Cerebral HemorrhagePhase 2/3NCT04742205
ITCH Trial: Protocol for a Randomized, Double Blind Placebo-controlled Trial
A Phase 2/3 study testing Tranexamic Acid 500 MG in people with Cerebral Hemorrhage, run by Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital at 1 site in Nepal.
Trial summary
Intracerebral hemorrhage is increasingly becoming a major burden in the society because of significant morbidity as well as mortality. Hematoma volume at the time of presentation as well as hematoma expansion and re-bleed or ongoing bleed further deteriorates the patient making a poor prognosis, however at present no… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Hemorrhage
- What is being tested?
- Tranexamic Acid 500 MG
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 154 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNepal
- Study dates
- 8 Feb 2021to 4 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients presenting to the emergency department with symptom of hemorrhagic stroke within 24 hours from onset of symptom or last seen well.
- Patient who had a follow up
Who cannot join
- Glasgow coma scale <8 after resuscitation (as this can lead to biasness; requires surgery)
- Contraindication to tranexamic acid,
- Hemorrhagic stroke secondary to trauma,
- Hemorrhage was caused by coagulopathy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Primary Cerebral Hemorrhage for Prevention of Hematoma Progression: Protocol for a Randomized, Double Blind Placebo-controlled Trial
Intracerebral hemorrhage is increasingly becoming a major burden in the society because of significant morbidity as well as mortality. Hematoma volume at the time of presentation as well as hematoma expansion and re-bleed or ongoing bleed further deteriorates the patient making a poor prognosis, however at present no therapy targets this pathological process. Though clinical studies do report benefit of using tranexamic acid in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage by reducing hematoma expansion rate as well as decreasing ongoing bleed, large randomized controlled trials have not shown any convincing advantage owing to various limitations in their design and methods. However, they uniformly did not find any significant side effect with the use of tranexamic acid.
The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that intravenous tranexamic acid is superior to placebo by reducing hematoma expansion when given within 24 h of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
Read the detailed description
Patients and Methods: Data are being collected as patient gets admitted with Intracerebral haemorrhage. 154 spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage patients presenting within 24 hours of ictus or last known well will be taken in the study. Outcomes of these patients will be calculated to establish a relationship between hematoma expansion, underlying pathology and outcome of the patients.
Results: Primary outcome i.e. radiological improvement (CT scan): Difference between hematoma volume with perilesional edema from baseline and 48-hour post treatment scan, hematoma location, and new infarction.
Secondary outcomes: Neurological impairment (NIHSS), Disability (Barthel index), dependency (mRS) on day of discharge. mRS at day 30. Cognition (Telephone Interview Cognition Score-Modified), dependency (mRS) at days 90 and 180. Similarly, costs of treatment between two groups, length of stay in hospital and f/u data. Also, Safety endpoints recorded until day 180: Death (cause), venous thromboembolism confirmed by ultrasound, vascular occlusive events (stroke/transient ischemic attack/myocardial infarction/peripheral artery disease), seizures. Serious adverse events (AEs) in first seven days will be analyzed and calculated.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Hemorrhage
- Being tested
- Tranexamic Acid 500 MG
- Keywords
- double blind randomized trial, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, tranexamic acid
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tranexamic Acid 500 MGDrug
Loading dose of trial (1g of tranexamic acid in 10ml) is mixed in 100ml sodium chloride 0.9% and given over 10 minutes. Maintenance dose of trial mixed in 500ml sodium chloride 0.9% is given over 8 hours
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tranexamic acid | Active comparator | Four 5ml solution of either tranexamic acid 500mg or sodium chloride 0.9% are distributed which cannot be differentiated from the appearance. Loading dose of trial (1g of tranexamic acid in 10ml) or placebo (10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) is mixed in 100ml sodium chloride 0.9% and given over 10 minutes. Maintenance dose of trial or placebo mixed in 500ml sodium chloride 0.9% is given over 8 hours Receives: Drug: Tranexamic Acid 500 MG |
| Sodium Chloride | Placebo comparator | Four 5ml solution of either tranexamic acid 500mg or sodium chloride 0.9% are distributed which cannot be differentiated from the appearance. Loading dose of trial (1g of tranexamic acid in 10ml) or placebo (10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) is mixed in 100ml sodium chloride 0.9% and given over 10 minutes. Maintenance dose of trial or placebo mixed in 500ml sodium chloride 0.9% is given over 8 hours Receives: Drug: Tranexamic Acid 500 MG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Radiological improvement (CT scan)
