AnesthesiaPhase 2/3ELSANCT04741880
Evaluation of Intravenous Lidocaine and Time to Regression of the Sensory Block After Spinal Anesthesia (ELSA Trial)
A Phase 2/3 study testing Lidocaine IV and Saline in people with Anesthesia and Cancer, run by Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion in the perioperative period is associated with a reduction in postoperative pain scores, opioid use, incidence of nausea and vomiting, among other favorable outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Lidocaine IV and Saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 17 Jun 2021to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 85 years-old
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification from I to III
- To be submitted to:
- - Spinal Anesthesia
- - For surgeries performed by the Bone and Connective Tissue (TOC) service
- - Involving lower limbs and inguinal region requiring sensory block level up to the T12 dermatome (except for larger amputations and bone resections)
Show all 9Show fewer
- - Expected duration of less than 120 minutes
- - In supine position
- That they voluntarily decide to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Coagulation disorder that prevents the execution of the blockade:
- - International normalized ratio for prothrombin (INR) time and activity > 1.5
- - Activated partial thromboplastin time ratio (PTTa) >1.5
- - Use of enoxaparin up to 40mg/day less than 12h before the procedure
- - Use of enoxaparin above 40mg/day less than 24hours before the procedure
- - Use of oral anticoagulant or platelet aggregation inhibitors in a lower interval than recommended for spinal block
Show all 22Show fewer
- - Other coagulation disorders that prevent spinal anesthesia
- Moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (defined by the presence of left ventricle ejection fraction below 40%)
- Sinus bradycardia (FC < 50 beats per minute)
- Relevant cardiac conduction system disorders (e.g. atrium ventricular block greater than first-degree, Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome)
- Clinically significant arrhythmia (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
- Body mass index (BMI) than > 35 mg.kg-1
- Previous diagnosis of liver cirrhosis
- Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 estimated by the method of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study group
- Infection at the site of lumbar puncture
- Previous spinal surgery
- Allergy to local anesthetics amino-amides
- Difficulty in communication, understanding or cognitive deficit that prevents adequate oral response to study the study forms
- Pre-existing neurological lesion in topography to be evaluated motor block
- Documented or suspected spinal or central nervous system metastasis
- Regular use of strong opioids at a dose equal or greater than 60 mg of oral morphine equivalents per day
- Desire to withdraw from the study at any time of its execution
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Andreia C de Melo, PhD contact
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital de Câncer II, INCA
Rio de Janeiro, 20270212
Bruno LC Araujo, MSc, +552132072915, brunoaraujomed@yahoo.com.BR
About this study
Official title: Intravenous Lidocaine and Time to Regression of the Sensory Block After Spinal Anesthesia With Isobaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Surgery to Treat Skin and Soft Tissue Tumors of the Lower Limbs
The use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion in the perioperative period is associated with a reduction in postoperative pain scores, opioid use, incidence of nausea and vomiting, among other favorable outcomes. However, this therapeutic intervention has not yet been adequately evaluated by clinical trials when associated with regional anesthesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion during spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine alters the time to regression of sensory block in patients undergoing surgical procedures for the treatment of bone and connective tissue tumor surgeries. This will be a triple-blind randomized trial. The sample size estimated was 66 patients. The study will include all patients who meet the pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, choose to participate, and agree with the Informed Consent Form. The main anesthetic technique will be spinal anesthesia with 13 mg of isobaric bupivacaine. Patients will be allocated in two groups in a blindly after randomization: Group S (lidocaine 0.75mg.kg-1 in bolus followed by infusion of saline solution) and Group L (lidocaine 1.5 mg.kg-1 followed by continuous infusion of lidocaine solution at 2 mg.kg-1.h-1). The primary outcome will be the time to T12 regression of the sensory block. Will also be evaluated: time to regression of the motor block, most rostral dermatome achieved by the sensory block, time to two-segment regression oh the sensory block, propofol dose in the operating room, postoperative pain score at rest, pain at movement score, quality of recovery, use of opioids in the postoperative period, nausea or vomiting, dizziness, shivering, arrhythmias, hypotension, urinary retention, and length of stay. The records will be assigned to the RedCap database. The data will be extracted without identification of the allocation groups for the R software and the groups will be revealed to the researcher after the end of the statistical analysis to write the summary of the results. The results will be submitted to scientific journals afterward.
