Device Related InfectionPRACTICENCT04736979
Antibiotic PRophylAxis Based on infeCTIve Risk in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
An observational study of Device Related Infection, run by University Hospital of Ferrara.
Trial summary
This study was aimed at the evaluation of a new protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis, stratified according to individual infective risk calculated with the Shariff score at the moment of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Device Related Infection
- What is being tested?
- amoxicillin clavulanate
- How many people
- 1,044 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2017to 31 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: patients undergoing CIED-related intervention
Who may be able to join
- first implantation or replacement or upgrade of pacemaker or ICD
Who cannot join
- age 18 years
- ongoing pregnancy
- inability to express informed consent
About this study
Official title: Antibiotic PRophylAxis Based on infeCTIve Risk in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device - PRACTICE Study
This study was aimed at the evaluation of a new protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis, stratified according to individual infective risk calculated with the Shariff score at the moment of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation.
Read the detailed description
Prospective, single centre, cohort study. Patients undergoing CIED surgery in a 3-years period were considered for participation. In particular, patients were eligible if undergoing first implantation or replacement or upgrade of pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), including cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
At the time of enrolment, before index procedure, the Shariff score was calculated for every patient. According to the score, patients were stratified in two groups: low infective risk (score <3) and high infective risk (score ≥3). Two different protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis were administered according to risk stratification. Patients in the "low risk" group were treated with only two doses of antibiotics, both intravenous, of whom the first one hour before skin incision and the second after eight hours. Patients in the "high risk" group were treated with intravenous prophylaxis for two full days (of whom the first administration one hour before skin incision and the others every eight hours), followed by other seven days of oral prophylaxis, for a total of nine days. Thereby, every patient received one administration of intravenous antibiotic one hour before skin incision and a second administration after eight hours, while patients in the low risk group did not receive other antibiotics and patients in the high risk group continued intravenous antibiotics every eight hours for two days, followed by oral antibiotics for other seven days.
The intended drug for antibiotic prophylaxis was amoxicillin + clavulanic acid unless the patient had a history of allergic reactions to penicillin. The dosage was dependent on renal function: for intravenous amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 2.2 g in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) <30 ml/min and 1.2 g in patients with CrCl >30ml/min, for oral amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1 g every 8 hours in patients with <30 ml/min and 1 g every 12 hours in patients with CrCl >30ml/min. In case of penicillin allergy, clindamycin was chosen. The intravenous dosage was 600 mg every 8 hours for CrCl <30 ml/min and 600 mg every 12 hours for CrCl >30 ml/min, while the oral dosage was 450 mg every 8 hours for CrCl <30 ml/min and 450 mg every 12 hours for CrCl >30 ml/min.
Patients who were already in antibiotic therapy at the time of index procedure (for reasons other than CIED implantation) were not stratified in one of the two groups: post-operative antibiotics were continued according to clinical indications and not to the study protocol. This group included patients with a documented or suspected infection before surgery in whom the CIED procedure was judged not deferrable.
- Conditions
- Device Related Infection
- Being tested
- amoxicillin clavulanate
- Keywords
- pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac implantable electronic device, infection, antibiotic, Shariff score
- Medical subject headings
- Prosthesis-Related Infections, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
amoxicillin clavulanateDrug
dosage according to Shariff score and creatinine clearance
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CIED related infection
clinical diagnosis of systemic or local infection involving subcutaneous CIED pocket or intravenous/intracardiac CIED lead or sepsis
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2017
- Primary completion31 Aug 2020
- Study completion31 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Device Related InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,044 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of Ferrara
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matteo Bertini, University Hospital of Ferrara
- Investigators
- Matteo Bertini, Principal investigator, Università degli Studi di Ferrara
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04736979
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 170499
- Acronym
- PRACTICE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Malagu M, Vitali F, Brieda A, Cimaglia P, De Raffele M, Tazzari E, Musolino C, Balla C, Serenelli M, Cultrera R, Rapezzi C, Bertini M. Antibiotic prophylaxis based on individual infective risk stratification in cardiac implantable electronic device: the PRACTICE study. Europace. 2022 Mar 2;24(3):413-420. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab222.