Difference between hematoma volume from baseline and 48-hour post treatment scan
Measured: 48 hour
Secondary outcomes (3)
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Neurological impairment (score:0-42; 0:favourable outcome)
Measured: day 10
Barthel index
Disability (score:0-100; 100: independent)
Measured: days 10
modified rankin scale
dependency (score:0-5; 0: no symptom)
Measured: days 10 and 30, 90, 180
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2021
- Study start8 Feb 2021
- Primary completion5 Dec 2023
- Study completion4 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebral HemorrhageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 154 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bibesh Pokhrel, Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital
- Investigators
- Deepak Regmi, MS, Study chair, KMC AmbA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04742205
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KathmanduMCTH
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Barsan WG, Hanley DF, Hsu CY, Martin RL, Moy CS, Silbergleit R, Steiner T, Suarez JI, Toyoda K, Wang Y, Yamamoto H, Yoon BW; ATACH-2 Trial Investigators and the Neurological Emergency Treatment Trials Network. Intensive Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 15;375(11):1033-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603460. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
PubMed 27276234van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, van der Tweel I, Algra A, Klijn CJ. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Feb;9(2):167-76. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
PubMed 20056489Dowlatshahi D, Demchuk AM, Flaherty ML, Ali M, Lyden PL, Smith EE; VISTA Collaboration. Defining hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship with patient outcomes. Neurology. 2011 Apr 5;76(14):1238-44. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182143317. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
PubMed 21346218Brouwers HB, Greenberg SM. Hematoma expansion following acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(3):195-201. doi: 10.1159/000346599. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
PubMed 23466430Steiner T, Bosel J. Options to restrict hematoma expansion after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2010 Feb;41(2):402-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.552919. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
PubMed 20044536Flaherty ML, Haverbusch M, Sekar P, Kissela B, Kleindorfer D, Moomaw CJ, Sauerbeck L, Schneider A, Broderick JP, Woo D. Long-term mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006 Apr 25;66(8):1182-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000208400.08722.7c.
PubMed 16636234Zehtabchi S, Abdel Baki SG, Falzon L, Nishijima DK. Tranexamic acid for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;32(12):1503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
PubMed 25447601Roos Y, Rinkel G, Vermeulen M, Algra A, van Gijn J. Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a major update of a cochrane review. Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2308-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000089030.04120.0E. Epub 2003 Aug 21. No abstract available.
PubMed 12933970Germans MR, Post R, Coert BA, Rinkel GJ, Vandertop WP, Verbaan D. Ultra-early tranexamic acid after subarachnoid hemorrhage (ULTRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 May 16;14:143. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-143.
PubMed 23680226Mahmood A, Roberts I, Shakur H. A nested mechanistic sub-study into the effect of tranexamic acid versus placebo on intracranial haemorrhage and cerebral ischaemia in isolated traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CRASH-3 Trial Intracranial Bleeding Mechanistic Sub-Study [CRASH-3 IBMS]). Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2073-6.
PubMed 28716153Anderson CS, Huang Y, Wang JG, Arima H, Neal B, Peng B, Heeley E, Skulina C, Parsons MW, Kim JS, Tao QL, Li YC, Jiang JD, Tai LW, Zhang JL, Xu E, Cheng Y, Heritier S, Morgenstern LB, Chalmers J; INTERACT Investigators. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 May;7(5):391-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70069-3. Epub 2008 Apr 7.
PubMed 18396107Arumugam A, A Rahman NA, Theophilus SC, Shariffudin A, Abdullah JM. Tranexamic Acid as Antifibrinolytic Agent in Non Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhages. Malays J Med Sci. 2015 Dec;22(Spec Issue):62-71.
PubMed 27006639Sprigg N, Flaherty K, Appleton JP, Al-Shahi Salman R, Bereczki D, Beridze M, Christensen H, Ciccone A, Collins R, Czlonkowska A, Dineen RA, Duley L, Egea-Guerrero JJ, England TJ, Krishnan K, Laska AC, Law ZK, Ozturk S, Pocock SJ, Roberts I, Robinson TG, Roffe C, Seiffge D, Scutt P, Thanabalan J, Werring D, Whynes D, Bath PM; TICH-2 Investigators. Tranexamic acid for hyperacute primary IntraCerebral Haemorrhage (TICH-2): an international randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 superiority trial. Lancet. 2018 May 26;391(10135):2107-2115. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31033-X. Epub 2018 May 16.
