Preterm NewbornCALIPREMNCT04757012
Efficacy Study of a Device Allowing Broadcasting Maternal Voice and Heartbeat in Preterm Newborn (CALIPREM)
A study testing calinange in people with Preterm Newborn, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits of an exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns. For that, we use of a specific neonatal device "Calinange" able to record maternal voice and heartbeats and to restore it with a sound level control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 7 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Preterm Newborn
- What is being tested?
- calinange
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 19 Apr 2022to 18 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 7 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- hospitalised premature newborn in Port-Royal NICU
- age between 3 and 6 daysof life
- gestational age between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks
- hospitalisation in one bed room
- parental consents
- beneficiaries social security scheme
Who cannot join
- occurrence of one or more non-inclusion criteria
- Non-inclusion Criteria:
- Chromosomal abnormality, severe congenital malformation
- Toxic substance consumption during pregnancy
- Sedative medication in progress, High frequencies ventilation in progress
- Neurological damage: intraventricular haemorrhage stage 3 and 4, bilateral and expanse periventricular leukomalacia lesions
- Severe infectious state requiring haemodynamic support (inotropic drugs or hemissucinate)
- Participation to a other intervention research
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
NICU of Port-Royal, Maternity of Port-Royal, Cochin Hospital
Paris, 75014
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study to Evaluate the Benefits of Preterm Newborn Exposition to a Maternal Voice and Heardbeat Recording During Hospital Stay
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits of an exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns. For that, we use of a specific neonatal device "Calinange" able to record maternal voice and heartbeats and to restore it with a sound level control. We hypothesize an improvement of the well being of the newborn under Calinange exposition.
Read the detailed description
Immediately after birth, preterm newborns are immersed in a hostile environment of intensive care unit with light, sound and painful stimulations. Previously, exposure to maternal voice has demonstrated improvement on infants' statements: reduction of bradycardia, desaturation events, improvement of tolerance feeding and sleep. Unfortunatly in most of the N ICU in France, the mothers' presence attendance time is reduced because of the absence of accommodation structure. The use of a specific neonatal device able to daily record maternal voice and hearbeats and to restore it when mother is gone could improve the environment and promote the well-being of the newborn.
- Conditions
- Preterm Newborn
- Being tested
- calinange
- Keywords
- Preterm newborn, Maternal voice reccording, NIPE
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
calinangeDevice
calinange
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Calinage exposition | Experimental | exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns at D2, D4 and D6 Receives: Device: calinange |
| no exposition | No intervention | No exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns at D1, D3 and D5 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Heart rate variability / NIPE Index
Recorded heart rate
Measured: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))
Secondary outcomes (5)
Number of desaturation events
Change in desaturation events before and after intervention
Measured: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))
Number of apnoeic events
Change in apneic events before and after intervention
Measured: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))
Number of bradycardia events
Change in bradycardia events before and after intervention
Measured: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))
Evaluate the benefits for the nurses
Evaluation questionnaire
Measured: To be completed after each use of calinange ether on day 2, 4 and 6
Evaluate the benefits for the mother
Satisfaction questionnaire
Measured: At day 7, after the end of intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Feb 2021
- Study start19 Apr 2022
- Primary completion18 Jun 2023
- Study completion18 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Preterm NewbornStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Juliana PATKAI, MD, Principal investigator, Service de Médecine et Réanimation néonatales de Port-Royal APHP.Centre - Université de Paris. Site Cochin.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04757012
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP200731
- Other IDs
- 2020-A01369-30
- Acronym
- CALIPREM
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Alexandre C, De Jonckheere J, Rakza T, Mur S, Carette D, Logier R, Jeanne M, Storme L. [Impact of cocooning and maternal voice on the autonomic nervous system activity in the premature newborn infant]. Arch Pediatr. 2013 Sep;20(9):963-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 23. French.
