StrokeNCT04745481
Effects of Trunk Stabilization Training Device on Balance Ability for Stroke Patients
A study testing Trunk stabilization training device and Conventional rehabilitation in people with Stroke, run by Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Balance pro(SBT-330:trunk stabilization training device) for stroke patients reduced balance ability Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Trunk stabilization training device and Conventional rehabilitation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2021to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stroke patients 40 years or older (within 2 years of onset)
- Those who have no problems with visual function in conducting and conducting clinical trials
- Patients who are found to have decreased balance ability after stroke (BBS score is 21-40 points)
- Those who do not have orthopedic diseases in both lower limbs
- Subjects with cognitive functions capable of fulfilling and carrying out instructions
- Those who voluntarily consent to the clinical trial
Who cannot join
- Subjects with intellectual disabilities to the extent that they are unable to perform instructions
- Subjects taking drugs that may affect the study
- Subjects with skin and musculoskeletal abnormalities for which the device cannot be worn
- Patients with neurological disorders other than stroke and other disorders that may affect balance
- Other subjects who are judged to be unsuitable for this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Pusan national university Yangsan Hospital
Gyeongsang, Yangsan, 50610
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness Evaluation of Trunk Stabilization Training Using Balance Pro(SBT-330) for Stroke Patients With Reduced Balance Ability
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Balance pro(SBT-330:trunk stabilization training device) for stroke patients reduced balance ability
Read the detailed description
after being informed about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informed consent will undergo a 1-week screening period to determine eligibility for study entry. Subjects who pass the screening test will randomize in a 1:1 ratio to experimental group(conventional rehabilitation + trunk stabilization training device, 30min each, 20days) or control group(conventional rehabilitation + conventional rehabilitation, 30min each, 20days). And then, They receive a registration number within 7 days and proceed with the pre-intervention test.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Trunk stabilization training device, Conventional rehabilitation
- Keywords
- trunk stabilization training
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Trunk stabilization training deviceDevice
Also called Balance Pro(SBT-330)
Conventional rehabilitation 30min daily, 20times 4weeks
+Trunk stabilization training device 30min daily, 20time 4weeks
Conventional rehabilitationDevice
Also called Ergometer, Stepper
Conventional rehabilitation 30min daily, 20times 4weeks
+Conventional rehabilitation 30min daily, 20times 4weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Trunk stabilization training device | Experimental | Participants will receive conventional rehabilitation and use trunk stabilization training device 30min each daily, 20 times for 4weeks. Receives: Device: Trunk stabilization training device |
| Conventional rehabilitation | Active comparator | Participants will receive conventional rehabilitation 60min daily, 20times for 4weeks. Receives: Device: Conventional rehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of Berg Balance Scale
The Berg Balance Scale(BBS) is the quantified cutoff values for the four basic gait-related activities of stroke patients. It consists of a total of 14 items, and each item is divided into 5 levels, ranging from 0 to 4 points, with a total score of 56 points. Interpretation of exercise state according to score is 0-20: Wheelchair bound. 21-40: Walking with assistance. 41-56: independent.
Measured: Change from baseline Berg Balance Scale at week 4
Secondary outcomes (5)
Timed Up and Go test
The Timed Up and Go test(TUG) starts with sitting in a chair and measures the time it takes to get up and walk 3 meters back to sitting on the chair.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Functional Ambulation Category
The Functional Ambulation Category(FAC) is a 7-point scale to evaluate the gait and mobility of patients with nervous and musculoskeletal injury. A higher score is interpreted as having higher independence of walking, and a score of 3 or less is considered difficult to move independently. It is a tool to evaluate not only balance ability but also actual mobility ability.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Korean version of Modified Barthel Index
The Korean version of Modified Barthel Index(K-MBI) is a tool to evaluate the patient's level of independence in daily living activities, including basic daily living activities and instrumental daily living activities. It consists of 5 to 15 points depending on the item, and the perfect score is 100 points. The higher the score, the higher the patient's level of independence from daily activities is considered.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Fugl-Meyer Assessment(L/E)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment(FMA)(L/E) is an exercise ability scale to evaluate the motor function of stroke patients, and it is a tool to evaluate motor function of the healthy and injured upper and lower limbs. Each exercise item is evaluated on a 2-point scale and 3-point scale, with a perfect score of 100. In this study, lower limb evaluation items are implemented.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Trunk Impairment Scale
The Trunk Impairment Scale(TIS) is for the motor impairment of the trunk of a stroke patient.
As an optimal test method, it measures static and dynamic balance and coordination between the body in a sitting position. There are a total of 17 items with 3 items for static balance ability in a sitting position, 10 items for dynamic balance ability, and 4 items for trunk coordination, and minimum 0 to maximum 23 points.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2021
- Study start15 Mar 2021
- Primary completion30 May 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yong-il Shin, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
- Investigators
- Yong-il Shin, PhD, Study director, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04745481
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 03-2020-010
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 31 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Min JH, Seong HY, Ko SH, Jo WR, Sohn HJ, Ahn YH, Son JH, Seo HY, Son YR, Mun SJ, Ko MH, Shin YI. Effects of trunk stabilization training robot on postural control and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Jun;43(2):159-166. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000399.
