PregnancyNCT04755218
Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol
An observational study of Pregnancy and Labor, Induced, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare vaginal and oral misoprostol, to determine whether a vaginal misoprostol regimen achieves a higher vaginal delivery rate in a real-world, high-volume setting, and whether this regimen reduces time and oxytocin need on a high-volume Labor and Delivery unit at Parkland Hospital. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 2,546 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 May 2021to 7 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, no prior uterine scar, with intact fetal membranes, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os, requiring induction at Parkland Health and Hospital System.
Who may be able to join
- Nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women
- 37 weeks gestation or greater
- Living, singleton fetus
- No major fetal malformations
- Cephalic presentation
- No prior uterine scar
Show all 10Show fewer
- Intact fetal membranes
- Qualifies for prostaglandin administration according to current Parkland protocol
- Have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os
- Have an indication for induction or attempted induction of labor according to Parkland protocol
Who cannot join
- Non-reassuring fetal status
- Active herpes outbreak
- Prior uterine scar
- Contraindication to prostaglandins according to current Parkland protocol (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 min prior to prostaglandin administration)
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Parkland Health and Hospital Systems
Dallas, Texas, 75235
About this study
Official title: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol
This study will compare vaginal and oral misoprostol, to determine whether a vaginal misoprostol regimen achieves a higher vaginal delivery rate in a real-world, high-volume setting, and whether this regimen reduces time and oxytocin need on a high-volume Labor and Delivery unit at Parkland Hospital.
Our primary hypothesis is that among women with singleton, term pregnancies, cervical dilation 2cm or less, and indicated labor induction, the rate of vaginal delivery is significantly increased when a standardized vaginal misoprostol regimen is used, compared with a standardized oral misoprostol regimen.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a standardized vaginal misoprostol regimen will result in a decreased primary cesarean delivery rate among women with a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters of less who require induction of labor at term, compared with the currently used oral misoprostol regimen. We also aim to evaluate oxytocin use, time to delivery, uterine activity, indication for cesarean delivery, intrapartum and postpartum infectious morbidities, excess blood loss at delivery, and adverse neonatal outcomes in the overall population as well as nulliparous women specifically.
This will be a prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial to compare the rate of vaginal delivery achieved when two standards of care are used across a large population of women with indication for labor induction at Parkland Hospital. Eligible participants will include nulliparous and multiparous women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, no prior uterine scar, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os. Patients with non-reassuring fetal status, active herpes outbreak, a prior uterine scar, or any contraindication to prostaglandins (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 minutes prior to prostaglandin administration) will be excluded from participation in the study.
Computer-generated cluster randomization will occur on a weekly basis for all study participants, to either the vaginal misoprostol regimen (study group) or to oral misoprostol regimen (control group).
According to the randomization protocol each week, participants will be randomized to either the oral misoprostol standard of care (control group) or vaginal misoprostol standard of care (study group). The study group will receive vaginal misoprostol 25 mcg every 3 hours for a maximum of 5 doses in those who meet criteria for prostaglandin administration. The control group will receive oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Misoprostol will not be administered to patients who have progressed to active labor, defined as 4 centimeters cervical dilation. Intravenous oxytocin will be administered according to current PHHS protocol for both groups.
No direct contact between the research team and patients will be required, as this is a systematic comparison of two standards of care.
The primary outcome will be the rate of vaginal delivery.
Secondary outcomes will include maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Maternal outcomes will include time to delivery, time (hours) of oxytocin, need for oxytocin, indication for cesarean delivery, labor analgesia, clinical chorioamnionitis, tachysystole, hyperstimulation syndrome, excess estimated blood loss, transfusion at delivery, endometritis, surgical site infection, uterine rupture, and unplanned hysterectomy.
Neonatal outcomes will include meconium-stained amniotic fluid, umbilical cord pH <7.0, 5-minute Apgar <4, neonatal intubation or ventilation in the delivery room, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission.
