AzTrials
AzTrials

Active AgeingRELOC-AGENCT04765696

Prospective RELOC-AGE: How Do Housing Choices and Relocation Matter for Active Ageing?

An observational study of Active Ageing, run by Lund University at 1 site in Sweden.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of prospective RELOC-AGE is to study housing choices and relocation and to examine the effects on active ageing among people aged 55+ considering relocation. All data collection will be conducted at baseline and after 1, 3, 5 and 7 years of follow-up. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Active Ageing
How many people
1,964 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
1 Mar 2021to 30 Jun 2029
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Persons 55 years or older, living in Sweden, listed for relocation at any of the three housing companies Karlshamnsbostäder and Örebrobostäder (public housing companies) and Riksbyggen (a condominium provider)

Who may be able to join

  • Persons 55 years or older, living in Sweden, listed for relocation at any of the three housing companies Karlshamnsbostäder and Örebrobostäder (public housing companies) and Riksbyggen (a condominium provider)

Who cannot join

  • Severe cognitive impairments or insufficient language skills to give informed consent and participate in telephone interviews

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Active and Healthy Ageing Research Group, Department of Health Sciences Lund University

    Lund, 22120

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

The objective of prospective RELOC-AGE is to study housing choices and relocation and to examine the effects on active ageing among people aged 55+ considering relocation. All data collection will be conducted at baseline and after 1, 3, 5 and 7 years of follow-up.

Read the detailed description

The objective of prospective RELOC-AGE is to study housing choices and relocation and to examine the effects on active ageing among people aged 55+ considering relocation.

Research Questions

  1. What aspects of housing, health and participation predict a) relocation to different housing options in the ordinary housing stock; b) residential care facilities; c) remaining in the present dwelling?
  2. How is the complex interaction between objective and perceived aspects of housing, health and participation associated with active ageing, and what are the patterns and characteristics of such dynamics?
  3. What housing attributes do people aged 55+ considering relocation find important, and to what extent, when making their decisions on housing preferences?
  4. How do people aged 55+ considering relocation reason a) regarding different housing options; b) motives for considering and effectuating relocation, and; c) to what extent are their motives fulfilled?

The sample will include people aged 55+ considering relocation. Recruitment will be made from a sub-sample based on waiting lists (n=22 000) among three housing companies in Sweden: Karlshamnsbostäder AB, Örebrobostäder AB, and Riksbyggen. The expected final sample size is n=3000. Quantitative data will be collected through a web survey and one telephone interview at baseline (2021) and by a web survey at follow-ups 2022, 2024, 2026 and 2028. Data on primary and secondary outcomes are based on established questionnaires used in previous research on older people, health, and housing as well as in national public health surveys in Sweden. In addition to primary and secondary outcomes (presented below), the surveys include demographic and socioeconomic characteristics including civil status, education level, economic situation, occupational status, holding a driver license, critical life events (e.g., death of spouse, long-term disease, divorce), original nationality; questions about present housing situation (dwelling characteristics (e.g., type and size of dwelling, location) and neighborhood characteristics (e.g., access to services and green areas), potential and realized mobility, social/cohabiting situation, time spent at home, housing adaptations); use of technical aids for mobility, use of health, social and informal care, thoughts about future housing, reasons related to consideration about relocating and moving intentions. Data on stated preferences in relation to housing will be collected in a specific survey based on a discrete choice methodology. Qualitative interviews will be conducted consecutively with a subsample (n=100) of respondents who have relocated during the follow-up period. Further, linking to register data will be made within the scope of Register RELOC-AGE, which is another part of the larger project.

For quantitative data, descriptive, exploratory, and inferential statistics will be used. For longitudinal analyses, generalized linear models or Cox regression with time-dependent covariates will be applied. Throughout, we will control for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and other potential confounders and compare the results across different cohorts. Quantitative analyses will be conducted using standard statistical software. For analyses of DCE data, we will use the conditional logit model (also referred to as the multinomial logit model) as the reference model, but the analysis will be extended to mixed logit and latent class models to take preference heterogeneity into account. Qualitative interviews will be audio-recorded and transc¬ribed verbatim and principles from Grounded Theory will be used for the analysis.

Conditions
Active Ageing
Being tested
No intervention is administered
Keywords
Housing, Relocation, Health, Neighbourhood, Life space mobility, Housing preferences

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No intervention is administeredOther

    No intervention is administered, the cohort is followed in order to evaluate the impact of housing and relocation on active ageing outcomes.