Read the detailed description
Hypotheses:
Null hypothesis
H0: The time to T12 regression of the sensory block after administration of isobaric bupivacaine is EQUAL with or without the use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion.
Alternative hypothesis
H1: The time to T12 regression of the sensory block after administration of isobaric bupivacaine is DIFFERENT depending on the use or not of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion.
Methods
Study design
It is a randomized, controlled, triple blind clinical trial (patient, assistant team / investigator, and data collection/analysis).
Standard procedures
All patients should undergo an outpatient preoperative evaluation with an anesthesiologist. At that moment, eligibility for the study will be evaluated and the informed consent form will be presented. The preoperative form will also be completed by the investigator of the study who includes the patient of the patient.
Study participants will undergo continuous 5 leads electrocardiographic, automated noninvasive blood pressure and capnography monitoring initiated at the entrance to the operating room. Peripheral venous access will also be obtained. After certification of monitoring and venous access the patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus with the side to be performed the surgery (or the side of higher major surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures) superiorly (e.g. surgery with right side of the body the puncture will be performed in left lateral decubitus) and then will be initiated the infusion the solutions present in the syringe and in the bag sent by the Division of Pharmacy of the hospital unit according to the protocol. Immediately after the initiation of continuous infusion of the solution the anesthesiologist will begin preparation for performing subarachnoid puncture with a Quinke needle between 22 and 27 Gauge (preferably 26 Gauge) between spaces L4-L5 and L2-L3 (preferably L3-L4) depending on the assessment of the anesthesiologist responsible for the predicted difficulty for the block and the risk of post-dural puncture headache. Conscious sedation with propofol in continuous infusion and local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine solution up to 100 mg will also be initiated. It will be administered in the subarachnoid space 13mg (2.6 ml of solution) of isobaric bupivacaine at 0.5%.
As a multimodal and antiemetic analgesia regimen, the following will be administered:
- dexamethasone 4mg in the operating room;
- ondansetron 4mg in the operating room and in case of postoperative nausea or vomiting;
- dipyrone 20mg.kg-1 every 4 hours or paracetamol 500mg every 4 hours (in case of dipyrone allergy) started before regional anesthesia and kept until discharge;
- tenoxicam 40mg in the OR and 20 mg on the first postoperative day, unless contraindicated by the assistant team;
- tramadol 50mg up to every 4 hours or morphine 4 mg up to every 10 minutes in case of pain assessed by verbal numerical scale greater than or equal to 4 (0-10) or according to evaluation of the assistant team.
After the block, evaluations of the extension of sensory and motor block will be performed at minutes 5, 10, 15 and then every 15 minutes as presented in the data collection form . The sensory block will be evaluated by pinprick sequentially from the most caudal to the most cephalic level, at the midclavicular line, on the opposite side of the surgical procedure (or on the side of minor surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures) and will be computed as the level of blockade the point at which the patient reports sensitivity similar to reference point (homolateral shoulder) will be computed. Motor block will be initially evaluated for ankle flexion, followed by knee elevation and finally leg elevation with knees extended, and the level of motor block will be recorded according to the modified Bromage scale on the opposite side of the surgical procedure (or on the side of lower surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures).
The patient will be released for the surgical procedure as soon as he reaches motor block evidenced by a modified Bromage scale equal to 2. During the procedure, only sensory block will be observed so that there is no interference with the surgical procedure. After the end of the procedure, each 15 minutes evaluations of sensory and motor block will be performed. Supplementary sensory and motor status evaluations may be performed in addition to the evaluations every 15 minutes at the discretion of the assistant team. After the end of the surgery. Sensory block and motor block will be evaluated concomitantly until the primary outcome (regression of sensory block up T12 dermatome), regression of motor block to modified Bromage 1 and regression of two dermatomes of the sensory block (secondary outcomes) are achieved.
The patient will be continuously evaluated in the post-anesthetic recovery room until at least the second postoperative hour and until the primary outcome. Twenty-four hours after the end of the procedure, the patient will be reevaluated at the ward, or by phone contact in case of discharge, and the study information and questionnaires will be computed as described in the data collection form.
