AzTrials
AzTrials

Female Genital FistulaNCT04748653

Fistula Reintegration Pilot

A study testing Multi-component reintegration intervention in people with Female Genital Fistula and Urinary Incontinence, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in Uganda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a pilot study to test the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component facility-based intervention designed to be provided adjunct to genital fistula surgery incorporating: health education, psychosocial counseling, physiotherapy, and economic investment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Female Genital Fistula, Urinary Incontinence
What is being tested?
Multi-component reintegration intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteUganda
Study dates
1 Aug 2021to 14 Sep 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Undergoing surgery for female genital fistula
  • Age 18 or above, or emancipated minor per Ugandan law

Who cannot join

  • No further criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Uganda1 site
  • Mulago Specialized Women's and Children's Hospital

    Kampala

Other trials in Uganda

About this study

Official title: Comprehensive Reintegration Assistance for Women With Obstetric Fistula

This is a pilot study to test the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component facility-based intervention designed to be provided adjunct to genital fistula surgery incorporating: health education, psychosocial counseling, physiotherapy, and economic investment. We will include a total of 30 women in the study, and follow them for 6-months using a mixed-methods strategy for feasibility and acceptability assessment.

Being tested
Multi-component reintegration intervention
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Multi-component reintegration interventionBehavioural

    The intervention incorporates health education, psychosocial counseling, physiotherapy and economic investment.

Study groups in NCT04748653
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Multi-component reintegration interventionExperimentalThere is one arm for the feasibility and acceptability study - all intervention participants will receive the intervention: health education, psychosocial counseling, physiotherapy, and economic investment.
Receives: Behavioral: Multi-component reintegration intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Planned Intervention Sessions That Were Delivered

    Number of planned intervention session over the total number of planned interention sessions

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Number of Participants Reporting to be "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" About Their Overall Experience With the Intervention on a Five-point Likert Scale at Six Weeks Over the Total Number of Intervention Participants.

    Number of participants reporting to be "satisfied" or "very satisfied" about their overall experience participating in the intervention on a five-point Likert scale at six weeks over the total number of participants.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in Reintegration Score

    Mean change in reintegration score from pre-intervention (baseline) to post (6 months) on the post-fistula repair reintegration instrument (range 0-100, higher indicating better)

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  2. Number of Participants Reporting to be "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" About Their Experience With the Health Education Component of the Intervention on a Five-point Likert Scale at Six Weeks Over the Total Number of Intervention Participants

    Number of participants reporting to be "satisfied" or "very satisfied" about their experience participating in the health education component of the intervention on a five-point Likert scale at six weeks over the total number of participants.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  3. Number of Participants Reporting to be "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" About Their Experience Participating in the Psychosocial Counseling Component of the Intervention on a Five-point Likert Scale at Six Weeks Over the Total Number of Participants.

    Number of participants reporting to be "satisfied" or "very satisfied" about their experience participating in the psychosocial counseling component of the intervention on a five-point Likert scale at six weeks over the total number of participants.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  4. Number of Participants Reporting to be "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" About Their Experience With the Physiotherapy Component of the Intervention on a Five-point Likert Scale at Six Weeks Over the Total Number of Intervention Participants.

    Number of participants reporting to be "satisfied" or "very satisfied" about their experience with the physiotherapy component of the intervention on a five-point Likert scale at six weeks over the total number of intervention participants.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  5. Number of Participants Reporting to be "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" About Their Experience With the Economic Empowerment Component of the Intervention on a Five-point Likert Scale at Six Weeks Over the Total Number of Intervention Participants

    Number of Participants Reporting to be "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" About Their Experience With the Economic Empowerment Component of the Intervention on a Five-point Likert Scale at Six Weeks Over the Total Number of Intervention Participants

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2021
  2. Study start1 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion14 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion14 Sep 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The intervention incorporates 15 health education sessions, 6 psychosocial counseling sessions, 15 physiotherapy sessions, and an economic investment.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04748653
Sponsor's protocol ID
P0527552
Other IDs
R00HD086232
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
5 Feb 2021
Last updated
22 May 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Multi-component reintegration intervention in people with Female Genital Fistula and Urinary Incontinence, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in Uganda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Planned Intervention Sessions That Were Delivered (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in