AzTrials
AzTrials

PregnancyNCT04755218

Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol

An observational study of Pregnancy and Labor, Induced, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will compare vaginal and oral misoprostol, to determine whether a vaginal misoprostol regimen achieves a higher vaginal delivery rate in a real-world, high-volume setting, and whether this regimen reduces time and oxytocin need on a high-volume Labor and Delivery unit at Parkland Hospital. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
2,546 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
24 May 2021to 7 Jul 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, no prior uterine scar, with intact fetal membranes, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os, requiring induction at Parkland Health and Hospital System.

Who may be able to join

  • Nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women
  • 37 weeks gestation or greater
  • Living, singleton fetus
  • No major fetal malformations
  • Cephalic presentation
  • No prior uterine scar
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Intact fetal membranes
  • Qualifies for prostaglandin administration according to current Parkland protocol
  • Have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os
  • Have an indication for induction or attempted induction of labor according to Parkland protocol

Who cannot join

  • Non-reassuring fetal status
  • Active herpes outbreak
  • Prior uterine scar
  • Contraindication to prostaglandins according to current Parkland protocol (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 min prior to prostaglandin administration)
  • Contraindication to vaginal delivery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Parkland Health and Hospital Systems

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol

This study will compare vaginal and oral misoprostol, to determine whether a vaginal misoprostol regimen achieves a higher vaginal delivery rate in a real-world, high-volume setting, and whether this regimen reduces time and oxytocin need on a high-volume Labor and Delivery unit at Parkland Hospital.

Our primary hypothesis is that among women with singleton, term pregnancies, cervical dilation 2cm or less, and indicated labor induction, the rate of vaginal delivery is significantly increased when a standardized vaginal misoprostol regimen is used, compared with a standardized oral misoprostol regimen.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a standardized vaginal misoprostol regimen will result in a decreased primary cesarean delivery rate among women with a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters of less who require induction of labor at term, compared with the currently used oral misoprostol regimen. We also aim to evaluate oxytocin use, time to delivery, uterine activity, indication for cesarean delivery, intrapartum and postpartum infectious morbidities, excess blood loss at delivery, and adverse neonatal outcomes in the overall population as well as nulliparous women specifically.

This will be a prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial to compare the rate of vaginal delivery achieved when two standards of care are used across a large population of women with indication for labor induction at Parkland Hospital. Eligible participants will include nulliparous and multiparous women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, no prior uterine scar, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os. Patients with non-reassuring fetal status, active herpes outbreak, a prior uterine scar, or any contraindication to prostaglandins (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 minutes prior to prostaglandin administration) will be excluded from participation in the study.

Computer-generated cluster randomization will occur on a weekly basis for all study participants, to either the vaginal misoprostol regimen (study group) or to oral misoprostol regimen (control group).

According to the randomization protocol each week, participants will be randomized to either the oral misoprostol standard of care (control group) or vaginal misoprostol standard of care (study group). The study group will receive vaginal misoprostol 25 mcg every 3 hours for a maximum of 5 doses in those who meet criteria for prostaglandin administration. The control group will receive oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Misoprostol will not be administered to patients who have progressed to active labor, defined as 4 centimeters cervical dilation. Intravenous oxytocin will be administered according to current PHHS protocol for both groups.

No direct contact between the research team and patients will be required, as this is a systematic comparison of two standards of care.

The primary outcome will be the rate of vaginal delivery.

Secondary outcomes will include maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Maternal outcomes will include time to delivery, time (hours) of oxytocin, need for oxytocin, indication for cesarean delivery, labor analgesia, clinical chorioamnionitis, tachysystole, hyperstimulation syndrome, excess estimated blood loss, transfusion at delivery, endometritis, surgical site infection, uterine rupture, and unplanned hysterectomy.

Neonatal outcomes will include meconium-stained amniotic fluid, umbilical cord pH <7.0, 5-minute Apgar <4, neonatal intubation or ventilation in the delivery room, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission.