Intervention
The bolus and infusion of the solution referring to the allocated group will be made:
- After monitoring and obtaining venous access
- Prior to the initiation of continuous propofol infusion and spinal puncture
Group L (Lidocaine):
Lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of lidocaine infusion.
Lidocaine 2mg.kg-1.h-1.
Group S (saline solution):
Lidocaine bolus 0.75 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of saline infusion.
Saline solution.
Group L will be sent a 20 ml syringe of 2% lidocaine and 200 ml of lidocaine solution at 8mg.ml-1 (80ml of 2% lidocaine associated with 120ml 0.9% sodium chloride) Group S will be sent a 20 ml syringe of 1% lidocaine and 200 ml of saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride)
A syringe with 20 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.
Continuous infusion of lidocaine (group L) or saline solution (group S) will be maintained until the sensory block regresses to the T12 level, until the regression of 2 dermatomes of the sensory block and until the motor block reaches the score on the modified Bromage scale 1.
The infusion will be interrupted and the masking will be broken in case of:
- severe neurological disorders (e.g. seizure, respiratory depression);
- cardiac (e.g. atrioventricular block greater than second degree, bradycardia with HR less than 40 bpm not responsive to atropine, refractory hypotension);
- other unforeseen clinical changes that pose a risk to the patient.
The infusion will be maintained until the end of anesthesia and masking in case of need for conversion to general anesthesia (e.g., insufficient block, psychomotor agitation) and the patient will be (1) censored for the outcomes related to the extension of the blockade and (2) will continue contributing to the other outcomes.
Collected variables
The variables evaluated in the study will be collected preoperatively, at the operating room, at the PACU, in the first 24 postoperative hours, and in 30 days and recorded in the RedCap database. All data collected in the study is available at the data collection sheets.
Statistical analysis
Medical records numbers and names will be included in the data collection but will not be imputed in RedCap. Therefore, the participants' data will not be revealed at the time of data extraction and analysis, preserving the anonymity of the research individuals.
The data extracted from RedCap will be analyzed in software R. The groups will be separated by intervention group, but the researcher responsible for the analysis will only have access to the groups after the end of the analysis of the results.
Continuous variables will be presented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range depending on their distribution. To check the comparability between the groups and study, the basal covariates will be presented by intervention group. Bivariate statistical tests will be performed bicaudal chi-squared test, t-test, nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and log rank test depending on the characteristics of the variable. In the outcome "most rostral dermatome achieved by sensory block" each dermatome will be numbered for statistical analysis from S5 to C6 according to the following examples: S5=1, S4=2, S3=3, C8=23, C7=24 and C6=25 and will be analyzed according to its distribution. The primary outcome will be presented graphically by the Kaplan Meier curve. The value of α was set at 0.05. For the primary outcome, the p-value will be analyzed without adjustment for multiple tests. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated without adjustment for multiple comparisons because it is an exploratory analysis.
The sample size was calculation was performed with the software R, package 'WMWssp', command 'WMWssp'. Based on previous studies, the mean time for regression was estimated at 120 minutes standard deviation for sensory block regression after subarachnoid anesthesia with bupivacaine in 20 minutes. Adopting the α value of 0.05, the power of 80%, and a 10% drop out rate, the estimated sample size to demonstrate the difference of 15 minutes in the primary outcome was 66 patients (R software input: 'WMWssp(round(rnorm(1000000, 120, 20)), rnorm(1000000, 135, 20), alpha = 0.05, power = 0.8, t = 1/2, simulation = FALSE, nsim = 10^4)').
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Cancer
- Being tested
- Lidocaine IV, Saline
- Keywords
- Spinal Anesthesia, Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, Regression of the sensory block
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lidocaine IVDrug
Also called Lidocaine
Will be sent to Group L a 10 ml syringe of 2% lidocaine and 200 ml of lidocaine solution at 8mg.ml-1 (80ml of 2% lidocaine associated with 120ml 0.9% sodium chloride)
A syringe with 10 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.
