Cognitive FunctionNCT04753047
The Cognitive Functioning of Young Athletes Including Bioelectrical Brain Function
An observational study of Cognitive Function, run by University of Gdansk at 2 sites in Poland.
Trial summary
The project focuses on two central issues: 1. The impact of intensity of sport on the cognitive functioning and brain waves of children in late childhood (10-12 years old); 2. The specific impact of individual forms of sporting competitions classified according to dynamic, static components as well as closed / open… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cognitive Function
- How many people
- 179 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesPoland
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2020to 2 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: The participants will be recruited for research via Szkoły Mistrzostwa Sportowego [Sports Championship Schools] (criterion groups), sports clubs, as well as by establishing contact with other primary schools. Selecting 40 - 45 people aged 10-12 for each of the 2 control groups differentiated by the dynamic, static factor and nature of the sport close / open skill and for the comparative group of 40-45 children who are cognitively stimulated through physical activity and / or otherwise. They will be enrolled to the study after giving their and their parents written consent to participate in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Polish-speaking children
Who cannot join
- mental illness;
- non-Polish speaking children
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Poland2 sites
University of Gdansk
Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-309
University of Gdansk
Gdansk, 80-309
About this study
Official title: The Cognitive Functioning of Young Athletes (10-12 Years Old) Undertaking Various Sports Activities (Gymnastics, Football) Including Bioelectrical Brain Function
The project focuses on two central issues:
- The impact of intensity of sport on the cognitive functioning and brain waves of children in late childhood (10-12 years old);
- The specific impact of individual forms of sporting competitions classified according to dynamic, static components as well as closed / open skill exercise. The variables will be age, gender, and fluid intelligence. Additionally, children's temperament will be examined in order to assess its relationship with the preferences for choosing a particular type of sport activity and the intensity of this activity.
- Conditions
- Cognitive Function
- Being tested
- No intervention
- Keywords
- cognitive function, sport, football, gymnastics, children
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No interventionOther
No intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Children practicing football | Children in late childhood (age 10-12 years) practicing sport, which is high dynamic (> 75%), and low static (<10\&) and in the same time it is open skill exercise sport (football) Receives: Other: No intervention | |
| Children practicing gymnastics | Children in late childhood (age 10-12 years) practicing sport, which is low dynamic (<50%), high static (>30%) and in the same time it is closed skill exercise sport (sport gymnastics) Receives: Other: No intervention | |
| Comparative group | A comparative group of children that do not attend sport classes or sports clubs, but carrying out sports activity and / or in other areas Receives: Other: No intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Attention
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016) - attention (the ability to orientate on stimulus, motor speed, maintain attention on the visual stimulus, distinguishing significant and non-significant material). Higher score means better attention.
Measured: Baseline
Brain Waves
- EEG Biofeedback - bioelectric recording of brain activity from a centrally placed electrode to measure fast brainwaves (Alpha, Beta1, Beta2) and slow brainwaves (Delta, Theta)
Measured: Baseline
Short-term memory of verbal material material
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016). Higher score means better short-term memory of verbal material
Measured: Baseline
Visual-spatial material
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016). Higher score means better visual-spatial material.
Measured: Baseline
Executive functions
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016). Higher score means better executive functions.
Measured: Baseline
Language functions
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016). Higher score means better language functions.
Measured: Baseline
Episodic memory of visual-spatial material
- Diagnosis of Brain Injury (DUM) (Weidlich, Lamberti, 1996) [assessment of episodic memory of visual-spatial material (the rate of acquiring new information, the process of consolidation - the ability to transfer information from short-term to long-term memory)]. Higher score means better episodic memory of visual-spatial material (maximal points: 54, minimal: 0).
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (3)
Sports Intensity by International Physical Activity Questionnaire (in a modified version, relating to children) (Biernat, 2007)
Higher scores mean a better physical activity. In test there are 3 categories of activity: insufficient (less than 600), sufficient (600 - 1500 or 600 - 3000) or high (more than 1500 or 3000 MET-min / week)
Measured: Baseline
Intelligence by CFT 20-R, The Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) - version 2, part 1 only (Cattell, Weiss, adapt. Stańczak,2013)
Measurement of fluid intelligence. Higher score means higher fluid intelligence (maximum number of points: 56, minimal: 0).
Measured: Baseline
Temperament by EAS Buss & Plomin Questionnaire (Buss, Plomin, 1997)
A questionnaire for parents, coaches, teachers. It consists of 20 items - statements, which suitableness is rated by the subject on a five-point scale (from "Never true" to "Always true"). This version has four scales: Shyness, Sociability, Activity, and Emotionality and has 20 items relating to each of the 4 temperaments. There is a 5-point rating scale (from 1: "not characteristic or typical of your child" to 5 : "very characteristic or typical of your child"). These scores belong to each temperament and they are summed.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2021
- Study start2 Jan 2020
- Primary completion2 Jan 2022
- Study completion2 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cognitive FunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Gdansk
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ilona Bidzan-Bluma, University of Gdansk
- Investigators
- Ilona Bidzan-Bluma, MS, Principal investigator, University of Gdansk
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04753047
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UGdansk
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Bidzan-Bluma I. Twin-To-Twin Transfusion Syndrome Donor and Recipient and Their Subsequent Cognitive Functioning in Late Childhood as Juvenile Athletes-A Case Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052545.
