Weaning FailureSPEED-UPNCT04758546
Speeding the Weaning up: Aggressive Screening Criteria and Higher Minimal Ventilatory Settings.
A study testing Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial in people with Weaning Failure, run by Gonzalo Hernandez Martinez at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Hypothesis: 1. In patients with less than 4 high risk factors for reintubation excluding body mass index >30 and hypercapnia during the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) (low and intermediate risk for extubation failure), who receive preventive therapy with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), the use of SBT with "HIGH… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Weaning Failure
- What is being tested?
- Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 940 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 31 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients on mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours with >= positive end-expiratory pressure 10.
- Patients with up to three high risk factors for extubation failure excluding hypercapnia during the spontaneous breathing trial and obese patients (BMI >30).
- Patients fulfilling weaning criteria expected to have a spontaneous breathing trial in the following 24 hours.
- Patients expected to be prevented with high-flow oxygen therapy after extubation.
Who cannot join
- <18 years old.
- Pregnant women.
- Tracheostomized patients.
- Accidental or self-extubated patients.
- Obese (BMI >30) or hypercapnic patients during the spontaneous breathing trial.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Customizing Spontaneous Breathing Trial After Aggressive Readiness Criteria Hastens Weaning in Low and Intermediate Risk Patients With Prevention: A Randomized Trial (SPEED-UP Trial).
Hypothesis:
- In patients with less than 4 high risk factors for reintubation excluding body mass index >30 and hypercapnia during the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) (low and intermediate risk for extubation failure), who receive preventive therapy with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), the use of SBT with "HIGH minimal ventilator settings" (PS 8 + PEEP 5 cm H2O Vs PS 5 + PEEP 0 cm H2O), increase the proportion of patients with simple weaning (extubation after the first SBT).
- In patients with low and intermediate risk for extubation failure, who receive preventive therapy with HFNC, the use of Walsh screening criteria reduces the mechanical ventilation time compared with the use of Boles criteria.
Read more
Study design: This is a multicenter randomized open trial with 4 arms.
- Screening with PaO2/FiO2 > 180 and PEEP ≤ 10cm H2O; SBT with "HIGH minimal ventilator settings" (PS 8 + PEEP 5 cm H2O).
- Screening with PaO2/FiO2 > 180 and PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O; SBT with "LOW minimal ventilator settings" (PS 5 + PEEP 0 cm H2O).
- Screening with PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 and PEEP ≤ 8 cm H2O; SBT with "HIGH minimal ventilator settings" (PS 8 + PEEP 5 cm H2O).
- Screening with PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 and PEEP ≤ 8 cm H2O; SBT with "LOW minimal ventilator settings" (PS 5 + PEEP 0 cm H2O).
Primary Outcome Measure:
- - Percentage of first spontaneous breathing trial tolerated.
- - Time on mechanical ventilation.
Read the detailed description
Discontinuation of mechanical ventilation is a three-step process including:
- - Readiness testing. It evaluates the criteria to determine whether a patient might be able to be successfully and safety weaned from mechanical ventilation. The detection of readiness to try a spontaneous breathing test has controversial questions, in special concerning to oxygenation. From a conservative to an aggressive criteria we can list:
- PaO2/FiO2 > 200 on PEEP ≤ 5 cm H2O (Esteban et al, 1999).
- PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 on PEEP ≤ 8 cm H2O (Boles et al, 2007).
- PaO2/FiO2 > 180 on PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O (Walsh et al, 2004). We will compare Walsh and Boles in their different considerations for oxygenation criteria. Since Walsh criteria require a higher level of PEEP we understand that this criteria is more aggressive and in this way it allow to an early detection of readiness to SBT, but there is not any evidence of this statement.
- - Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). It tries to simulate (but not only) post-extubation work of breathing to promptly determine the time to extubation. There is also disparity about SBT minimal ventilator settings:
- Inspiratory pressure with a range between automatic tube compensation (ATC) and inspiratory pressure of 5 - 8 cm H2O. Theoretically, if we use a higher support pressure during SBT it would be easier to pass the test. One could think that this may rise the risk of reintubation but there are various trials that have not confirmed this assumption.
