AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityNICESTNCT04732013

Noninvasive Chromosomal Screening for Embryo Selection Trial

An observational study of Infertility and Aneuploidy, run by Olive Fertility Centre at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (NI-PGT-A) for embryo selection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Infertility, Aneuploidy
What is being tested?
No clinical intervention is planned; study is observational
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
4 Dec 2020to 4 Dec 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Patients undergoing IVF-ICSI at the Olive Fertility Centre that fit the eligibility criteria.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient undergoing IVF-ICSI at the Olive Fertility Centre
  • 21 - 35 years old at the time of enrolment
  • Elective freeze-all cycle
  • Planning for single embryo transfer

Who cannot join

  • Undergoing PGT-A, PGT-SR, PGT-M
  • History of recurrent pregnancy loss
  • History of recurrent implantation failure
  • Planning on transfer of more than 1 embryo

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Olive Fertility Centre

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6R1L4

    Gary Nakhuda, MD, 6048165534, nicesttrial@olivefertility.com

    Gary Nakhuda, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Nonselection Pilot Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy of Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (NI-PGT-A) for embryo selection.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis:

Analysis of cell free DNA (cfDNA) released from developing embryos into spent culture media (SCM) can serve as a non-invasive method for performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). A non-selection study that compares clinical outcomes to the NI-PGT-A results of the transferred embryos in a blinded fashion will characterize the diagnostic accuracy by determination of positive and negative predictive values

Justification:

During the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, the selection of a healthy embryo is limited by the inability of the microscopic appearance to reveal the chromosomal complement. Thus, in order to reliably select chromosomally normal embryos, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is performed. PGT-A requires biopsy of the embryo, amplification of the DNA, then next generation sequencing (NGS) to determine chromosome copy number.

While the clinical utility of PGT-A has been demonstrated, the process has limitations, the most significant of which is the requirement for embryo biopsy. Typically, 5-10 cells are removed from the TE after the zona pellucida has been breached. While the procedure can be safely and effectively performed by trained embryologists, the obvious concern for damage to the embryo is relevant. Even if implantation successfully occurs, concern has been raised that biopsy of the embryo at this stage can lead to complications such as miscarriage, or issues with placental function later in pregnancy. Furthermore, because the TE is destined to differentiate to placenta rather than the fetus itself, there is controversy regarding if the chromosomal analysis of these cells is always representative of the chromosomal complement of the fetus. For these reasons, and because TE biopsy is laborious and expensive, PGT-A has still not supplanted morphological evaluation as the clinical standard for embryo selection.

An accurate noninvasive method for aneuploidy screening of embryos before implantation would be ideal. To this end, development of noninvasive PGT-A (NI-PGT-A) methods is an area of active investigation. The approach leverages the ability to isolate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) that is secreted from the blastocyst into the spent culture media (SCM). SCM is routinely discarded after the embryo has been removed from culture, however, minute amounts of DNA from the embryo can be isolated, amplified, then sequenced for chromosomal copy number analysis. The obvious advantage is that this process can occur without posing any harm to the embryo. An additional putative benefit of this noninvasive approach is that the DNA is secreted from both the TE and the inner cell mass (ICM), theoretically serving as a more accurate representation of the fetal karyotype than the DNA isolated from just the TE biopsy alone.

Technical limitations of deploying NI-PGT-A are related to the limited quantity of DNA available in the SCM. Unlike other modes of genetic testing where ample amounts of genetic material is readily extracted from blood, amniotic fluid, or tissue biopsy, cell-free DNA secretion from blastocysts is exceptionally minute in quantity. However, laboratory protocols are developing rapidly, evidenced by numerous publications which have already demonstrated a high level of consistency when chromosomal copy number is analyzed by NI-PGT-A and traditional PGT-A in parallel.

