AzTrials
AzTrials

Oropharyngeal DysphagiaFIS2018NCT04741620

Subacute Effect of Pharyngeal Pharmacological Sensory Stimulation in Elderly Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

A study testing Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist), Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist) and Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist) in people with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Dysphagia, run by Hospital de Mataró at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Oropharyngeal sensory impairments are a potential target for treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in older patients. We previously found acute administration of TRP sensory stimulants improved VFS signs and swallow response. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 70 years and older
What is being tested?
Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist), Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist) and Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
17 Jan 2019to 27 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 70 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • More than 70 years old.
  • Oropharyngeal dysphagia with impaired safety of swallow (penetration aspiration score higher or equal than 2).
  • Patients able to comply with the study protocol.
  • Signature or the written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Previous history of severe gastrointestinal diseases.
  • Epilepsy or previous convulsive crisis episodes.
  • Pacemaker or implanted defibrillator carriers.
  • Cardiopulmonary instability.
  • Oropharyngeal dysphagia of structural cause.
  • Previous history of head and neck surgery.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Neurodegenerative disease.
  • Advanced dementia (GDS higher than 5).
  • Gastroesophageal reflux.
  • Taking drugs with effects on dopamine.
  • Neoplasia or active infection.
  • Alcohol, tobacco or drugs dependence.
  • Participate or have participated in another interventionist clinical trial in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Consorci Sanitari del Maresme (Hospital de Mataró)

    Mataró, Barcelona, 08301

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Subacute Effect of Pharmacological Sensory Stimulation of the Oropharynx by Agonists of TRP Receptors in Swallowing Neurophysiology in the Elderly With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Oropharyngeal sensory impairments are a potential target for treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in older patients. We previously found acute administration of TRP sensory stimulants improved VFS signs and swallow response. We hypothesized that sub-acute administration of TRP pharyngeal sensory stimulants, would improve cortical neuroplasticity and will lead into a faster and stronger swallow response, however desensitization of TRP receptors may occur. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the biomechanical (Videofluoroscopy) and neurophysiological (pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials -PSEPs- and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs)) effect of 2 week treatment with TRP agonists in older patients with OD. Design: 150 older (>70yr) patients with OD will be included in a Randomized Control Trial assessing the effect of oral administration of either: a) capsaicin (TRPV1); b) piperine (TRPV1/TRPA1) c) cinnamaldehyde (TRPA1); d) citric acid (ASIC3); e) capsaicin+citric acid (TRPV1/ASIC3); and f) placebo (Control). Measurements: 1) VFS signs of safety and efficacy of swallow and timing and extent of swallow response; 2) Latency, amplitude and cortical representation of PSEP and MEP; 3) Substance P concentration in saliva by ELISA as a marker of peripheral stimulation. Results from this study might help to develop new and effective pharmacological treatments for older dysphagic patients, from compensation to recovery of swallow function.

Read the detailed description

The project consists of a randomized, double-blind controlled interventional clinical trial (patient and analysis of results) with five treatment arms and a control group (placebo) involving a total of 150 elderly patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (25 patients per group).

The recruitment of participants for the study will be carried out from the patients referred to the Dysphagia Unit of the Hospital de Mataró for the evaluation of swallowing disorders. The swallowing function of all candidates to be included in the study will be clinically evaluated using the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST). Those patients with signs of impaired safety of swallowing during the examination (cough, decreased O2 saturation greater than 2% or voice change) will be candidates to participate in the study. They will be informed and in case of acceptance a saliva sample will be taken, and a videofluoroscopy (VFS) will be performed. If the patient presents impaired safety of swallow (Penetration aspiration scale higher or equal than 2), the patient will be definitively randomized to one of the branches of intervention and the rest of the explorations will proceed (sensory evoked potentials to pharyngeal electrical stimulation and pharyngeal motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation). After the treatment period a second evaluation of study procedures will be performed.