- Guidelines does not make any recommendation about expiratory pressurization, although the trials conducted use levels of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), between 0 and 5 cm H2O.
- Furthermore, we consider that "minimal ventilator settings" must be adjusted to additional parameters not previously considered, like preventive therapy applied after the extubation.
- All spontaneous breathing trials will last 30 minutes.
- - Extubation follow-up care. Therapies targeted to prevent post-extubation respiratory failure like high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and respiratory physiotherapy for improving airway clearance, have been proposed.
The variability of preventive therapies and its settings generate different "minimal ventilator settings".
In view of all that has been set out above, there are two essential points that has not been analyzed as far we understand:
- The different screening criteria available have not been compared with each other about allowing early detection of readiness, even less with the individual risk of postextubation failure and still less with the preventive therapy that would be applied for each group.
- The different inspiratory support pressure as well as PEEP level, have not been compared with other different values, even less with the individual risk of postextubation failure and still less with the preventive therapy that would be applied for each group.
The detailed weaning criteria include the following:
- Clinical evaluation:
- Adequate cough reflex and good clearance of respiratory secretions.
- Resolution or stabilization of the initial reason for intubation.
- Patient awake with RASS between +1 and -2 according the Richmond Assessment Sedation Scale (RASS).
- Data evaluation:
- Cardiovascular stability with minimal or no need of vasopressors (HR ≤ 140 lpm, blood systolic pressure between 90-160 mmHg with minimal or no need of vasopressors and without increase in the last 24 hours).
- Successful oxygenation defined by SpO2 >90% on FiO2 ≤ 40% or PaO2/FiO2 ≥150 with PEEP up to ≤8 cmH2O (Boles et al, 2007) or PaO2/FiO2 >180 con PEEP ≤10 cm H2O (Walsh et al, 2004).
- Respiratory rate ≤35 bpm without respiratory acidosis.
- Hemoglobin >7g/dL.
- Temperature between 36-38,5ºC.
- Blood potassium between 3-5 mmol/L.
- Blood sodium between 128-150 mmol/L.
Detailed definition of high risk factors for extubation failure: age older than 65 years; heart failure as the primary indication for mechanical ventilation; moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score higher than 12 on extubation day; body mass index of more than 30 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); airway patency problems, including high risk of developing laryngeal edema; inability to deal with respiratory secretions (inadequate cough reflex or suctioning >2 times within 8 hours before extubation); difficult or prolonged weaning, in brief, a patient failing the first attempt at disconnection from mechanical ventilation; 2 or more comorbidities defined with Charlson score; and mechanical ventilation for more than 7 days.
The detailed risk categories are the following:
- Low risk: Patients without risk factors who benefit from HFNC.
- Intermediate risk: Patients with 1 to 3 risk factors excluding obese (BMI >30 Kg/m2) and those who develop hypercapnia during the SBT, that can benefit from HFNC.
- High risk: Obese (BMI >30 Kg/m2) and patients with 4 or more risk factors including hypercapnia during the SBT. This group may benefit from prevention with NIV.
Sample size estimation:
- Basal parameters in low risk patients treated with post-extubation HFNC: estimated 30% of the entire population. Reintubation rate 4.9% and 1(1-3) days on mechanical ventilation. Estimated reduction in the intervention group: 1 day in the 25% of the patients.
- Basal parameters in intermediate risk patients treated with HFNC: estimated 70% of the entire population. Reintubation rate 12.24% and 4 (2 - 9) days on mechanical ventilation. Estimated reduction 1 day in the 33% of the patients).
Calculated standard deviation 3.5 days. CI 95% and power 80%, loss rate 10%, and one-tail analysis: 260 patients per group.
Simple randomization immediately after finishing the spontaneous breathing trial. An intention to treat analysis will be performed.
