Renal Cell Carcinoma MetastaticPhase 3AxiPRONCT04764487
A Web-mediated Follow-up With the Web-application KidneyPRO Versus Standard Follow-up for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Axitinib/Pembrolizumab in First Line
A Phase 3 study testing KidneyPRO and standard follow-up in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic, run by Weprom at 13 sites in France.
Trial summary
With the advent of immunotherapy, standard first-line treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma is now an association with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. In this context, the association axitinib plus pembrolizumab has already been evaluated in several studies with positive results for Progression Free… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic
- What is being tested?
- KidneyPRO and standard follow-up
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 178 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 7 Jun 2021to 15 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced RCC who require a first line systemic treatment by axitinib/pembrolizumab combo
- Patient with at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1 criteria or with clinically apparent disease that can be reliably monitored by the investigator
- Patient aged 18 years or older
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status < 3
- Patient with adequate hematopoietic or organ function, as indicated by the following criteria (assessed within -14 days prior the first dosing):
- WBC > 2 x 109/L
Show all 19Show fewer
- Polynuclear neutrophils > 1.5 x 109/L
- Platelets > 100 x 109/L
- Hemoglobin > 8.0 g/mL
- ALT/AST < 2.5 x ULN in the absence of liver metastases or < 5x ULN in the presence of liver metastases
- Bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN (except Gilbert Syndrome: < 3.0 mg/dL)
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/min (measured or calculated by Cockroft and Gault formula) or serum creatinine < 2.0 x ULN
- Patient possessing an initial symptom score less than or equal to 6 (Specific scale: assessment of the importance of 3 symptoms in appendix 1)
- Patient has internet access and an email account (or has someone at home who can help send patients' symptoms or complete the form)
- Woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to the first administration of study treatment.
- Patients who are sexually active must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (e.g. implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices or vasectomized partner, for participating women; condoms for participating men) or practice complete abstinence, beginning 14 days before the first administration of study treatment, while on treatment.
- Patient without symptomatic brain metastases (non-symptomatic metastases : without edema, not on corticosteroids, not eligible for radiation therapy/surgery and not receiving active treatments).
- Patient enrolled in social security
- Patient has given his written consent ahead of any specific protocol procedure
Who cannot join
- Prior systemic therapy directed at advanced or metastatic RCC
- Patient with contraindication to a treatment by axitinib/pembrolizumab
- Prior immunotherapy with IL-2, IFN-α, or anti PD 1, anti PD L1, anti PD L2, anti CD137 or anti cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA 4) antibody (including ipilimumab), or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T cell co stimulation or immune checkpoint pathways or TKI
- Known severe hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies (Grade ≥ 3), any history of anaphylaxis, or uncontrolled asthma (ie, 3 or more features of partially controlled asthma Global Initiative for Asthma 2011)
- Uncontrolled hypertension in spite of anti-hypertensive therapy
- Clinically significant (i.e., active) cardiovascular disease: cerebral vascular accident/stroke (< 6 months prior to enrollment), myocardial infarction (< 6 months prior to enrollment), unstable angina, congestive heart failure (≥ New York Heart Association Classification Class II), or serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication
Show all 26Show fewer
- Any of the following in the previous 6 months: deep vein thrombosis or symptomatic pulmonary embolism
- Current use of immunosuppressive medication, EXCEPT for the following:
- intranasal inhaled, topical steroids, or local steroid injection (e.g., intra-articular injection);
- Systemic corticosteroids at physiologic doses ≤ 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent;
- Steroids as premedication for hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., CT scan premedication)
- Has active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years (i.e. with use of disease modifying agents, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs). Replacement therapy (eg., thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency, etc.) is not considered as a form of systemic treatment
- Active autoimmune disease that might deteriorate when receiving an immuno-stimulatory agent. Patients with diabetes type I, vitiligo, psoriasis, or hypo/hyperthyroid diseases not requiring immunosuppressive treatment are eligible
- Prior organ transplantation including allogenic stem-cell transplantation
- Active serious infections requiring systemic antibiotic or antimicrobial therapy
- Known history of testing positive for HIV or known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
- Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection at screening (positive HBV surface antigen or HCV RNA if anti-HCV antibody screening test positive)
