AzTrials
AzTrials

STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionREVIVA-STNCT04743154

In-hospital Versus After-discharge Complete Revascularization

A study testing In-hospital nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and After-discharge nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in people with STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease, run by Hospital General Universitario de Valencia at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with STEMI and multivessel disease in whom the culprit lesion has been successfully revascularized during prmimary PCI, will be randomized to in-hospital or after-discharge complete revascularization. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
In-hospital nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and After-discharge nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
20 Jan 2018to 21 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute onset of chest pain <12 hours duration.
  • ST-segment elevation ≥ 0.1 millivolt in ≥ 2 contiguous leads, signs of a true posterior infarction or documented newly developed left bundle branch block.
  • Culprit lesion in a major native vessel, with successful primary PCI.
  • Presence of at least one non-culprit lesion more than or equal to 70% of stenosis in a vessel more than 2mm of diameter or more than or equal to 50% stenosis in proximal segments.
  • The patient is able to give written consent for participation in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy.
  • Significant left main stenosis.
  • Stent thrombosis.
  • Chronic total occlusion.
  • Severe stenosis of non-culprit vessels with distal flow less than TIMI3.
  • Significant non-culprit stenosis no candidate to revascularization.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Presence of valvulopathy candidate for cardiac surgery.
  • Cardiogenic shock status at admission.
  • The patient is not able to give written consent for participation in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: In-hospital Versus After-discharge Complete Revascularization in STEMI Patients With Multivessel Disease.

Patients with STEMI and multivessel disease in whom the culprit lesion has been successfully revascularized during prmimary PCI, will be randomized to in-hospital or after-discharge complete revascularization.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of these two different strategies in terms of hospital stay.

Read the detailed description

STEMI patients with mutivessel disease are, after successful primary angioplasty, randomized 1:1 ratio to either in-hospital complete revascularization or after-discharge complete revascularization strategy.

Eligible non-culprit coronary arteries must be >2.0 mm in diameter and at the discretion of the operator suitable for PCI. Only arteries with angiographically stenoses ≥70% or between ≥50% and <70 in proximal segments can be randomized.

Patients in the in-hospital revascularization group will undergo to non-culprit percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at least 24 hours after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. On the other hand, patients in the after-discharge group will undergo to non-culprit PCI within 4-6 weeks after STEMI.

Being tested
In-hospital nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), After-discharge nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Keywords
STEMI, Multivessel, PCI
Medical subject headings
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • In-hospital nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Other

    To perform percutaneous coronary intervention of non-culprit vessels in a staged procedure during index admission.

  • After-discharge nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Other

    To perform percutaneous coronary intervention of non-culprit vessels in a staged procedure after hospital discharge.

Study groups in NCT04743154
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
In-hospital complete revascularization group.OtherPatients will undergo to a complete revascularization of non-culprit lesions at least 24 hours after STEMI and before hospital discharge.
Receives: Other: In-hospital nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
After-discharge complete revascularization group.OtherPatients will undergo to a complete revascularization of non-culprit lesions after hospital discharge within 4-6 weeks after STEMI.
Receives: Other: After-discharge nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Impact in hospital stay

    To evaluate the impact of two different revascularization strategies (in-hospital versus after-discharge) in terms of hospital stay (days) in patients with a STEMI and multivessel disease.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction or revascularization.

    Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia driven revascularization of non-culprit coronary lesions eligible for and randomized to either of the two strategies.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Fractional flow reserve of angiographically moderate stenosis

    Evaluate the presence of ischemia by analyzing the fractional flow reserve of angiographically moderate stenoses (≥50% and <70) in proximal segments of the anterior descending, circumflex, or right coronary artery.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Feb 2021
  2. Study start20 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion25 Nov 2021
  4. Study completion21 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
250 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04743154
Sponsor's protocol ID
HGUValencia
Acronym
REVIVA-ST
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
3 Feb 2021
Last updated
24 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr, Alpert JS, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Gregoratos G, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Ornato JP. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 4;44(3):E1-E211. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.014. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15358047
  • Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7.

    PubMed 12517460
  • Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Vesterlund T, Grande P, Abildgaard U, Thayssen P, Pedersen F, Mortensen LS; DANAMI-2 Investigators. Danish multicenter randomized study on fibrinolytic therapy versus acute coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the DANish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 (DANAMI-2). Am Heart J. 2003 Aug;146(2):234-41. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00316-8.

    PubMed 12891190
  • O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):e78-e140. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019. Epub 2012 Dec 17. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23256914
  • Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Cox DA, McLaughlin MG, Zimetbaum P, Costantini C, Stuckey T, Tcheng JE, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Grines CL, Stone GW. Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(14):1709-16. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm184. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

    PubMed 17556348
  • Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, Holmes DR Jr, Jacobs AK, Stamato NJ, Venditti FJ, Sharma S, King SB 3rd. Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017.

    PubMed 20129564
  • Vlaar PJ, Mahmoud KD, Holmes DR Jr, van Valkenhoef G, Hillege HL, van der Horst IC, Zijlstra F, de Smet BJ. Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):692-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.046.

    PubMed 21816304
  • Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, Chase AJ, Edwards RJ, Hughes LO, Berry C, Oldroyd KG; PRAMI Investigators. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1115-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305520. Epub 2013 Sep 1.

    PubMed 23991625
  • Gershlick AH, Khan JN, Kelly DJ, Greenwood JP, Sasikaran T, Curzen N, Blackman DJ, Dalby M, Fairbrother KL, Banya W, Wang D, Flather M, Hetherington SL, Kelion AD, Talwar S, Gunning M, Hall R, Swanton H, McCann GP. Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and multivessel disease: the CvLPRIT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 17;65(10):963-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.038.

    PubMed 25766941
  • Engstrom T, Kelbaek H, Helqvist S, Hofsten DE, Klovgaard L, Holmvang L, Jorgensen E, Pedersen F, Saunamaki K, Clemmensen P, De Backer O, Ravkilde J, Tilsted HH, Villadsen AB, Aaroe J, Jensen SE, Raungaard B, Kober L; DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI Investigators. Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Aug 15;386(9994):665-71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60648-1.

    PubMed 26347918
  • Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann FJ, Boxma-de Klerk BM, Lunde K, Schotborgh CE, Piroth Z, Horak D, Wlodarczak A, Ong PJ, Hambrecht R, Angeras O, Richardt G, Omerovic E; Compare-Acute Investigators. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Multivessel Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 30;376(13):1234-1244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701067. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

    PubMed 28317428
  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Ting HH, O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Diercks DB, Fang JC, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;67(10):1235-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 21. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26498666
  • Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimsky P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28886621
  • Politi L, Sgura F, Rossi R, Monopoli D, Guerri E, Leuzzi C, Bursi F, Sangiorgi GM, Modena MG. A randomised trial of target-vessel versus multi-vessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: major adverse cardiac events during long-term follow-up. Heart. 2010 May;96(9):662-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.177162. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

    PubMed 19778920
  • Grines CL, Marsalese DL, Brodie B, Griffin J, Donohue B, Costantini CR, Balestrini C, Stone G, Wharton T, Esente P, Spain M, Moses J, Nobuyoshi M, Ayres M, Jones D, Mason D, Sachs D, Grines LL, O'Neill W. Safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge after primary angioplasty in low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. PAMI-II Investigators. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Apr;31(5):967-72. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00031-x.

    PubMed 9561995

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing In-hospital nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and After-discharge nonculprit-lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in people with STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease, run by Hospital General Universitario de Valencia at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Impact in hospital stay (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04743154, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in