Detailed HFNC treatment: High-flow oxygen (Optiflow, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare) will be applied immediately after extubation through specific nasal cannula. Flow will be initially set at 10 L/min and titrated upwards in 5-L/min steps until patients experience discomfort. Temperature will be initially set to 37°C, unless reported too hot by patients, and FIO2 will be regularly adjusted to the target peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SPO2) of greater than 92%. After 48 hours, high-flow will be stopped and, if necessary, patients will receive conventional oxygen therapy.
Criteria for spontaneous breathing trial failure are: agitation, anxiety, depressed mental status, diaphoresis, cyanosis, evidence of increasing respiratory effort, increased accessory muscle activity, facial signs of distress, dyspnea, PaO2 lower than 60 mmHg or SpO2 lower than 90% on inspired fraction of oxygen higher than .5, PaCO2 higher than 50 mmHg or increased more than 8 mmHg from baseline value, arterial pH lower than 7.32 or decreased more than .07 from baseline value, respiratory rate higher than 35 breaths per minute or increased more than 50% from baseline value, heart rate higher than 140 beats per minute or increased more than 20% from baseline value, systolic arterial pressure higher than 180 mmHg or increased more than 20% from baseline value, systolic arterial pressure lower than 90 mmHg, or cardiac arrhythmias.
Patients who tolerate the spontaneous breathing trial will be reconnected with the previous ventilator settings for rest and clinical evaluation of airway patency, respiratory secretions, and upper airway obstruction before extubation.
- Conditions
- Weaning Failure
- Being tested
- Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trialDiagnostic test
Aggressive screening criteria: Walsh Conservative screening criteria: Boles High minimal ventilatory settings: pressure Support 8 + positive end-expiratory pressure 5 Low minimal ventilatory settings: pressure support 5
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aggressive screening criteria + high minimal ventilatory settings | Experimental | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial |
| Aggressive screening criteria + low minimal ventilatory settings | Experimental | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial |
| Conservative screening criteria + high minimal ventilatory settings | Experimental | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial |
| Conservative screening criteria + low minimal ventilatory settings | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of first spontaneous breathing trial tolerated
Measured: 1 month after intubation
Time on mechanical ventilation
Measured: 1 month after intubation
Secondary outcomes (5)
Reintubation rate
Measured: 7 days after extubation
Post-extubation respiratory failure rate
Measured: 7 days after extubation
ICU and Hospital length of stay
Measured: 3 months after ICU and Hospital admission
ICU and Hospital mortality rate
Measured: 3 months after ICU and Hospital admission
Sepsis and multiorgan failure rate
Measured: 3 months after ICU and Hospital admission
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2021
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023
- Study completion31 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Weaning FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 940 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gonzalo Hernandez Martinez
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Gonzalo Hernandez Martinez, Hospital Virgen de la Salud
- Investigators
- Gonzalo Hernandez, Study chair, University Hospital Virgen de la Salud
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04758546
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7/10/2020 Nº 10
- Acronym
- SPEED-UP
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Rodriguez Villamizar P, Thille AW, Marquez Doblas M, Frat JP, Leal Sanz P, Alonso E, Pais V, Morales G, Colinas L, Propin A, Fernandez Olivares A, Martinez Balaguer M, Alvaredo Rodrigo D, Hernandez G. Best clinical model predicting extubation failure: a diagnostic accuracy post hoc analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):106-114. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07758-0. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
PubMed 39774863Hernandez Martinez G, Rodriguez P, Soto J, Caritg O, Castellvi-Font A, Mariblanca B, Garcia AM, Colinas L, Anon JM, Parrilla-Gomez FJ, Silva-Obregon JA, Masclans JR, Propin A, Cuadra A, Dalorzo MG, Rialp G, Suarez-Sipmann F, Roca O. Effect of aggressive vs conservative screening and confirmatory test on time to extubation among patients at low or intermediate risk: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Feb;50(2):258-267. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07330-w. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
PubMed 38353714
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Customizing Spontaneous Breathing Trial After Aggressive Readiness Criteria Hastens Weaning in Low and Intermediate Risk Patients With Prevention: A Randomized Trial (SPEED-UP Trial).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04758546
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPEED-UP / 7/10/2020 Nº 10
- Conditions
- Weaning Failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 940 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gonzalo Hernandez MartinezUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypothesis:
- In patients with less than 4 high risk factors for reintubation excluding body mass index >30 and hypercapnia during the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) (low and intermediate risk for extubation failure), who receive preventive therapy with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), the use of SBT with "HIGH minimal ventilator settings" (PS 8 + PEEP 5 cm H2O Vs PS 5 + PEEP 0 cm H2O), increase the proportion of patients with simple weaning (extubation after the first SBT).
