Immune ThrombocytopeniaPhase 1NCT04741139
Post IVIG Medication in Children With Immune Thrombocytopenia
A Phase 1 study testing Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine Only Product in people with Immune Thrombocytopenia, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is a single hospital system, single-arm year-long pilot to evaluate the feasibility of enrolling children with ITP who are receiving IVIG for treatment of disease to a scheduled post-infusion medication for 72 hours following IVIG infusion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Immune Thrombocytopenia
- What is being tested?
- Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine Only Product
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Sep 2021to Oct 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of ITP confirmed by hematology team.
- Patient receiving IVIG for a clinical indication as determined by primary hematologist. IVIG can be administered in the inpatient, outpatient, and emergency room settings.
- Age 0 to 18 years
Who cannot join
- Patients with a history of anaphylaxis to IVIG infusion.
- Patients receiving IVIG for indications other than ITP.
- Patients who have previously received IVIG or who receive multiple IVIG infusions within the study period.
- Patients who require additional platelet direct therapies including corticosteroids, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, or thrombopoietin receptor agonists.
- Other cause of thrombocytopenia (congenital thrombocytopenias, drug induced thrombocytopenia, bone marrow failure, liver disease, etc.) apparent by history and physical examination, and/or laboratory tests.
- Inability to tolerate oral medications
- Other medical or social factors at discretion of treating physician such as ability to follow-up, etc.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Reduction of Adverse Events and Re-Presentation to Medical Care After Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Children With Immune Thrombocytopenia With a Scheduled Post-Infusion Medication Strategy
This study is a single hospital system, single-arm year-long pilot to evaluate the feasibility of enrolling children with ITP who are receiving IVIG for treatment of disease to a scheduled post-infusion medication for 72 hours following IVIG infusion.
This year-long feasibility pilot will test the (1) feasibility of enrollment and the willingness of families to participate in a scheduled medication regimen and (2) adherence of patients and families to the scheduled medication regimen. Clinical outcomes, as defined by rates of headache or nausea/vomiting or other adverse event following IVIG, return to medical care, and need for further laboratory or imaging studies, will be collected. These rates will be compared to retrospective, historical data from Texas Children's Hematology Center from 2010 to 2019. However, due to the rate at which these events occur following IVIG, this feasibility pilot is not fully powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common acquired immune cytopenia in childhood, affecting 4-6 in 100,000 children. The pathophysiology of ITP is highly complex and incompletely understood. Accepted mechanisms include immune dysregulation caused by an often unidentified trigger leading to the formation of anti-platelet antibodies and antibody-mediated reticuloendothelial clearance. Cell-mediated platelet destruction and disruption of T cell homeostasis are also well described. ITP is also characterized by impaired platelet production due to antibody effect in the bone marrow and subsequent megakaryocyte ultrastructural abnormalities.
Children with ITP generally present with a sudden onset of symptoms. Bleeding tendency is variable, but the vast majority of children will experience cutaneous bleeding symptoms including bruising and petechiae. More extensive bleeding ranging from extensive oral bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, menorrhagia, or other significant bleeding necessitating urgent medical intervention develops in up to 20% of patients.8 Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), the most feared and devastating complication of ITP, occurs in approximately 0.5% of pediatric patients. Bleeding phenotype is unable to be reliably predicted at diagnosis. In children who present with mucosal or more significant bleeding, treatment is indicated to achieve rapid hemostasis by increase in platelet count. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a commonly utilized first line agent to reduce bleeding symptoms and improve the platelet count to a hemostatic range within 24-48 hours of administration. The mechanism of action of IVIG in ITP is currently incompletely understood and likely involves multiple immunomodulatory mechanisms. Previous data has suggested IVIG leads to a rise in platelet count via blockade of Fc receptors on phagocytic cells within the reticuloendothelial system. Another hypothesis suggests IVIG upregulates the expression of the inhibitory IgG Fc receptor 2B encoded by FCGR2B gene, thus leading to decreased cell mediated destruction and decreased anti-platelet antibody production.14 Following IVIG administration, an improvement in clinical bleeding and an associated rise in platelet count is seen in approximately 75% of children with ITP
IVIG is a polyclonal antibody preparation developed from pooled donor plasma from 15,000 to 60,000 donors depending on the preparation utilized. The safety and efficacy of IVIG in patients with ITP has been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, and IVIG is considered a first line therapy for the treatment of children with ITP. Overall, IVIG is well tolerated across patients with a spectrum of diseases. The majority of reported adverse events are mild, transient, and infusion related. The most commonly reported immediate adverse events include headache, fever, nausea/vomiting, malaise, back pain, flushing, and chills. In comparison to other patient populations who receive IVIG, patients with ITP carry the unique risk for intracranial hemorrhage due to profound thrombocytopenia. Mild side effects such as headache and nausea/vomiting can easily be attributed to recent IVIG administration in non-thrombocytopenic populations. However, these symptoms overlap with the heralding symptoms of an intracranial hemorrhage which, due to high morbidity and mortality, must not go undiagnosed in patients with ITP. To decrease the percentage of patients experiencing these immediate, infusion associated symptoms, patients with ITP at most pediatric centers are routinely pre-medicated with a single dose of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine prior to IVIG infusion.21 However, post-infusion medication regimens differ amongst providers and pediatric centers and frequently utilized acetaminophen and diphenhydramine as these symptoms arise.