- History of pneumonitis that required steroids, or current pneumonitis
- Vaccination within 4 weeks of the first dose of pembrolizumab and while on trial is prohibited except for administration of inactivated vaccines (for example, inactivated influenza vaccines)
- Other severe acute or chronic medical conditions including immune colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, immune pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis
- Patient deprived of their liberty, under guardianship or trusteeship
- Patient is being treated for another cancer and has not been cured
- Patient with dementia, mental disorders or psychological pathology which could compromise patient informed consent and/or the observance of the study protocol
- Patient cannot submit to the protocol for psychological, social, familial or geographical reasons
- Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
- Patient is participating in another interventional study of telemonitoring
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
France13 sites, 13 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
Angers, 49055
Sophie ABADIE-LACOURTOISIE, MD, sophie.abadie-lacourtoisie@ico-unicancer.fr
Sophie ABADIE-LACOURTOISIE, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25000
Antoine THIERY-VUILLEMIN, MD, a.thieryvuillemin@mac.com
Antoine THIERY-VUILLEMIN, MD
- Recruiting
Clilnique Pasteur
Brest, 29000
Ali HASBINI, MD, alihasbini@oncologie-brest.fr
Ali HASBINI, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CHRU Brest
Brest, 29609
FRIEDERIKE SCHLURMANN, MD, friederike.schlurmann@chru-brest.fr
Friederike SCHLURMANN, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Centre François Baclesse
Caen, 14076
FLorence JOLY, MD, f.joly@baclesse.unicancer.fr
Florence JOLY, MD
- Recruiting
CHD Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Frank PRIOU, MD, frank.priou@chd-vendee.fr
Frank PRIOU, MD
- Recruiting
Clinique Victor Hugo / Centre Jean Bernard
Le Mans, 72000
Eric VOOG, MD, e.voog@cjb72.org
Eric VOOG, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69373
Sylvie NEGRIER, MD, sylvie.negrier@lyon.unicancer.fr
Sylvie NEGRIER, MD
- Recruiting
Institut Jean Godinot
Reims, 5100
Jean-Christophe EYMARD, MD, jc.eymard@reims.unicancer.fr
Jean-Christophe EYMARD, MD
- Recruiting
CHP St Grégoire
Saint-Grégoire, 35760
Xavier ARTIGNAN, MD, xartignan@vivalto-sante.com
Xavier ARTIGNAN, MD
- Recruiting
Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091
Gabriel MALOUF, MD, gabriel.malouf@chru-strasbourg.fr
Gabriel MALOUF, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, 31059
Christine CHEVREAU, MD, chevreau.christine@iuct-oncopole.fr
Christine CHEVREAU, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Bretonneau
Tours, 37000
Berengère NARCISO, MD, berengere.narciso@univ-tours.fr
Bérengère NARCISO, MD
About this study
With the advent of immunotherapy, standard first-line treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma is now an association with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. In this context, the association axitinib plus pembrolizumab has already been evaluated in several studies with positive results for Progression Free survival, Overall survival and Complete response. The combo received a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, and the European Commission approves the extension of Marketing Authorization in first line for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.
In a context of treatment with a new association, it is important to manage the toxicities closely in order to allow the patients to have an optimal treatment. The underlying hypothesis is that the use of new information and communication technologies could improve clinical patient management.
In this study, we wish assess the impact of monitoring via the web application KidneyPRO on the quality of life of patients with the new combination of treatment axitinib/pembrolizumab for a renal cell carcinoma in first line.
Read the detailed description
Metastatic or locally advanced clear cell renal carcinomas (RCC) are treated with targeted therapies (inhibitors of tyrosine kinases) and immune check-points inhibitors.
In first line many combos are tested. Association of TKI-PD L1-inhibitor is one option. Axitinib-Pembrolizumab showed very high response rate and progression free survival compared to Sunitinib but immunotherapies have a specific adverse event profile. Actually, there is no standardized follow-up for this type of treatment.
It is important to develop new strategies that reduce the resources used while improving the performance of this surveillance for the benefit of patients, to improve the comfort of patients, to improve the compliance and to optimise the dose of treatment received, in a course of care reworked by maintaining a continuous contact not demanding.
In collaboration with the Scientific Research National Center, the theory of chaos and its derivatives was applied to cancer and a web-application was developed on these concepts to remotely analyze the dynamics of the symptoms felt by the patient and early detect a recurrence or a complication of his cancer. Clinical symptoms are self-assessed by patients once a week, transcribed on their smartphone or computer through the Internet application. Relevant clinical events are detected using data processing algorithms, combining the dynamics of the various reported symptoms. In this case, an alert message is sent to the health care team. The referring oncologist is thus warned early. He can then make a telephone call to the patient about the reality of the medical alert and summon him for a check-up or any other complementary examination.