- In patients with low and intermediate risk for extubation failure, who receive preventive therapy with HFNC, the use of Walsh screening criteria reduces the mechanical ventilation time compared with the use of Boles criteria.
Study design: This is a multicenter randomized open trial with 4 arms.
- Screening with PaO2/FiO2 > 180 and PEEP ≤ 10cm H2O; SBT with "HIGH minimal ventilator settings" (PS 8 + PEEP 5 cm H2O).
- Screening with PaO2/FiO2 > 180 and PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O; SBT with "LOW minimal ventilator settings" (PS 5 + PEEP 0 cm H2O).
- Screening with PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 and PEEP ≤ 8 cm H2O; SBT with "HIGH minimal ventilator settings" (PS 8 + PEEP 5 cm H2O).
- Screening with PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 and PEEP ≤ 8 cm H2O; SBT with "LOW minimal ventilator settings" (PS 5 + PEEP 0 cm H2O).
Primary Outcome Measure:
- - Percentage of first spontaneous breathing trial tolerated.
- - Time on mechanical ventilation.
Detailed description
Discontinuation of mechanical ventilation is a three-step process including:
- - Readiness testing. It evaluates the criteria to determine whether a patient might be able to be successfully and safety weaned from mechanical ventilation. The detection of readiness to try a spontaneous breathing test has controversial questions, in special concerning to oxygenation. From a conservative to an aggressive criteria we can list:
- PaO2/FiO2 > 200 on PEEP ≤ 5 cm H2O (Esteban et al, 1999).
- PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 on PEEP ≤ 8 cm H2O (Boles et al, 2007).
- PaO2/FiO2 > 180 on PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O (Walsh et al, 2004). We will compare Walsh and Boles in their different considerations for oxygenation criteria. Since Walsh criteria require a higher level of PEEP we understand that this criteria is more aggressive and in this way it allow to an early detection of readiness to SBT, but there is not any evidence of this statement.
- - Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). It tries to simulate (but not only) post-extubation work of breathing to promptly determine the time to extubation. There is also disparity about SBT minimal ventilator settings:
- Inspiratory pressure with a range between automatic tube compensation (ATC) and inspiratory pressure of 5 - 8 cm H2O. Theoretically, if we use a higher support pressure during SBT it would be easier to pass the test. One could think that this may rise the risk of reintubation but there are various trials that have not confirmed this assumption.
- Guidelines does not make any recommendation about expiratory pressurization, although the trials conducted use levels of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), between 0 and 5 cm H2O.
- Furthermore, we consider that "minimal ventilator settings" must be adjusted to additional parameters not previously considered, like preventive therapy applied after the extubation.
- All spontaneous breathing trials will last 30 minutes.
- - Extubation follow-up care. Therapies targeted to prevent post-extubation respiratory failure like high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and respiratory physiotherapy for improving airway clearance, have been proposed.
The variability of preventive therapies and its settings generate different "minimal ventilator settings".
In view of all that has been set out above, there are two essential points that has not been analyzed as far we understand:
- The different screening criteria available have not been compared with each other about allowing early detection of readiness, even less with the individual risk of postextubation failure and still less with the preventive therapy that would be applied for each group.
- The different inspiratory support pressure as well as PEEP level, have not been compared with other different values, even less with the individual risk of postextubation failure and still less with the preventive therapy that would be applied for each group.
