following epilepsy surgery decreased with time, from 41.8% to 5.2% in temporal resections and from 30.2% to 19.5% in extratemporal resections. However, studies on this topic with large sample sizes (> 500 patients) were either multicenter or covered a long study period. In addition, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not used in the early stage in these studies. Differences in medical environment among epilepsy centers and advancements in presurgical evaluations and surgical techniques over time may have caused heterogeneity and biases, thereby limiting the quality of these studies. Over the past two decades, there was no large-scale studies on post-epilepsy surgery complications performed at a single center. Moreover, surgery-related complications are seldom graded according to severity. Especially, the risk factors for these complications remain unclear.
Understanding the incidence and severity of complications after epilepsy surgery and the associated risk factors is beneficial, allowing physicians to provide patients with adequate surgical advice, and allowing patients to make rational decisions regarding epilepsy surgery. Furthermore, this information may help in the prevention of postoperative complications and improve our understanding of the procedures. Therefore, we reported the incidence of complications occurring in a three-month period after epilepsy surgery performed by the single neurosurgeon at the single center, identified the associated risk factors, and developed a nomogram for individually predicting the probability of complications.
- Conditions
- Epilepsy, Surgery--Complications
- Being tested
- epilepsy surgery
- Keywords
- epilepsy surgery, complication, prediction
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
epilepsy surgeryProcedure or surgery
Surgical procedures were individually designed according to the presurgical evaluation findings. Standard epilepsy surgery procedures were applied. Generally, surgical procedures were divided into curative and palliative surgery. Curative surgery included resection and disconnection of the epileptogenic zone. Palliative surgery included corpus callosotomy for bilateral synchronous onset and multiple subpial transections for epileptic foci located in the eloquent cortex. For widespread epileptogenic zones, multiple surgical techniques were combined.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| complications after epilepsy surgery | Group A with no complication; Group B with complications Receives: Procedure: epilepsy surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complications
Complications included neurologic deficit, cerebral edema, intracranial hemorrhage, infection, hydrocephalus, subdural effusion, subcutaneous cerebrospinal fluid accumulation, and poor wound healing. Neurologic deficit was classified as either transient (resolving within 3 months) or persistent (lasting more than 3 months) Complication severity was categorized into four grades based on the therapeutic regimen: grade I, minor complications, conservative treatment; grade II, major complications; grade III, life-threatening complications requiring invasive treatment under general anesthesia or monitoring in the intensive care unit; grade IV, death.
Measured: in the 3-month period after epilepsy surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Predictors of complications.
Potential factors included the preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative clinical characteristics, such as sex, age at surgery, duration of seizure, previous medical history, pathology, serial number of surgery, invasive electrode implantation, type of surgical procedure, surgery duration, intra-operative blood loss, and acute postoperative seizure.
Risk factors for complications were determined by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Variables with P< .10 were selected as a potential risk factors and included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The forward stepwise method was used to select the variables that were eventually included in the model. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
Measured: in the 3-month period after epilepsy surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2021
- Study start1 Oct 2003
- Primary completion30 Apr 2019
- Study completion1 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for EpilepsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 2,026 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhang Hua, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
- Investigators
- Hua Zhang, PhD, Study chair, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04727892
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XJTU1AF2020LSK-167
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Partial participant data are to be shared with other researchers
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Severity Grading, Risk Factors and Prediction Model of Complications After Epilepsy Surgery: a Single-center, Large-scale and Retrospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04727892
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- XJTU1AF2020LSK-167
- Conditions
- Epilepsy, Surgery--Complications
- Keywords
- epilepsy surgery, complication, prediction
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,026 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2003 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Epilepsy surgery is effective for refractory epilepsy, particularly focal epilepsy, but is still underutilized worldwide. In the United States, the annual percentage of surgical procedures for refractory epilepsy was low (range: 0.35%-0.63%) from 2003 to 2012. Fear associated with the risks of invasive procedures may be the reason for the cautious attitude towards epilepsy surgery. Therefore, the risks of epilepsy surgery in the modern age need to be evaluated thoroughly and precisely to improve epilepsy surgery outcomes.
The safety of epilepsy surgery has been confirmed in several studies. Studies on this topic with large sample sizes (> 500 patients) were either multicenter or covered a long study period. In addition, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not used in the early stage in these studies. Differences in medical environment among epilepsy centers and advancements in presurgical evaluations and surgical techniques over time may have caused heterogeneity and biases, thereby limiting the quality of these studies. Over the past two decades, there was no large-scale studies on post-epilepsy surgery complications performed at a single center. Moreover, surgery-related complications are seldom graded according to severity. Especially, the risk factors for these complications remain unclear.