The treatment will consist of administering 10mL solution of the study product, according to randomization, 3 times a day (before breakfast, lunch and dinner) for 14 consecutive days after inclusion in the study. Treatment selected according our previous studies (Alvarez-Berdugo et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017) are: Capsaicin 10microM, Piperine 150microM, Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM, citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5), Capsaicin 10microM + citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5). For the control group, placebo product will be administered, which will be the vehicle solution with a more neutral pH.

Being tested
Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist), Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist), Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist), Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist), Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists)
Keywords
Oropharyngeal dysphagia, TRP agonists, Pharmacological stimulation, Sensory stimulation, Elderly
Medical subject headings
Deglutition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist)Other

    10 mL Capsaicin 10microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.

  • Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist)Other

    10 mL Piperine 150microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.

  • Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist)Other

    10 mL Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.

  • Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist)Other

    10 mL Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.

  • Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists)Other

    10 mL Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.

  • Placebo (Methyl benzoate, Propyl benzoate, Propylenglycol)Other

    10 mL placebo solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.

Study groups in NCT04741620
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Capsaicin 10microMActive comparator10mL capsaicin 10microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Receives: Other: Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist); Other: Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists); Other: Placebo (Methyl benzoate, Propyl benzoate, Propylenglycol)
Piperine 150microMActive comparator10mL Piperine 150microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Receives: Other: Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist); Other: Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist); Other: Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists); Other: Placebo (Methyl benzoate, Propyl benzoate, Propylenglycol)
Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microMActive comparator10mL Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Receives: Other: Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist); Other: Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist); Other: Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists); Other: Placebo (Methyl benzoate, Propyl benzoate, Propylenglycol)
Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5)Active comparator10mL Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Receives: Other: Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist); Other: Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists); Other: Placebo (Methyl benzoate, Propyl benzoate, Propylenglycol)
Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5)Active comparator10mL Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Receives: Other: Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist); Other: Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist); Other: Placebo (Methyl benzoate, Propyl benzoate, Propylenglycol)
PlaceboPlacebo comparator10mL placebo solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Receives: Other: Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist); Other: Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist); Other: Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist); Other: Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the score of the Penetration Aspiration Scale

    Differences found in the videofluoroscopy Penetration Aspiration Scale (from 1 (safe swallow) to 8 (silent aspiration)) between treatments and vs. the placebo group.

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Impaired safety of swallow

    Videofluoroscopic signs of impaired safety of swallow (penetrations an aspirations)

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  2. Impaired efficacy

    Videofluoroscopic signs of impaired efficacy of swallow (oral and pharyngeal residue)

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  3. Oropharyngeal swallow response (laryngeal vestibule closure time)

    Laryngeal vestibule closure time (ms) in videofluoroscopy

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  4. Oropharyngeal swallow response (upper esophageal opening time)

    Upper esophageal opening time (ms) in videofluoroscopy

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  5. Oropharyngeal swallow response (laryngeal vestibule opening time)

    Laryngeal vestibule opening time (ms) in videofluoroscopy

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  6. Oropharyngeal swallow response (Bolus final velocity)

    Bolus final velocity (m/s) in videofluoroscopy

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  7. Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials

    Latency and amplitude of N1, P1, N2 and P2 peaks of the Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials.

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  8. Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials

    Latency, amplitude, duration and area under de curve of the Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials.

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  9. Sensory threshold

    Sensory threshold to pharyngeal electrical stimulation (mA)

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  10. Substance P

    Concentration of substance P in saliva.

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

  11. Palatability and comfort with the treatment.

    Palatability and comfort with the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2021
  2. Study start17 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion27 Mar 2022
  4. Study completion27 Mar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04741620
Sponsor's protocol ID
PI18/00241
Acronym
FIS2018
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
29 Jan 2021
Last updated
13 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Guanyabens N, Tomsen N, Palomeras E, Mundet L, Clave P, Ortega O. Neurophysiological characterization of oropharyngeal dysphagia in older patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2024 Jun;162:129-140. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.03.030. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

    PubMed 38615499

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist), Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist) and Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist) in people with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Dysphagia, run by Hospital de Mataró at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the score of the Penetration Aspiration Scale (time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04741620, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in