PubMed 32282572Chung SH, Kim JH, Yong SY, Lee YH, Park JM, Kim SH, Lee HC. Effect of Task-Specific Lower Extremity Training on Cognitive and Gait Function in Stroke Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Rehabil Med. 2019 Feb;43(1):1-10. doi: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.1. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
PubMed 30852865
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness Evaluation of Trunk Stabilization Training Using Balance Pro(SBT-330) for Stroke Patients With Reduced Balance Ability
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04745481
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 03-2020-010
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- trunk stabilization training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pusan National University Yangsan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Balance pro(SBT-330:trunk stabilization training device) for stroke patients reduced balance ability
Detailed description
after being informed about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informed consent will undergo a 1-week screening period to determine eligibility for study entry. Subjects who pass the screening test will randomize in a 1:1 ratio to experimental group(conventional rehabilitation + trunk stabilization training device, 30min each, 20days) or control group(conventional rehabilitation + conventional rehabilitation, 30min each, 20days). And then, They receive a registration number within 7 days and proceed with the pre-intervention test.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Trunk stabilization training device | Experimental | Device: Trunk stabilization training deviceParticipants will receive conventional rehabilitation and use trunk stabilization training device 30min each daily, 20 times for 4weeks. |
| Conventional rehabilitation | Active comparator | Device: Conventional rehabilitationParticipants will receive conventional rehabilitation 60min daily, 20times for 4weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Stroke patients 40 years or older (within 2 years of onset)
- Those who have no problems with visual function in conducting and conducting clinical trials
- Patients who are found to have decreased balance ability after stroke (BBS score is 21-40 points)
- Those who do not have orthopedic diseases in both lower limbs
- Subjects with cognitive functions capable of fulfilling and carrying out instructions
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects with intellectual disabilities to the extent that they are unable to perform instructions
- Subjects taking drugs that may affect the study
- Subjects with skin and musculoskeletal abnormalities for which the device cannot be worn
- Patients with neurological disorders other than stroke and other disorders that may affect balance
- Other subjects who are judged to be unsuitable for this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Trunk stabilization training deviceAlso: Balance Pro(SBT-330)Conventional rehabilitation 30min daily, 20times 4weeks +Trunk stabilization training device 30min daily, 20time 4weeks | Device | Trunk stabilization training device |
| Conventional rehabilitationAlso: Ergometer, StepperConventional rehabilitation 30min daily, 20times 4weeks +Conventional rehabilitation 30min daily, 20times 4weeks | Device | Conventional rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Change of Berg Balance Scale
Time frame: Change from baseline Berg Balance Scale at week 4
The Berg Balance Scale(BBS) is the quantified cutoff values for the four basic gait-related activities of stroke patients. It consists of a total of 14 items, and each item is divided into 5 levels, ranging from 0 to 4 points, with a total score of 56 points. Interpretation of exercise state according to score is 0-20: Wheelchair bound. 21-40: Walking with assistance. 41-56: independent.
5 secondary outcomes
Timed Up and Go test
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Functional Ambulation Category
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Korean version of Modified Barthel Index
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Fugl-Meyer Assessment(L/E)
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Trunk Impairment Scale
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32282572Min JH, Seong HY, Ko SH, Jo WR, Sohn HJ, Ahn YH, Son JH, Seo HY, Son YR, Mun SJ, Ko MH, Shin YI. Effects of trunk stabilization training robot on postural control and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Jun;43(2):159-166. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000399.
- Background: PubMed 30852865Chung SH, Kim JH, Yong SY, Lee YH, Park JM, Kim SH, Lee HC. Effect of Task-Specific Lower Extremity Training on Cognitive and Gait Function in Stroke Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Rehabil Med. 2019 Feb;43(1):1-10. doi: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.1. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Foot Drop Rehabilitation and Mobility in Chronic Stroke
Stroke
Enrolling by invitation
Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interface With MRI-Guided Multi-Channel Time-Domain Interference Stimulation in Treating Motor Dysfunction in Acute Cerebral Infarction Patients
Acute Ichemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Development, Validation and Normative Data of the Italian Battery for the Recognition of Famous Faces (FAME)
Stroke, Alzheimer s Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Long-Term Clinical, Health Economic, and Process Evaluation of Intensive Technology-Integrated Motor Rehabilitation in Chronic Neurological Conditions (INTeRAcT-bis)
Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Rimonabant for Improving Walking Ability in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Chronic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yong-il Shin, PhD study director
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Trunk stabilization training device and Conventional rehabilitation in people with Stroke, run by Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of Berg Balance Scale (time frame: Change from baseline Berg Balance Scale at week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04745481, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2024.