Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1NCT04759495
Is Real-time CGM Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring in Real Life Study (CORRIDA LIFE)
A study testing Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring) and Continuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring) in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
The aim of the investigator's study is to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in adult patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in real life practice during 24 weeks of follow-up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- What is being tested?
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring) and Continuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 187 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2019to 30 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with T1D naive to rt-CGM and FGM
- Type 1 diabetes for > 1 year
- ≥ 18 years old
- CSII without automatic functions or MDI
Who cannot join
- previous rtCGM or FGM use
- treatment with insulin pump with automatic functions
- severe noncompliance
- known severe diabetic retinopathy and/or macular edema
- lactation, pregnancy, or intending to become pregnant during the study
- a condition likely to require MRI
- use of acetaminophen-containing medication
- unwillingness to use the study device for >70% of time
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Czechia1 site
3rd Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University
Prague
About this study
Official title: Comparison of CGM in Non-randomised Real Life Study of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Systems in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
The aim of the investigator's study is to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in adult patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in real life practice during 24 weeks of follow-up.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- Being tested
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring), Continuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring)
- Keywords
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Flash Glucose Monitoring, Hypoglycaemia, Time in Range
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Hypoglycemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring)Device
rtCGM is used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring)Device
FGM is used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| rtCGM | Experimental | Patients with use of the DEXCOM G5 or G6 system (real time continuous glucose monitoring). Receives: Device: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring) |
| FGM | Experimental | Patients with use of the FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring). Receives: Device: Continuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Differences between HbA1c values in the Run in period and after 12 month of follow-up and differences of HbA1c between groups.
Measured: Up to 13 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percentage of time in hypoglycemic ranges
<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dl] and <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dl]
Measured: Up to 13 months
Percentage of time in target ranges
3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dl]
Measured: Up to 13 months
Percentage of time in hyperglycemic ranges
>10.0 mmol/L [180 mg/dl] and >13.9 mmol/L [250 mg/dl]
Measured: Up to 13 months
Changes in glycemic variability
Expressed as the standard deviation
Measured: Up to 13 months
Mean sensor glucose concentration
Measured by rtCGM or FGM
Measured: Up to 13 months
Incidence of severe hypoglycaemia
Requiring third-party assistance to treat
Measured: Up to 13 months
Incidence of severe ketoacidosis
Requiring hospitalization
Measured: Up to 13 months
Incidence of skin reaction, infection or hematoma at the site of insertion of the sensor
Skin reaction, infection or hematoma reported by patients
Measured: Up to 13 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2021
- Study start1 Jun 2019
- Primary completion30 Nov 2020
- Study completion30 Sep 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charles University, Czech RepublicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 187 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charles University, Czech Republic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jan Soupal, MD, Charles University, Czech Republic
- Investigators
- Jan Soupal, Principal investigator, Charles University, Prague
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04759495
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CORRIDA LIFE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Haskova A, Radovnicka L, Petruzelkova L, Parkin CG, Grunberger G, Horova E, Navratilova V, Kade O, Matoulek M, Prazny M, Soupal J. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2744-2750. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0112. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
PubMed 32859607Fullerton B, Jeitler K, Seitz M, Horvath K, Berghold A, Siebenhofer A. Intensive glucose control versus conventional glucose control for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD009122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009122.pub2.
PubMed 24526393Soupal J, Petruzelkova L, Flekac M, Pelcl T, Matoulek M, Dankova M, Skrha J, Svacina S, Prazny M. Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities for Type 1 Diabetes, Including Sensor-Augmented Insulin Regimens, in 52 Weeks of Follow-Up: A COMISAIR Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Sep;18(9):532-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0171. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
PubMed 27482825Soupal J, Petruzelkova L, Grunberger G, Haskova A, Flekac M, Matoulek M, Mikes O, Pelcl T, Skrha J Jr, Horova E, Skrha J, Parkin CG, Svacina S, Prazny M. Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With T1D Are Impacted More by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than by Insulin Delivery Method: 3 Years of Follow-Up From the COMISAIR Study. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):37-43. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0888. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
PubMed 31530663Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, Kollman C, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Toschi E, Wolpert H, Price D; DIAMOND Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.