PubMed 29778325Gayet-Ageron A, Prieto-Merino D, Ker K, Shakur H, Ageron FX, Roberts I; Antifibrinolytic Trials Collaboration. Effect of treatment delay on the effectiveness and safety of antifibrinolytics in acute severe haemorrhage: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 40 138 bleeding patients. Lancet. 2018 Jan 13;391(10116):125-132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32455-8. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
PubMed 29126600O'Donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, Rao-Melacini P, Zhang X, Pais P, Agapay S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Damasceno A, Langhorne P, McQueen MJ, Rosengren A, Dehghan M, Hankey GJ, Dans AL, Elsayed A, Avezum A, Mondo C, Diener HC, Ryglewicz D, Czlonkowska A, Pogosova N, Weimar C, Iqbal R, Diaz R, Yusoff K, Yusufali A, Oguz A, Wang X, Penaherrera E, Lanas F, Ogah OS, Ogunniyi A, Iversen HK, Malaga G, Rumboldt Z, Oveisgharan S, Al Hussain F, Magazi D, Nilanont Y, Ferguson J, Pare G, Yusuf S; INTERSTROKE investigators. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study. Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):761-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30506-2. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
PubMed 27431356
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Primary Cerebral Hemorrhage for Prevention of Hematoma Progression: Protocol for a Randomized, Double Blind Placebo-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04742205
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KathmanduMCTH
- Conditions
- Cerebral Hemorrhage
- Keywords
- double blind randomized trial, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, tranexamic acid
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 154 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intracerebral hemorrhage is increasingly becoming a major burden in the society because of significant morbidity as well as mortality. Hematoma volume at the time of presentation as well as hematoma expansion and re-bleed or ongoing bleed further deteriorates the patient making a poor prognosis, however at present no therapy targets this pathological process. Though clinical studies do report benefit of using tranexamic acid in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage by reducing hematoma expansion rate as well as decreasing ongoing bleed, large randomized controlled trials have not shown any convincing advantage owing to various limitations in their design and methods. However, they uniformly did not find any significant side effect with the use of tranexamic acid.
The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that intravenous tranexamic acid is superior to placebo by reducing hematoma expansion when given within 24 h of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
Detailed description
Patients and Methods: Data are being collected as patient gets admitted with Intracerebral haemorrhage. 154 spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage patients presenting within 24 hours of ictus or last known well will be taken in the study. Outcomes of these patients will be calculated to establish a relationship between hematoma expansion, underlying pathology and outcome of the patients.
Results: Primary outcome i.e. radiological improvement (CT scan): Difference between hematoma volume with perilesional edema from baseline and 48-hour post treatment scan, hematoma location, and new infarction.
Secondary outcomes: Neurological impairment (NIHSS), Disability (Barthel index), dependency (mRS) on day of discharge. mRS at day 30. Cognition (Telephone Interview Cognition Score-Modified), dependency (mRS) at days 90 and 180. Similarly, costs of treatment between two groups, length of stay in hospital and f/u data. Also, Safety endpoints recorded until day 180: Death (cause), venous thromboembolism confirmed by ultrasound, vascular occlusive events (stroke/transient ischemic attack/myocardial infarction/peripheral artery disease), seizures. Serious adverse events (AEs) in first seven days will be analyzed and calculated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tranexamic acid | Active comparator | Drug: Tranexamic Acid 500 MGFour 5ml solution of either tranexamic acid 500mg or sodium chloride 0.9% are distributed which cannot be differentiated from the appearance. Loading dose of trial (1g of tranexamic acid in 10ml) or placebo (10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) is mixed in 100ml sodium chloride 0.9% and given over 10 minutes. Maintenance dose of trial or placebo mixed in 500ml sodium chloride 0.9% is given over 8 hours |
| Sodium Chloride | Placebo comparator | Drug: Tranexamic Acid 500 MGFour 5ml solution of either tranexamic acid 500mg or sodium chloride 0.9% are distributed which cannot be differentiated from the appearance. Loading dose of trial (1g of tranexamic acid in 10ml) or placebo (10 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) is mixed in 100ml sodium chloride 0.9% and given over 10 minutes. Maintenance dose of trial or placebo mixed in 500ml sodium chloride 0.9% is given over 8 hours |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All patients presenting to the emergency department with symptom of hemorrhagic stroke within 24 hours from onset of symptom or last seen well.
