AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical SyndromeNCT04729270

Treatment of Neck Pain With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

A study testing Physiotherapy treatment with physium device. and Conventional physiotherapy treatment. in people with Cervical Syndrome, run by University of Cadiz at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aim to investigate the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for improving pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), range of motion,Neck Disability Index, the multidimensional health related quality of life (SF-12) and the multidimensional health related quality of life and pain in patients with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Syndrome
What is being tested?
Physiotherapy treatment with physium device. and Conventional physiotherapy treatment.
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
6 Feb 2023to 20 Nov 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients of both sexes,
  • Aged between 18 and 60 years, in an
  • Active state of pain and diagnosed with a month of evolution.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are pregnant, have pacemaker and those Surgically operated cervical spine - Patients who have been treated with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation a month earlier.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Policlínica Santa María

    Cadiz, Cádiz, 11007

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Treatment of Neck Pain With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aim to investigate the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for improving pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), range of motion,Neck Disability Index, the multidimensional health related quality of life (SF-12) and the multidimensional health related quality of life and pain in patients with mechanical neck pain (NP).

Read the detailed description

Fifty-four participants with NP will randomly allocated to either an Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ten sessions) or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) (ten sessions) during two weeks. . Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index ( NDI), range of motion and (CROM), Questionnaire SF-12 and PPTs in sub-occipital and upper trapezius muscles were measured at baseline, at the end of treatment and at 1 month follow-up. T-tests and a repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (RM-MANOVA) were used for VAS, CROM and PPTs, respectively.

Being tested
Physiotherapy treatment with physium device., Conventional physiotherapy treatment.
Keywords
Neck Pain, Physical Therapy Modalities, Manual Therapy, massage, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Medical subject headings
Neck Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Physiotherapy treatment with physium device.Procedure or surgery

    The intervention for this group consisted of 10 sessions with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for a month.

  • Conventional physiotherapy treatment.Procedure or surgery

    The intervention for this group consisted of 10 sessions with Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for a month.

Study groups in NCT04729270
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EXPERIMENTAL GROUPExperimentalThe intervention for this group consisted of 10 sessions with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for a month.
Receives: Procedure: Physiotherapy treatment with physium device.
CONTROL GROUPExperimentalThe intervention for this group consisted of 10 sessions with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for a month.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional physiotherapy treatment.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The intensity of cervical pain

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of cervical pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the cervical area.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The intensity of cervical pain

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of cervical pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the cervical area.

    Measured: Four weeks

  2. The intensity of cervical pain

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of cervical pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the cervical area.

    Measured: Twelve weeks

  3. Active cervical range of motion

    Measured by goniometer type crom

    Measured: Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.

  4. Pressure pain thresholds in cervical trigger points

    Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) will be measured with a pressure algometer (Baseline,

    Measured: Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.

  5. Neck Disability Index (NDI).

    Questionnaire Neck Disability Index (NDI).

    Measured: Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2021
  2. Study start6 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion20 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL WITH BLIND EVALUATION BY THIRD PARTIES, LONGITUDINAL AND PROSPECTIVE.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04729270
Sponsor's protocol ID
tDCS
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
24 Jan 2021
Last updated
17 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Whiteford CM, Steinbeck L, Dommerholt J. On "Clinical Practice Guideline for Physical Therapy Assessment and Treatment in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain," Bier JD, Scholten-Peeters WGM, Staal JB, et al. Phys Ther. 2018;98:162-171. Phys Ther. 2018 Sep 1;98(9):819-820. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy078. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29961845
  • Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Feb;90(2):284-99. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008.

    PubMed 25659245
  • Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017 Aug 14;358:j3221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3221.

    PubMed 28807894
  • Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.

    PubMed 28666405
  • Cote P, Yu H, Shearer HM, Randhawa K, Wong JJ, Mior S, Ameis A, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Varatharajan S, Sutton D, Southerst D, Jacobs C, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A, Gross DP, Brison RJ, Paulden M, Ammendolia C, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Marshall S, Bohay RN, Stapleton J, Lacerte M. Non-pharmacological management of persistent headaches associated with neck pain: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain. 2019 Jul;23(6):1051-1070. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1374. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

    PubMed 30707486
  • Fitzgibbon BM, Schabrun SM. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Pain Disorders: Challenges and New Frontiers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Oct;106(4):717-719. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1544. Epub 2019 Jul 15. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31309544
  • Yalinay Dikmen P, Yavuz BG, Aydinlar EI. The relationships between migraine, depression, anxiety, stress, and sleep disturbances. Acta Neurol Belg. 2015 Jun;115(2):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s13760-014-0312-0. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

    PubMed 24889393
  • Schwartz DP, Robbins MS. Primary headache disorders and neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations. Eye Brain. 2012 Sep 13;4:49-61. doi: 10.2147/EB.S21841. eCollection 2012.

    PubMed 28539781
  • Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463-92. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0618.

    PubMed 22085959
  • Martelletti P, Jensen RH, Antal A, Arcioni R, Brighina F, de Tommaso M, Franzini A, Fontaine D, Heiland M, Jurgens TP, Leone M, Magis D, Paemeleire K, Palmisani S, Paulus W, May A; European Headache Federation. Neuromodulation of chronic headaches: position statement from the European Headache Federation. J Headache Pain. 2013 Oct 21;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-86.

    PubMed 24144382
  • Charvet LE, Shaw MT, Bikson M, Woods AJ, Knotkova H. Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):686-693. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

    PubMed 32289698
  • Caulfield KA, Badran BW, DeVries WH, Summers PM, Kofmehl E, Li X, Borckardt JJ, Bikson M, George MS. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):961-969. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

    PubMed 32330607
  • DaSilva AF, Truong DQ, DosSantos MF, Toback RL, Datta A, Bikson M. State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control. Front Neuroanat. 2015 Jul 15;9:89. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00089. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26236199
  • Auvichayapat P, Janyacharoen T, Rotenberg A, Tiamkao S, Krisanaprakornkit T, Sinawat S, Punjaruk W, Thinkhamrop B, Auvichayapat N. Migraine prophylaxis by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Aug;95(8):1003-12.

    PubMed 23061303
  • Straudi S, Buja S, Baroni A, Pavarelli C, Pranovi G, Fregni F, Basaglia N. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with group exercise treatment in subjects with chronic low back pain: a pilot randomized control trial. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Oct;32(10):1348-1356. doi: 10.1177/0269215518777881. Epub 2018 May 21.

    PubMed 29783893

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Physiotherapy treatment with physium device. and Conventional physiotherapy treatment. in people with Cervical Syndrome, run by University of Cadiz at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The intensity of cervical pain (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04729270, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in