AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteo Arthritis KneeNCT04730271

Comparison of Alignment Achieved Using the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution Versus Manual Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A study testing Total Knee Replacement in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee and Osteoarthritis, run by DePuy Orthopaedics at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this post-market research study is to gather clinical and radiographic (X-ray) information about total knee replacement surgeries completed with the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution and with standard manual instrumentation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
Total Knee Replacement
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
23 Feb 2021to 6 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is male or female and between the ages of 22 and 85 years at the time of consent, inclusive.
  • Subject has a severely painful and/or severely disabled joint resulting from osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and in the opinion of the Investigator, is a suitable candidate for primary TKA using the devices described in this CIP with either resurfaced or non-resurfaced patellae.
  • Subject that is willing to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and authorize the transfer of his/her information to the Sponsor
  • Subject is currently not permanently bedridden, as determined by the Investigator
  • Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, is able to understand this clinical investigation and is willing and able to perform all study procedures and follow-up visits and co-operate with investigational procedures.
  • Subject is able to read and comprehend the Informed Consent Document as well as complete the required PROs in English.
  • Subject's pre-operative alignment is such that (in the opinion of the Investigator) it is appropriate for it to be adjusted to mechanical long leg alignment during surgery.

Who cannot join

  • The Subject is a woman who is pregnant or lactating.
  • Contralateral knee has already been enrolled in this study.
  • Subject had a contralateral amputation.
  • Previous partial knee replacement (unicompartmental, bicompartamental or patellofemoral joint replacement), patellectomy, high tibial osteotomy or primary TKA in affected knee.
  • Subject has an active local or systemic infection
  • Subject has loss of bone or musculature, osteoporosis, neuromuscular compromise or vascular deficiency in the affected limb in sufficient degree to render the procedure unjustifiable in the opinion of the Investigator (e.g. absence of musculo-ligamentous supporting structures, joint neuropathy)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Subject has severe instability secondary to advanced loss of osteochondral structure or the absence of collateral ligament integrity.
  • Subject has participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product (drug or device) in the last three (3) months.
  • Subject is currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensation claims.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21215

  • OrthoCarolina

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207

  • Cuyuna Regional Medical Center

    Crosby, Minnesota, 56441

  • Campbell Clinic

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • Proliance Orthopedic Associates

    Renton, Washington, 98055

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Alignment Achieved Using the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution Versus Manual Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Non-Randomized Multi-Center Post-market Clinical Investigation

The purpose of this post-market research study is to gather clinical and radiographic (X-ray) information about total knee replacement surgeries completed with the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution and with standard manual instrumentation. The VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution helps the surgeon to plan bone cuts and then accurately achieve the planned cuts during the total knee replacement surgery. The study aims to compare how well the VELYS Robotic-Assisted system enables the surgeon to position the implants exactly as planned compared to manual instrumentation.

Being tested
Total Knee Replacement
Keywords
Arthroplasty, Knee, Robotic-Assisted, VELYS, Accuracy
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Total Knee ReplacementDevice

    Subjects will be implanted with an ATTUNE Primary total knee replacement.

Study groups in NCT04730271
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Manual ArmActive comparatorSubjects enrolled into this arm of the study will receive an ATTUNE primary total knee replacement that has been implanted using manual instrumentation which is the current standard of care at the participating sites.
Receives: Device: Total Knee Replacement
Robotic-Assisted ArmExperimentalSubjects enrolled into this arm will receive an ATTUNE primary total knee replacement that has been implanted with the use of the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution device.
Receives: Device: Total Knee Replacement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of the Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKA) Measured on Long-leg X-rays at 12 Weeks.

    The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate whether the accuracy to plan of the long leg alignment achieved with VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution is non-inferior to the accuracy to plan of the long leg alignment achieved with the manual ATTUNE Intuition instrumentation. This will be assessed by measuring the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) on long-leg X-rays taken at 12 weeks and comparing to the planned HKA. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Accuracy of the Distal Femoral Varus-valgus Angle Measured on Long Leg X-rays at 12 Weeks.

    The accuracy of the distal femoral varus-valgus angle was assessed by comparing the angle measured on an X-ray 12 weeks post operatively to the angle that the surgeon was targeting or planning intra operatively. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Accuracy of the Proximal Tibial Varus-valgus Angle Measured on Long-leg X-rays at 12 Weeks

    The accuracy of the proximal tibial varus-valgus angle was assessed by comparing the angle measured on an X-ray 12 weeks post operatively to the angle that the surgeon was targeting or planning intra operatively. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Accuracy of Femoral Component Flexion Angle Measured on Lateral X-rays at 12 Weeks

    The accuracy of the femoral component flexion angle was assessed by comparing the angle measured on a lateral X-ray 12 weeks post operatively to the angle that the surgeon was targeting or planning intra operatively. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Accuracy of the Tibial Slope Angle Measured on Lateral X-rays at 12 Weeks

    The accuracy of the Tibial slope angle was assessed by comparing the angle measured on a lateral X-ray 12 weeks post operatively to the angle that the surgeon was targeting or planning intra operatively. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Type and Frequency of Adverse Events

    Rate of local Adverse events and local serious adverse events reported within the first 90 days and the first year post surgery. Local means at the site of the procedure (i.e. the operated Knee). Serious adverse events are events that required medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious impairment to health.

    Measured: 12 weeks, 1 year

  6. Soft Tissue Damage

    Investigators conducted an intra-operative assessment of the condition and function of key soft tissue structures in both Manual and Robotic-assisted cohorts.

    Measured: Day of operation (intraoperative)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2021
  2. Study start23 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion7 Apr 2023
  4. Study completion6 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04730271
Sponsor's protocol ID
DSJ_2019_08
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
26 Jan 2021
Last updated
27 Apr 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Total Knee Replacement in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee and Osteoarthritis, run by DePuy Orthopaedics at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jul 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of the Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKA) Measured on Long-leg X-rays at 12 Weeks. (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in