Small-cell Lung CancerPhase 2NCT04768296
Berzosertib + Topotecan in Relapsed Platinum-Resistant Small-Cell Lung Cancer (DDRiver SCLC 250)
A Phase 2 study testing Berzosertib and Topotecan in people with Small-cell Lung Cancer, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 51 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The main purpose of this study is to assess efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Berzosertib in combination with Topotecan in participants with relapsed, platinum-resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study will be conducted in two parts: safety run-in part and main part. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Small-cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Berzosertib and Topotecan
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 51 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 29 Mar 2021to 21 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Dose level 1 participants with histologically proven advanced solid tumors, for which no effective standard therapy exists, or standard therapy has failed or cannot be tolerated
- Dose level 1 participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) less than or equal to (<=) 1 and Karnofsky Scale greater than or equal to (>=) 70 percent (%)
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with ECOG PS <= 2 and Karnofsky Scale >= 60%
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with histologically confirmed SCLC
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with radiologically confirmed progression after first-line or chemoradiation platinum-based treatment (carboplatin or cisplatin), with or without immunotherapy, for treatment of limited or extensive stage SCLC, with a Platinum-free interval (PFI) less than (<) 90 days. The PFI is measured by the elapsed time from the last day of the regimen of a platinum-based treatment until the first day of documented disease progression
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (RECISTv1.1) at Screening. Evidence of measurable disease must be confirmed by the IRC prior to start of treatment
Show all 9Show fewer
- Tumor tissue provision: archival (collected within 12 months before date of informed consent form [ICF]) signature for Screening) or fresh biopsy specimen, if medically feasible
- Have adequate hematologic and renal function
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Who cannot join
- Clinically relevant (that is [i.e.], active), uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, severe active infection including, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection/coronavirus disease 2019, immune deficiencies, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Classification greater than or equal to [>=] Class III), unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, cerebral vascular accident/stroke. Calculated corrected QT interval (QTc) average (using the Fridericia correction calculation) of greater than [>] 450 millisecond (msec) for males and > 470 msec for females. Any psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
- Unstable brain metastases; however, participants with known brain metastases may be enrolled in this clinical study if they are clinically stable (without evidence of progression by imaging for at least 2 weeks prior to the first study intervention dose and any neurologic symptoms have returned to baseline), have no evidence of new brain metastases, and are on a stable or decreasing dose of steroids for at least 14 days prior to study intervention Participants with carcinomatous meningitis are excluded regardless of clinical stability. Screening central nervous system imaging is not mandatory
- Prior malignant disease within the last 3 years. Exceptions include fully resected basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, in situ cervical cancer, fully resected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, superficial or noninvasive bladder cancer, and Stage IA, Grade I endometrioid endometrial cancer with no myometrial invasion, that has undergone curative therapy. Participants with other localized malignancies treated with curative intent need to be discussed with the Medical Monitor
- Participants not recovered from adverse events (AEs) Grade > 1 from prior anticancer therapies, including surgeries. Exception: Grade 2 AEs not constituting a safety risk (for example [e.g.], alopecia), based on the Investigator's judgment; must consult with the medical Monitor prior to enrollment.
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
Trial locations and contacts
51 sites in 7 countries.
51 sites in 7 countries
United States12 sites
Summa Health
Akron, Ohio, 44304
National Cancer Institute
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
NJ Center for Cancer Research
Brick, New Jersey, 08724
Southeastern Medical Oncology Center
Goldsboro, North Carolina, 27534
Cancer & Hematology Centers of Western Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546
Millennium Physicians Association, LLP
Houston, Texas, 77090
MidAmerica Cancer Care
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114
FirstHealth of the Carolinas, Inc.
