AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNCT04745741

Evaluating the Rationality of the International Guideline About Selective Coverage of Level Ib in CTV With NPC

An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Fujian Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate its rationality in real-world data and provide clinical evidence for the refinement of nodal CTV delineation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
What is being tested?
IB-positive group
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 May 2021to 1 Jun 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not meet the exclusion criteria of our center.

Who may be able to join

  • histologically confirmed NPC by biopsy (clearly recorded in the pathology report or medical history) ;
  • no evidence of distant metastasis at initial diagnosis and receiving radical IMRT in our center
  • the following conditions: ① level IB metastasis, ② involvement of the submandibular gland, ③ involvement of structures that drain to level Ib as the first echelon site ( the oral cavity, anterior half of nasal cavity involvement) ④ involvement of level II LNs with extracapsular extension(because the judgment of extracapsular invasion is greatly influenced by subjective factors, this study only include patients who had high grade ENE(G2/G3 as demonstrated in our previous study: Oral Oncol. 2019 Dec;99:104438.)⑤ level II nodal involvement with maximum nodal axial diameter greater than 2 cm.
  • all patients who were treated at Lin Shaojun's attending group from June 2005 to December 2012.
  • presence of complete baseline magnetic resonance imaging data of the nasopharyngeal skull base and neck and treated in our center at initial diagnosis .

Who cannot join

  • disease progression during IMRT;
  • fail to obtain tumor efficacy evaluation information in the medical records of the research center;
  • previous malignancy or other concomitant malignant disease;
  • receiving blind treatment in clinical research.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Shaojun Lin, DR contact

13860603879

linshaojun@yeah.net

Qiaojuan Guo, DR contact

15080013157

guoqiaojuan@163.com

China1 site
  • Department of radiation oncology, Fujian cancer hospital

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350014

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Rationality of the International Guideline's Recommendations Regarding Selective Coverage of Level Ib in Node Clinical Target Volume With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma : Results From a Real-world Series

The purpose of this study was to evaluate its rationality in real-world data and provide clinical evidence for the refinement of nodal CTV delineation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC).

Read the detailed description

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has gradually replaced two-dimensional radiation therapy as it offers improved target conformity. Xerostomia is still the most common side effect of radiotherapy in patients with NPC treated with IMRT. Most stimulated saliva is secreted by the parotid glands (PGs), while the submandibular glands (SMGs) produce most of the unstimulated saliva and mucins, which may influence the degree of a dry mouth sensation.There are still differences in the understanding of nasopharyngeal cancer experts at home and abroad on the delineation of clinical target volumes., suitable criteria for elective irradiation of neck level Ib need to be re-evaluated.Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to assess the feasibility of recommendation to level Ib in the International Guideline for Delineation of Clinical Target Volumes.

Being tested
IB-positive group
Medical subject headings
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IB-positive groupRadiation

    The gross tumor volume of the nasopharynx and neck nodes (GTVnx and GTVnd) were delineated according to the tumor extension. The CTVnx was defined as GTVnx + nasopharynx mucosa + 8mm +corresponding anatomical structure without the delineation of CTV1. The CTVnd was defined as GTVnd plus the elective neck area. The prescribe doses of GTVnx/GTVnd, CTVnx, CTVnd were 66-70Gy,54-56Gy and 50-54Gy in 31-35 fractions, respectively.

Study groups in NCT04745741
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IB-positive groupPatients with level IB metastasis and histologically confirmed positive by biopsy.
Receives: Radiation: IB-positive group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS)

    The duration of time to regional failure were calculated from the start of treatment to the dates of recurrence.

    Measured: 60 months

  2. level IB nodal recurrence-free survival

    The duration of time to level Ib recurrence were calculated from the start of treatment to the date of Ievel Ib recurrence.

    Measured: 60 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. local recurrence-free survival (LRFS)

    LRFS was calculated from the start of treatment to the dates of local recurrence.

    Measured: 60 months

  2. distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS)

    DMFS was calculated from the start of treatment to the dates of distant metastasis.

    Measured: 60 months

  3. Overall survival

    OS was calculated from the date of randomization to death from any cause.

    Measured: 60 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2021
  2. Study start1 May 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 May 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04745741
Sponsor's protocol ID
NPC006.1
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
2 Feb 2021
Last updated
29 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Fujian Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shaojun Lin, DR (13860603879, linshaojun@yeah.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) (time frame: 60 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in