PreeclampsiaPE37NCT04766866
sFlt1/PlGF and Planned Delivery to Prevent Preeclampsia at Term.
A study testing sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestation in people with Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction, run by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau at 21 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
Preeclampsia (PE) affects ~5% of pregnancies. Although improved obstetrical care has significantly diminished associated maternal mortality, PE remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the world. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Preeclampsia, Intrauterine Growth Restriction, Maternal Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9,132 participants
- Where
- 21 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2021to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Nulliparous women
- Singleton pregnancies
- >18 years old
- 35.0-36.6 weeks of gestation
- Maternal written consent form
Who cannot join
- Fetuses/neonates with major malformations or genetic anomalies that could modify the timing of delivery or has an impact on obstetric outcome
- Suspected fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight <3 centile or between the 3rd and 10th centile together with abnormal Doppler in the mean uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, or in umbilical artery pulsatility index or in the middle cerebral artery or in the cerebral umbilical index (CPR))
- Participation in another interventional study that could modify the timing of delivery.
Trial locations and contacts
21 sites in 9 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
21 sites in 9 countries
Spain11 sites, 2 recruiting
- Active, not recruiting
Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona
- Active, not recruiting
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona
- Active, not recruiting
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona
- Recruiting
Hospital Maternitat del Clínic
Barcelona
Francesc Figueras, ffiguera@clinic.cat
- Recruiting
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
Barcelona
Francesc Figueras, ffiguera@clinic.cat
- Active, not recruiting
Virgen de la Arrixaca
El Palmar, Murcia, 30120
- Withdrawn
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands
- Withdrawn
Hospital La Paz
Madrid
- Active, not recruiting
Hospital Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca
- Active, not recruiting
Hospital la Fe
Valencia
- Withdrawn
Hospital Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza
India3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC)
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110002
Sangeeta Gupta, MD, drsangeetamamc@gmail.com
- Recruiting
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Ansari Nagar
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110029
Aparna Sharma, MD, kaparnasharma@gmail.com
- Recruiting
Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC)
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110029
Sumitra Bachani, MD
sumitrabachani@gmail.com
Colombia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Clinica del Prado SAS
Bogotá
Catalina Valencia, MD, PhD
Czechia1 site
- Active, not recruiting
Institute for the Care of Mother and Child
Prague
Ecuador1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Medicina Fetal Quito
Quito
Belén Nieto, MD, PhD
Eduardo Yepez, MD, PhD
Mexico1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Hospital Gineco-Obstetricia nº4
Mexico City
Oscar Moreno, MD, PhD
Panama1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Santo Tomas
Panama City
Ameth Hawkins
Poland1 site
- Active, not recruiting
Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine
Warsaw
About this study
Official title: Protocol of the PE37 Study: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Screening With sFlt1/PlGF and Planned Delivery to Prevent Preeclampsia at Term
- Preeclampsia (PE) affects ~5% of pregnancies. Although improved obstetrical care has significantly diminished associated maternal mortality, PE remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the world.
- Term PE accounts for 70% of all PE and a large proportion of maternal-fetal morbidity related with this condition. Prediction and prevention of term PE remains unsolved.
- Previously proposed approaches are based on combined screening and/or prophylactic drugs, but these policies are unlikely to be implementable in many world settings.
- Recent evidence shows that sFlt1-PlGF ratio at 35-37w predicts term PE with 80% detection rate.
- Likewise, recent studies demonstrate that induction of labor (IOL) from 37w is safe.
- The investigators hypothesize that a single-step universal screening for term PE based on sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-37w followed by IOL from 37w would reduce the prevalence of term PE without increasing cesarean section rates or adverse neonatal outcomes.
- The investigators propose a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of a screening of term PE with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in asymptomatic nulliparous women at 35-37w. Women will be assigned to revealed (sFlt-1/PlGF known to clinicians) versus concealed (unknown) arms. A cutoff of >90th centile will be used to define high risk of PE and offer IOL from 37w.
- If successful, the results of this trial will provide evidence to support a simple universal screening strategy reducing the prevalence of term PE, which could be applicable in most healthcare settings and have enormous implications on perinatal outcomes and public health policies worldwide.