Detailed description
Epilepsy, involving a persistent predisposition to seizure, is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders, affecting more than 65million people worldwide. Epilepsy not only negatively impacts patients'education, employment, and social contact, but also imposes a serious burden on patients'families and on society. Notably, epilepsy is the second most burdensome neurological disorder, accounting for 0.7% of disability-adjusted life years worldwide, according to the World Health Organization's 2010 Global Burden of Disease study, making it a global public health issue.
Furthermore, about 40% of patients respond poorly to the first 2 antiepileptic drugs and have medically refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy surgery is effective for refractory epilepsy, particularly focal epilepsy, but is still underutilized worldwide. In the United States, the annual percentage of surgical procedures for refractory epilepsy was low (range: 0.35%-0.63%) from 2003 to 2012. Moreover, the number of surgical procedures for mesial temporal sclerosis (the most common type of refractory epilepsy) declined by more than half from 2006 to 2010. Fear associated with the risks of invasive procedures may be the reason for the cautious attitude towards epilepsy surgery. Therefore, the risks of epilepsy surgery in the modern age need to be evaluated thoroughly and precisely to improve epilepsy surgery outcomes.
The safety of epilepsy surgery has been confirmed in several studies. From 1980 to 2012, neurological deficits following epilepsy surgery decreased with time, from 41.8% to 5.2% in temporal resections and from 30.2% to 19.5% in extratemporal resections. However, studies on this topic with large sample sizes (> 500 patients) were either multicenter or covered a long study period. In addition, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not used in the early stage in these studies. Differences in medical environment among epilepsy centers and advancements in presurgical evaluations and surgical techniques over time may have caused heterogeneity and biases, thereby limiting the quality of these studies. Over the past two decades, there was no large-scale studies on post-epilepsy surgery complications performed at a single center. Moreover, surgery-related complications are seldom graded according to severity. Especially, the risk factors for these complications remain unclear.
Understanding the incidence and severity of complications after epilepsy surgery and the associated risk factors is beneficial, allowing physicians to provide patients with adequate surgical advice, and allowing patients to make rational decisions regarding epilepsy surgery. Furthermore, this information may help in the prevention of postoperative complications and improve our understanding of the procedures. Therefore, we reported the incidence of complications occurring in a three-month period after epilepsy surgery performed by the single neurosurgeon at the single center, identified the associated risk factors, and developed a nomogram for individually predicting the probability of complications.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| complications after epilepsy surgery | – | Procedure: epilepsy surgeryGroup A with no complication; Group B with complications |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This is a large-scale retrospective study of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery performed by a single neurosurgeon, Dr. Zhang, at the single epilepsy centre from.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- (i) medically refractory epilepsy defined by the International League Against Epilepsyc; (ii) epilepsy surgery performed by a single neurosurgeon, Dr. H.Z.; (iii) surgical procedure performed via craniotomy.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with neuromodulation therapy were excluded in this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| epilepsy surgerySurgical procedures were individually designed according to the presurgical evaluation findings. Standard epilepsy surgery procedures were applied. Generally, surgical procedures were divided into curative and palliative surgery. Curative surgery included resection and disconnection of the epileptogenic zone. Palliative surgery included corpus callosotomy for bilateral synchronous onset and multiple subpial transections for epileptic foci located in the eloquent cortex. For widespread epileptogenic zones, multiple surgical techniques were combined. | Procedure or surgery | complications after epilepsy surgery |
Primary outcome
Complications
Time frame: in the 3-month period after epilepsy surgery
Complications included neurologic deficit, cerebral edema, intracranial hemorrhage, infection, hydrocephalus, subdural effusion, subcutaneous cerebrospinal fluid accumulation, and poor wound healing. Neurologic deficit was classified as either transient (resolving within 3 months) or persistent (lasting more than 3 months) Complication severity was categorized into four grades based on the therapeutic regimen: grade I, minor complications, conservative treatment; grade II, major complications; grade III, life-threatening complications requiring invasive treatment under general anesthesia or monitoring in the intensive care unit; grade IV, death.
1 secondary outcome
Predictors of complications.
Time frame: in the 3-month period after epilepsy surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Partial participant data are to be shared with other researchers
Related trials for Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitation
An Examination of Cognitive and Sensorimotor Processes in Patients With Epilepsy
Epilepsy
RecruitingObservational study
Surgery as a Treatment for Medically Intractable Epilepsy
Epilepsy, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe
RecruitingObservational study
Tumor Related Epilepsy
Epilepsy, Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Epilepsy: Screening and Evaluation
Seizures, Epilepsy
Recruiting
Optimizing Brain Stimulation Parameters
Epilepsy; Seizure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hua Zhang, PhD study chair
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Epilepsy and Surgery--Complications, run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complications (time frame: in the 3-month period after epilepsy surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.