Applied to lung cancer, this application is a tried-and-tested solution with a phase III clinical trial. The main criteria was overall survival. The monitoring of these patients with the web-application and with a number of scanners reduced by 50% compared to the reference arm, made it possible to diagnose relapses earlier, to treat them under better conditions and, above all, to improve statistically significant overall survival (a gain in overall survival of 26% at 1 year (in patients intending to treat): 49% in the standard arm versus 75% in the experimental arm: p = 0.0025. This profit persists with 2 years of decline (a median gain in overall survival of 7.6 months, p=0.0312).
This concept was confirmed in the NCT0578006 study published by Basch et al. Basch used a similar application during chemotherapy treatment in 766 cancer patients. The web-application has improved overall survival by 5 months (Hazard ratio: 0.83).
This web-application provided a statistical improvement in the quality of life for lung cancer, access to new therapeutic lines (74% versus 33%, p <0.001) and optimally with treatments delivered at therapeutic doses (in 76% versus 34%) and faster access to supportive care for a clear improvement in the general condition of patients (77 versus 33%, p <0.001). The key for these patients who experienced many treatment toxicities was to use a better method of active follow-up.
A real-time survey of quality of life of Renal Cell Cancer patients receiving Axitinib/Pembrolizumab is an objective that has never been evaluated. This study will allow to generate data in patients who were not included in the phase III study (KEYNOTE 426): Performance Status =2, with central nervous system metastasis and with renal insufficiency. Personalized monitoring of these patients with the web-application KidneyPRO is even more relevant because the aim would be to quickly provide care adapted to adverse events, supportive care in case of loss of activity…
The web-application KidneyPRO investigated has been developed for this purpose.
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic
- Being tested
- KidneyPRO, standard follow-up
- Keywords
- Web-application, Quality Of Life, Metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Follow-up, Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
KidneyPRODevice
Also called web-application
Web-application for symptoms assessment
standard follow-upOther
usual follow-up
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard follow-up | Other | Patients will have no intervention. It is the comparator group. Patients will have the usual follow-up for clinical, biological and imaging exams. Receives: Other: standard follow-up |
| KidneyPRO web-application follow up | Experimental | Patients will have to connect to the KidneyPRO web-application weekly to complete a questionnaire about their symptoms in addition to usual follow-up.
Appropriate care will be offered if necessary (depending on the symptoms assessment) Receives: Device: KidneyPRO |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
symtom specific Quality Of Life at 24 weeks
difference of 4 points of the Quality Of Life, between the two arms, by the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) 24 weeks (6 months) after the first treatment administration date. Higher score is worse.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (16)
Overall survival
Calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or the date last known to be alive if patient is censored.
Measured: 2 years
Progression Free survival
Calculated from the date of start of treatment to the date of first progression of disease based on Investigator assessment or the date of death or censored at the date of the last valid tumor assessment before start of a new therapy for patients who are still alive and without progression
Measured: 2 years
Treatment Free Survival
Evaluated from the date of last administration of treatment to the date of the first administration of the next line of treatment or the date last known to be alive if patient is censored
Measured: 2 years
Duration Of Response
Evaluated from the date of the first documented tumor response to the date of disease progression or the date last known to be alive if patient is censored
Measured: 2 years
Change From Baseline in FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI)-19
TThe FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains- Disease Related Symptoms (physical and emotional), Treatment related side effects and Functional and Well-Being . A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Measured: 2 years
Change From Baseline in Quality Of life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30)
QLQ-C30 is a generic questionnaire for cancer patients. Score will be calculated according to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer guidelines for QLQ-C30. . QoL with QLQ-C30 will be evaluated before start of treatment and every 3 months until 24 months and at the end of treatment. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Measured: 2 years
Number of patients who experienced an adverse event (AE)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of study treatment, was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.
Measured: 2 years
Duration of the treatment
Calculated from the date of the first administration of the treatment until the last administration of the last treatment in progress
Measured: 2 years
Time to treatment discontinuation/failure due to toxicity
Calculated from the date of the first administration of the treatment until the date of the first discontinuation / failure due to toxicity of one of the 2 molecules
Measured: 2 years
Description of subsequent cancer treatments
Names of subsequant cancer treatments
Measured: 2 years
Web-application compliance
evaluated by the following ratio: the number of completed questionnaires made via the app verus the theoretical number of questionnaires that the included patients should have complete during a given period
Measured: 2 years
Treatment compliance
Evaluated by the number of taken tablets verus.the theoretical number of tablets the patient should have taken during a given period
Measured: 2 years
Sensibility of the application
Evaluated the number of events diagnosed by the app on the number of events that occurred in total.