Peak IgG concentration following IVIG administration occurs in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) between 24-48 hours after infusion. The common events of headache, nausea, and vomiting often peak during this time, when most patients have already been discharged from medical care. Headache and associated nausea/vomiting are particularly worrisome in patients with ITP given the risk for ICH and overlap of symptoms at presentation. Aseptic meningitis, a rare and serious adverse event following IVIG infusion, presents with headache, nausea/vomiting, nuchal rigidity, and fever. The development of aseptic meningitis is hypothesized to be dose dependent and has been noted to cluster within patients who suffer from migraines.
At Texas Children's Hospital, most children prescribed IVIG receive Gamunex-C, which has a reported incidence of headache in 30-50% of patients. At the onset of symptoms, patients typically remain severely thrombocytopenic and at highest risk of ICH. Many of these patients will develop symptoms severe enough to necessitate return to medical care, additional laboratory studies, and computed tomography (CT) of the head to rule out ICH. Texas Children's Hematology Center data reveals 28% of the 473 IVIG infusions administered to patients for ITP between 2010 and 2016 resulted in the report of headache or nausea/vomiting. Seventy-seven percent (103/133) of these infusions resulted in the patient developing symptoms sufficiently severe to cause re-evaluation by a medical provider. Subsequent urgent visits often come at significant expense. Of the 133 infusions resulting in the report of headache and/or nausea/vomiting, 45% (60/133) required additional lab work and 27% (36/133) required imaging via CT to rule out ICH ( please see Figure 1 in the full protocol). These 36 patients who required urgent head CTs represent 7.6% of all IVIG infusions administered for ITP between 2010 and 2016 (American Society of Hematology Conference Abstract 2018; further cohort data analysis in process).
The etiology of these neurologic IVIG-associated adverse events is not well understood. It is currently hypothesized that central nervous system (CNS) symptoms ranging from headache to aseptic meningitis following IVIG administration may represent a spectrum of symptoms secondary to IgG-mediated meningeal inflammation. This hypothesis is based off cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis in patients who developed aseptic meningitis following IVIG. CSF demonstrated the presence of allogeneic IgG as well as pleocytosis with neutrophil predominance. As the pathophysiology underlying the development of these adverse events is currently not fully understood, it is reasonable to trial the safe pediatric medications that are already employed in premedication regimens. It is for this reason the investigators propose the use of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine for the post-IVIG infusion medication regimen.
Currently, no evidence-based guideline exists for the administration of prophylactic medications following IVIG infusions as these specific IVIG side effects are of less concern in non-thrombocytopenic patients. The 2011 American Society of Hematology ITP Clinical Practice Guidelines found insufficient evidence to recommend or oppose routine premedication prior to IVIG. The newly released 2019 Guidelines note that headache can be particularly problematic, however they do not recommend a specific avoidance strategy. While providers often pre-medicate, post-infusion medication practices are entirely physician dependent and frequently involve the use of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine as symptoms arise. The investigators hypothesize that an alternative approach to post-infusion practices may alter IVIG-related symptomatology, particularly those symptoms most alarming in a patient with thrombocytopenia and at risk for ICH. Scheduled post-infusion medication with acetaminophen and diphenhydramine may decrease the rate of worrisome symptoms in patients with ITP and subsequently decrease the need to return to medical care where additional laboratory and imaging studies are often performed to further assess for ICH. The ability of routine post-infusion medication to decrease the rate of adverse events and subsequent return to medical care has yet to be studied in patients with ITP.