Pinehurst, North Carolina, 28374
Providence Medical Foundation
Santa Rosa, California, 95403
St Joseph Heritage Healthcare
Santa Rosa, California, 95403
Toledo Clinic
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
Cotton-O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Hematology and Oncology
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
China9 sites
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing
Jilin Cancer Hospital
Changchun
Sichuan Cancer Hospital
Chengdu
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu
Jiangsu Province Hospital
Nanjing
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute
Shenyang
Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University school of medicine
Zhejiang
Japan7 sites
National Cancer Center Hospital
Chūōku
Kansai Medical University Hospital
Hirakata-shi
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Kashiwa-shi
Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
Kōtoku
Kindai University Hospital
Osaka
Kurume University Hospital
Osaka
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital
Takatsuki-shi
Spain7 sites
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid
Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria - Oncology Service
Málaga
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville
France6 sites
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil - Service de Pneumologie
Créteil
Hopital Albert Calmette - CHU Lille - service de pneumologie et immuno allergologie
Lille
CHU Poitiers - Hôpital la Milétrie - service d'oncologie médicale
Poitiers
CHU Nantes - Hôpital Guillaume et René Laënnec - Service de Pneumologie
Saint-Herblain
CHU de Strasbourg - Nouvel Hôpital Civil - Service de Pneumologie
Strasbourg
Belgium5 sites
Centre Hospitalier de l'Ardenne
Arlon
Institut Jules Bordet - Department of Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent
AZ Delta
Roeselare
CHU UCL Namur - Mont-Godinne
Yvoir
Italy5 sites
IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo Per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" - IRST
Meldola
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Niguarda (Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)
Milan
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (Presidio di Cisanello)
Pisa, 56124
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena IRCCS
Roma, 00144
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS - UOC Oncologia Medica
Rome
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Open-label, Single-arm Study of Berzosertib (M6620) in Combination With Topotecan in Participants With Relapsed Platinum-resistant Small-Cell Lung Cancer (DDRiver SCLC 250)
The main purpose of this study is to assess efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Berzosertib in combination with Topotecan in participants with relapsed, platinum-resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study will be conducted in two parts: safety run-in part and main part. The safety run-in part will be conducted in Japan.
- Conditions
- Small-cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Berzosertib, Topotecan
- Keywords
- M6620, Berzosertib, Solid Tumor, Topotecan, Ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related, Platinum-resistant Small-Cell Lung Cancer, DDRiver
- Medical subject headings
- Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BerzosertibDrug
Also called M6620
Participants received Berzosertib at a dose of 105 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2 ) intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met.
BerzosertibDrug
Also called M6620
Participants received Berzosertib at a dose of 210 mg/m^2 intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL2 of safety run-in part and main part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met.
TopotecanDrug
Participants received Topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m^2 intravenously on Days 1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL1 and DL2 of safety run-in part and main part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Safety run-in Part (Dose Level1 [DL 1]): Berzosertib 105 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 | Experimental | Participants received Berzosertib at a dose of 105 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2 ) intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-daycycle in combination with Topotecan at a dose of 1.25mg/m^2 intravenously on Days1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL1 of safety run-in part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met. Receives: Drug: Berzosertib; Drug: Topotecan |
| Safety run-in Part (DL2) +Main Part: Berzosertib 210 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 | Experimental | Participants received Berzosertib at a dose of 210 mg/m^2 intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m^2 intravenously on Days 1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL 1 and DL 2 of safety run-in part and main part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met. Receives: Drug: Berzosertib; Drug: Topotecan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Main Part: Objective Response Rate According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Objective response rate was defined as percentage of participants with either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) from first administration of study treatment to first observation of progressive disease (PD). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of their diameters, and no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesion.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLT is defined as drug-related: Neutropenia Grade 4 for greater than (>) 7 days' duration; Febrile neutropenia (that is [i.e.] absolute neutrophil count less than (< ) 1000 per millimeter cube (mm^3) with single temperature of > 38.3°degree Celsius or a sustained temperature of greater than or equal to (>=) 38 degree Celsius for more than 1 hour; Infection (documented clinically or microbiologically) with Grades 3 or 4 neutropenia; Thrombocytopenia >= Grade 3; Grade >= 3 non-hematological AEs.