SalineDrug
Also called 0.9% sodium chloride
Group S will be sent a 10 ml syringe of 1% lidocaine and 200 ml of saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride)
A syringe with 10 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group L (Lidocaine) | Experimental | Lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of lidocaine infusion Lidocaine 2mg.kg-1.h-1 Receives: Drug: Lidocaine IV |
| Group S (saline solution) | Placebo comparator | Lidocaine bolus 0.75 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of saline infusion Saline solution infusion Receives: Drug: Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to T12 regression of the sensory block
Time between the injection of bupivacaine into the subarachnoid space and the regression of sensory block to T12 dermatome (in minutes)
Measured: Period: Day 0 postoperative
Secondary outcomes (17)
Time to motor block regression
Time between the injection of bupivacaine into the subarachnoid space and the regression of motor block to the modified Bromage scale 1 (in minutes)
Measured: Day 0 postoperative
Most rostral dermatome achieved by the sensory block
Evaluated as ordinal variable (see statistical analysis)
Measured: Day 0 postoperative
Time to two-segment regression of the sensory block
Time between the injection of bupivacaine into the subarachnoid space and the regression of 2 dermatomes sensory block level (in minutes)
Measured: Day 0 postoperative
Propofol dose at the operating room
In mg
Measured: Intraoperative
Time to the first opioid rescue
In mg
Measured: Intraoperative
Postoperative pain score at rest
Verbal numerical scale between 0 and 10, being 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable"
Measured: Admission to the PACU, 2 postoperative hours, 24 postoperative hours, and worse in the first 24 postoperative hours measurements
Pain score at movement
Verbal numerical scale between 0 and 10, being 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable"
Measured: 24 postoperative hours
Quality of recovery in 24 hours
Quality of recovery measured by the "40-item quality-of-recovery questionnaire" (QoR-40)
Measured: 24 postoperative hours
Need for opioid analgesics (binary)
YES/NO
Measured: Between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Need for opioid analgesics (continuous)
In oral morphine equivalents (in mg)
Measured: between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Nausea or vomiting
Presence of nausea or vomiting reported by the patient - YES/NO
Measured: Between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Dizziness
Report of dizziness by patient - YES/NO
Measured: From intraoperative to 24 postoperative hours
Bradycardia
Heart rate below 50 beats per minute (YES/NO)
Measured: At the operating room (OR) and admission to the PACU up to 24 postoperative hours
Other arrhythmias
Heart rhythm change except sinus bradycardia and sinus tachycardia (YES/NO)
Measured: At the OR and admission to the PACU up to 24 postoperative hours
Hypotension
MAP < 65mmHg or presence of compatible symptoms (such as nausea, vomiting or cognitive impairments)
Measured: At the OR, between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Urinary retention
Voiding difficulty that requires bladder catheterization for relief by the assistant team
Measured: Between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Length of stay
Time between the end of the operation and administrative discharge in days
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2021
- Study start17 Jun 2021
- Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bruno LC Araujo, MSc, EDAIC, Principal investigator, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital do Câncer II, Instituto Nacional do Câncer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04741880
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 40904720.3.0000.5274
- Acronym
- ELSA
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Miller RD. Miller's Anesthesia. 7th ed. Phyladelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2010.
Imbelloni LE, Moreira AD, Gaspar FC, Gouveia MA, Cordeiro JA. Assessment of the densities of local anesthetics and their combination with adjuvants: an experimental study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Mar-Apr;59(2):154-65. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000200003. English, Portuguese.
PubMed 19488527Lui AC, Polis TZ, Cicutti NJ. Densities of cerebrospinal fluid and spinal anaesthetic solutions in surgical patients at body temperature. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Apr;45(4):297-303. doi: 10.1007/BF03012018.
PubMed 9597201Beloeil H. Opioid-free anesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;33(3):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
PubMed 31785720Blaudszun G, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramer MR. Effect of perioperative systemic alpha2 agonists on postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1312-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31825681cb.
PubMed 22546966Gelineau AM, King MR, Ladha KS, Burns SM, Houle T, Anderson TA. Intraoperative Esmolol as an Adjunct for Perioperative Opioid and Postoperative Pain Reduction: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1035-1049. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002469.