Read the detailed description
Finding an effective prediction and prevention for term PE remains an unsolved challenge. From previous recent evidence it seems clear that prediction very close to term may achieve a high detection rate, but there is no evidence as to which strategy might be effective in preventing PE in high-risk women. The investigators postulate that a solution that would be applicable in most settings worldwide would require a simplified, pragmatic, approach. The rationale of this proposal is that PE could be reduced with a single-step lab test screening followed by induction of labor (IOL).
A single-step lab measure to detect PE. Combined algorithms using angiogenic factors with Doppler ultrasound and maternal features seem to achieve the highest performance in detecting pre-clinical PE. However, the need to train staff and change pregnancy care protocols renders difficult generalization in high-resource and even more low-resource settings. On the contrary, single lab tests can be more easily incorporated into the mainstream clinical practice and provide a widespread solution for high-resource settings and specially sub-optimal healthcare systems heavily affected by the consequences of term PE. Angiogenic factors are the obvious candidate for these purposes. The sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-36w predicts term PE with a DR of 82% and is a standardized lab test nowadays, realizable by ELISA with widely available automated lab platforms. Normal values in late pregnancy have been reported and are fairly similar among different populations. As preliminary research for this study, the investigators have confirmed that the gestational-age adjusted normal values of sFlt1/PlGF matched quite remarkably those previously published in different populations across Europe. A one-step screening with sFlt1/PlGF would select a 5-10% of the population with the highest risk for PE.
IOL at 37 weeks as an intervention in women at high-risk for PE. Previous trials based on statins have failed to show a reduction of PE in high-risk women. IOL at 37 weeks is an alternative to avoid PE in those high-risk women. IOL has consistently been demonstrated to be safe ( ) and does not affect long-term maternal quality of life ( ). Both the HYPITAT and the DIGITAT randomized trials showed that IOL did not increase caesarean rates or adverse neonatal outcomes ( ). A recent large randomized trial in the US has shown that even in low-risk women, universal IOL decreased cesarean section rates and was well accepted ( ). While in low-risk pregnancies labour induction has been found to be beneficial from 39 weeks (ARRIVE study), in women with placental-related conditions such as hypertension (HYPITAT) or small-for-gestational age (DIGITAT) it is 37+ weeks when the trade-off between neonatal and maternal benefits makes induction recommendable.
Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a single-step universal screening for term PE based on sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-36.6 w followed by IOL at 37w in those women found to be at high risk might represent a feasible and reproducible strategy, applicable worldwide, to reduce the prevalence of term PE without increasing cesarean section rates or adverse neonatal outcomes.
Individual participant data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan and informed consent form will be available with publication by email addresses after approval of a proposal with a signed data access agreement
- Conditions
- Preeclampsia, Intrauterine Growth Restriction, Maternal Hypertension, Neonatal Outcome, Perinatal Death
- Being tested
- sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestation
- Keywords
- Preeclampsia, angiogenic factors, perinatal death, induction of labour
- Medical subject headings
- Pre-Eclampsia, Fetal Growth Retardation, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Perinatal Death
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestationDiagnostic test
A ratio cutoff of >p90th will be used to define low and elevated risk of developing a placental complications of pregnancy and therefore induction of labour will be offered from 37th weeks of gestation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-intervention or non-reveal group | No intervention | Non-intervention or non-reveal (result unknown) group: routine follow-up and spontaneous delivery |
| Intervention group or reveal group | Experimental | A ratio cutoff of >p90th will be used to define low and elevated risk of developing a placental complications of pregnancy and therefore induction of labour will be offered from 37th weeks of gestation Receives: Diagnostic Test: sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of term Preeclampsia development
Number of participants with term preeclampsia/total number participants.
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Maternal morbidity rate
Composite including any of the following: (i) HELLP syndrome; (ii) Central nervous system dysfunction (eclampsia, Glasgow Coma Score <13, stroke, reversible ischemic neurological deficit or cortical blindness); (iii) hepatic dysfunction; (iv) renal dysfunction; (v) respiratory dysfunction; (vi) cardiovascular dysfunction; (vii) placental abruption; or, (viii) a requirement for transfusion of blood products according to the total deliveries.
Measured: 6 weeks
Maternal Hospital stay
Days of admission
Measured: 6 weeks
Caesarean section rate
number of c-section / total deliveries
Measured: 4 weeks
Perinatal complications rate
Presence of placental abruptio, severe fetal growth restriction (defined as birth weight <3rd centile), perinatal mortality, an Apgar score at 5-minute below 7.0, an umbilical artery pH below 7.10, need for respiratory support within 72 hours after birth neonatal intraventricular haemorrhage grade III/IV, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy/total deliveries.