Measured: Up to Cycle 1 Day 21 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs were defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment-related TEAEs is defined as reasonably related to the study intervention.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and respiration rate. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical significance was decided by Investigator.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
ECG parameters included PR interval, RR interval, QT interval, QRS duration, QTc intervals (derived using Fridericia's correction method) and heart rate. A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 5 minutes using an ECG machine. Clinical significance was decided by investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-Lead ECGs were reported.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
The laboratory measurements included hematology and biochemistry. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities with Grade greater than or equals to (>=) 3 in laboratory values reported as TEAEs as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening; Grade 5: Death. Clinically Significance was decided by investigator.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Secondary outcomes (35)
Main Part: Duration of Response (DoR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
DoR was defined for participants with objective response, as the time from first documentation of objective response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) to the date of first documentation of progression disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of their diameters, and no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesion.
Measured: From first documented objective response to PD or death due to any cause, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
PFS was defined as the time is defined as the time from first administration of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesion.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the time from first administration of study treatment to the date of death.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of death, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Measured by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a participant completed 30 item questionnaire that is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale. For the physical functioning scale, subjects self-rated levels of difficulty in doing strenuous activities, taking a walk, how much they needed to stay in bed or a chair, or needed help with eating, dressing, bathing, using the toilet. The physical functioning scale had 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in physical functioning.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 62 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Main Part: Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life and Lung Cancer Specific Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is the lung cancer module of EORTC QLQ-C30 and includes questions specific to the disease associated symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site specific pain), treatment-related symptoms (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy and alopecia), and analgesic use of lung cancer patients. The scale was transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using standard EORTC algorithm. Higher score indicates worse symptoms, and improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 10 points, worsening was defined as an increase of at least 10 points. All scales which had not improved nor worsened were considered stable.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 62 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Main Part: Change From Baseline in Health State as Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Component of European Quality of Life 5-dimensions 5 Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L)
EQ-5D-5L is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive overall score using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 62 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Main Part: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs were defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment-related TEAEs is defined as reasonably related to the study intervention.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and respiration rate. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical significance was decided by Investigator.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
ECG parameters included PR interval, RR interval, QT interval, QRS duration, QTc intervals (derived using Fridericia's correction method) and heart rate. A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 5 minutes using an ECG machine. Clinical significance was decided by investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-Lead ECGs were reported.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
The laboratory measurements included hematology and biochemistry. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities with Grade greater than or equals to (>=) 3 in laboratory values reported as TEAEs as per NCI-CTCAE, v5.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening; Grade 5: Death. Clinically Significance was decided by investigator. The laboratory assessments were graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 5.0 and data for individual clinically significant abnormalities (Grade >= 3) was extracted using data source (ADLBHEMA). The data categorized here may not necessarily be considered as TEAE by the investigator during the reporting of TEAEs and there is no correlation between the grade >=3 treatment related TEAEs hematology parameters and the TEAEs in the AE module.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Objective Response Rate According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
Objective response rate was defined as percentage of participants with either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) from first administration of study treatment to first observation of progressive disease (PD). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of their diameters, and no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesion.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Duration of Response (DoR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
DOR was defined for participants with objective response, as the time from first documentation of objective response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) to the date of first documentation of progression disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of their diameters, and no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesion.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
PFS was defined as the time is defined as the time from first administration of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesion.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, assessed up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the time from first administration of study treatment to the date of death.
Measured: Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of death, assessed up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Measured by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a participant completed 30 item questionnaire that is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale. For the physical functioning scale, subjects self-rated levels of difficulty in doing strenuous activities, taking a walk, how much they needed to stay in bed or a chair, or needed help with eating, dressing, bathing, using the toilet. The physical functioning scale had 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in physical functioning.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 64 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Safety Run-in Part: Change From Baseline in Cough, Dyspnea and Chest Pain Measured by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life and Lung Cancer Specific Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
EORTC QLQ-LC13 consisted of 13 questions relating to disease symptoms specific to lung cancer and treatment side effects typical of treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 module generated one multiple-item score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in chest, pain in arms or shoulder and pain in other parts. Score range: 0 (no burden of symptom domain or single symptom item) to 100 (highest burden of symptoms for symptom domains and single items).