While these studies have illustrated proof of concept and preclinical validation, the true diagnostic accuracy can only be assessed by evaluating the predictive value of negative (euploid) and positive (aneuploid) results. Specifically, embryos found to be euploid should have a greater ability for sustained implantation that proceeds to live birth, while aneuploid embryos should have a dramatically lower rate of sustained implantation, or will be predictive of clinical aneuploidy. Without rigorous clinical validation, using these results for embryo selection could lead to misdiagnosis, causing selection of unhealthy embryos, or selection against embryos that could have been potentially viable.

To determine if NI-PGT-A is clinically robust, we propose a non-selection, pilot, study, whereby embryo selection is performed by routine clinical methods (ie, morphological selection). However, after the clinical outcome has manifested, the SCM will be analyzed by a commercially available NI-PGT-A protocols in a blinded fashion. By correlating clinical outcomes to NI-PGT-A results, positive and negative predictive values can be calculated without bias. Because no intervention will be performed that deviates from the clinical routine, no additional risk will be posed to the embryo or parent.

This study will serve as a pilot for a possible future trials. If reasonable predictive value of NI-PGT-A is demonstrated, a prospective, selection study could be justified to investigate the utility of NI-PGT-A in a clinical setting.

Research Design:

Patients will undergo IVF-ICSI per clinical indication, with plans to freeze all embryos for deferred embryo transfer. Embryo culture will follow routine protocols and embryo selection for transfer will be performed using standard morphological criteria. SCM from all blastocysts that appear viable will be collected and shipped to a reference lab (Sequence 46). Specimens will be completely de-identified of patient information and labelled with an accession number. NI-PGT-A analysis will be performed using a commercial kit according to manufacturer's recommendations, with technicians blinded to clinical outcomes. When patients return for the embryo transfer cycle, routine clinical protocol will be followed for endometrial preparation. A single embryo will be selected according to routine morphological grading criteria, and embryo transfer will be performed with standard techniques. Initial pregnancy outcome will be documented with serum hCG testing. If hCG testing is positive, early pregnancy will be confirmed with ultrasound assessment per clinical routine. After all patients have completed treatment and clinical outcomes manifested (failed implantation, miscarriage, or ongoing pregnancy (defined as viability beyond 13 weeks), NI-PGT-A results will be released to the clinical team and correlated to clinical outcomes for calculation of predictive values. All on-going pregnancies will be offered routine prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies.

Additional details regarding laboratory protocols are as follows:

Blastocyst culture Embryo culture will follow routine protocols. On day 3 post-fertilization, embryos will be repeatedly pipetted through a series of culture media droplets in order to lower potential for maternal cell contamination. Embryos will then be individually cultured in 35µL droplets of embryo culture medium to the blastocyst stage. On day 5 or day 6, blastocyst development and quality will be evaluated using standard morphological criteria.

Sample collection and blastocyst vitrification Blastocyst culture medium (20µL) from selected embryos will be collected and transferred to PCR tubes and stored at -20°C until whole genome amplification (WGA). Blastocysts will be frozen via routine vitrification protocol and stored in liquid nitrogen per routine clinical protocol. Specimens will be completely de-identified of patient information and labelled with an accession number prior to shipping to reference lab (Sequence46).

Whole genome amplification and DNA sequencing NI-PGT-A analysis will be performed upon receipt, using a commercial kit according to manufacturer's recommendations, with technicians blinded to clinical outcomes. DNA will be amplified by whole genome amplification (WGA) and barcoded to prepare libraries. The libraries are then loaded onto an Ion Chef instrument for template preparation by automated clonal amplification and then loaded onto a chip for DNA sequencing on an Ion Genestudio S5 Prime system, with approximately 150,000-200,000 sequencing reads per sample. Data is analyzed using the Ion Reporter software (v5.10 or later). Ploidy will be measured using baseline, Ion ReproSeq Low-Coverage Whole-Genome (99M) Baseline. Standard quality control measures will be evaluated. Results will be released to the clinical team 6 weeks post-embryo transfer and correlated to clinical outcomes for calculation of predictive values.