PubMed 29028742Ng KT, Yap JLL, Izham IN, Teoh WY, Kwok PE, Koh WJ. The effect of intravenous magnesium on postoperative morphine consumption in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Mar;37(3):212-223. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001164.
PubMed 31977626Wang X, Lin C, Lan L, Liu J. Perioperative intravenous S-ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110071. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110071. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
PubMed 33007645Weibel S, Jokinen J, Pace NL, Schnabel A, Hollmann MW, Hahnenkamp K, Eberhart LH, Poepping DM, Afshari A, Kranke P. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):770-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew101.
PubMed 27199310Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P, Brandenburger T, Piegeler T, Werdehausen R. Molecular mechanisms of action of systemic lidocaine in acute and chronic pain: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;123(3):335-349. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
PubMed 31303268Dunn LK, Durieux ME. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2017 Apr;126(4):729-737. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001527. No abstract available.
PubMed 28114177Ghimire A, Subedi A, Bhattarai B, Sah BP. The effect of intraoperative lidocaine infusion on opioid consumption and pain after totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01054-2.
PubMed 32493276Farag E, Ghobrial M, Sessler DI, Dalton JE, Liu J, Lee JH, Zaky S, Benzel E, Bingaman W, Kurz A. Effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine administration on pain, opioid consumption, and quality of life after complex spine surgery. Anesthesiology. 2013 Oct;119(4):932-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318297d4a5.
PubMed 23681143Choi GJ, Kang H, Ahn EJ, Oh JI, Baek CW, Jung YH, Kim JY. Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):2941-2947. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3619-6.
PubMed 27379388Beaussier M, Delbos A, Maurice-Szamburski A, Ecoffey C, Mercadal L. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Drugs. 2018 Aug;78(12):1229-1246. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0955-x.
PubMed 30117019
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intravenous Lidocaine and Time to Regression of the Sensory Block After Spinal Anesthesia With Isobaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Surgery to Treat Skin and Soft Tissue Tumors of the Lower Limbs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04741880
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ELSA / 40904720.3.0000.5274
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Cancer
- Keywords
- Spinal Anesthesia, Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, Regression of the sensory block
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer, BrazilOther government
- Study start
- 17 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion in the perioperative period is associated with a reduction in postoperative pain scores, opioid use, incidence of nausea and vomiting, among other favorable outcomes. However, this therapeutic intervention has not yet been adequately evaluated by clinical trials when associated with regional anesthesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion during spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine alters the time to regression of sensory block in patients undergoing surgical procedures for the treatment of bone and connective tissue tumor surgeries. This will be a triple-blind randomized trial. The sample size estimated was 66 patients. The study will include all patients who meet the pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, choose to participate, and agree with the Informed Consent Form. The main anesthetic technique will be spinal anesthesia with 13 mg of isobaric bupivacaine. Patients will be allocated in two groups in a blindly after randomization: Group S (lidocaine 0.75mg.kg-1 in bolus followed by infusion of saline solution) and Group L (lidocaine 1.5 mg.kg-1 followed by continuous infusion of lidocaine solution at 2 mg.kg-1.h-1). The primary outcome will be the time to T12 regression of the sensory block. Will also be evaluated: time to regression of the motor block, most rostral dermatome achieved by the sensory block, time to two-segment regression oh the sensory block, propofol dose in the operating room, postoperative pain score at rest, pain at movement score, quality of recovery, use of opioids in the postoperative period, nausea or vomiting, dizziness, shivering, arrhythmias, hypotension, urinary retention, and length of stay. The records will be assigned to the RedCap database. The data will be extracted without identification of the allocation groups for the R software and the groups will be revealed to the researcher after the end of the statistical analysis to write the summary of the results. The results will be submitted to scientific journals afterward.
Detailed description
Hypotheses:
Null hypothesis
H0: The time to T12 regression of the sensory block after administration of isobaric bupivacaine is EQUAL with or without the use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion.
Alternative hypothesis
H1: The time to T12 regression of the sensory block after administration of isobaric bupivacaine is DIFFERENT depending on the use or not of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion.
Methods
Study design
It is a randomized, controlled, triple blind clinical trial (patient, assistant team / investigator, and data collection/analysis).
