Uncomplicated MalariaPhase 4NCT04767217
Malaria Therapeutic Efficacy Study, Rwanda
A Phase 4 study testing artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) in people with Uncomplicated Malaria, run by Jhpiego at 3 sites in Rwanda.
Trial summary
WHO recommends that Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) for 1st and 2nd line antimalarial medicines should be routinely carried out and data made available for decision-making due to the threat of emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance in malaria-endemic countries, especially in Africa. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 59 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Uncomplicated Malaria
- What is being tested?
- artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 528 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesRwanda
- Study dates
- 14 Jun 2021to 31 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 59 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children aged 6 months to 59 months old
- Monoinfection with P. falciparum and parasitaemia of 1,000 - 100,000 asexual parasites per µl
- Axillary temperature 37.5 °C or history of fever in the preceding 24 hours before recruitment
- Ability to swallow oral medication
- Haemoglobin ≥7.0 g/dL at admission
- Informed consent from guardian/parent of patient
- Parent/guardian agrees to bring the patient for planned follow-up visits at day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 (35 and 42 in DHA-PPQ arm only)
- Ability for the child to be admitted to a health center for inpatient blood testing, observation and treatment for three days
Who cannot join
- Danger signs of severe malaria or signs of severe malaria
- Other underlying diseases (cardiac, renal, hepatic diseases)
- Severe malnutrition according to WHO child growth standards (WHO, 2006), children - with marasmus or oedematous malnutrition
- History of allergy to study drugs
- A clear history of receiving any antimalarial treatment in the preceding 72 hours
- Ongoing prophylaxis with drugs having antimalarial activity, such as cotrimoxazole for the prevention of Pneumocisti jirovici pneumonia in children born to HIV+ women
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Rwanda3 sites
Bugarama health center
Bugarama
Masaka health center
Masaka
Rukara health center
Rukara
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Artemether-lumefantrine and Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in Children With Uncomplicated Clinical Malaria in Rural Rwanda
WHO recommends that Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) for 1st and 2nd line antimalarial medicines should be routinely carried out and data made available for decision-making due to the threat of emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance in malaria-endemic countries, especially in Africa. In line with this WHO recommendation, Rwanda Ministry of Health (MOH) is conducting the TES to determine the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine (ALN), which has been used in Rwanda for the last 14 years) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ), another WHO-approved drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria which, though, has not been used in Rwanda, is being considered for adoption as a second line or alternative first line treatment. The objective of this study is to inform the decisions or actions made by a public health authority (Rwanda Rwanda Ministry of Health) to inform decision on revision of the antimalarial guidelines and policy in Rwanda. Jhpiego's Impact Malaria project in Rwanda, with funding and technical oversight from US President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) through USAID and CDC, will support the Rwanda MOH in its effort to evaluate the efficacy of ALN and DHA-PPQ in the treatment of children with uncomplicated malaria. The study is being conducted by Rwanda MOH, with technical support and funding by PMI-USAID through Jhpiego in Rwanda.
Read the detailed description
WHO recommends that Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) for 1st and 2nd line antimalarial medicines should be routinely carried out and data made available for decision-making due to the threat of emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance in malaria-endemic countries, especially in Africa. The Rwandan Ministry of Health (MOH) in 2006 adopted WHO-approved artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) as the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. A clinical trial carried out in 2004-2005 in Rwanda showed that ALN was very efficacious in children although efficacy varied in different parts of the country. ALN efficacy was shown to remain high in TES conducted in 2012-2015 and in 2018. However, both studies found a molecular marker of parasite resistance to artemisinin (included delayed parasite clearance associated with artemisinin resistance in one site in 2018) and both studies also found high prevalence of markers associated with tolerance to lumefantrine. The clinical efficacy of ALN therefore needs to be regularly monitored in Rwanda to ensure this first line treatment is still efficacious. Given the detection of antimalarial resistance markers in recent TES, it is also important for Rwanda MOH to determine the efficacy an additional ACT that could be considered for adoption as a second line or alternative first line treatment. This study will monitor the efficacy of ALN (which has been used in Rwanda for the last 14 years) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ), another WHO-approved ACT for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria which has not been used in Rwanda.
In line with the WHO recommendation, Jhpiego Impact Malaria project in Rwanda, with funding and technical oversight from US President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) through USAID and CDC, will be supporting the Rwanda MOH Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases Unit (MOPDD) of the Rwanda Biomedical Center (RBC) to conduct a TES to monitor the efficacy of ALN and DHA-PPQ in children with uncomplicated clinical malaria in rural Rwanda. The study is being conducted by Rwanda MOH MOPDD, with technical support and funding by PMI-USAID through the Jhpiego Impact Malaria project in Rwanda.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) in children with uncomplicated clinical malaria in rural Rwanda
Study Sites: The study will be conducted in three sentinel sites - Rukara, Bugarama and Masaka rural health centers- where antimalaria efficacy studies are always carried out in Rwanda because of the intensity of malaria transmission. Different levels of artemisinin resistance have been identified in two of these three (Rukara and Bugarama) in previous studies. At each site, there will be two arms: one for ALN and one for DHA-PPQ.
