AzTrials
AzTrials

Maxillary Transverse Deficiency (MTD)NCT04760535

Effectiveness of Aligners Versus Rapid Maxillary Expansion

A study testing Invisalign® First Phase I treatment (Align Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander in people with Maxillary Transverse Deficiency (MTD), run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of Invisalign® First clear aligners compared to tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander on palatal morphology in growing subjects using 3D technology. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 10 years
Conditions the study is for
Maxillary Transverse Deficiency (MTD)
What is being tested?
Invisalign® First Phase I treatment (Align Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
15 Jan 2019to 3 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 10 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • patients who have been diagnosed with transverse maxillary deficiency;
  • mixed dentition phase with cervical vertebral maturation stage (CVMS) less than 4;
  • fully erupted upper and lower first molars;
  • transversal discrepancy ≤5mm
  • demonstration of a good standard of oral hygiene (determined through questioning and clinical examination);
  • subjects willing to consent to the trial and comply with the trial regime.

Who cannot join

  • any general medical health problems which may influence gingival health, such as those necessitating antibiotic cover as bacteremia prophylaxis, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, or physical or mental disability;
  • permanent teeth extraction-based treatment (third molars excluded);
  • morphologic crown anomalies;
  • auxiliary treatment during arch expansion stage (such as crossbite elastics);
  • posterior interproximal reduction;
  • orthognathic surgery treatment planned;
  • cleft palate or severe facial deformities.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • University of Turin

    Turin, 10126

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Aligners Versus Rapid Maxillary Expansion on 3D Palatal Volume in Mixed Dentition Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of Invisalign® First clear aligners compared to tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander on palatal morphology in growing subjects using 3D technology.

Read the detailed description

Aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of Invisalign® First clear aligners compared to tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander on palatal morphology in growing subjects using 3D technology. This two-arm parallel-group randomized prospective clinical trial will include patients with: indications for maxillary expansion treatment, age between 6 and 10 years old, mixed dentition, good standard of oral hygiene, good compliance during treatment as assessed by the practitioner. Patients will be assigned to one of two expansion methods (arm A: Invisalign® First clear aligners, arm B: tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander) according to a computer-generated randomization list shortly before the start of expansion Primary outcome measure will be the change in palatal morphology (palatal volume and surface area variations). Secondary outcomes will be: arch dimensions (upper inter-canine width, upper inter-molar width, anterior segment length, posterior segment length), complications, patients' satisfaction and periodontal health. Due to the nature of the intervention blinding will not be possible. Potential statistical differences between the two intervention groups will be evaluated.

Being tested
Invisalign® First Phase I treatment (Align Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), Tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Invisalign® First Phase I treatment (Align Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA)Device

    Subjects in this arm will be instructed to wear aligners 24h/day for entire duration of the therapy. They will be asked to remove their retainers only while eating, drinking (except water), or cleaning. At the time of appliance delivery, both written and verbal oral hygiene instructions were given, including methods for cleaning appliances themselves. Also, written informed consent were obtained for each patient or the parents.

  • Tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expanderDevice

    The expansion protocol was one quarter-turn twice a day (0.45 mm activation per day) until overcorrection with the maxillary lingual cusps contacting the mandibular buccal cusps. The expander was left passively for retention for a minimum of 6 months. At the time of appliance delivery, both written and verbal oral hygiene instructions were given, including methods for cleaning appliances themselves. Also, written informed consent were obtained for each patient or the parents.

Study groups in NCT04760535
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A: Invisalign® First clear alignersExperimentalThe Invisalign® First aligners are fabricated in a multilayer aromatic thermoplastic polyurethane/co-polyester 0.75mm (.030")-thick with a fine 3D manufacturing process.
Receives: Device: Invisalign® First Phase I treatment (Align Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA)
Arm B: tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expanderActive comparatorThe Hyrax-type maxillary expander is a tooth-borne expansion appliance that is fixed to the upper second deciduous molars (or to the first permanent molars) using bands and includes a midline 12-mm self-locking screw (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany; 0.9 mm, complete turn). The expansion screw is connected to the conventional molar bands or printed clasps, modeled surrounding the molars, via a framework of 0.9mm stainless-steel wire. The framework is soldered to the bands and extending on the palatal side to the deciduous canines. The expander will be fabricated by qualified laboratory technician.
Receives: Device: Tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Palate morphology

    The primary outcome will be to evaluate the changes in palatal morphology after the treatment of maxillary deficiencies using two different therapies and to re-evaluate changes over the initial 12-months after the end of the treatment. The changes in palatal morphology are defined as the variation in palatal volume and surface. These will be measured from digitized study models within the boundaries of the palate, the gingival and distal planes, defined as follow. The gingival plane will be created by connecting the midpoints of the dentogingival junction of all upper erupted deciduous and permanent teeth. The distal plane will be created through two points at the distal of the first upper permanent molars perpendicular to the gingival plane.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Upper inter-canine width (ICW)

    Upper inter-canine width (ICW) (secondary outcome measure) is the transverse distance between upper canines in millimeters.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Upper inter-molar width (IMW)

    Upper inter-molar width (IMW) (secondary outcome measure) is the transverse distance between upper first molars in millimeters.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Feb 2021
  2. Study start15 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion15 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion3 May 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04760535
Sponsor's protocol ID
Maxillary Expansion
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
14 Feb 2021
Last updated
25 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bruni A, Ferrillo M, Gallo V, Parrini S, Garino F, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A. Efficacy of clear aligners vs rapid palatal expanders on palatal volume and surface area in mixed dentition patients: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Sep;166(3):203-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

    PubMed 39066746

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Invisalign® First Phase I treatment (Align Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander in people with Maxillary Transverse Deficiency (MTD), run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Palate morphology (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04760535, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in