- Conditions
- Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
- Keywords
- Pregnancy, Labor induction, Cervical Ripening, misoprostol
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vaginal Misoprostol | Patients will receive vaginal misoprostol 25 micrograms given every 3 hours for a maximum of 5 doses. Although labeled "experimental" for comparison purposes, this is not an experimental intervention, as the method is a currently accepted standard of care for cervical ripening and labor induction in the United States | |
| Oral Misoprostol | Patients will receive standard oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses according to current labor induction protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants with Vaginal Delivery
vaginal delivery at first induction
Measured: at delivery
Secondary outcomes (19)
Time to Delivery
time (in hours) from start of induction agent to delivery at first induction
Measured: from start of induction agent to time of delivery
Time (hours) of Oxytocin
time (in hours) from start of Oxytocin until turned off for delivery
Measured: at delivery
Need for Oxytocin
administration of Oxytocin to facilitate labor contractions
Measured: at delivery
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
among women delivered by cesarean, the indication for cesarean
Measured: at delivery
Use of Epidural During Labor
use of epidural between the start of induction and delivery
Measured: at delivery
Presence of Chorioamnionitis
intrapartum fever (temp greater than or equal to 38 degrees C) with clinical concern for infection and no other identified cause
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants with Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome
tachysystole accompanied by fetal heart rate decelerations
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants with Excess Blood Loss
Maternal excess blood loss is defined as >500mL for vaginal and >1000mL for cesarean delivery
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants with Blood Transfusion
administration of blood products related to delivery blood loss
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants with Puerperal Fever and/or Endometritis
maternal fever recorded in the time after delivery, but prior to discharge from the hospital, with or without clinical assessment of endometritis
Measured: immediately after delivery to discharge from the hospital, or up to 4 weeks postpartum
Surgical Site Infection
documentation of cellulitis, organisms grown on wound culture, or superficial or deep space surgical site infection with or without purulent drainage requiring readmission
Measured: from time of birth until the time of discharge, or up to 4 weeks postpartum
Number of Participants with Uterine Rupture
spontaneous separation of myometrium in a previously intact, unscarred uterus
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants with Unplanned Hysterectomy
unplanned removal of the uterus following delivery of the fetus
Measured: immediately after delivery to discharge from the hospital, or up to 4 weeks postpartum
Number of Participants with Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid
identification of any meconium (green tinge) in the amniotic fluid before or during delivery by a healthcare provider's assessment of gross fluid color
Measured: at the time of rupture of membranes or at delivery
Number of Participants with Umbilical pH <7.0
arterial or venous cord blood pH defined as < 7.0
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants with a 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4
Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respirations-scored from 0-2 for each component, added to make a total score and used as an assessment of initial response to newborn resuscitation, lower scores associated with poor outcomes. Here defined as Apgar <4 at 5 minutes
Measured: 5 minutes after time of birth
Number of Participants That Needed Mechanical Ventilation in Delivery Room (Yes/No)
intubation with mechanical support or control of neonatal breathing in the delivery room
Measured: at delivery
Number of Participants with Neonatal Sepsis
neonatal bacteremia as defined by bacterial growth in blood cultures
Measured: from time of birth until time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Participants with NICU Admission Order
admission order to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) placed between the time of delivery and infant discharge
Measured: from time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Feb 2021
- Study start24 May 2021
- Primary completion18 Sep 2022
- Study completion7 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PregnancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,546 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emily Adhikari, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Investigators
- Emily H Adhikari, MD, Principal investigator, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04755218
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU 2020-1395
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Adhikari EH, McGuire J, Lo J, McIntire DD, Spong CY, Nelson DB. Vaginal Compared With Oral Misoprostol Induction at Term: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb 1;143(2):256-264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005464. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
PubMed 37989142
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Cluster Randomized Trial of Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04755218
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU 2020-1395
- Conditions
- Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
- Keywords
- Pregnancy, Labor induction, Cervical Ripening, misoprostol
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,546 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare vaginal and oral misoprostol, to determine whether a vaginal misoprostol regimen achieves a higher vaginal delivery rate in a real-world, high-volume setting, and whether this regimen reduces time and oxytocin need on a high-volume Labor and Delivery unit at Parkland Hospital.
Our primary hypothesis is that among women with singleton, term pregnancies, cervical dilation 2cm or less, and indicated labor induction, the rate of vaginal delivery is significantly increased when a standardized vaginal misoprostol regimen is used, compared with a standardized oral misoprostol regimen.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a standardized vaginal misoprostol regimen will result in a decreased primary cesarean delivery rate among women with a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters of less who require induction of labor at term, compared with the currently used oral misoprostol regimen. We also aim to evaluate oxytocin use, time to delivery, uterine activity, indication for cesarean delivery, intrapartum and postpartum infectious morbidities, excess blood loss at delivery, and adverse neonatal outcomes in the overall population as well as nulliparous women specifically.