The detailed weaning criteria include the following:
- Clinical evaluation:
- Adequate cough reflex and good clearance of respiratory secretions.
- Resolution or stabilization of the initial reason for intubation.
- Patient awake with RASS between +1 and -2 according the Richmond Assessment Sedation Scale (RASS).
- Data evaluation:
- Cardiovascular stability with minimal or no need of vasopressors (HR ≤ 140 lpm, blood systolic pressure between 90-160 mmHg with minimal or no need of vasopressors and without increase in the last 24 hours).
- Successful oxygenation defined by SpO2 >90% on FiO2 ≤ 40% or PaO2/FiO2 ≥150 with PEEP up to ≤8 cmH2O (Boles et al, 2007) or PaO2/FiO2 >180 con PEEP ≤10 cm H2O (Walsh et al, 2004).
- Respiratory rate ≤35 bpm without respiratory acidosis.
- Hemoglobin >7g/dL.
- Temperature between 36-38,5ºC.
- Blood potassium between 3-5 mmol/L.
- Blood sodium between 128-150 mmol/L.
Detailed definition of high risk factors for extubation failure: age older than 65 years; heart failure as the primary indication for mechanical ventilation; moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score higher than 12 on extubation day; body mass index of more than 30 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); airway patency problems, including high risk of developing laryngeal edema; inability to deal with respiratory secretions (inadequate cough reflex or suctioning >2 times within 8 hours before extubation); difficult or prolonged weaning, in brief, a patient failing the first attempt at disconnection from mechanical ventilation; 2 or more comorbidities defined with Charlson score; and mechanical ventilation for more than 7 days.
The detailed risk categories are the following:
- Low risk: Patients without risk factors who benefit from HFNC.
- Intermediate risk: Patients with 1 to 3 risk factors excluding obese (BMI >30 Kg/m2) and those who develop hypercapnia during the SBT, that can benefit from HFNC.
- High risk: Obese (BMI >30 Kg/m2) and patients with 4 or more risk factors including hypercapnia during the SBT. This group may benefit from prevention with NIV.
Sample size estimation:
- Basal parameters in low risk patients treated with post-extubation HFNC: estimated 30% of the entire population. Reintubation rate 4.9% and 1(1-3) days on mechanical ventilation. Estimated reduction in the intervention group: 1 day in the 25% of the patients.
- Basal parameters in intermediate risk patients treated with HFNC: estimated 70% of the entire population. Reintubation rate 12.24% and 4 (2 - 9) days on mechanical ventilation. Estimated reduction 1 day in the 33% of the patients).
Calculated standard deviation 3.5 days. CI 95% and power 80%, loss rate 10%, and one-tail analysis: 260 patients per group.
Simple randomization immediately after finishing the spontaneous breathing trial. An intention to treat analysis will be performed.
Detailed HFNC treatment: High-flow oxygen (Optiflow, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare) will be applied immediately after extubation through specific nasal cannula. Flow will be initially set at 10 L/min and titrated upwards in 5-L/min steps until patients experience discomfort. Temperature will be initially set to 37°C, unless reported too hot by patients, and FIO2 will be regularly adjusted to the target peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SPO2) of greater than 92%. After 48 hours, high-flow will be stopped and, if necessary, patients will receive conventional oxygen therapy.
Criteria for spontaneous breathing trial failure are: agitation, anxiety, depressed mental status, diaphoresis, cyanosis, evidence of increasing respiratory effort, increased accessory muscle activity, facial signs of distress, dyspnea, PaO2 lower than 60 mmHg or SpO2 lower than 90% on inspired fraction of oxygen higher than .5, PaCO2 higher than 50 mmHg or increased more than 8 mmHg from baseline value, arterial pH lower than 7.32 or decreased more than .07 from baseline value, respiratory rate higher than 35 breaths per minute or increased more than 50% from baseline value, heart rate higher than 140 beats per minute or increased more than 20% from baseline value, systolic arterial pressure higher than 180 mmHg or increased more than 20% from baseline value, systolic arterial pressure lower than 90 mmHg, or cardiac arrhythmias.