It is unknown whether families of children with ITP are willing to enroll in a clinical trial to evaluate the effects and potential benefits of scheduled post-infusion. Additionally, it is unknown to what degree adherence to scheduled post-infusion medication can be achieved. In order to determine if enrollment and adherence can be achieved, the investigators plan to conduct a year-long feasibility study in patients in whom IVIG is indicated for treatment of bleeding symptoms and/or risk associated with ITP (Figure 2). The results of this feasibility study will assess the ability to successfully conduct future comparative randomized control trials (RCTs). This single-arm feasibility study with comparison to Texas Children's Hematology Center historical data will also provide preliminary clinical data regarding rates of return to medical care and additional medical interventions. Further RCTs will be critical to determine if the number of patients who must return to care and undergo further testing can be decreased with a scheduled post-infusion medication regimen. These data will inform future clinical practice guidelines.
- Conditions
- Immune Thrombocytopenia
- Being tested
- Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine Only Product
- Medical subject headings
- Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine Only ProductDrug
Using a scheduled medication regimen of diphenhydramine and acetaminophen following IVIG medication to evaluate feasibility of enrollment, medication adherence, side effects related to study medication and IVIG.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled post-IVIG medication | Experimental | Utilization of post-IVIG medication with acetaminophen and diphenhydramine on a scheduled basis of 72 hours post-infusion. Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine Only Product |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Eligible Patients Agreeing to Enrollment
Patients who are considered eligible for study participation and are approached by the research team to participate will be included in the determination of enrollment feasibility.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percentage of Enrolled Patients who Achieve Medication Adherence
Patients and families will be considered adherent to the medication regimen if >75% of the scheduled doses are administered (average of 3 of 4 daily doses given). A patient must meet the following two criteria to be considered adherent:
- The patient received on average at least 75% of the scheduled doses across the 72 hours study period
- The patient received at least 75% of the doses scheduled to be given within the first 24 hours of the study period
Measured: 12 months
Rate of Return to Medical Care for Emergent Evaluation
The rate of return to medical care for emergent evaluation, along with additional clinical outcomes as detailed in outcomes 4-6, will be collected. This rate will be compared to retrospective, historical data from Texas Children's Hematology Center from 2010 to 2019. However, due to the rate at which these events occur following IVIG, this feasibility pilot is not fully powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes. This data will provide important preliminary clinical data regarding rates of return to medical care and additional medical interventions.
Measured: 72 hours following IVIG for each patient
Rates of IVIG-Associated Adverse Drug Events
The rates of headache, nausea/vomiting, and other patient reported adverse event following IVIG will be collected. These rates will be compared to retrospective, historical data from Texas Children's Hematology Center from 2010 to 2019. However, due to the rate at which these events occur following IVIG, this feasibility pilot is not fully powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes. This data will provide important preliminary clinical data regarding rates of return to medical care and additional medical interventions.
Measured: 72 hours following IVIG for each patient
Rate of Laboratory Evaluation with Platelet Count During Emergent Medical Evaluation
In addition to the rate at which patients return to medical care for emergent evaluation after IVIG, the rate of subsequent laboratory evaluation, specifically platelet count, will be collected. This rate will be compared to retrospective, historical data from Texas Children's Hematology Center from 2010 to 2019. However, due to the rate at which these events occur following IVIG, this feasibility pilot is not fully powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes. This data will provide important preliminary clinical data regarding rates of return to medical care and additional medical interventions.
Measured: 72 hours following IVIG for each patient
Rate of Patients Requiring Head CT During Emergent Medical Evaluation
The rate of patients who require CT of the head during return to medical care for emergent evaluation will be collected. This rate will be compared to retrospective, historical data from Texas Children's Hematology Center from 2010 to 2019. However, due to the rate at which these events occur following IVIG, this feasibility pilot is not fully powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes. This data will provide important preliminary clinical data regarding rates of return to medical care and additional medical interventions.