Standard procedures
All patients should undergo an outpatient preoperative evaluation with an anesthesiologist. At that moment, eligibility for the study will be evaluated and the informed consent form will be presented. The preoperative form will also be completed by the investigator of the study who includes the patient of the patient.
Study participants will undergo continuous 5 leads electrocardiographic, automated noninvasive blood pressure and capnography monitoring initiated at the entrance to the operating room. Peripheral venous access will also be obtained. After certification of monitoring and venous access the patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus with the side to be performed the surgery (or the side of higher major surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures) superiorly (e.g. surgery with right side of the body the puncture will be performed in left lateral decubitus) and then will be initiated the infusion the solutions present in the syringe and in the bag sent by the Division of Pharmacy of the hospital unit according to the protocol. Immediately after the initiation of continuous infusion of the solution the anesthesiologist will begin preparation for performing subarachnoid puncture with a Quinke needle between 22 and 27 Gauge (preferably 26 Gauge) between spaces L4-L5 and L2-L3 (preferably L3-L4) depending on the assessment of the anesthesiologist responsible for the predicted difficulty for the block and the risk of post-dural puncture headache. Conscious sedation with propofol in continuous infusion and local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine solution up to 100 mg will also be initiated. It will be administered in the subarachnoid space 13mg (2.6 ml of solution) of isobaric bupivacaine at 0.5%.
As a multimodal and antiemetic analgesia regimen, the following will be administered:
- dexamethasone 4mg in the operating room;
- ondansetron 4mg in the operating room and in case of postoperative nausea or vomiting;
- dipyrone 20mg.kg-1 every 4 hours or paracetamol 500mg every 4 hours (in case of dipyrone allergy) started before regional anesthesia and kept until discharge;
- tenoxicam 40mg in the OR and 20 mg on the first postoperative day, unless contraindicated by the assistant team;
- tramadol 50mg up to every 4 hours or morphine 4 mg up to every 10 minutes in case of pain assessed by verbal numerical scale greater than or equal to 4 (0-10) or according to evaluation of the assistant team.
After the block, evaluations of the extension of sensory and motor block will be performed at minutes 5, 10, 15 and then every 15 minutes as presented in the data collection form . The sensory block will be evaluated by pinprick sequentially from the most caudal to the most cephalic level, at the midclavicular line, on the opposite side of the surgical procedure (or on the side of minor surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures) and will be computed as the level of blockade the point at which the patient reports sensitivity similar to reference point (homolateral shoulder) will be computed. Motor block will be initially evaluated for ankle flexion, followed by knee elevation and finally leg elevation with knees extended, and the level of motor block will be recorded according to the modified Bromage scale on the opposite side of the surgical procedure (or on the side of lower surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures).
The patient will be released for the surgical procedure as soon as he reaches motor block evidenced by a modified Bromage scale equal to 2. During the procedure, only sensory block will be observed so that there is no interference with the surgical procedure. After the end of the procedure, each 15 minutes evaluations of sensory and motor block will be performed. Supplementary sensory and motor status evaluations may be performed in addition to the evaluations every 15 minutes at the discretion of the assistant team. After the end of the surgery. Sensory block and motor block will be evaluated concomitantly until the primary outcome (regression of sensory block up T12 dermatome), regression of motor block to modified Bromage 1 and regression of two dermatomes of the sensory block (secondary outcomes) are achieved.
The patient will be continuously evaluated in the post-anesthetic recovery room until at least the second postoperative hour and until the primary outcome. Twenty-four hours after the end of the procedure, the patient will be reevaluated at the ward, or by phone contact in case of discharge, and the study information and questionnaires will be computed as described in the data collection form.
Intervention
The bolus and infusion of the solution referring to the allocated group will be made:
- After monitoring and obtaining venous access
- Prior to the initiation of continuous propofol infusion and spinal puncture
Group L (Lidocaine):
Lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of lidocaine infusion.
Lidocaine 2mg.kg-1.h-1.
Group S (saline solution):
Lidocaine bolus 0.75 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of saline infusion.
Saline solution.
Group L will be sent a 20 ml syringe of 2% lidocaine and 200 ml of lidocaine solution at 8mg.ml-1 (80ml of 2% lidocaine associated with 120ml 0.9% sodium chloride) Group S will be sent a 20 ml syringe of 1% lidocaine and 200 ml of saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride)
A syringe with 20 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.