Patients who tolerate the spontaneous breathing trial will be reconnected with the previous ventilator settings for rest and clinical evaluation of airway patency, respiratory secretions, and upper airway obstruction before extubation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aggressive screening criteria + high minimal ventilatory settings | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial |
| Aggressive screening criteria + low minimal ventilatory settings | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial |
| Conservative screening criteria + high minimal ventilatory settings | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial |
| Conservative screening criteria + low minimal ventilatory settings | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients on mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours with >= positive end-expiratory pressure 10.
- Patients with up to three high risk factors for extubation failure excluding hypercapnia during the spontaneous breathing trial and obese patients (BMI >30).
- Patients fulfilling weaning criteria expected to have a spontaneous breathing trial in the following 24 hours.
- Patients expected to be prevented with high-flow oxygen therapy after extubation.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- <18 years old.
- Pregnant women.
- Tracheostomized patients.
- Accidental or self-extubated patients.
- Obese (BMI >30) or hypercapnic patients during the spontaneous breathing trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trialAggressive screening criteria: Walsh Conservative screening criteria: Boles High minimal ventilatory settings: pressure Support 8 + positive end-expiratory pressure 5 Low minimal ventilatory settings: pressure support 5 | Diagnostic test | Aggressive screening criteria + high minimal ventilatory settings, Aggressive screening criteria + low minimal ventilatory settings, Conservative screening criteria + high minimal ventilatory settings, Conservative screening criteria + low minimal ventilatory settings |
Primary outcome
Percentage of first spontaneous breathing trial tolerated
Time frame: 1 month after intubation
Time on mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 1 month after intubation
5 secondary outcomes
Reintubation rate
Time frame: 7 days after extubation
Post-extubation respiratory failure rate
Time frame: 7 days after extubation
ICU and Hospital length of stay
Time frame: 3 months after ICU and Hospital admission
ICU and Hospital mortality rate
Time frame: 3 months after ICU and Hospital admission
Sepsis and multiorgan failure rate
Time frame: 3 months after ICU and Hospital admission
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39774863Rodriguez Villamizar P, Thille AW, Marquez Doblas M, Frat JP, Leal Sanz P, Alonso E, Pais V, Morales G, Colinas L, Propin A, Fernandez Olivares A, Martinez Balaguer M, Alvaredo Rodrigo D, Hernandez G. Best clinical model predicting extubation failure: a diagnostic accuracy post hoc analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):106-114. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07758-0. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38353714Hernandez Martinez G, Rodriguez P, Soto J, Caritg O, Castellvi-Font A, Mariblanca B, Garcia AM, Colinas L, Anon JM, Parrilla-Gomez FJ, Silva-Obregon JA, Masclans JR, Propin A, Cuadra A, Dalorzo MG, Rialp G, Suarez-Sipmann F, Roca O. Effect of aggressive vs conservative screening and confirmatory test on time to extubation among patients at low or intermediate risk: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Feb;50(2):258-267. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07330-w. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Weaning Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Predicting Extubation Failure Using Machine Learning
Extubation Failure, Critical Illness
Recruiting
A Post-Approval Multicenter Study to Assess the Continued Safety and Effectiveness of the AeroPace® System
Ventilator Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction
Recruiting
Physiological Effect High-flow Tracheal Oxygen on Viscosity of Airway Mucus and Respiratory Effort in Patients Weaning From Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation, Tracheostomy Weaning
Not yet recruiting
Protocolized Weaning of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Adult Patients
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Weaning Practices in ICUs of Global South Countries
Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation, Weaning Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gonzalo Hernandez study chair
University Hospital Virgen de la Salud
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Screening criteria for weaning and minimal ventilatory settings for spontaneous breathing trial in people with Weaning Failure, run by Gonzalo Hernandez Martinez at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of first spontaneous breathing trial tolerated (time frame: 1 month after intubation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04758546, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2023.