Measured: 72 hours following IVIG for each patient
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2021
- Study start2 Sep 2021
- Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Immune ThrombocytopeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Baylor College of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single hospital system, single-arm year-long pilot to evaluate the feasibility of enrolling children with ITP who are receiving IVIG for treatment of disease to a scheduled post-infusion medication for 72 hours following IVIG infusion. This year-long feasibility pilot will test the (1) feasibility of enrollment and the willingness of families to participate in a scheduled medication regimen and (2) adherence of patients and families to the scheduled medication regimen. Clinical outcomes, as defined by rates of headache or nausea/vomiting or other adverse event following IVIG, return to medical care, and need for further laboratory or imaging studies, will be collected. These rates will be compared to retrospective, historical data from Texas Children's Hematology Center from 2010 to 2019. However, due to the rate at which these events occur following IVIG, this feasibility pilot is not fully powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Megan Gilbert, Baylor College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04741139
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-47160
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 27 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reduction of Adverse Events and Re-Presentation to Medical Care After Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Children With Immune Thrombocytopenia With a Scheduled Post-Infusion Medication Strategy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04741139
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-47160
- Conditions
- Immune Thrombocytopenia
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a single hospital system, single-arm year-long pilot to evaluate the feasibility of enrolling children with ITP who are receiving IVIG for treatment of disease to a scheduled post-infusion medication for 72 hours following IVIG infusion.
This year-long feasibility pilot will test the (1) feasibility of enrollment and the willingness of families to participate in a scheduled medication regimen and (2) adherence of patients and families to the scheduled medication regimen. Clinical outcomes, as defined by rates of headache or nausea/vomiting or other adverse event following IVIG, return to medical care, and need for further laboratory or imaging studies, will be collected. These rates will be compared to retrospective, historical data from Texas Children's Hematology Center from 2010 to 2019. However, due to the rate at which these events occur following IVIG, this feasibility pilot is not fully powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common acquired immune cytopenia in childhood, affecting 4-6 in 100,000 children. The pathophysiology of ITP is highly complex and incompletely understood. Accepted mechanisms include immune dysregulation caused by an often unidentified trigger leading to the formation of anti-platelet antibodies and antibody-mediated reticuloendothelial clearance. Cell-mediated platelet destruction and disruption of T cell homeostasis are also well described. ITP is also characterized by impaired platelet production due to antibody effect in the bone marrow and subsequent megakaryocyte ultrastructural abnormalities.
Children with ITP generally present with a sudden onset of symptoms. Bleeding tendency is variable, but the vast majority of children will experience cutaneous bleeding symptoms including bruising and petechiae. More extensive bleeding ranging from extensive oral bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, menorrhagia, or other significant bleeding necessitating urgent medical intervention develops in up to 20% of patients.8 Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), the most feared and devastating complication of ITP, occurs in approximately 0.5% of pediatric patients. Bleeding phenotype is unable to be reliably predicted at diagnosis. In children who present with mucosal or more significant bleeding, treatment is indicated to achieve rapid hemostasis by increase in platelet count. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a commonly utilized first line agent to reduce bleeding symptoms and improve the platelet count to a hemostatic range within 24-48 hours of administration. The mechanism of action of IVIG in ITP is currently incompletely understood and likely involves multiple immunomodulatory mechanisms. Previous data has suggested IVIG leads to a rise in platelet count via blockade of Fc receptors on phagocytic cells within the reticuloendothelial system. Another hypothesis suggests IVIG upregulates the expression of the inhibitory IgG Fc receptor 2B encoded by FCGR2B gene, thus leading to decreased cell mediated destruction and decreased anti-platelet antibody production.14 Following IVIG administration, an improvement in clinical bleeding and an associated rise in platelet count is seen in approximately 75% of children with ITP
IVIG is a polyclonal antibody preparation developed from pooled donor plasma from 15,000 to 60,000 donors depending on the preparation utilized. The safety and efficacy of IVIG in patients with ITP has been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, and IVIG is considered a first line therapy for the treatment of children with ITP. Overall, IVIG is well tolerated across patients with a spectrum of diseases. The majority of reported adverse events are mild, transient, and infusion related. The most commonly reported immediate adverse events include headache, fever, nausea/vomiting, malaise, back pain, flushing, and chills. In comparison to other patient populations who receive IVIG, patients with ITP carry the unique risk for intracranial hemorrhage due to profound thrombocytopenia. Mild side effects such as headache and nausea/vomiting can easily be attributed to recent IVIG administration in non-thrombocytopenic populations. However, these symptoms overlap with the heralding symptoms of an intracranial hemorrhage which, due to high morbidity and mortality, must not go undiagnosed in patients with ITP. To decrease the percentage of patients experiencing these immediate, infusion associated symptoms, patients with ITP at most pediatric centers are routinely pre-medicated with a single dose of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine prior to IVIG infusion.21 However, post-infusion medication regimens differ amongst providers and pediatric centers and frequently utilized acetaminophen and diphenhydramine as these symptoms arise.