Continuous infusion of lidocaine (group L) or saline solution (group S) will be maintained until the sensory block regresses to the T12 level, until the regression of 2 dermatomes of the sensory block and until the motor block reaches the score on the modified Bromage scale 1.
The infusion will be interrupted and the masking will be broken in case of:
- severe neurological disorders (e.g. seizure, respiratory depression);
- cardiac (e.g. atrioventricular block greater than second degree, bradycardia with HR less than 40 bpm not responsive to atropine, refractory hypotension);
- other unforeseen clinical changes that pose a risk to the patient.
The infusion will be maintained until the end of anesthesia and masking in case of need for conversion to general anesthesia (e.g., insufficient block, psychomotor agitation) and the patient will be (1) censored for the outcomes related to the extension of the blockade and (2) will continue contributing to the other outcomes.
Collected variables
The variables evaluated in the study will be collected preoperatively, at the operating room, at the PACU, in the first 24 postoperative hours, and in 30 days and recorded in the RedCap database. All data collected in the study is available at the data collection sheets.
Statistical analysis
Medical records numbers and names will be included in the data collection but will not be imputed in RedCap. Therefore, the participants' data will not be revealed at the time of data extraction and analysis, preserving the anonymity of the research individuals.
The data extracted from RedCap will be analyzed in software R. The groups will be separated by intervention group, but the researcher responsible for the analysis will only have access to the groups after the end of the analysis of the results.
Continuous variables will be presented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range depending on their distribution. To check the comparability between the groups and study, the basal covariates will be presented by intervention group. Bivariate statistical tests will be performed bicaudal chi-squared test, t-test, nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and log rank test depending on the characteristics of the variable. In the outcome "most rostral dermatome achieved by sensory block" each dermatome will be numbered for statistical analysis from S5 to C6 according to the following examples: S5=1, S4=2, S3=3, C8=23, C7=24 and C6=25 and will be analyzed according to its distribution. The primary outcome will be presented graphically by the Kaplan Meier curve. The value of α was set at 0.05. For the primary outcome, the p-value will be analyzed without adjustment for multiple tests. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated without adjustment for multiple comparisons because it is an exploratory analysis.
The sample size was calculation was performed with the software R, package 'WMWssp', command 'WMWssp'. Based on previous studies, the mean time for regression was estimated at 120 minutes standard deviation for sensory block regression after subarachnoid anesthesia with bupivacaine in 20 minutes. Adopting the α value of 0.05, the power of 80%, and a 10% drop out rate, the estimated sample size to demonstrate the difference of 15 minutes in the primary outcome was 66 patients (R software input: 'WMWssp(round(rnorm(1000000, 120, 20)), rnorm(1000000, 135, 20), alpha = 0.05, power = 0.8, t = 1/2, simulation = FALSE, nsim = 10^4)').
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group L (Lidocaine) | Experimental | Drug: Lidocaine IVLidocaine bolus 1.5 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of lidocaine infusion Lidocaine 2mg.kg-1.h-1 |
| Group S (saline solution) | Placebo comparator | Drug: SalineLidocaine bolus 0.75 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of saline infusion Saline solution infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age between 18 and 85 years-old
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification from I to III
- To be submitted to:
- - Spinal Anesthesia
- - For surgeries performed by the Bone and Connective Tissue (TOC) service
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Coagulation disorder that prevents the execution of the blockade:
- - International normalized ratio for prothrombin (INR) time and activity > 1.5
- - Activated partial thromboplastin time ratio (PTTa) >1.5
- - Use of enoxaparin up to 40mg/day less than 12h before the procedure
- - Use of enoxaparin above 40mg/day less than 24hours before the procedure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine IVAlso: LidocaineWill be sent to Group L a 10 ml syringe of 2% lidocaine and 200 ml of lidocaine solution at 8mg.ml-1 (80ml of 2% lidocaine associated with 120ml 0.9% sodium chloride) A syringe with 10 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered. | Drug | Group L (Lidocaine) |
| SalineAlso: 0.9% sodium chlorideGroup S will be sent a 10 ml syringe of 1% lidocaine and 200 ml of saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) A syringe with 10 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered. | Drug | Group S (saline solution) |
Primary outcome
Time to T12 regression of the sensory block
Time frame: Period: Day 0 postoperative