Measured: 18 weeks
Neonatal hospital stay
Days
Measured: 18 weeks
Maternal experience
Satisfaction score (PSS, STAI, WHO and Labor Agentry scale).
Measured: 12 weeks
Incurred costs
Calculated costs
Measured: 6 weeks
Number of participants with Cardiovascular risk
Maternal blood pressure and endothelial function 6-months postpartum/ participants
Measured: 6 months post-delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2021
- Study start2 Mar 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PreeclampsiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, open-label randomized study with parallel groups.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 9,132 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elisa Llurba, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04766866
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PE37
- Acronym
- PE37
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Llurba E, Crispi F, Crovetto F, Youssef L, Delgado JL, Puig I, Mora J, Krofta L, Mackova K, Martinez-Varea A, Tubau A, Ruiz A, Paya A, Prat M, Chantraine F, Comas C, Kajdy A, Lopez-Tinajero MF, Figueras F, Gratacos E; PE37 study group. Multicentre randomised trial of screening with sFlt1/PlGF and planned delivery to prevent pre-eclampsia at term: protocol of the PE37 study. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e076201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076201.
PubMed 38458783
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Protocol of the PE37 Study: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Screening With sFlt1/PlGF and Planned Delivery to Prevent Preeclampsia at Term
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04766866
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PE37 / PE37
- Conditions
- Preeclampsia, Intrauterine Growth Restriction, Maternal Hypertension, Neonatal Outcome, Perinatal Death
- Keywords
- Preeclampsia, angiogenic factors, perinatal death, induction of labour
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 9,132 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Preeclampsia (PE) affects ~5% of pregnancies. Although improved obstetrical care has significantly diminished associated maternal mortality, PE remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the world.
- Term PE accounts for 70% of all PE and a large proportion of maternal-fetal morbidity related with this condition. Prediction and prevention of term PE remains unsolved.
- Previously proposed approaches are based on combined screening and/or prophylactic drugs, but these policies are unlikely to be implementable in many world settings.
- Recent evidence shows that sFlt1-PlGF ratio at 35-37w predicts term PE with 80% detection rate.
- Likewise, recent studies demonstrate that induction of labor (IOL) from 37w is safe.
- The investigators hypothesize that a single-step universal screening for term PE based on sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-37w followed by IOL from 37w would reduce the prevalence of term PE without increasing cesarean section rates or adverse neonatal outcomes.
- The investigators propose a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of a screening of term PE with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in asymptomatic nulliparous women at 35-37w. Women will be assigned to revealed (sFlt-1/PlGF known to clinicians) versus concealed (unknown) arms. A cutoff of >90th centile will be used to define high risk of PE and offer IOL from 37w.
- If successful, the results of this trial will provide evidence to support a simple universal screening strategy reducing the prevalence of term PE, which could be applicable in most healthcare settings and have enormous implications on perinatal outcomes and public health policies worldwide.
Detailed description
Finding an effective prediction and prevention for term PE remains an unsolved challenge. From previous recent evidence it seems clear that prediction very close to term may achieve a high detection rate, but there is no evidence as to which strategy might be effective in preventing PE in high-risk women. The investigators postulate that a solution that would be applicable in most settings worldwide would require a simplified, pragmatic, approach. The rationale of this proposal is that PE could be reduced with a single-step lab test screening followed by induction of labor (IOL).
A single-step lab measure to detect PE. Combined algorithms using angiogenic factors with Doppler ultrasound and maternal features seem to achieve the highest performance in detecting pre-clinical PE. However, the need to train staff and change pregnancy care protocols renders difficult generalization in high-resource and even more low-resource settings. On the contrary, single lab tests can be more easily incorporated into the mainstream clinical practice and provide a widespread solution for high-resource settings and specially sub-optimal healthcare systems heavily affected by the consequences of term PE. Angiogenic factors are the obvious candidate for these purposes. The sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-36w predicts term PE with a DR of 82% and is a standardized lab test nowadays, realizable by ELISA with widely available automated lab platforms. Normal values in late pregnancy have been reported and are fairly similar among different populations. As preliminary research for this study, the investigators have confirmed that the gestational-age adjusted normal values of sFlt1/PlGF matched quite remarkably those previously published in different populations across Europe. A one-step screening with sFlt1/PlGF would select a 5-10% of the population with the highest risk for PE.