Study groups in NCT04765696
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Persons 55 years or older considering relocationNo intervention is administered.
Receives: Other: No intervention is administered

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. University of Jyväskylä Active Aging Scale (UJACAS)

    17 items(areas of activity), each to be self-rated regarding goals, ability, autonomy and activity (total scores 0-272)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Active Ageing score to 12 months

  2. University of Jyväskylä Active Aging Scale (UJACAS)

    17 items(areas of activity), each to be self-rated regarding goals, ability, autonomy and activity (total scores 0-272)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Active Ageing score to 36 months

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Life-space mobility

    6 items related to life spaces visited during the past four weeks, whether the person had visited (yes/no), frequency on a four-point scale, and level of dependence on others or technical equipment on a three-point scale)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Life-space mobility to 12 months

  2. Life-space mobility

    6 items related to life spaces visited during the past four weeks, whether the person had visited (yes/no), frequency on a four-point scale, and level of dependence on others or technical equipment on a three-point scale)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Life-space mobility to 36 months

  3. Meaning of home

    28 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a ten-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (very much)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Meaning of home scores to 12 months

  4. Meaning of home

    28 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a ten-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (very much)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Meaning of home scores to 36 months

  5. Housing related control beliefs

    24 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Housing related control beliefs scores to 12 months

  6. Housing related control beliefs

    24 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Housing related control beliefs scores to 36 months

  7. Usability in my home

    4 items (selected from original instrument) with statements about aspects of usability rated on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Usability in my home scores to 12 months

  8. Usability in my home

    4 items (selected from original instrument) with statements about aspects of usability rated on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Usability in my home scores to 36 months

  9. Housing satisfaction

    One item "Are you happy with the condition of your home?" answered on a five-point scale from 1 (definitely not) to 5 ('yes, definitely)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Housing satisfaction scores to 12 months

  10. Housing satisfaction

    One item "Are you happy with the condition of your home?" answered on a five-point scale from 1 (definitely not) to 5 ('yes, definitely)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Housing satisfaction scores to 36 months

  11. Health-related Quality of life

    EuroQol-5d questionnaire (5 items, range 1-5 per item, with higher score indicating worse outcome)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Health-related Quality of Life to 12 months

  12. Health-related Quality of life

    EuroQol-5d questionnaire (5 items, range 1-5 per item, with higher score indicating worse outcome)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Health-related Quality of Life to 36 months

  13. Self-rated health

    One item "How would you rate your own health", rated from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Self-rated Health to 12 months

  14. Self-rated health

    One item "How would you rate your own health", rated from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Self-rated Health to 36 months

  15. Life satisfaction

    One item "How satisfied are you with life in general", rated from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Life satisfaction to 12 months

  16. Life satisfaction

    One item "How satisfied are you with life in general", rated from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Life satisfaction to 36 months

  17. Housing enabler, functional limitations

    8 items indicating presence (yes or yes to some extent) /absence (no) functional limitations

    Measured: Change from Baseline Functional limitations to 12 months

  18. Housing enabler, functional limitations

    8 items indicating presence (yes or yes to some extent) /absence (no) functional limitations

    Measured: Change from Baseline Functional limitations to 36 months

  19. General self-efficacy

    10 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a four-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 4 (totally agree)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Genreal Self-efficacy to 12 months

  20. General self-efficacy

    10 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a four-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 4 (totally agree)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Genreal Self-efficacy to 36 months

  21. Physical exercise

    Rated as duration per week on five levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more

    Measured: Change from Baseline physical exercise duration/week to 12 months

  22. Physical exercise

    Rated as duration per week on five levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more

    Measured: Change from Baseline physical exercise duration/week to 36 months

  23. Physical activity

    Rated as duration per week on six levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more

    Measured: Change from Baseline physical activity duration/week to 12 months

  24. Physical activity

    Rated as duration per week on six levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more

    Measured: Change from Baseline physical activity duration/week to 36 months

  25. Frailty (FRESCH)

    4 items to be answered yes or no

    Measured: Change from Baseline Frailty scores to 12 months

  26. Frailty (FRESCH)

    4 items to be answered yes or no

    Measured: Change from Baseline Frailty scores to 36 months

  27. Satisfaction with mobility opportunities

    One item, rated from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very unsatisfied)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Satisfaction with mobility opportunities to 12 months

  28. Satisfaction with mobility opportunities

    One item, rated from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very unsatisfied)

    Measured: Change from Baseline Satisfaction with mobility opportunities to 36 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2021
  2. Study start1 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,964 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04765696
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-03457
Acronym
RELOC-AGE
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
16 Feb 2021
Last updated
31 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zingmark M, Nordestrom F, Iwarsson S. Challenges related to self-assessment of active ageing during the Covid-19 pandemic in Sweden. BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 13;15(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06059-3.

    PubMed 35562784
  • Zingmark M, Bjork J, Granbom M, Gefenaite G, Nordestrom F, Schmidt SM, Rantanen T, Slaug B, Iwarsson S. Exploring Associations of Housing, Relocation, and Active and Healthy Aging in Sweden: Protocol for a Prospective Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(9):e31137. doi: 10.2196/31137.

    PubMed 34546172

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Active Ageing, run by Lund University at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

University of Jyväskylä Active Aging Scale (UJACAS) (time frame: Change from Baseline Active Ageing score to 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04765696, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in