Diabetic RetinopathyNCT04732208
Automated Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy Using a Smartphone-based Camera
An observational study of Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Tameside General Hospital at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the UK is on the rise. Within 20 years of diabetes diagnosis, nearly all people with type 1 and almost two thirds of people with type 2 diabetes (60%) have some degree of DR. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Retinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Colour fundus photography
- How many people
- 410 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 20 Apr 2022to 24 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Individuals with established diabetes mellitus presenting to GPs clinic for routine clinical care
Who may be able to join
- Age above 18 years who can provide an informed consent
- Established cases of diabetes mellitus (DM) with or without established diabetic retinopathy
- Subjects who have been dilated for an ophthalmic evaluation previously
Who cannot join
- Patients with acute vision loss
- Participants contraindicated for fundus imaging if hypersensitive to light or underwent recent photodynamic therapy or is photosensitive
- Participants who have been treated for diabetic retinopathy (laser or intra-vitreal injections) in the past 3 months
- Participants known to have other known retinal pathologies
- Participants identified to be at risk of acute angle closure glaucoma from previous ophthalmic evaluation (anterior chamber depth, gonioscopy to look at angles and IOP)
- Participants with known allergy to 1% tropicamide solution
- Currently participating in another investigational eye study and/or actively receiving investigational product for DR or diabetic macula edema.
- Participant has a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status- glycemic control, blood pressure etc)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using a Smartphone-based Fundus Camera in the UK Population
The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the UK is on the rise. Within 20 years of diabetes diagnosis, nearly all people with type 1 and almost two thirds of people with type 2 diabetes (60%) have some degree of DR. NHS guidelines mandate annual DR screening in all patients aged 12 and above to prevent complications of DR. Screening for DR in England involves labour-intensive manual grading of retinal images through the teleophthalmology platform. Automated retinal image analysis systems with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) may offer an alternative to manual grading.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a portable, hand-held fundus camera with integrated artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy screening by comparing it against the current standard i.e diagnosis provided by trained human graders evaluating the standard photographs/ophthalmologists.
Read the detailed description
Study will enroll diabetic patients (new and established) meeting the inclusion criteria and who would provide an informed consent to participate in the study. This would include subjects who visit the endocrinology clinic and had either their retina evaluated by a teleophthalmology consult or visited the ophthalmology clinic for an indirect ophthalmoscopic fundus evaluation in the past 3 months. Subjects whose fundus has been recently evaluated in the past 3 months will also be re-called to the endocrinology clinic to get a fundus image captured on the Remidio NM FOP-10 device. Images will be captured by an operator who will be provided training in using the device prior to the study.
Non-mydriatic fundus images are captured using a pre-defined imaging protocol. One disc centered and one macula centred 45 deg image is taken for each eye. The images are then submitted to an AI system for analysis that runs locally on the Remidio FOP. An initial image quality assessment is performed by the AI. If the image is of sufficient quality then the AI will give an output of either 'signs of DR detected' (that would include moderate NPDR, severe NPDR, PDR and/or DME present) or no signs of diabetic retinopathy detected (that would include no DR, mild DR, absence of DME). If the image is of insufficient quality, then the operator makes 2 more attempts using the same imaging protocol. The images that are output as insufficient quality will be noted. All subjects who have provided consent for dilation are then instilled with a single drop of 1% tropicamide solution. After 20 mins, mydriatic 2 field (one disc centered and one macula centered) fundus images are captured and submitted to the AI for analysis along the same lines of non-mydriatic imaging. If the image is of insufficient quality then the operator makes 2 more attempts using the same imaging protocol. The images that are output as insufficient quality will be noted.
De-identified patient data including age, gender, ethnicity and lens status (Cataract grade, pseudophakia, aphakia) along with the final diagnosis made by a certified grader/ophthalmologist during clinical examination/teleophthalmology are retrieved from the NHS database. This DR diagnosis will act as a reference standard against which the AI output will be compared.
Data entry of subjects will be performed by approved trained Site Personnel. The de-identified data is stored onto an electronic data capture system (EDC). Approved Site Personnel will have a user specific log-in name and password to access the electronic data capture (EDC) system in order to enter study data. The principal investigator will ensure that all aspects of the study are complied with. The study will be conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements and established rules for Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
- Conditions
- Diabetic Retinopathy
- Being tested
- Colour fundus photography
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, screening, fundus camera
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Retinopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Colour fundus photographyDiagnostic test
Also called Instillation of mydriatic eye drops
Fundus images will be captured before and after administration of mydriatic agent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetic patients | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Colour fundus photography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity and Specificity of the AI in detecting any grade of diabetic retinopathy in those with established diabetes mellitus (DM)
Measured: 4 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
To assess the positive predictive value, negative predictive value of AI in detecting any grade of DR
Measured: 4 months
To assess the sensitivity to identify sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR defined as severe NPDR or more severe disease and/or the presence of DME ie grades U, M1, R2 or R3)
Measured: 4 months
To compare the diagnostic ability of the AI in mydriatic and non-mydriatic eyes
Measured: 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2021
- Study start20 Apr 2022
- Primary completion24 Aug 2022
- Study completion24 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic RetinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 410 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tameside General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04732208
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- tgh001
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using a Smartphone-based Fundus Camera in the UK Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04732208
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- tgh001
- Conditions
- Diabetic Retinopathy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, screening, fundus camera
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 410 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tameside General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the UK is on the rise. Within 20 years of diabetes diagnosis, nearly all people with type 1 and almost two thirds of people with type 2 diabetes (60%) have some degree of DR. NHS guidelines mandate annual DR screening in all patients aged 12 and above to prevent complications of DR. Screening for DR in England involves labour-intensive manual grading of retinal images through the teleophthalmology platform. Automated retinal image analysis systems with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) may offer an alternative to manual grading.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a portable, hand-held fundus camera with integrated artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy screening by comparing it against the current standard i.e diagnosis provided by trained human graders evaluating the standard photographs/ophthalmologists.
