AzTrials
AzTrials

Aircraft AccidentNCT04728373

An Analysis of Air-Crash Injury Patterns Presenting at a Level 1 Trauma Unit in Johannesburg, a Retrospective Cohort Study.

An observational study of Aircraft Accident, run by Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aviation related deaths are often fatal, with most patients dying at the scene; however, with increased safety and improvement in medical management, patients are surviving aviation accidents. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Aircraft Accident
What is being tested?
surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
56 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2011to Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: all aircraft accidents victims

Who may be able to join

  • all patients involved in aircraft accidents presenting to the hospital

Who cannot join

  • patients who died on scene

About this study

Aviation related deaths are often fatal, with most patients dying at the scene; however, with increased safety and improvement in medical management, patients are surviving aviation accidents. Among the aviation-related deaths reported between 1980 and 1990, polytrauma was listed as the immediate cause of death in 42% of fatalities, followed by head injuries (22%), internal organ injuries of the thorax, abdomen, pelvis (12%), burns (4%), and drowning (3%) .

Analysis and interpretation of aviation-pattern injuries may provide healthcare facilities with planning information on the spectrum of possible injuries that may be expected, and, furthermore, tools for a protocol and guidelines on the comprehensive and complete management of such patients.

The aim of the study was to describe the injury patterns, and mortality rate resulting from air crashes presenting at a level 1 trauma centre in Johannesburg, South Africa

Read the detailed description

In the twenty-first century, transportation disasters and subsequent injuries are on the rise, in particular air travel, and, thus, contributing significantly to the morbidity and mortality of this millennium. However, information regarding injuries sustained by air crash survivors is lacking. As the number of commercial and non-commercial flights are increasing, health care facilities are faced with a rise in the number of patients with air crash injuries. Consequently, management guidelines must be formulated for the treatment of patients with these air crash injuries.

According to the South African Civil Aviation authority, 565 aviation accidents and incidents were reported from 2011 to 2019. The injuries and outcomes of patients involved in these accidents are unknown. There is little data to describe injury patterns and outcomes of patients in aviation accidents within our setting. Consequently, to find data on the frequency distribution of aviation injury patterns in hospitalized patients, one must use other data sources Injury patterns from several aircraft disasters have been previously described. Some authors have described injury patterns and fatalities from aviation accidents based on their patients and aircraft data. Friedman et al. described that when a plane impacts with the ground, the landing gear of an aircraft may be retracted, resulting in energy being directly transmitted from the aircraft to the passengers, through the body of the aircraft from the bottom going upwards along the axial skeleton causing vertebral column injuries that are coming with air crash patients. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that such survivors of crashes be transferred to an adequately equipped trauma center.

In 2009, Baker et al. aimed to explore the configurations of aviation-related injuries in hospitals in the United States of America (USA) whilst comparing them to the aviation deaths over the same time frame (2000 - 2005). This revealed just over 4500 aviation-related (87% non-commercial aircraft, and 7% commercial aircraft) deaths occurred in the USA - an average of 753 per year, with one death for every 1.3 hospitalizations. This represents the largest number of patients reported to date. Lower limb fractures/injuries were the most common sustained injuries, followed by head injuries, various open soft tissue wounds, upper extremity fractures/injuries, and lastly internal organ injuries. Head injuries were the cause of most fatalities. This study's case-fatality showed that 39% were due to vascular injuries, 13% due to burns, followed by 8% from head injuries.

Rautji et al. discussed the injury pattern examined in the post-mortem findings in eight occupants of a light executive jet aircraft crash. One body was severely burnt, but the other seven were intact. On serum blood toxicology, it was established that there was no carboxyhemoglobin present. Therefore, all burns were sustained post-mortem; concluding that the cause of death in all these cases was polytrauma. This evaluation found that the most commonly occurring fractures were ribs (72.3%), skull (55.1%), facial bones (49.4%), tibia (37.9%), and pelvis (36%) [9]. The common organ injuries were liver (48.1%), lung (37.6%), heart (35.6%), spleen (30.1%), and hemorrhagic cerebral and pulmonary injuries being 33.3% and 32.9%, respectively. Once again, injuries of sudden deceleration transmitted in a vertical fashion were also described, resulting in vertebral column injuries and extensive visceral damage.

A report discussed by Afshar et al. illustrated that up to 85% of injuries of survivors of a Boeing 727 flight were extremity injuries (particularly lower limb injuries), followed by vertebral column injuries at various levels, and a minority sustained internal organ injuries . Similarly, Rowles et al. (1990) concluded that most M1 Kegworth air crash injuries were orthopedic in nature, approximately 85%, and 3.8% were general surgical procedures (laparotomies, thoracotomies, vascular repair, and a tracheostomy).

Aviation related deaths are often fatal, with most patients dying at the scene; however, with increased safety and improvement in medical management, patients are surviving aviation accidents. Among the aviation-related deaths reported between 1980 and 1990, polytrauma was listed as the immediate cause of death in 42% of fatalities, followed by head injuries (22%), internal organ injuries of the thorax, abdomen, pelvis (12%), burns (4%), and drowning (3%) .

Analysis and interpretation of aviation-pattern injuries may provide healthcare facilities with planning information on the spectrum of possible injuries that may be expected, and, furthermore, tools for a protocol and guidelines on the comprehensive and complete management of such patients.

Aim of the study was to describe the injury patterns, and mortality rate resulting from air crashes presenting at a level 1 trauma centre in Johannesburg, South Africa

Being tested
surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • surgeryProcedure or surgery

    the need for surgery after aircraft accidents

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. An Analysis of Air-Crash Injury Patterns Presenting at a Level 1 Trauma Unit

    An Analysis of Air-Crash Injury Patterns Presenting at a Level 1 Trauma Unit in Johannesburg, a retrospective cohort study

    Measured: 8 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. An Analysis of Air-Crash Injury Patterns Presenting at a Level 1 Trauma Unit in Johannesburg, a retrospective cohort study

    28 day in-hospital mortality post aircraft accidents

    Measured: 8 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2021
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2019
  4. Study completionDec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04728373
Sponsor's protocol ID
M180463
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
23 Jan 2021
Last updated
2 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: protocol, study report, and statistical analysis

Publications

  • Friedman A, Floman Y, Sabatto S, Safran O, Mosheiff R. Light aircraft crash--a case analysis of injuries. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 May;4(5):337-9.

    PubMed 12040820
  • Lundin T. Transportation disasters--a review. J Trauma Stress. 1995 Jul;8(3):381-9. doi: 10.1002/jts.2490080302. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7582604

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aircraft Accident, run by Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

An Analysis of Air-Crash Injury Patterns Presenting at a Level 1 Trauma Unit (time frame: 8 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04728373, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in