Peak IgG concentration following IVIG administration occurs in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) between 24-48 hours after infusion. The common events of headache, nausea, and vomiting often peak during this time, when most patients have already been discharged from medical care. Headache and associated nausea/vomiting are particularly worrisome in patients with ITP given the risk for ICH and overlap of symptoms at presentation. Aseptic meningitis, a rare and serious adverse event following IVIG infusion, presents with headache, nausea/vomiting, nuchal rigidity, and fever. The development of aseptic meningitis is hypothesized to be dose dependent and has been noted to cluster within patients who suffer from migraines.
At Texas Children's Hospital, most children prescribed IVIG receive Gamunex-C, which has a reported incidence of headache in 30-50% of patients. At the onset of symptoms, patients typically remain severely thrombocytopenic and at highest risk of ICH. Many of these patients will develop symptoms severe enough to necessitate return to medical care, additional laboratory studies, and computed tomography (CT) of the head to rule out ICH. Texas Children's Hematology Center data reveals 28% of the 473 IVIG infusions administered to patients for ITP between 2010 and 2016 resulted in the report of headache or nausea/vomiting. Seventy-seven percent (103/133) of these infusions resulted in the patient developing symptoms sufficiently severe to cause re-evaluation by a medical provider. Subsequent urgent visits often come at significant expense. Of the 133 infusions resulting in the report of headache and/or nausea/vomiting, 45% (60/133) required additional lab work and 27% (36/133) required imaging via CT to rule out ICH ( please see Figure 1 in the full protocol). These 36 patients who required urgent head CTs represent 7.6% of all IVIG infusions administered for ITP between 2010 and 2016 (American Society of Hematology Conference Abstract 2018; further cohort data analysis in process).
The etiology of these neurologic IVIG-associated adverse events is not well understood. It is currently hypothesized that central nervous system (CNS) symptoms ranging from headache to aseptic meningitis following IVIG administration may represent a spectrum of symptoms secondary to IgG-mediated meningeal inflammation. This hypothesis is based off cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis in patients who developed aseptic meningitis following IVIG. CSF demonstrated the presence of allogeneic IgG as well as pleocytosis with neutrophil predominance. As the pathophysiology underlying the development of these adverse events is currently not fully understood, it is reasonable to trial the safe pediatric medications that are already employed in premedication regimens. It is for this reason the investigators propose the use of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine for the post-IVIG infusion medication regimen.
Currently, no evidence-based guideline exists for the administration of prophylactic medications following IVIG infusions as these specific IVIG side effects are of less concern in non-thrombocytopenic patients. The 2011 American Society of Hematology ITP Clinical Practice Guidelines found insufficient evidence to recommend or oppose routine premedication prior to IVIG. The newly released 2019 Guidelines note that headache can be particularly problematic, however they do not recommend a specific avoidance strategy. While providers often pre-medicate, post-infusion medication practices are entirely physician dependent and frequently involve the use of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine as symptoms arise. The investigators hypothesize that an alternative approach to post-infusion practices may alter IVIG-related symptomatology, particularly those symptoms most alarming in a patient with thrombocytopenia and at risk for ICH. Scheduled post-infusion medication with acetaminophen and diphenhydramine may decrease the rate of worrisome symptoms in patients with ITP and subsequently decrease the need to return to medical care where additional laboratory and imaging studies are often performed to further assess for ICH. The ability of routine post-infusion medication to decrease the rate of adverse events and subsequent return to medical care has yet to be studied in patients with ITP.