Measured: 2 years
Patient web-application satisfaction
Evaluated by a specific self-evaluation at the 6th and 12th month follow-up visits (specific questionnaire dedicated to the use of the web-application) and at the end of treatment
Measured: 1 year
Performance Status at the end of treatment
Evaluated with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group's recommendations, at each visit
Measured: 2 years
Medical team web-application satisfaction
Evaluated with a specific questionnaire at 12 months.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2021
- Study start7 Jun 2021
- Primary completion7 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma MetastaticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Weprom
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer, FLGXPL
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric VOOG, MD, Principal investigator, Clinique Victor Hugo/Centre Jean Bernard
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04764487
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WP-2019-03
- Other IDs
- 2020-A01103-36
- Acronym
- AxiPRO
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 3 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Web-mediated Follow-up With the Web-application KidneyPRO Versus Standard Follow-up for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Axitinib/Pembrolizumab in First Line
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04764487
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AxiPRO / WP-2019-03
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic
- Keywords
- Web-application, Quality Of Life, Metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Follow-up, Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- WepromUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer, FLGXPL
- Study start
- 7 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With the advent of immunotherapy, standard first-line treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma is now an association with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. In this context, the association axitinib plus pembrolizumab has already been evaluated in several studies with positive results for Progression Free survival, Overall survival and Complete response. The combo received a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, and the European Commission approves the extension of Marketing Authorization in first line for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.
In a context of treatment with a new association, it is important to manage the toxicities closely in order to allow the patients to have an optimal treatment. The underlying hypothesis is that the use of new information and communication technologies could improve clinical patient management.
In this study, we wish assess the impact of monitoring via the web application KidneyPRO on the quality of life of patients with the new combination of treatment axitinib/pembrolizumab for a renal cell carcinoma in first line.
Detailed description
Metastatic or locally advanced clear cell renal carcinomas (RCC) are treated with targeted therapies (inhibitors of tyrosine kinases) and immune check-points inhibitors.
In first line many combos are tested. Association of TKI-PD L1-inhibitor is one option. Axitinib-Pembrolizumab showed very high response rate and progression free survival compared to Sunitinib but immunotherapies have a specific adverse event profile. Actually, there is no standardized follow-up for this type of treatment.
It is important to develop new strategies that reduce the resources used while improving the performance of this surveillance for the benefit of patients, to improve the comfort of patients, to improve the compliance and to optimise the dose of treatment received, in a course of care reworked by maintaining a continuous contact not demanding.
In collaboration with the Scientific Research National Center, the theory of chaos and its derivatives was applied to cancer and a web-application was developed on these concepts to remotely analyze the dynamics of the symptoms felt by the patient and early detect a recurrence or a complication of his cancer. Clinical symptoms are self-assessed by patients once a week, transcribed on their smartphone or computer through the Internet application. Relevant clinical events are detected using data processing algorithms, combining the dynamics of the various reported symptoms. In this case, an alert message is sent to the health care team. The referring oncologist is thus warned early. He can then make a telephone call to the patient about the reality of the medical alert and summon him for a check-up or any other complementary examination.
Applied to lung cancer, this application is a tried-and-tested solution with a phase III clinical trial. The main criteria was overall survival. The monitoring of these patients with the web-application and with a number of scanners reduced by 50% compared to the reference arm, made it possible to diagnose relapses earlier, to treat them under better conditions and, above all, to improve statistically significant overall survival (a gain in overall survival of 26% at 1 year (in patients intending to treat): 49% in the standard arm versus 75% in the experimental arm: p = 0.0025. This profit persists with 2 years of decline (a median gain in overall survival of 7.6 months, p=0.0312).
This concept was confirmed in the NCT0578006 study published by Basch et al. Basch used a similar application during chemotherapy treatment in 766 cancer patients. The web-application has improved overall survival by 5 months (Hazard ratio: 0.83).