PubMed 34487163
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Antibiotic PRophylAxis Based on infeCTIve Risk in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device - PRACTICE Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04736979
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRACTICE / 170499
- Conditions
- Device Related Infection
- Keywords
- pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac implantable electronic device, infection, antibiotic, Shariff score
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,044 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of FerraraUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was aimed at the evaluation of a new protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis, stratified according to individual infective risk calculated with the Shariff score at the moment of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation.
Detailed description
Prospective, single centre, cohort study. Patients undergoing CIED surgery in a 3-years period were considered for participation. In particular, patients were eligible if undergoing first implantation or replacement or upgrade of pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), including cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
At the time of enrolment, before index procedure, the Shariff score was calculated for every patient. According to the score, patients were stratified in two groups: low infective risk (score <3) and high infective risk (score ≥3). Two different protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis were administered according to risk stratification. Patients in the "low risk" group were treated with only two doses of antibiotics, both intravenous, of whom the first one hour before skin incision and the second after eight hours. Patients in the "high risk" group were treated with intravenous prophylaxis for two full days (of whom the first administration one hour before skin incision and the others every eight hours), followed by other seven days of oral prophylaxis, for a total of nine days. Thereby, every patient received one administration of intravenous antibiotic one hour before skin incision and a second administration after eight hours, while patients in the low risk group did not receive other antibiotics and patients in the high risk group continued intravenous antibiotics every eight hours for two days, followed by oral antibiotics for other seven days.
The intended drug for antibiotic prophylaxis was amoxicillin + clavulanic acid unless the patient had a history of allergic reactions to penicillin. The dosage was dependent on renal function: for intravenous amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 2.2 g in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) <30 ml/min and 1.2 g in patients with CrCl >30ml/min, for oral amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1 g every 8 hours in patients with <30 ml/min and 1 g every 12 hours in patients with CrCl >30ml/min. In case of penicillin allergy, clindamycin was chosen. The intravenous dosage was 600 mg every 8 hours for CrCl <30 ml/min and 600 mg every 12 hours for CrCl >30 ml/min, while the oral dosage was 450 mg every 8 hours for CrCl <30 ml/min and 450 mg every 12 hours for CrCl >30 ml/min.
Patients who were already in antibiotic therapy at the time of index procedure (for reasons other than CIED implantation) were not stratified in one of the two groups: post-operative antibiotics were continued according to clinical indications and not to the study protocol. This group included patients with a documented or suspected infection before surgery in whom the CIED procedure was judged not deferrable.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- patients undergoing CIED-related intervention
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- first implantation or replacement or upgrade of pacemaker or ICD
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- age 18 years
- ongoing pregnancy
- inability to express informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| amoxicillin clavulanatedosage according to Shariff score and creatinine clearance | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
CIED related infection
Time frame: 6 months
clinical diagnosis of systemic or local infection involving subcutaneous CIED pocket or intravenous/intracardiac CIED lead or sepsis
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 34487163Malagu M, Vitali F, Brieda A, Cimaglia P, De Raffele M, Tazzari E, Musolino C, Balla C, Serenelli M, Cultrera R, Rapezzi C, Bertini M. Antibiotic prophylaxis based on individual infective risk stratification in cardiac implantable electronic device: the PRACTICE study. Europace. 2022 Mar 2;24(3):413-420. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab222.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Device Related Infection
Recruiting
Effectiveness of the NowCath Foley in Reducing Catheter-Associated UTIs and Blockages in Long-Term Indwelling Catheter Users (REDUCE)
Urinary Catheters, Urinary Catheterization
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multimodal Physiologic State Intelligence Study
Heart Failure, Cardiomyopathies
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Emerging Indications for Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment
Post-COVID-19 Condition, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Risk Factors for Mesh Infection After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
Incisional Hernia, Ventral Hernia
Not yet recruiting
The IVCare Adaptive Platform Trial
Device Related Infection, Vascular Access Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matteo Bertini principal investigator
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Device Related Infection, run by University Hospital of Ferrara.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CIED related infection (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04736979, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2022.