PubMed 33806653
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Cognitive Functioning of Young Athletes (10-12 Years Old) Undertaking Various Sports Activities (Gymnastics, Football) Including Bioelectrical Brain Function
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04753047
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UGdansk
- Conditions
- Cognitive Function
- Keywords
- cognitive function, sport, football, gymnastics, children
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of GdanskUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The project focuses on two central issues:
- The impact of intensity of sport on the cognitive functioning and brain waves of children in late childhood (10-12 years old);
- The specific impact of individual forms of sporting competitions classified according to dynamic, static components as well as closed / open skill exercise. The variables will be age, gender, and fluid intelligence. Additionally, children's temperament will be examined in order to assess its relationship with the preferences for choosing a particular type of sport activity and the intensity of this activity.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Children practicing football | – | Other: No interventionChildren in late childhood (age 10-12 years) practicing sport, which is high dynamic (> 75%), and low static (<10\&) and in the same time it is open skill exercise sport (football) |
| Children practicing gymnastics | – | Other: No interventionChildren in late childhood (age 10-12 years) practicing sport, which is low dynamic (<50%), high static (>30%) and in the same time it is closed skill exercise sport (sport gymnastics) |
| Comparative group | – | Other: No interventionA comparative group of children that do not attend sport classes or sports clubs, but carrying out sports activity and / or in other areas |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- The participants will be recruited for research via Szkoły Mistrzostwa Sportowego [Sports Championship Schools] (criterion groups), sports clubs, as well as by establishing contact with other primary schools. Selecting 40 - 45 people aged 10-12 for each of the 2 control groups differentiated by the dynamic, static factor and nature of the sport close / open skill and for the comparative group of 40-45 children who are cognitively stimulated through physical activity and / or otherwise. They will be enrolled to the study after giving their and their parents written consent to participate in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Polish-speaking children
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- mental illness;
- non-Polish speaking children
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No interventionNo intervention | Other | Children practicing football, Children practicing gymnastics, Comparative group |
Primary outcome
Attention
Time frame: Baseline
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016) - attention (the ability to orientate on stimulus, motor speed, maintain attention on the visual stimulus, distinguishing significant and non-significant material). Higher score means better attention.
Brain Waves
Time frame: Baseline
- EEG Biofeedback - bioelectric recording of brain activity from a centrally placed electrode to measure fast brainwaves (Alpha, Beta1, Beta2) and slow brainwaves (Delta, Theta)
Short-term memory of verbal material material
Time frame: Baseline
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016). Higher score means better short-term memory of verbal material
Visual-spatial material
Time frame: Baseline
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016). Higher score means better visual-spatial material.
Executive functions
Time frame: Baseline
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016). Higher score means better executive functions.
Language functions
Time frame: Baseline
- PU1 Battery (Borkowska, SajewiczRadtke, Lipowska, Kalka, 2016). Higher score means better language functions.
Episodic memory of visual-spatial material
Time frame: Baseline
- Diagnosis of Brain Injury (DUM) (Weidlich, Lamberti, 1996) [assessment of episodic memory of visual-spatial material (the rate of acquiring new information, the process of consolidation - the ability to transfer information from short-term to long-term memory)]. Higher score means better episodic memory of visual-spatial material (maximal points: 54, minimal: 0).
3 secondary outcomes
Sports Intensity by International Physical Activity Questionnaire (in a modified version, relating to children) (Biernat, 2007)
Time frame: Baseline
Intelligence by CFT 20-R, The Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) - version 2, part 1 only (Cattell, Weiss, adapt. Stańczak,2013)
Time frame: Baseline
Temperament by EAS Buss & Plomin Questionnaire (Buss, Plomin, 1997)
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Apr 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33806653Bidzan-Bluma I. Twin-To-Twin Transfusion Syndrome Donor and Recipient and Their Subsequent Cognitive Functioning in Late Childhood as Juvenile Athletes-A Case Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052545.
Related trials for Cognitive Function
RecruitingPhase 3
Vibegron for ENergy Thinking and Resilience in Aging
Obesity
Not yet recruiting
Creatine and Beta-Hydroxy-Beta-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation Plus Home-Based Exercise for Sarcopenia in Huntington's Disease
Huntington Disease, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruiting
Supplementation of Inulin + L. Acidophilus in Elders With T2DM
Diabetes Mellitus, Microbiome
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Not yet recruiting
Negotiation Training for Family Caregivers of People With Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Dementia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ilona Bidzan-Bluma, MS principal investigator
University of Gdansk
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cognitive Function, run by University of Gdansk at 2 sites in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Attention (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04753047, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2022.