Time between the injection of bupivacaine into the subarachnoid space and the regression of sensory block to T12 dermatome (in minutes)
17 secondary outcomes
Time to motor block regression
Time frame: Day 0 postoperative
Most rostral dermatome achieved by the sensory block
Time frame: Day 0 postoperative
Time to two-segment regression of the sensory block
Time frame: Day 0 postoperative
Propofol dose at the operating room
Time frame: Intraoperative
Time to the first opioid rescue
Time frame: Intraoperative
Postoperative pain score at rest
Time frame: Admission to the PACU, 2 postoperative hours, 24 postoperative hours, and worse in the first 24 postoperative hours measurements
Pain score at movement
Time frame: 24 postoperative hours
Quality of recovery in 24 hours
Time frame: 24 postoperative hours
Need for opioid analgesics (binary)
Time frame: Between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Need for opioid analgesics (continuous)
Time frame: between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Nausea or vomiting
Time frame: Between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Dizziness
Time frame: From intraoperative to 24 postoperative hours
Bradycardia
Time frame: At the operating room (OR) and admission to the PACU up to 24 postoperative hours
Other arrhythmias
Time frame: At the OR and admission to the PACU up to 24 postoperative hours
Hypotension
Time frame: At the OR, between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Urinary retention
Time frame: Between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
Length of stay
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2021.
- BackgroundMiller RD. Miller's Anesthesia. 7th ed. Phyladelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2010.
- Background: PubMed 19488527Imbelloni LE, Moreira AD, Gaspar FC, Gouveia MA, Cordeiro JA. Assessment of the densities of local anesthetics and their combination with adjuvants: an experimental study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Mar-Apr;59(2):154-65. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000200003. English, Portuguese.
- Background: PubMed 9597201Lui AC, Polis TZ, Cicutti NJ. Densities of cerebrospinal fluid and spinal anaesthetic solutions in surgical patients at body temperature. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Apr;45(4):297-303. doi: 10.1007/BF03012018.
- Background: PubMed 31785720Beloeil H. Opioid-free anesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;33(3):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
- Background: PubMed 22546966Blaudszun G, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramer MR. Effect of perioperative systemic alpha2 agonists on postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1312-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31825681cb.
- Background: PubMed 29028742Gelineau AM, King MR, Ladha KS, Burns SM, Houle T, Anderson TA. Intraoperative Esmolol as an Adjunct for Perioperative Opioid and Postoperative Pain Reduction: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1035-1049. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002469.
- Background: PubMed 31977626Ng KT, Yap JLL, Izham IN, Teoh WY, Kwok PE, Koh WJ. The effect of intravenous magnesium on postoperative morphine consumption in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Mar;37(3):212-223. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001164.
- Background: PubMed 33007645Wang X, Lin C, Lan L, Liu J. Perioperative intravenous S-ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110071. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110071. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 27199310Weibel S, Jokinen J, Pace NL, Schnabel A, Hollmann MW, Hahnenkamp K, Eberhart LH, Poepping DM, Afshari A, Kranke P. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):770-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew101.
- Background: PubMed 31303268Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P, Brandenburger T, Piegeler T, Werdehausen R. Molecular mechanisms of action of systemic lidocaine in acute and chronic pain: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;123(3):335-349. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
- Background: PubMed 28114177Dunn LK, Durieux ME. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2017 Apr;126(4):729-737. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001527. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32493276Ghimire A, Subedi A, Bhattarai B, Sah BP. The effect of intraoperative lidocaine infusion on opioid consumption and pain after totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01054-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andreia C de Melo, PhD contact
Bruno LC Araujo, MSc, EDAIC principal investigator
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital do Câncer II, Instituto Nacional do Câncer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Lidocaine IV and Saline in people with Anesthesia and Cancer, run by Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bruno LC Araujo, MSc, EDAIC (+5521988400944, brunoaraujomed@yahoo.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to T12 regression of the sensory block (time frame: Period: Day 0 postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04741880, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2021.