AnalgesiaNCT04733586
Comparison Between Single Shot Ultrasonographic Guided Fascia Iliaca Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block in Hip Arthralgia. Comparative Double Blind Study
A study testing Sonar guided fascia iliaca and Sonar guided quadratus lumborum block in people with Analgesia, run by Minia University.
Trial summary
hip arthralgia is a painful condition specially geriatric patients. Trail to alleviate pain using locoregional procedures Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Analgesia
- What is being tested?
- Sonar guided fascia iliaca and Sonar guided quadratus lumborum block
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 408 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2021to 1 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All candidates with hip arthalgia (primary or secondery)
Who cannot join
- History of warfarin or clopidogrel adminstration .
- patient on chemotherapy
- Cognitive disrder
About this study
hip arthralgia is a painful condition specially geriatric patients. Trail to alleviate pain using locoregional procedures
Read the detailed description
hip arthralgia is a common presentation in many conditions as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus . Pain is agonizing and disabling patinet to have normal life. we are considering fascial plane block versus quadratus lumborum block to dampen pain score.
- Conditions
- Analgesia
- Being tested
- Sonar guided fascia iliaca, Sonar guided quadratus lumborum block
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sonar guided fascia iliacaProcedure or surgery
Sonar guided fascia iliaca
Sonar guided quadratus lumborum blockProcedure or surgery
Sonar guided quadratus lumborum block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| fascia iliaca group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Sonar guided fascia iliaca |
| quadratus lumborum | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Sonar guided quadratus lumborum block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pain score
Visual analogue scale
Measured: one week and 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2021
- Study start20 Feb 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion20 May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AnalgesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Minia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 408 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Minia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mina Maher, Minia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04733586
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 122-1/2020
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Single Shot Ultrasonographic Guided Fascia Iliaca Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block in Hip Arthralgia. Comparative Double Blind Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04733586
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 122-1/2020
- Conditions
- Analgesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 408 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Minia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 20 May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
hip arthralgia is a painful condition specially geriatric patients. Trail to alleviate pain using locoregional procedures
Detailed description
hip arthralgia is a common presentation in many conditions as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus . Pain is agonizing and disabling patinet to have normal life. we are considering fascial plane block versus quadratus lumborum block to dampen pain score.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| fascia iliaca group | Active comparator | Procedure: Sonar guided fascia iliaca |
| quadratus lumborum | Active comparator | Procedure: Sonar guided quadratus lumborum block |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All candidates with hip arthalgia (primary or secondery)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- History of warfarin or clopidogrel adminstration .
- patient on chemotherapy
- Cognitive disrder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sonar guided fascia iliacaSonar guided fascia iliaca | Procedure or surgery | fascia iliaca group |
| Sonar guided quadratus lumborum blockSonar guided quadratus lumborum block | Procedure or surgery | quadratus lumborum |
Primary outcome
pain score
Time frame: one week and 3 months
Visual analogue scale
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Analgesia
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Pain After Bunion Removal Surgery (MK-6916-007)
Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sonar guided fascia iliaca and Sonar guided quadratus lumborum block in people with Analgesia, run by Minia University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pain score (time frame: one week and 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2021.