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 64 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Safety Run-in Part: Change From Baseline in Health State as Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Component of European Quality of Life 5-dimensions 5 Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L)
EQ-5D-5L is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive overall score using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 64 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Berzosertib
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). AUC0-t was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast/Dose) of Berzosertib
AUC0-t/Dose was defined as AUC from time of dosing to the time of the last measurable concentration divided by dose. AUC0-t/dose was measured in hour*nanogram per milliliter per milligram (h*ng/mL/mg).
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Berzosertib
AUC0-inf was calculated by combining AUC0-t and AUCextra. AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast pred/Lambda z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above the Lower Limit of quantification (LLOQ) and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined by log-linear regression analysis of the measured plasma concentrations of the terminal log-linear phase.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf/Dose) of Berzosertib
AUC0-inf/Dose was defined as AUC extrapolated to infinity divided by dose.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 48 Hours (AUC0-48h) of Berzosertib
Area under the concentration-time curve from pre-dose (time 0) to 48 hours post-dose calculated using the linear-log trapezoidal rule
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24 and 48 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 48 Hours (AUC0-48h/Dose) of Berzosertib
AUC0-48 hour/Dose was defined as AUC from time of dosing to 48 hours divided by dose.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24 and 48 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 72 Hours (AUC0-72h) of Berzosertib
Area under the concentration-time curve from pre-dose (time 0) to 72 hours post-dose calculated using the linear-log trapezoidal rule
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 72 Hours (AUC0-72h/Dose) of Berzosertib
AUC0-72 hour/Dose was defined as AUC from time of dosing to 72 hours divided by dose.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Berzosertib
Cmax was obtained directly from the plasma concentration versus time curve.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax/Dose) of Berzosertib
Dose normalized was calculated as Cmax obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve divided by dose. Cmax/dose was measured in nanogram per milliliter per milligram (ng/mL/mg).
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Plasma Observed Concentration at the End of the Infusion (Ceoi) of Berzosertib
Ceoi was the observed concentration at the end of the infusion period. This was taken directly from the observed Berzosetib concentration-time data.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2; Pre-dose, 1 and 1.5 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 5 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Plasma Observed Concentration Immediately Before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of Berzosertib
Ctrough was the plasma concentration observed immediately before next dosing.
Measured: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 5 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL) of Berzosertib
CL was a measure of the rate at which a drug was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-t + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Accumulation Ratio for Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration [Racc(Cmax)] of Berzosertib
Accumulation ratio of Cmax was calculated as Cmax after dosing on Day 5 divided by Cmax after dosing on Day 2 of Cycle 1.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2; Pre-dose, 1 and 1.5 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 5 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Berzosertib
Tmax was obtained directly from the plasma concentration versus time curve.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Berzosertib
T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Last Sampling Time (Tlast) of Berzosertib
tlast is defined as the last sampling time at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz) of Berzosertib
Vz: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-t + Clast pred/Lambda Z). Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLOQ and Lambda Z = the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2021
- Study start29 Mar 2021
- Primary completion21 Jul 2023
- Study completion21 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Small-cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Responsible, Study director, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04768296
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS201923_0050
- Other IDs
- 2020-004231-25
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Open-label, Single-arm Study of Berzosertib (M6620) in Combination With Topotecan in Participants With Relapsed Platinum-resistant Small-Cell Lung Cancer (DDRiver SCLC 250)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04768296
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS201923_0050
- Conditions
- Small-cell Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- M6620, Berzosertib, Solid Tumor, Topotecan, Ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related, Platinum-resistant Small-Cell Lung Cancer, DDRiver