PubMed 28118453Oskarsson P, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Krӧger J, Weitgasser R, Bolinder J. Impact of flash glucose monitoring on hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes managed with multiple daily injection therapy: a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the IMPACT randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2018 Mar;61(3):539-550. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4527-5. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
PubMed 29273897Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kroger J, Weitgasser R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2254-2263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
PubMed 27634581Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Ehrmann D, Faber-Heinemann G, Guerra S, Waldenmaier D, Hermanns N. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1367-1377. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30297-6. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
PubMed 29459019Radovnicka L, Haskova A, Do QD, Horova E, Navratilova V, Mikes O, Cihlar D, Parkin CG, Grunberger G, Prazny M, Soupal J. Lower Glycated Hemoglobin with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than with Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring After 1 Year: The CORRIDA LIFE Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Dec;24(12):859-867. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0152. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
PubMed 36037056
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of CGM in Non-randomised Real Life Study of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Systems in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04759495
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CORRIDA LIFE
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- Keywords
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Flash Glucose Monitoring, Hypoglycaemia, Time in Range
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 187 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Charles University, Czech RepublicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the investigator's study is to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in adult patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in real life practice during 24 weeks of follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| rtCGM | Experimental | Device: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring)Patients with use of the DEXCOM G5 or G6 system (real time continuous glucose monitoring). |
| FGM | Experimental | Device: Continuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring)Patients with use of the FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patients with T1D naive to rt-CGM and FGM
- Type 1 diabetes for > 1 year
- ≥ 18 years old
- CSII without automatic functions or MDI
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- previous rtCGM or FGM use
- treatment with insulin pump with automatic functions
- severe noncompliance
- known severe diabetic retinopathy and/or macular edema
- lactation, pregnancy, or intending to become pregnant during the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring)rtCGM is used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia. | Device | rtCGM |
| Continuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring)FGM is used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia. | Device | FGM |
Primary outcome
Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Differences between HbA1c values in the Run in period and after 12 month of follow-up and differences of HbA1c between groups.
8 secondary outcomes
Percentage of time in hypoglycemic ranges
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Percentage of time in target ranges
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Percentage of time in hyperglycemic ranges
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Changes in glycemic variability
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Mean sensor glucose concentration
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Incidence of severe hypoglycaemia
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Incidence of severe ketoacidosis
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Incidence of skin reaction, infection or hematoma at the site of insertion of the sensor
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2021.
- Background: PubMed 32859607Haskova A, Radovnicka L, Petruzelkova L, Parkin CG, Grunberger G, Horova E, Navratilova V, Kade O, Matoulek M, Prazny M, Soupal J. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2744-2750. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0112. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 24526393Fullerton B, Jeitler K, Seitz M, Horvath K, Berghold A, Siebenhofer A. Intensive glucose control versus conventional glucose control for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD009122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009122.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 27482825Soupal J, Petruzelkova L, Flekac M, Pelcl T, Matoulek M, Dankova M, Skrha J, Svacina S, Prazny M. Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities for Type 1 Diabetes, Including Sensor-Augmented Insulin Regimens, in 52 Weeks of Follow-Up: A COMISAIR Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Sep;18(9):532-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0171. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
- Background: PubMed 31530663Soupal J, Petruzelkova L, Grunberger G, Haskova A, Flekac M, Matoulek M, Mikes O, Pelcl T, Skrha J Jr, Horova E, Skrha J, Parkin CG, Svacina S, Prazny M. Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With T1D Are Impacted More by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than by Insulin Delivery Method: 3 Years of Follow-Up From the COMISAIR Study. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):37-43. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0888. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
- Background: PubMed 28118453Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, Kollman C, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Toschi E, Wolpert H, Price D; DIAMOND Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.
- Background: PubMed 29273897Oskarsson P, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Krӧger J, Weitgasser R, Bolinder J. Impact of flash glucose monitoring on hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes managed with multiple daily injection therapy: a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the IMPACT randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2018 Mar;61(3):539-550. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4527-5. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
- Background: PubMed 27634581Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kroger J, Weitgasser R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2254-2263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 29459019Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Ehrmann D, Faber-Heinemann G, Guerra S, Waldenmaier D, Hermanns N. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1367-1377. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30297-6. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36037056Radovnicka L, Haskova A, Do QD, Horova E, Navratilova V, Mikes O, Cihlar D, Parkin CG, Grunberger G, Prazny M, Soupal J. Lower Glycated Hemoglobin with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than with Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring After 1 Year: The CORRIDA LIFE Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Dec;24(12):859-867. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0152. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jan Soupal principal investigator
Charles University, Prague
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dexcom G5 and G6 system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring) and Continuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring) in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (time frame: Up to 13 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04759495, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2021.