Type2 DiabetesISTENCT04736225
Effects of the Insulin Self Titration Education for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
A study testing Insulin Self-Titration Education Program in people with Type2 Diabetes, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of an insulin self-titration education program on glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes. The quasi-experimental design was adapted. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Insulin Self-Titration Education Program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2010to 30 Jul 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age ≥ 18 years
- diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
- treatment with insulin injection for > six months
- HbA1C > 7.5% in the last three months
- ability to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese
Who cannot join
- non
About this study
Official title: Effects of the Insulin Self-titration Education on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of an insulin self-titration education program on glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes. The quasi-experimental design was adapted. A convenient sample of 120 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes was recruited from a general hospital in Taiwan. Among them, 60 were in the insulin self-titration group, and 60 were in the comparison group. Data on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), self-efficacy, and self-care behavior were collected at baseline, three-month, and six-month follow-up. The study instruments included the Insulin Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Diabetes Self-Care questionnaire.
Read the detailed description
Sixty patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were recruited as the intervention participants and enrolled in the insulin self-titration program. Sixty propensity score-matched patients treated with traditional insulin therapy without self-titration were recruited as the control participants. Data on HbA1C and hypoglycemia were collected at baseline and during follow-ups at three and six months. Data on self-efficacy and self-care were collected at the six-month follow-up using self-report questionnaires.
The inclusion criteria were recruited: (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) diagnosis of type 2 diabetes; (3) treatment with insulin injection for > six months; (4) HbA1C > 7.5% in the last three months; and (5) ability to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
The insulin self-titration education program includes a 60-min small-group lesson, a 20-min individual instruction. Patients in the comparison group received usual care at the Diabetes Health Education Center. During a 15-min individual education, these patients were taught how to self-inject insulin and test and record their before-breakfast and before-dinner blood glucose levels daily at home Data on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and the number of hypoglycemia were collected at baseline, three-month, and six-month follow-up. Data on self-efficacy and self-care were collected at the six-month follow-up, using the self-reported questionnaires. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the hospital where the data were collected.
Data were analyzed by using the SPSS 21.0 software. Descriptive analyses were used to describe the research variables. Chi-Square and independent t-test were used to analyze the baseline equilibriums between the two groups. Independent t-tests were used to analyze between-group differences in HbA1C at each time point. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to analyze between-group differences in HbA1C change over time. The independent t-test was used to analyze the difference between the two groups of participants in the post-testing diabetes self-efficacy and self-care.
- Conditions
- Type2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- Insulin Self-Titration Education Program
- Keywords
- Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Self Efficacy, Self Care,
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Insulin Self-Titration Education ProgramOther
The program contents of instruction included blood glucose self-monitoring, types of insulin, insulin self-administration, insulin dose titration, hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia self-management, diet, and exercise.a 20-min one-on-one training session from a nurse on how to self-titrate the insulin dose. The participants were taught to monitor their before-breakfast and before-dinner blood glucose levels at home and adjust their insulin doses accordingly.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ISTE Group | Experimental | This program includes a 60-min small-group lesson, a 20-min individual instruction. The education program's goal is to teach patients to self-titrate their insulin doses every six days to maintain their six-day average blood glucose levels < 120 mg/dl Receives: Other: Insulin Self-Titration Education Program |
| Non-ISTE Group | Placebo comparator | The usual care (a 15-min individual education) was giving at the Diabetes Health Education Center. They were taught how to self-inject insulin and test and record their before-breakfast and before-dinner blood glucose levels daily at home. Receives: Other: Insulin Self-Titration Education Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HbA1C
HbA1c was measured by a 3cc venous blood sample was and analyzed with the Tosoh G8 HPLC Analyzer.
Measured: six-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (2)
self-efficacy
The Chinese version of the Insulin Management Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (IMDSES) was used to assess a participant's degree of confidence in the ability of self-controlled diabetes. The 28-item scale includes six subscales: general self-efficacy, dietary self-efficacy, insulin self-efficacy, blood glucose monitoring self-efficacy, exercise self-efficacy, and foot self-efficacy. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 (completely unsure) to 100 (very sure). The average score of all items represents the scale sore, with a possible range of 0 to 100. The higher the score the better the self-efficacy. In this study, the Cronbach's α of this scale was 0.89, and the Cronbach's α value of each sub-scale was between 0.69 and 0.95.
Measured: six-month follow-up
self-care behavior
The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Self-Care Scale (DSC) was used to measure a participant's self-care behavior. The 28-item scale includes six subscales: general self-care, self-care for diet, self-care for insulin adjustment, self-care for blood glucose monitoring, self-care for exercise, and self-care for the feet. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 (not done at all) to 100 (completely done). The average score of all items represents the scale score, with a possible range of 0 to 100. The higher the score the better the self-care behavior. In this study, the Cronbach's α of this scale was 0.89, and the Cronbach's α value of each subscale was between 0.69 and 0.86.