IOL at 37 weeks as an intervention in women at high-risk for PE. Previous trials based on statins have failed to show a reduction of PE in high-risk women. IOL at 37 weeks is an alternative to avoid PE in those high-risk women. IOL has consistently been demonstrated to be safe ( ) and does not affect long-term maternal quality of life ( ). Both the HYPITAT and the DIGITAT randomized trials showed that IOL did not increase caesarean rates or adverse neonatal outcomes ( ). A recent large randomized trial in the US has shown that even in low-risk women, universal IOL decreased cesarean section rates and was well accepted ( ). While in low-risk pregnancies labour induction has been found to be beneficial from 39 weeks (ARRIVE study), in women with placental-related conditions such as hypertension (HYPITAT) or small-for-gestational age (DIGITAT) it is 37+ weeks when the trade-off between neonatal and maternal benefits makes induction recommendable.
Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a single-step universal screening for term PE based on sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-36.6 w followed by IOL at 37w in those women found to be at high risk might represent a feasible and reproducible strategy, applicable worldwide, to reduce the prevalence of term PE without increasing cesarean section rates or adverse neonatal outcomes.
Individual participant data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan and informed consent form will be available with publication by email addresses after approval of a proposal with a signed data access agreement
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, open-label randomized study with parallel groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-intervention or non-reveal group | No intervention | –Non-intervention or non-reveal (result unknown) group: routine follow-up and spontaneous delivery |
| Intervention group or reveal group | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestationA ratio cutoff of >p90th will be used to define low and elevated risk of developing a placental complications of pregnancy and therefore induction of labour will be offered from 37th weeks of gestation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Nulliparous women
- Singleton pregnancies
- >18 years old
- 35.0-36.6 weeks of gestation
- Maternal written consent form
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Fetuses/neonates with major malformations or genetic anomalies that could modify the timing of delivery or has an impact on obstetric outcome
- Suspected fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight <3 centile or between the 3rd and 10th centile together with abnormal Doppler in the mean uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, or in umbilical artery pulsatility index or in the middle cerebral artery or in the cerebral umbilical index (CPR))
- Participation in another interventional study that could modify the timing of delivery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestationA ratio cutoff of >p90th will be used to define low and elevated risk of developing a placental complications of pregnancy and therefore induction of labour will be offered from 37th weeks of gestation | Diagnostic test | Intervention group or reveal group |
Primary outcome
Rate of term Preeclampsia development
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of participants with term preeclampsia/total number participants.
8 secondary outcomes
Maternal morbidity rate
Time frame: 6 weeks
Maternal Hospital stay
Time frame: 6 weeks
Caesarean section rate
Time frame: 4 weeks
Perinatal complications rate
Time frame: 18 weeks
Neonatal hospital stay
Time frame: 18 weeks
Maternal experience
Time frame: 12 weeks
Incurred costs
Time frame: 6 weeks
Number of participants with Cardiovascular risk
Time frame: 6 months post-delivery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Feb 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38458783Llurba E, Crispi F, Crovetto F, Youssef L, Delgado JL, Puig I, Mora J, Krofta L, Mackova K, Martinez-Varea A, Tubau A, Ruiz A, Paya A, Prat M, Chantraine F, Comas C, Kajdy A, Lopez-Tinajero MF, Figueras F, Gratacos E; PE37 study group. Multicentre randomised trial of screening with sFlt1/PlGF and planned delivery to prevent pre-eclampsia at term: protocol of the PE37 study. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e076201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076201.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Preeclampsia
Recruiting
Exercise to Improve Heart and Metabolic Health After Childbirth in Women at High Risk for Preeclampsia
Postpartum Exercise, Cardiometabolic Health
RecruitingObservational study
Molecular Study of the Maternal-fetal Interface in Preeclampsia.
Preeclampsia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The CoPenHagen PREeClampsia and cardIOvascUlar diSease Study
Pre-Eclampsia, Atherosclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Furosemide vs Placebo in Severe Preeclampsia Postpartum
Severe Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
21 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing sFlt1/PlGF screening in maternal blood at 35 to 36.6 weeks of gestation in people with Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction, run by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau at 21 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 21 sites in Spain, India, Belgium, Colombia, Czechia and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Elisa Llurba, MD; PhD (0034687743699, ellurba@santpau.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of term Preeclampsia development (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04766866, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2025.