Study Design: The study will be a two-arm, open-label trial in which patients (children aged 6 months to 59 months) with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria will be treated with supervised doses of ALN or DHA-PPQ. Children will be followed for 28 days after treatment for ALN and 42 days after DHA-PPQ. Data on molecular markers of artemisinin resistance will be collected at all sites. The study will be conducted at three sites in Rwanda with historically different efficacy profiles to antimalarials, including ACTs.
The primary endpoint is the clinical and parasitological cure by day 28 (ALN) and day 42 (DHA-PPQ) post-treatment.
Study Period: March 2021 to October 2022
Sample Size: At each site, 88 patients per treatment arm (allowing for 20% loss to follow-up) would be enrolled. In total, we will enrol 528 patients in our study.
Treatment(s) and follow-up: All children enrolled in the study will be admitted to a health centre for three days to ensure adherence to treatment regimen, and detect possible adverse events. Clinical and parasitological parameters will be monitored over a 28-day follow-up period to evaluate ALN efficacy, and over a 42-day follow-up period to evaluate DHA-PPQ efficacy.
Exploratory endpoints: to characterize molecular markers of artemisinin and partner drug resistance in all three sites and the clinical (parasite clearance) and in vitro phenotypes of resistance in two of the three study sites: Rukara and Masaka.
- Conditions
- Uncomplicated Malaria
- Being tested
- artemether-lumefantrine (ALN), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
artemether-lumefantrine (ALN)Drug
Assessing the efficacy on current 1st line antimalarial, and an alternative 1st line or 2nd line medicine
dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ)Drug
dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) |
| dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients (in the artemether-lumefantrine arm) with clinical and parasitological cure (i.e. free of malaria symptoms and parasites) assessed clinically and via microscopy and rapid diagnostic test
Measured: By day 28 post-treatment
Number of patients (in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine arm) with clinical and parasitological cure (i.e. free of malaria symptoms and parasites) assessed clinically and via microscopy and rapid diagnostic test
Measured: By day 42 post-treatment
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of patients (in the artemether-lumefantrine arm) that developed molecular markers of drug (artemisinin) resistance (assessed via phenotype tests)
Measured: By day 28 post-treatment
Number of patients (in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine arm) that developed molecular markers of drug (artemisinin) resistance (assessed via phenotype tests)
Measured: By day 42 post-treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2021
- Study start14 Jun 2021
- Primary completion8 Dec 2023
- Study completion31 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Uncomplicated MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 528 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jhpiego
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Rwanda, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04767217
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00014153
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of Artemether-lumefantrine and Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in Children With Uncomplicated Clinical Malaria in Rural Rwanda
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04767217
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00014153
- Conditions
- Uncomplicated Malaria
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 528 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- JhpiegoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Rwanda, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
- Study start
- 14 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
WHO recommends that Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) for 1st and 2nd line antimalarial medicines should be routinely carried out and data made available for decision-making due to the threat of emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance in malaria-endemic countries, especially in Africa. In line with this WHO recommendation, Rwanda Ministry of Health (MOH) is conducting the TES to determine the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine (ALN), which has been used in Rwanda for the last 14 years) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ), another WHO-approved drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria which, though, has not been used in Rwanda, is being considered for adoption as a second line or alternative first line treatment. The objective of this study is to inform the decisions or actions made by a public health authority (Rwanda Rwanda Ministry of Health) to inform decision on revision of the antimalarial guidelines and policy in Rwanda. Jhpiego's Impact Malaria project in Rwanda, with funding and technical oversight from US President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) through USAID and CDC, will support the Rwanda MOH in its effort to evaluate the efficacy of ALN and DHA-PPQ in the treatment of children with uncomplicated malaria. The study is being conducted by Rwanda MOH, with technical support and funding by PMI-USAID through Jhpiego in Rwanda.
Detailed description
WHO recommends that Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) for 1st and 2nd line antimalarial medicines should be routinely carried out and data made available for decision-making due to the threat of emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance in malaria-endemic countries, especially in Africa. The Rwandan Ministry of Health (MOH) in 2006 adopted WHO-approved artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) as the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. A clinical trial carried out in 2004-2005 in Rwanda showed that ALN was very efficacious in children although efficacy varied in different parts of the country. ALN efficacy was shown to remain high in TES conducted in 2012-2015 and in 2018. However, both studies found a molecular marker of parasite resistance to artemisinin (included delayed parasite clearance associated with artemisinin resistance in one site in 2018) and both studies also found high prevalence of markers associated with tolerance to lumefantrine. The clinical efficacy of ALN therefore needs to be regularly monitored in Rwanda to ensure this first line treatment is still efficacious. Given the detection of antimalarial resistance markers in recent TES, it is also important for Rwanda MOH to determine the efficacy an additional ACT that could be considered for adoption as a second line or alternative first line treatment. This study will monitor the efficacy of ALN (which has been used in Rwanda for the last 14 years) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ), another WHO-approved ACT for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria which has not been used in Rwanda.