Keywords
Pregnancy, Labor induction, Cervical Ripening, misoprostol

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04755218
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vaginal MisoprostolPatients will receive vaginal misoprostol 25 micrograms given every 3 hours for a maximum of 5 doses. Although labeled "experimental" for comparison purposes, this is not an experimental intervention, as the method is a currently accepted standard of care for cervical ripening and labor induction in the United States
Oral MisoprostolPatients will receive standard oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses according to current labor induction protocol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants with Vaginal Delivery

    vaginal delivery at first induction

    Measured: at delivery

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Time to Delivery

    time (in hours) from start of induction agent to delivery at first induction

    Measured: from start of induction agent to time of delivery

  2. Time (hours) of Oxytocin

    time (in hours) from start of Oxytocin until turned off for delivery

    Measured: at delivery

  3. Need for Oxytocin

    administration of Oxytocin to facilitate labor contractions

    Measured: at delivery

  4. Indication for Cesarean Delivery

    among women delivered by cesarean, the indication for cesarean

    Measured: at delivery

  5. Use of Epidural During Labor

    use of epidural between the start of induction and delivery

    Measured: at delivery

  6. Presence of Chorioamnionitis

    intrapartum fever (temp greater than or equal to 38 degrees C) with clinical concern for infection and no other identified cause

    Measured: at delivery

  7. Number of Participants with Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome

    tachysystole accompanied by fetal heart rate decelerations

    Measured: at delivery

  8. Number of Participants with Excess Blood Loss

    Maternal excess blood loss is defined as >500mL for vaginal and >1000mL for cesarean delivery

    Measured: at delivery

  9. Number of Participants with Blood Transfusion

    administration of blood products related to delivery blood loss

    Measured: at delivery

  10. Number of Participants with Puerperal Fever and/or Endometritis

    maternal fever recorded in the time after delivery, but prior to discharge from the hospital, with or without clinical assessment of endometritis

    Measured: immediately after delivery to discharge from the hospital, or up to 4 weeks postpartum

  11. Surgical Site Infection

    documentation of cellulitis, organisms grown on wound culture, or superficial or deep space surgical site infection with or without purulent drainage requiring readmission

    Measured: from time of birth until the time of discharge, or up to 4 weeks postpartum

  12. Number of Participants with Uterine Rupture

    spontaneous separation of myometrium in a previously intact, unscarred uterus

    Measured: at delivery

  13. Number of Participants with Unplanned Hysterectomy

    unplanned removal of the uterus following delivery of the fetus

    Measured: immediately after delivery to discharge from the hospital, or up to 4 weeks postpartum

  14. Number of Participants with Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid

    identification of any meconium (green tinge) in the amniotic fluid before or during delivery by a healthcare provider's assessment of gross fluid color

    Measured: at the time of rupture of membranes or at delivery

  15. Number of Participants with Umbilical pH <7.0

    arterial or venous cord blood pH defined as < 7.0

    Measured: at delivery

  16. Number of Participants with a 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4

    Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respirations-scored from 0-2 for each component, added to make a total score and used as an assessment of initial response to newborn resuscitation, lower scores associated with poor outcomes. Here defined as Apgar <4 at 5 minutes

    Measured: 5 minutes after time of birth

  17. Number of Participants That Needed Mechanical Ventilation in Delivery Room (Yes/No)

    intubation with mechanical support or control of neonatal breathing in the delivery room

    Measured: at delivery

  18. Number of Participants with Neonatal Sepsis

    neonatal bacteremia as defined by bacterial growth in blood cultures

    Measured: from time of birth until time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first

  19. Number of Participants with NICU Admission Order

    admission order to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) placed between the time of delivery and infant discharge

    Measured: from time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Feb 2021
  2. Study start24 May 2021
  3. Primary completion18 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion7 Jul 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2,546 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04755218
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU 2020-1395
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
5 Feb 2021
Last updated
5 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Adhikari EH, McGuire J, Lo J, McIntire DD, Spong CY, Nelson DB. Vaginal Compared With Oral Misoprostol Induction at Term: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb 1;143(2):256-264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005464. Epub 2023 Nov 21.

    PubMed 37989142

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pregnancy and Labor, Induced, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants with Vaginal Delivery (time frame: at delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04755218, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in