Measured: six-month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2021
- Study start1 Jun 2010
- Primary completion30 Jul 2011
- Study completion30 Jul 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chiayi Christian Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tsae Jyy, Wang, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
- Investigators
- Tsae-Jyy Wang, Principal investigator, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04736225
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCYCH-099034
- Acronym
- ISTE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tsapas A, Wexler DJ, Buse JB. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
PubMed 30291106Tomah S, Mahmoud N, Mottalib A, Pober DM, Tasabehji MW, Ashrafzadeh S, Hamdy O. Frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose in relation to weight loss and A1C during intensive multidisciplinary weight management in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Jul 29;7(1):e000659. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000659. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31413841Misra A, Patel M, Agarwal P, Lodha S, Tandon N, Magdum M, Yajnik C, Ghosh R, Walekar A. Effectiveness and Safety of Physician-Led Versus Patient-Led Titration of Insulin Glargine in Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subanalysis of the Asian Treat to Target Lantus Study (ATLAS). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Nov;21(11):656-664. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0037. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
PubMed 31335198
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of the Insulin Self-titration Education on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04736225
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ISTE / CCYCH-099034
- Conditions
- Type2 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Self Efficacy, Self Care,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chiayi Christian Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of an insulin self-titration education program on glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes. The quasi-experimental design was adapted. A convenient sample of 120 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes was recruited from a general hospital in Taiwan. Among them, 60 were in the insulin self-titration group, and 60 were in the comparison group. Data on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), self-efficacy, and self-care behavior were collected at baseline, three-month, and six-month follow-up. The study instruments included the Insulin Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Diabetes Self-Care questionnaire.
Detailed description
Sixty patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were recruited as the intervention participants and enrolled in the insulin self-titration program. Sixty propensity score-matched patients treated with traditional insulin therapy without self-titration were recruited as the control participants. Data on HbA1C and hypoglycemia were collected at baseline and during follow-ups at three and six months. Data on self-efficacy and self-care were collected at the six-month follow-up using self-report questionnaires.
The inclusion criteria were recruited: (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) diagnosis of type 2 diabetes; (3) treatment with insulin injection for > six months; (4) HbA1C > 7.5% in the last three months; and (5) ability to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
The insulin self-titration education program includes a 60-min small-group lesson, a 20-min individual instruction. Patients in the comparison group received usual care at the Diabetes Health Education Center. During a 15-min individual education, these patients were taught how to self-inject insulin and test and record their before-breakfast and before-dinner blood glucose levels daily at home Data on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and the number of hypoglycemia were collected at baseline, three-month, and six-month follow-up. Data on self-efficacy and self-care were collected at the six-month follow-up, using the self-reported questionnaires. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the hospital where the data were collected.
Data were analyzed by using the SPSS 21.0 software. Descriptive analyses were used to describe the research variables. Chi-Square and independent t-test were used to analyze the baseline equilibriums between the two groups. Independent t-tests were used to analyze between-group differences in HbA1C at each time point. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to analyze between-group differences in HbA1C change over time. The independent t-test was used to analyze the difference between the two groups of participants in the post-testing diabetes self-efficacy and self-care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ISTE Group | Experimental | Other: Insulin Self-Titration Education ProgramThis program includes a 60-min small-group lesson, a 20-min individual instruction. The education program's goal is to teach patients to self-titrate their insulin doses every six days to maintain their six-day average blood glucose levels < 120 mg/dl |
| Non-ISTE Group | Placebo comparator | Other: Insulin Self-Titration Education ProgramThe usual care (a 15-min individual education) was giving at the Diabetes Health Education Center. They were taught how to self-inject insulin and test and record their before-breakfast and before-dinner blood glucose levels daily at home. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age ≥ 18 years
- diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
- treatment with insulin injection for > six months
- HbA1C > 7.5% in the last three months
- ability to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- non
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin Self-Titration Education ProgramThe program contents of instruction included blood glucose self-monitoring, types of insulin, insulin self-administration, insulin dose titration, hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia self-management, diet, and exercise.a 20-min one-on-one training session from a nurse on how to self-titrate the insulin dose. The participants were taught to monitor their before-breakfast and before-dinner blood glucose levels at home and adjust their insulin doses accordingly. | Other | ISTE Group, Non-ISTE Group |
Primary outcome
HbA1C
Time frame: six-month follow-up
HbA1c was measured by a 3cc venous blood sample was and analyzed with the Tosoh G8 HPLC Analyzer.
2 secondary outcomes
self-efficacy
Time frame: six-month follow-up
self-care behavior
Time frame: six-month follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Feb 2021.
- Background: PubMed 30291106Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tsapas A, Wexler DJ, Buse JB. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 31413841Tomah S, Mahmoud N, Mottalib A, Pober DM, Tasabehji MW, Ashrafzadeh S, Hamdy O. Frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose in relation to weight loss and A1C during intensive multidisciplinary weight management in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Jul 29;7(1):e000659. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000659. eCollection 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 31335198Misra A, Patel M, Agarwal P, Lodha S, Tandon N, Magdum M, Yajnik C, Ghosh R, Walekar A. Effectiveness and Safety of Physician-Led Versus Patient-Led Titration of Insulin Glargine in Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subanalysis of the Asian Treat to Target Lantus Study (ATLAS). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Nov;21(11):656-664. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0037. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type2 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tsae-Jyy Wang principal investigator
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Insulin Self-Titration Education Program in people with Type2 Diabetes, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HbA1C (time frame: six-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04736225, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2021.