This web-application provided a statistical improvement in the quality of life for lung cancer, access to new therapeutic lines (74% versus 33%, p <0.001) and optimally with treatments delivered at therapeutic doses (in 76% versus 34%) and faster access to supportive care for a clear improvement in the general condition of patients (77 versus 33%, p <0.001). The key for these patients who experienced many treatment toxicities was to use a better method of active follow-up.
A real-time survey of quality of life of Renal Cell Cancer patients receiving Axitinib/Pembrolizumab is an objective that has never been evaluated. This study will allow to generate data in patients who were not included in the phase III study (KEYNOTE 426): Performance Status =2, with central nervous system metastasis and with renal insufficiency. Personalized monitoring of these patients with the web-application KidneyPRO is even more relevant because the aim would be to quickly provide care adapted to adverse events, supportive care in case of loss of activity…
The web-application KidneyPRO investigated has been developed for this purpose.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard follow-up | Other | Other: standard follow-upPatients will have no intervention. It is the comparator group. Patients will have the usual follow-up for clinical, biological and imaging exams. |
| KidneyPRO web-application follow up | Experimental | Device: KidneyPROPatients will have to connect to the KidneyPRO web-application weekly to complete a questionnaire about their symptoms in addition to usual follow-up. Appropriate care will be offered if necessary (depending on the symptoms assessment) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced RCC who require a first line systemic treatment by axitinib/pembrolizumab combo
- Patient with at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1 criteria or with clinically apparent disease that can be reliably monitored by the investigator
- Patient aged 18 years or older
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status < 3
- Patient with adequate hematopoietic or organ function, as indicated by the following criteria (assessed within -14 days prior the first dosing):
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- Prior systemic therapy directed at advanced or metastatic RCC
- Patient with contraindication to a treatment by axitinib/pembrolizumab
- Prior immunotherapy with IL-2, IFN-α, or anti PD 1, anti PD L1, anti PD L2, anti CD137 or anti cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA 4) antibody (including ipilimumab), or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T cell co stimulation or immune checkpoint pathways or TKI
- Known severe hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies (Grade ≥ 3), any history of anaphylaxis, or uncontrolled asthma (ie, 3 or more features of partially controlled asthma Global Initiative for Asthma 2011)
- Uncontrolled hypertension in spite of anti-hypertensive therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| KidneyPROAlso: web-applicationWeb-application for symptoms assessment | Device | KidneyPRO web-application follow up |
| standard follow-upusual follow-up | Other | Standard follow-up |
Primary outcome
symtom specific Quality Of Life at 24 weeks
Time frame: 6 months
difference of 4 points of the Quality Of Life, between the two arms, by the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) 24 weeks (6 months) after the first treatment administration date. Higher score is worse.
16 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: 2 years
Progression Free survival
Time frame: 2 years
Treatment Free Survival
Time frame: 2 years
Duration Of Response
Time frame: 2 years
Change From Baseline in FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI)-19
Time frame: 2 years
Change From Baseline in Quality Of life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30)
Time frame: 2 years
Number of patients who experienced an adverse event (AE)
Time frame: 2 years
Duration of the treatment
Time frame: 2 years
Time to treatment discontinuation/failure due to toxicity
Time frame: 2 years
Description of subsequent cancer treatments
Time frame: 2 years
Web-application compliance
Time frame: 2 years
Treatment compliance
Time frame: 2 years
Sensibility of the application
Time frame: 2 years
Patient web-application satisfaction
Time frame: 1 year
Performance Status at the end of treatment
Time frame: 2 years
Medical team web-application satisfaction
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic
Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial Evaluating ctDNA-Guided Interruption Versus Standard of Care Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy In Patients With Advanced / Metastatic Solid Tumors.
NSCLC (Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Eribulin Mesylate in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer of the Urothelium and Kidney Dysfunction
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma, Locally Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of Two Immunotherapy Drugs (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) With One Anti-cancer Targeted Drug (Cabozantinib) for Rare Genitourinary Tumors
Bladder Adenocarcinoma, Bladder Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Upfront Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Cytoreductive Nephrectomy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Trial of Belzutifan (PT2977, MK-6482) Tablets In Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-6482-001)
Advanced Solid Tumors, Solid Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric VOOG, MD principal investigator
Clinique Victor Hugo/Centre Jean Bernard
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing KidneyPRO and standard follow-up in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic, run by Weprom at 13 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Magali BALAVOINE (2 41 68 29 70 ext. +33, m.balavoine@weprom.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
symtom specific Quality Of Life at 24 weeks (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2022.