Patient population:

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient undergoing IVF-ICSI 21 - 35 years old at the time of enrollment Elective freeze-all cycle Planning for single embryo transfer

Exclusion Criteria:

Undergoing PGT-A, PGT-SR, PGT-M History of recurrent pregnancy loss History of recurrent implantation failure Planning on transfer of more than 1 embryo

The justification for the age category is to control for age-related factors other than aneuploidy that may influence implantation, so variables that could compound predictive value calculations are minimized. Limiting participation to patients under 35 also optimizes embryo selection such that morphologically normal embryos are most likely healthy. Furthermore, patients in this age category have the lowest risk for clinical aneuploidies such as Down syndrome.

Data management and storage:

Research samples will be identified by a unique accession number, but no patient identifying information. The samples will be processed by Sequence46 with results associated with the accession number. The data will be uploaded via a secure cloud service, which will be accessed by the primary investigator to merge with the electronic case report form (eCRF) that will be stored locally at the Olive Fertility Centre on an encrypted hard drive that will be backed-up on a secondary local drive. The eCRF will contain the patients' unique medical record number and age, but will not document name, birthdate, or any other identifying information. Results of the NI-PGT-A analysis and clinical outcome will also be stored in the eCRF.

Research data will be retained for 5 years after the date of publication.

Statistical analysis:

Diagnostic accuracy will be interpreted in the context of positive and negative predictive values.

A positive result is a finding consistent with aneuploidy or mosaicism. A negative result is a finding consistent with euploidy.

PPV = (Failed implantation + miscarriage + clinical aneuploidy)/ All Positive Results NPV = Ongoing pregnancy / All Negative Results

Sample size calculation:

One hundred-twenty (120) patients should suffice for this pilot study. Previous research has established that in patients aged 35 or younger, the ratio of euploid:aneuploid embryos is approximately 60:40. Of euploid embryos, approximately 70% will implant, of which, 85% should continue to viability. Of aneuploid embryos, approximately 25% will implant, of which >99% will miscarry; the risk of a clinical aneuploidy is less than 0.5% in women 35 and under.

Given these probabilities, of the 120 patients to be enrolled, 72 euploid embryos are expected of which 50 should implant and 43 will continue as ongoing, viable pregnancies. Of the 48 that are expected to be aneuploid, 12 will implant, of which all should miscarry (the chance for a clinical aneuploidy in this population is less than 0.5%).

Recruitment:

Patients who are pursuing IVF-ICSI at the Olive Fertility Centre and meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be recruited directly by the co-investigators. Flyers will be posted within the clinic.

Being tested
No clinical intervention is planned; study is observational
Keywords
IVF, PGT-A, Aneuploidy
Medical subject headings
Infertility, Aneuploidy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No clinical intervention is planned; study is observationalOther

    No intervention

Study groups in NCT04732013
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study cohortSingle observational cohort of patients who meet study criteria
Receives: Other: No clinical intervention is planned; study is observational

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Predictive value of NI-PGT-A results with implantation rate.

    Positive and negative predictive value of NI-PGT-A results to embryo implantation rate determined by quantitative hCG levels and ultrasound findings.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Predictive value of NI-PGT-A results with on-going pregnancy rate.

    Positive and negative predictive values of NI-PGT-A results with ongoing pregnancy rates as determined by viability through the 1st trimester.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Predictive value of NI-PGT-A results with miscarriage rate.

    Positive and negative predictive values of NI-PGT-A results with miscarriage rates documented in the 1st trimester.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2021
  2. Study start4 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion4 Sep 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion4 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04732013
Sponsor's protocol ID
NI-PGTA
Acronym
NICEST
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
27 Nov 2020
Last updated
21 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Nakhuda G, Rodriguez S, Tormasi S, Welch C. A pilot study to investigate the clinically predictive values of copy number variations detected by next-generation sequencing of cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid in spent culture media. Fertil Steril. 2024 Jul;122(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.02.030. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

    PubMed 38382698

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Infertility and Aneuploidy, run by Olive Fertility Centre at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gary Nakhuda, MD (604-816-5534, nicesttrial@olivefertility.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Predictive value of NI-PGT-A results with implantation rate. (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04732013, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in