In line with the WHO recommendation, Jhpiego Impact Malaria project in Rwanda, with funding and technical oversight from US President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) through USAID and CDC, will be supporting the Rwanda MOH Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases Unit (MOPDD) of the Rwanda Biomedical Center (RBC) to conduct a TES to monitor the efficacy of ALN and DHA-PPQ in children with uncomplicated clinical malaria in rural Rwanda. The study is being conducted by Rwanda MOH MOPDD, with technical support and funding by PMI-USAID through the Jhpiego Impact Malaria project in Rwanda.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) in children with uncomplicated clinical malaria in rural Rwanda
Study Sites: The study will be conducted in three sentinel sites - Rukara, Bugarama and Masaka rural health centers- where antimalaria efficacy studies are always carried out in Rwanda because of the intensity of malaria transmission. Different levels of artemisinin resistance have been identified in two of these three (Rukara and Bugarama) in previous studies. At each site, there will be two arms: one for ALN and one for DHA-PPQ.
Study Design: The study will be a two-arm, open-label trial in which patients (children aged 6 months to 59 months) with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria will be treated with supervised doses of ALN or DHA-PPQ. Children will be followed for 28 days after treatment for ALN and 42 days after DHA-PPQ. Data on molecular markers of artemisinin resistance will be collected at all sites. The study will be conducted at three sites in Rwanda with historically different efficacy profiles to antimalarials, including ACTs.
The primary endpoint is the clinical and parasitological cure by day 28 (ALN) and day 42 (DHA-PPQ) post-treatment.
Study Period: March 2021 to October 2022
Sample Size: At each site, 88 patients per treatment arm (allowing for 20% loss to follow-up) would be enrolled. In total, we will enrol 528 patients in our study.
Treatment(s) and follow-up: All children enrolled in the study will be admitted to a health centre for three days to ensure adherence to treatment regimen, and detect possible adverse events. Clinical and parasitological parameters will be monitored over a 28-day follow-up period to evaluate ALN efficacy, and over a 42-day follow-up period to evaluate DHA-PPQ efficacy.
Exploratory endpoints: to characterize molecular markers of artemisinin and partner drug resistance in all three sites and the clinical (parasite clearance) and in vitro phenotypes of resistance in two of the three study sites: Rukara and Masaka.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) | Active comparator | Drug: artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) |
| dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) | Active comparator | Drug: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Children aged 6 months to 59 months old
- Monoinfection with P. falciparum and parasitaemia of 1,000 - 100,000 asexual parasites per µl
- Axillary temperature 37.5 °C or history of fever in the preceding 24 hours before recruitment
- Ability to swallow oral medication
- Haemoglobin ≥7.0 g/dL at admission
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Danger signs of severe malaria or signs of severe malaria
- Other underlying diseases (cardiac, renal, hepatic diseases)
- Severe malnutrition according to WHO child growth standards (WHO, 2006), children - with marasmus or oedematous malnutrition
- History of allergy to study drugs
- A clear history of receiving any antimalarial treatment in the preceding 72 hours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| artemether-lumefantrine (ALN)Assessing the efficacy on current 1st line antimalarial, and an alternative 1st line or 2nd line medicine | Drug | artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) |
| dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ)dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) | Drug | dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) |
Primary outcome
Number of patients (in the artemether-lumefantrine arm) with clinical and parasitological cure (i.e. free of malaria symptoms and parasites) assessed clinically and via microscopy and rapid diagnostic test
Time frame: By day 28 post-treatment
Number of patients (in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine arm) with clinical and parasitological cure (i.e. free of malaria symptoms and parasites) assessed clinically and via microscopy and rapid diagnostic test
Time frame: By day 42 post-treatment
2 secondary outcomes
Number of patients (in the artemether-lumefantrine arm) that developed molecular markers of drug (artemisinin) resistance (assessed via phenotype tests)
Time frame: By day 28 post-treatment
Number of patients (in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine arm) that developed molecular markers of drug (artemisinin) resistance (assessed via phenotype tests)
Time frame: By day 42 post-treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Uncomplicated Malaria
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Factors Influencing Adoption of a Novel Malaria Treatment in Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, and Rwanda
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 2
Platform Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-malarial Agents in Participants With Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria (Cohort C2)
Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ethiopian Antimalarial Therapeutic Efficacy Study 2026
Plasmodium Vivax Malaria Without Complication, Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria (Uncomplicated)
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Study to Assess Safety and Clinical Responses With Coartem® Baby Dispersible Tablets in Paediatric Patients Weighing 2 to <5 kg With Uncomplicated Malaria
Malaria
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2A Study of a Novel Antimalarial Pyrrolidinamide in Adult Patients With Uncomplicated P. Falciparum Malaria
Malaria, Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) in people with Uncomplicated Malaria, run by Jhpiego at 3 sites in Rwanda.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Rwanda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients (in the artemether-lumefantrine arm) with clinical and parasitological cure (i.e. free of malaria symptoms and parasites) assessed clinically and via microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (time frame: By day 28 post-treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2024.