- Patient who had a follow up
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Glasgow coma scale <8 after resuscitation (as this can lead to biasness; requires surgery)
- Contraindication to tranexamic acid,
- Hemorrhagic stroke secondary to trauma,
- Hemorrhage was caused by coagulopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic Acid 500 MGLoading dose of trial (1g of tranexamic acid in 10ml) is mixed in 100ml sodium chloride 0.9% and given over 10 minutes. Maintenance dose of trial mixed in 500ml sodium chloride 0.9% is given over 8 hours | Drug | Sodium Chloride, tranexamic acid |
Primary outcome
Radiological improvement (CT scan)
Time frame: 48 hour
Difference between hematoma volume from baseline and 48-hour post treatment scan
3 secondary outcomes
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Time frame: day 10
Barthel index
Time frame: days 10
modified rankin scale
Time frame: days 10 and 30, 90, 180
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 27276234Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Barsan WG, Hanley DF, Hsu CY, Martin RL, Moy CS, Silbergleit R, Steiner T, Suarez JI, Toyoda K, Wang Y, Yamamoto H, Yoon BW; ATACH-2 Trial Investigators and the Neurological Emergency Treatment Trials Network. Intensive Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 15;375(11):1033-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603460. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 20056489van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, van der Tweel I, Algra A, Klijn CJ. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Feb;9(2):167-76. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
- Background: PubMed 21346218Dowlatshahi D, Demchuk AM, Flaherty ML, Ali M, Lyden PL, Smith EE; VISTA Collaboration. Defining hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship with patient outcomes. Neurology. 2011 Apr 5;76(14):1238-44. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182143317. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
- Background: PubMed 23466430Brouwers HB, Greenberg SM. Hematoma expansion following acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(3):195-201. doi: 10.1159/000346599. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 20044536Steiner T, Bosel J. Options to restrict hematoma expansion after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2010 Feb;41(2):402-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.552919. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
- Background: PubMed 16636234Flaherty ML, Haverbusch M, Sekar P, Kissela B, Kleindorfer D, Moomaw CJ, Sauerbeck L, Schneider A, Broderick JP, Woo D. Long-term mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006 Apr 25;66(8):1182-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000208400.08722.7c.
- Background: PubMed 25447601Zehtabchi S, Abdel Baki SG, Falzon L, Nishijima DK. Tranexamic acid for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;32(12):1503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 12933970Roos Y, Rinkel G, Vermeulen M, Algra A, van Gijn J. Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a major update of a cochrane review. Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2308-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000089030.04120.0E. Epub 2003 Aug 21. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23680226Germans MR, Post R, Coert BA, Rinkel GJ, Vandertop WP, Verbaan D. Ultra-early tranexamic acid after subarachnoid hemorrhage (ULTRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 May 16;14:143. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-143.
- Background: PubMed 28716153Mahmood A, Roberts I, Shakur H. A nested mechanistic sub-study into the effect of tranexamic acid versus placebo on intracranial haemorrhage and cerebral ischaemia in isolated traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CRASH-3 Trial Intracranial Bleeding Mechanistic Sub-Study [CRASH-3 IBMS]). Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2073-6.
- Background: PubMed 18396107Anderson CS, Huang Y, Wang JG, Arima H, Neal B, Peng B, Heeley E, Skulina C, Parsons MW, Kim JS, Tao QL, Li YC, Jiang JD, Tai LW, Zhang JL, Xu E, Cheng Y, Heritier S, Morgenstern LB, Chalmers J; INTERACT Investigators. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 May;7(5):391-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70069-3. Epub 2008 Apr 7.
- Background: PubMed 27006639Arumugam A, A Rahman NA, Theophilus SC, Shariffudin A, Abdullah JM. Tranexamic Acid as Antifibrinolytic Agent in Non Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhages. Malays J Med Sci. 2015 Dec;22(Spec Issue):62-71.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Cerebral Hemorrhage
RecruitingObservational study
Clevidipine for the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adverse Events During Physical Therapy in Neurocritical ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Brain Injury
Active, not recruiting
Auricular VNS Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
RecruitingObservational study
Study On Histoacryl Used For Embolization Of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) In Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH)
Subdural Hematoma, Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deepak Regmi, MS study chair
KMC AmbA
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Tranexamic Acid 500 MG in people with Cerebral Hemorrhage, run by Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital at 1 site in Nepal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Radiological improvement (CT scan) (time frame: 48 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04742205, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2025.