It is unknown whether families of children with ITP are willing to enroll in a clinical trial to evaluate the effects and potential benefits of scheduled post-infusion. Additionally, it is unknown to what degree adherence to scheduled post-infusion medication can be achieved. In order to determine if enrollment and adherence can be achieved, the investigators plan to conduct a year-long feasibility study in patients in whom IVIG is indicated for treatment of bleeding symptoms and/or risk associated with ITP (Figure 2). The results of this feasibility study will assess the ability to successfully conduct future comparative randomized control trials (RCTs). This single-arm feasibility study with comparison to Texas Children's Hematology Center historical data will also provide preliminary clinical data regarding rates of return to medical care and additional medical interventions. Further RCTs will be critical to determine if the number of patients who must return to care and undergo further testing can be decreased with a scheduled post-infusion medication regimen. These data will inform future clinical practice guidelines.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single hospital system, single-arm year-long pilot to evaluate the feasibility of enrolling children with ITP who are receiving IVIG for treatment of disease to a scheduled post-infusion medication for 72 hours following IVIG infusion. This year-long feasibility pilot will test the (1) feasibility of enrollment and the willingness of families to participate in a scheduled medication regimen and (2) adherence of patients and families to the scheduled medication regimen. Clinical outcomes, as defined by rates of headache or nausea/vomiting or other adverse event following IVIG, return to medical care, and need for further laboratory or imaging studies, will be collected. These rates will be compared to retrospective, historical data from Texas Children's Hematology Center from 2010 to 2019. However, due to the rate at which these events occur following IVIG, this feasibility pilot is not fully powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled post-IVIG medication | Experimental | Drug: Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine Only ProductUtilization of post-IVIG medication with acetaminophen and diphenhydramine on a scheduled basis of 72 hours post-infusion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of ITP confirmed by hematology team.
- Patient receiving IVIG for a clinical indication as determined by primary hematologist. IVIG can be administered in the inpatient, outpatient, and emergency room settings.
- Age 0 to 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with a history of anaphylaxis to IVIG infusion.
- Patients receiving IVIG for indications other than ITP.
- Patients who have previously received IVIG or who receive multiple IVIG infusions within the study period.
- Patients who require additional platelet direct therapies including corticosteroids, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, or thrombopoietin receptor agonists.
- Other cause of thrombocytopenia (congenital thrombocytopenias, drug induced thrombocytopenia, bone marrow failure, liver disease, etc.) apparent by history and physical examination, and/or laboratory tests.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine Only ProductUsing a scheduled medication regimen of diphenhydramine and acetaminophen following IVIG medication to evaluate feasibility of enrollment, medication adherence, side effects related to study medication and IVIG. | Drug | Scheduled post-IVIG medication |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Eligible Patients Agreeing to Enrollment
Time frame: 12 months
Patients who are considered eligible for study participation and are approached by the research team to participate will be included in the determination of enrollment feasibility.
5 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Enrolled Patients who Achieve Medication Adherence
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of Return to Medical Care for Emergent Evaluation
Time frame: 72 hours following IVIG for each patient
Rates of IVIG-Associated Adverse Drug Events
Time frame: 72 hours following IVIG for each patient
Rate of Laboratory Evaluation with Platelet Count During Emergent Medical Evaluation
Time frame: 72 hours following IVIG for each patient
Rate of Patients Requiring Head CT During Emergent Medical Evaluation
Time frame: 72 hours following IVIG for each patient
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Dec 2022.
Related trials for Immune Thrombocytopenia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Tolerability of Ianalumab (VAY736) With Investigator's Choice Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist (IC TPO-RA) in Patients With Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), Primary Evans Syndrome (ES)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Pirtobrutinib in Participants With Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Tafasitamab in Adult Participants With Primary Autoimmune Blood Cell Disorders
Immune Thrombocytopenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Follow-up Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine Only Product in people with Immune Thrombocytopenia, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Eligible Patients Agreeing to Enrollment (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2022.