PubMed 23890732Filippa M, Devouche E, Arioni C, Imberty M, Gratier M. Live maternal speech and singing have beneficial effects on hospitalized preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2013 Oct;102(10):1017-20. doi: 10.1111/apa.12356. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
PubMed 23848529Williamson S, McGrath JM. What Are the Effects of the Maternal Voice on Preterm Infants in the NICU? Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Aug;19(4):294-310. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000578.
PubMed 31335378Provenzi L, Broso S, Montirosso R. Do mothers sound good? A systematic review of the effects of maternal voice exposure on preterm infants' development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 May;88:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
PubMed 29535067
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study to Evaluate the Benefits of Preterm Newborn Exposition to a Maternal Voice and Heardbeat Recording During Hospital Stay
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04757012
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CALIPREM / APHP200731
- Conditions
- Preterm Newborn
- Keywords
- Preterm newborn, Maternal voice reccording, NIPE
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Study start
- 19 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits of an exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns. For that, we use of a specific neonatal device "Calinange" able to record maternal voice and heartbeats and to restore it with a sound level control. We hypothesize an improvement of the well being of the newborn under Calinange exposition.
Detailed description
Immediately after birth, preterm newborns are immersed in a hostile environment of intensive care unit with light, sound and painful stimulations. Previously, exposure to maternal voice has demonstrated improvement on infants' statements: reduction of bradycardia, desaturation events, improvement of tolerance feeding and sleep. Unfortunatly in most of the N ICU in France, the mothers' presence attendance time is reduced because of the absence of accommodation structure. The use of a specific neonatal device able to daily record maternal voice and hearbeats and to restore it when mother is gone could improve the environment and promote the well-being of the newborn.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Calinage exposition | Experimental | Device: calinangeexposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns at D2, D4 and D6 |
| no exposition | No intervention | –No exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns at D1, D3 and D5 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 7 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- hospitalised premature newborn in Port-Royal NICU
- age between 3 and 6 daysof life
- gestational age between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks
- hospitalisation in one bed room
- parental consents
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- occurrence of one or more non-inclusion criteria
- Non-inclusion Criteria:
- Chromosomal abnormality, severe congenital malformation
- Toxic substance consumption during pregnancy
- Sedative medication in progress, High frequencies ventilation in progress
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| calinangecalinange | Device | Calinage exposition |
Primary outcome
Heart rate variability / NIPE Index
Time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))
Recorded heart rate
5 secondary outcomes
Number of desaturation events
Time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))
Number of apnoeic events
Time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))
Number of bradycardia events
Time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))
Evaluate the benefits for the nurses
Time frame: To be completed after each use of calinange ether on day 2, 4 and 6
Evaluate the benefits for the mother
Time frame: At day 7, after the end of intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 23890732Alexandre C, De Jonckheere J, Rakza T, Mur S, Carette D, Logier R, Jeanne M, Storme L. [Impact of cocooning and maternal voice on the autonomic nervous system activity in the premature newborn infant]. Arch Pediatr. 2013 Sep;20(9):963-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 23. French.
- Background: PubMed 23848529Filippa M, Devouche E, Arioni C, Imberty M, Gratier M. Live maternal speech and singing have beneficial effects on hospitalized preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2013 Oct;102(10):1017-20. doi: 10.1111/apa.12356. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 31335378Williamson S, McGrath JM. What Are the Effects of the Maternal Voice on Preterm Infants in the NICU? Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Aug;19(4):294-310. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000578.
- Background: PubMed 29535067Provenzi L, Broso S, Montirosso R. Do mothers sound good? A systematic review of the effects of maternal voice exposure on preterm infants' development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 May;88:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Preterm Newborn
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
RecruitingObservational study
Multidimensional Dynamic Early Warning System for Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Multicenter Clinical Study
NEC - Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
RecruitingObservational study
Growing Little PEAPODS Study
Premature Birth, Premature Infant
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juliana PATKAI, MD principal investigator
Service de Médecine et Réanimation néonatales de Port-Royal APHP.Centre - Université de Paris. Site Cochin.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing calinange in people with Preterm Newborn, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Heart rate variability / NIPE Index (time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04757012, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2026.