This will be a prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial to compare the rate of vaginal delivery achieved when two standards of care are used across a large population of women with indication for labor induction at Parkland Hospital. Eligible participants will include nulliparous and multiparous women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, no prior uterine scar, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os. Patients with non-reassuring fetal status, active herpes outbreak, a prior uterine scar, or any contraindication to prostaglandins (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 minutes prior to prostaglandin administration) will be excluded from participation in the study.
Computer-generated cluster randomization will occur on a weekly basis for all study participants, to either the vaginal misoprostol regimen (study group) or to oral misoprostol regimen (control group).
According to the randomization protocol each week, participants will be randomized to either the oral misoprostol standard of care (control group) or vaginal misoprostol standard of care (study group). The study group will receive vaginal misoprostol 25 mcg every 3 hours for a maximum of 5 doses in those who meet criteria for prostaglandin administration. The control group will receive oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Misoprostol will not be administered to patients who have progressed to active labor, defined as 4 centimeters cervical dilation. Intravenous oxytocin will be administered according to current PHHS protocol for both groups.
No direct contact between the research team and patients will be required, as this is a systematic comparison of two standards of care.
The primary outcome will be the rate of vaginal delivery.
Secondary outcomes will include maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Maternal outcomes will include time to delivery, time (hours) of oxytocin, need for oxytocin, indication for cesarean delivery, labor analgesia, clinical chorioamnionitis, tachysystole, hyperstimulation syndrome, excess estimated blood loss, transfusion at delivery, endometritis, surgical site infection, uterine rupture, and unplanned hysterectomy.
Neonatal outcomes will include meconium-stained amniotic fluid, umbilical cord pH <7.0, 5-minute Apgar <4, neonatal intubation or ventilation in the delivery room, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vaginal Misoprostol | – | –Patients will receive vaginal misoprostol 25 micrograms given every 3 hours for a maximum of 5 doses. Although labeled "experimental" for comparison purposes, this is not an experimental intervention, as the method is a currently accepted standard of care for cervical ripening and labor induction in the United States |
| Oral Misoprostol | – | –Patients will receive standard oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses according to current labor induction protocol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, no prior uterine scar, with intact fetal membranes, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os, requiring induction at Parkland Health and Hospital System.
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women
- 37 weeks gestation or greater
- Living, singleton fetus
- No major fetal malformations
- Cephalic presentation
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Non-reassuring fetal status
- Active herpes outbreak
- Prior uterine scar
- Contraindication to prostaglandins according to current Parkland protocol (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 min prior to prostaglandin administration)
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of Participants with Vaginal Delivery
Time frame: at delivery
vaginal delivery at first induction
19 secondary outcomes
Time to Delivery
Time frame: from start of induction agent to time of delivery
Time (hours) of Oxytocin
Time frame: at delivery
Need for Oxytocin
Time frame: at delivery
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: at delivery
Use of Epidural During Labor
Time frame: at delivery
Presence of Chorioamnionitis
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants with Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants with Excess Blood Loss
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants with Blood Transfusion
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants with Puerperal Fever and/or Endometritis
Time frame: immediately after delivery to discharge from the hospital, or up to 4 weeks postpartum
Surgical Site Infection
Time frame: from time of birth until the time of discharge, or up to 4 weeks postpartum
Number of Participants with Uterine Rupture
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants with Unplanned Hysterectomy
Time frame: immediately after delivery to discharge from the hospital, or up to 4 weeks postpartum
Number of Participants with Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid
Time frame: at the time of rupture of membranes or at delivery
Number of Participants with Umbilical pH <7.0
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants with a 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4
Time frame: 5 minutes after time of birth
Number of Participants That Needed Mechanical Ventilation in Delivery Room (Yes/No)
Time frame: at delivery
Number of Participants with Neonatal Sepsis
Time frame: from time of birth until time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first
Number of Participants with NICU Admission Order
Time frame: from time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37989142Adhikari EH, McGuire J, Lo J, McIntire DD, Spong CY, Nelson DB. Vaginal Compared With Oral Misoprostol Induction at Term: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb 1;143(2):256-264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005464. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pregnancy
Not yet recruiting
STRONG: SMART Trial
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Pentoxifylline in Diabetic Kidney Disease
Diabetic Kidney Disease
Recruiting
Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and a Modified Lumbopelvic Belt on Pain, Kinesiophobia, and Functional Status in Pregnant Women With Symphysis Pubis Pain
Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction, Pregnancy
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Iptacopan in Patients With C3 Glomerulopathy.
C3G
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emily H Adhikari, MD principal investigator
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pregnancy and Labor, Induced, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants with Vaginal Delivery (time frame: at delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04755218, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2024.