Detailed description
Study will enroll diabetic patients (new and established) meeting the inclusion criteria and who would provide an informed consent to participate in the study. This would include subjects who visit the endocrinology clinic and had either their retina evaluated by a teleophthalmology consult or visited the ophthalmology clinic for an indirect ophthalmoscopic fundus evaluation in the past 3 months. Subjects whose fundus has been recently evaluated in the past 3 months will also be re-called to the endocrinology clinic to get a fundus image captured on the Remidio NM FOP-10 device. Images will be captured by an operator who will be provided training in using the device prior to the study.
Non-mydriatic fundus images are captured using a pre-defined imaging protocol. One disc centered and one macula centred 45 deg image is taken for each eye. The images are then submitted to an AI system for analysis that runs locally on the Remidio FOP. An initial image quality assessment is performed by the AI. If the image is of sufficient quality then the AI will give an output of either 'signs of DR detected' (that would include moderate NPDR, severe NPDR, PDR and/or DME present) or no signs of diabetic retinopathy detected (that would include no DR, mild DR, absence of DME). If the image is of insufficient quality, then the operator makes 2 more attempts using the same imaging protocol. The images that are output as insufficient quality will be noted. All subjects who have provided consent for dilation are then instilled with a single drop of 1% tropicamide solution. After 20 mins, mydriatic 2 field (one disc centered and one macula centered) fundus images are captured and submitted to the AI for analysis along the same lines of non-mydriatic imaging. If the image is of insufficient quality then the operator makes 2 more attempts using the same imaging protocol. The images that are output as insufficient quality will be noted.
De-identified patient data including age, gender, ethnicity and lens status (Cataract grade, pseudophakia, aphakia) along with the final diagnosis made by a certified grader/ophthalmologist during clinical examination/teleophthalmology are retrieved from the NHS database. This DR diagnosis will act as a reference standard against which the AI output will be compared.
Data entry of subjects will be performed by approved trained Site Personnel. The de-identified data is stored onto an electronic data capture system (EDC). Approved Site Personnel will have a user specific log-in name and password to access the electronic data capture (EDC) system in order to enter study data. The principal investigator will ensure that all aspects of the study are complied with. The study will be conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements and established rules for Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetic patients | – | Diagnostic Test: Colour fundus photography |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Individuals with established diabetes mellitus presenting to GPs clinic for routine clinical care
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age above 18 years who can provide an informed consent
- Established cases of diabetes mellitus (DM) with or without established diabetic retinopathy
- Subjects who have been dilated for an ophthalmic evaluation previously
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with acute vision loss
- Participants contraindicated for fundus imaging if hypersensitive to light or underwent recent photodynamic therapy or is photosensitive
- Participants who have been treated for diabetic retinopathy (laser or intra-vitreal injections) in the past 3 months
- Participants known to have other known retinal pathologies
- Participants identified to be at risk of acute angle closure glaucoma from previous ophthalmic evaluation (anterior chamber depth, gonioscopy to look at angles and IOP)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Colour fundus photographyAlso: Instillation of mydriatic eye dropsFundus images will be captured before and after administration of mydriatic agent | Diagnostic test | Diabetic patients |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity and Specificity of the AI in detecting any grade of diabetic retinopathy in those with established diabetes mellitus (DM)
Time frame: 4 months
3 secondary outcomes
To assess the positive predictive value, negative predictive value of AI in detecting any grade of DR
Time frame: 4 months
To assess the sensitivity to identify sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR defined as severe NPDR or more severe disease and/or the presence of DME ie grades U, M1, R2 or R3)
Time frame: 4 months
To compare the diagnostic ability of the AI in mydriatic and non-mydriatic eyes
Time frame: 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Sep 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetic Retinopathy
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of RGX-314 Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space for Participants With and Without Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy, DR
Recruiting
To Investigate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Trained Non-medical Professionals Performing Laser Treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR), and the Potential Impact on Service Capacity. Assess Feasibility of Conducting a Full Trial Comparing Trained ECPs With Ophthalmologists
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Tameside General Hospital at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity and Specificity of the AI in detecting any grade of diabetic retinopathy in those with established diabetes mellitus (DM) (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Sep 2022.