AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Low-back PainAuriModNCT04753528

Personalized Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain

A study testing AuriMod CT01_A, AuriMod CT01_B and AuriMod CT01_C in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by Aurimod GmbH at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

One in five people in the general adult population suffer from chronic pain, a figure that is higher than heart disease, cancer, and diabetes combined. A majority of these patients is suffering from chronic back pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Low-back Pain
What is being tested?
AuriMod CT01_A, AuriMod CT01_B and AuriMod CT01_C
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
43 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
13 Apr 2021to 25 Oct 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female aged 18 to 65 years at screening
  • Patient has an understanding of the study and its procedures, agrees to its provisions, and gives written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures
  • Chronic back pain with or without leg pain (CBLP) persisting for at least 3 months
  • A minimum of 70 (out of 180) points on the Computer User Self-Efficacy Scale at the screening visit
  • Patient is constant with respect to pain treatment during the screening phase
  • A daily average VAS >= 4 on at least half of the days in the screening phase
  • Compliance with the daily status reporting requirements as demonstrated by having valid required data entries for all days. It is acceptable if data of one day is missing in the screening phase

Who cannot join

  • Patients with age under 18
  • Hemophilia
  • Infection, eczema, or psoriasis at application site
  • Numbed and desensitized skin at the application site
  • Florid malignant diseases
  • Mental and physical impairments that represent a source of risk for handling the device
Show all 20Show fewer
  • The presence of a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implant, or other active implantable device
  • Vagal hypersensitivity
  • Indication for back surgery
  • High-grade spinal stenosis
  • Patients with other active implants
  • Patients with autonomic disorders
  • Patients with diabetes type I or II
  • Patients taking Beta-Blockers
  • Patients taking drugs carrying the potential risk of arrhythmia (tricyclic medications, Alzheimer drugs, etc.)
  • Clinically significant hip or knee arthritis
  • Allergy against rescue medication used during the study
  • History of Vagus Nerve Stimulation
  • Pregnant or nursing female patients
  • Patients with arrhythmia, bradycardia, other rhythm disorders or any other clinically significant cardiac anomalies detected during ECG at screening

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Austria1 site
  • Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee

    Klagenfurt, Carinthia, 9020

Other trials in Austria

Switzerland1 site
  • Hopital de La Tour

    Geneva, 1217

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Personalized Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

One in five people in the general adult population suffer from chronic pain, a figure that is higher than heart disease, cancer, and diabetes combined. A majority of these patients is suffering from chronic back pain. Conventional treatment options offer only a partial response, with many people continuing to suffer severe chronic pain, despite receiving several treatments.

Non-pharmacological treatments by neuromodulation represent a promising treatment modality for these patients. For instance, spinal cord stimulation blocks pain signals travelling to the brain, but requires implantation near the spine with significant clinical risks. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is another neuromodulation modality proposed to alleviate chronic pain. Conventional VNS devices are implanted under the skin on the chest and the electrodes are wired to the left vagus nerve in the neck. However, aside from implantation risks, VNS is often associated with side effects such as swallowing difficulties, due to unwanted stimulation of motoric vagus nerve branches in the neck.

Read more

Percutaneous auricular VNS (pVNS) is an emerging technology for stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve in the pinna of the ear. Specific electrical impulses are applied via three miniature needle electrodes located in the auricle near sensory vagus nerve fibers. Scientific data show that pVNS modulates brain circuits involved in autonomic control and pain processing. pVNS has shown positive effects in chronic low-back pain patients, in a sustainable way with a low side-effect profile. However, the optimal settings of stimulation with regards to personalization remain to be elucidated.

The present prospective, open, randomized, controlled pilot study aims at evaluating the performance of pVNS treatment, using a small wearable stimulation device (AuriMod CT01), comparing personalized and non-personalized stimulation paradigms in patients with chronic low-back pain. Patients will be randomized in one of the following treatment groups (1) Group A: Stimulation with personalized stimulation parameters and amplitude, (2) Group B: Stimulation with personalized stimulation amplitude, (3) Group C: Stimulation without personalization (comparator group).

Patients will be treated for 8 weeks. Patients will receive standardized pain medication including rescue medication in parallel. An additional follow-up period of 12 weeks allows to evaluate sustainable and late-time effects of treatment. Patients will use a therapy management system to monitor outcome.

Being tested
AuriMod CT01_A, AuriMod CT01_B, AuriMod CT01_C
Keywords
Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Personalization, Therapy Management

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AuriMod CT01_ADevice

    AuriMod CT01 is a wearable medical device for personalised pain treatment through auricular vagus nerve stimulation. AuriMod CT01 is a battery-operated electrical stimulation device, to be placed behind the ear on the neck. AuriMod CT01 connects to three needle electrodes, which are placed in vagally innervated regions of the auricle. It emits electrical signals with a personalized set of stimulation parameters and adjustable amplitude.

  • AuriMod CT01_BDevice

    AuriMod CT01 with a fixed set of stimulation parameters and adjustable stimulation amplitude.

  • AuriMod CT01_CDevice

    AuriMod CT01 with a fixed set of stimulation parameters and amplitude.

Study groups in NCT04753528
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group AExperimentalPersonalized stimulation parameters and amplitude
Receives: Device: AuriMod CT01_A
Group BExperimentalPersonalized stimulation amplitude
Receives: Device: AuriMod CT01_B
Group CActive comparatorNon-personalized stimulation
Receives: Device: AuriMod CT01_C

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Average VAS

    Change from baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain) during the last 24 hours before the visit

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Max/Min VAS

    Change from baseline to EoT in max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Average/Max/Min VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)

    Change from baseline to End of Follow-Up in average/max/min VAS

    Measured: 20 weeks

  3. Normalized average/max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)

    Baseline-adjusted area under the max/min/average VAS from baseline to EoT

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)

    VAS during follow-up

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Medication use

    Pain and rescue medication consumption during treatment and follow-up phase

    Measured: 20 weeks

  6. Heart Rate

    Change in heart rate over therapy and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

  7. Heart Rate Variability

    Change in heart rate variability over therapy and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

  8. Blood Pressure

    Change in blood pressure over therapy and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

  9. Patient motility

    Change in daily step count over therapy and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

  10. painDETECT

    painDETECT questionnaire over treatment and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

  11. EQ-5D-5L

    EQ-5D-5L questionnaire over treatment and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

  12. HADS

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) over treatment and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

  13. Sleep quality

    Sleep quality (5-item questionnaire) over treatment and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

  14. Wellbeing

    Subjective wellbeing (on a 3-point ordinal scale: good, medium, bad)

    Measured: 20 weeks

  15. Perception Scale

    AuriMod CT01 Perception Scale evaluating the quality of stimulation perception in a 10-item questionnaire at EoT

    Measured: 8 weeks

  16. Usability Scale

    AuriMod CT01 Usability scoring using the System Usability Scale (10-item scale from 10-50, 10...worst usability, 50...best usability) at EoT

    Measured: 8 weeks

  17. Socioeconomic data

    Socioeconomic data change over treatment and follow-up

    Measured: 20 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2021
  2. Study start13 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion25 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion25 Oct 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
43 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04753528
Sponsor's protocol ID
AT-MF-000000433-CIV-001
Acronym
AuriMod
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
27 Jan 2021
Last updated
1 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AuriMod CT01_A, AuriMod CT01_B and AuriMod CT01_C in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by Aurimod GmbH at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Austria, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Average VAS (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in