AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT04744597

Fitt's Law MI Experiment

A study testing Real execution of Fitts's law tasks, Motor imagery of Fitts's law tasks and Skip counting in people with Healthy, run by Science and Research Centre Koper.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of our study is to investigate the acute effects of real execution (RE) and motor imagery (MI) of Fitts law tasks on near and far transfer of learning. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 11 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Real execution of Fitts's law tasks, Motor imagery of Fitts's law tasks and Skip counting
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 1 Jun 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 11 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • born in 2009
  • no significant muscular, skeleton or nervous system damage
  • the earlier-signed agreement to take part in the protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Nervous system disorders

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Luka Šlosar, PhD contact

0038640612132

luka.slosar@zrs-kp.si

About this study

Official title: Neural Aspects of Motor Learning Through Real Execution and Motor Imagery in Children

The aim of our study is to investigate the acute effects of real execution (RE) and motor imagery (MI) of Fitts law tasks on near and far transfer of learning.

Read the detailed description

Studies show changes in alpha (7.5 - 15 Hz) and beta (15 - 30 Hz) frequencies before and during motor tasks. However, researchers still disagree on the origin, timing, and direction of this. The neurophysiological mechanisms of motor learning are not yet fully understood. The authors note that event-related beta desynchronization is most commonly associated with motor learning. Reduced beta wave power can be observed in motor cortex, but it is still unclear whether this change is related to motor learning, performance, or movement repetition.

A comparative study of motor imagery and actual performance showed the occurrence of similar neurophysiological processes in the motor cortex. All the mentioned studies were conducted on adults and the results were mainly from the analysis of upper limb movements. In the present study, the investigators will comprehensively evaluate the upper and lower limb movements of children: from the recognition of visual stimuli to the generation of the motor program and the execution itself (behavioral data).

Forty-five children (year 2009) will be recruited from local primary schools. In a single-blinded design, children will be randomized into three groups (1st - real execution, 2nd - motor imagery, 3rd - control) and compared at baseline, immediately post-intervention and at follow-up 24 hours post-intervention. At pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments, participants will perform two different patterns of the Fitts Law task with the predefined difficulty: lower limbs/whole body and upper limbs/hands on an interactive whiteboard. The intervention period lasts approximately 10 minutes, during which participants perform the Fitts law task with different difficulty according to the intervention group to which they belong.

During the upper limb/hand tasks, brain activity will be recorded with electroencephalography (EEG).

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Real execution of Fitts's law tasks, Motor imagery of Fitts's law tasks, Skip counting
Keywords
EEG, Motor learning, Fitt's law, Motor imagery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Real execution of Fitts's law tasksBehavioural

    Also called REg

    Children will be training Fitts's law tasks of different difficulties. Once each task will be solved, they will receive a new, more demanding task

  • Motor imagery of Fitts's law tasksBehavioural

    Also called MIg

    Children will be training Fitts's law tasks of different difficulties, same as RE group but the exception of doing it mentally - motor imagery of Fitts's law tasks with eyes open.

  • Skip countingBehavioural

    Also called SCg

    Children in SCg will silently count (one number per second) in the same working blocks as both experimental groups with a task of saying the number they reached during each block - control condition to keep them mentally active at very low mental engagement.

Study groups in NCT04744597
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Real execution groupExperimentalThe real execution group will perform the acute intervention by the actual performance of the Fitt's law task.
Receives: Behavioral: Real execution of Fitts's law tasks
Motor imagery groupExperimentalThe motor imagery group will perform the acute intervention by simulating (mental process) the Fitt's law task.
Receives: Behavioral: Motor imagery of Fitts's law tasks
Control groupActive comparatorThe control group will perform skip counting.
Receives: Behavioral: Skip counting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline Movement related cortical potential at 24-yhours follow-up post intervention

    Event related potential that are typically linked with updating of internal models, decision-making and motor preparation.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention and at 24-yhours follow-up post intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change from baseline Fitts's law task performance at 24-yhours follow-up post intervention

    Change in movement time (seconds) needed to solve Fitts's law tasks of different difficulites

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention and at 24-yhours follow-up post intervention

  2. Change from baseline Fitts's law task performance at 24-yhours follow-up post intervention

    Accuracy, namely, a group of trials repeatedly hitting a narrow band (precise) but off the center of the target (inaccurate)

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention and at 24-yhours follow-up post intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion10 May 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
In a single-blind design children will be randomized into three groups: 1st - real execution, 2nd - motor imagery, 3rd - control (skip counting)
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
45 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04744597
Sponsor's protocol ID
TwinBrainFittsLaw
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
25 Jan 2021
Last updated
9 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kiefer AW, Gualberto Cremades J, Myer GD. Train the Brain: Novel Electroencephalography Data Indicate Links between Motor Learning and Brain Adaptations. J Nov Physiother. 2014 Apr;4(2):198. doi: 10.4172/2165-7025.1000198.

    PubMed 25309823
  • Thurer B, Stockinger C, Putze F, Schultz T, Stein T. Mechanisms within the Parietal Cortex Correlate with the Benefits of Random Practice in Motor Adaptation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Aug 2;11:403. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00403. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28824406
  • Wu J, Knapp F, Cramer SC, Srinivasan R. Electroencephalographic connectivity measures predict learning of a motor sequencing task. J Neurophysiol. 2018 Feb 1;119(2):490-498. doi: 10.1152/jn.00580.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

    PubMed 29093171
  • Ghasemian M, Taheri H, Saberi Kakhki A, Ghoshuni M. Electroencephalography Pattern Variations During Motor Skill Acquisition. Percept Mot Skills. 2017 Dec;124(6):1069-1084. doi: 10.1177/0031512517727404. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

    PubMed 28840774
  • Ozdenizci O, Yalcin M, Erdogan A, Patoglu V, Grosse-Wentrup M, Cetin M. Electroencephalographic identifiers of motor adaptation learning. J Neural Eng. 2017 Aug;14(4):046027. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa6abd.

    PubMed 28367834
  • Sobierajewicz J, Przekoracka-Krawczyk A, Jaskowski W, Verwey WB, van der Lubbe R. The influence of motor imagery on the learning of a fine hand motor skill. Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jan;235(1):305-320. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4794-2. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

    PubMed 27714404

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Real execution of Fitts's law tasks, Motor imagery of Fitts's law tasks and Skip counting in people with Healthy, run by Science and Research Centre Koper.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Luka Šlosar, PhD (0038640612132, luka.slosar@zrs-kp.si), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline Movement related cortical potential at 24-yhours follow-up post intervention (time frame: Assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention and at 24-yhours follow-up post intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04744597, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Fitt's Law MI Experiment (NCT04744597) | AzTrials