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Study start
- 29 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 26 Sep 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of this study is to assess efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Berzosertib in combination with Topotecan in participants with relapsed, platinum-resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study will be conducted in two parts: safety run-in part and main part. The safety run-in part will be conducted in Japan.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Safety run-in Part (Dose Level1 [DL 1]): Berzosertib 105 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 | Experimental | Drug: Berzosertib, Drug: TopotecanParticipants received Berzosertib at a dose of 105 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2 ) intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-daycycle in combination with Topotecan at a dose of 1.25mg/m^2 intravenously on Days1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL1 of safety run-in part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met. |
| Safety run-in Part (DL2) +Main Part: Berzosertib 210 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 | Experimental | Drug: Berzosertib, Drug: TopotecanParticipants received Berzosertib at a dose of 210 mg/m^2 intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m^2 intravenously on Days 1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL 1 and DL 2 of safety run-in part and main part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Dose level 1 participants with histologically proven advanced solid tumors, for which no effective standard therapy exists, or standard therapy has failed or cannot be tolerated
- Dose level 1 participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) less than or equal to (<=) 1 and Karnofsky Scale greater than or equal to (>=) 70 percent (%)
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with ECOG PS <= 2 and Karnofsky Scale >= 60%
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with histologically confirmed SCLC
- Dose level 2 and main part participants with radiologically confirmed progression after first-line or chemoradiation platinum-based treatment (carboplatin or cisplatin), with or without immunotherapy, for treatment of limited or extensive stage SCLC, with a Platinum-free interval (PFI) less than (<) 90 days. The PFI is measured by the elapsed time from the last day of the regimen of a platinum-based treatment until the first day of documented disease progression
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Clinically relevant (that is [i.e.], active), uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, severe active infection including, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection/coronavirus disease 2019, immune deficiencies, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Classification greater than or equal to [>=] Class III), unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, cerebral vascular accident/stroke. Calculated corrected QT interval (QTc) average (using the Fridericia correction calculation) of greater than [>] 450 millisecond (msec) for males and > 470 msec for females. Any psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
- Unstable brain metastases; however, participants with known brain metastases may be enrolled in this clinical study if they are clinically stable (without evidence of progression by imaging for at least 2 weeks prior to the first study intervention dose and any neurologic symptoms have returned to baseline), have no evidence of new brain metastases, and are on a stable or decreasing dose of steroids for at least 14 days prior to study intervention Participants with carcinomatous meningitis are excluded regardless of clinical stability. Screening central nervous system imaging is not mandatory
- Prior malignant disease within the last 3 years. Exceptions include fully resected basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, in situ cervical cancer, fully resected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, superficial or noninvasive bladder cancer, and Stage IA, Grade I endometrioid endometrial cancer with no myometrial invasion, that has undergone curative therapy. Participants with other localized malignancies treated with curative intent need to be discussed with the Medical Monitor
- Participants not recovered from adverse events (AEs) Grade > 1 from prior anticancer therapies, including surgeries. Exception: Grade 2 AEs not constituting a safety risk (for example [e.g.], alopecia), based on the Investigator's judgment; must consult with the medical Monitor prior to enrollment.
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BerzosertibAlso: M6620Participants received Berzosertib at a dose of 105 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2 ) intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met. | Drug | Safety run-in Part (Dose Level1 [DL 1]): Berzosertib 105 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 |
| BerzosertibAlso: M6620Participants received Berzosertib at a dose of 210 mg/m^2 intravenously on Day 2 and Day 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL2 of safety run-in part and main part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met. | Drug | Safety run-in Part (DL2) +Main Part: Berzosertib 210 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 |
| TopotecanParticipants received Topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m^2 intravenously on Days 1 through 5 of each 21-day cycle in DL1 and DL2 of safety run-in part and main part until disease progression or other criteria for study intervention discontinuation are met. | Drug | Safety run-in Part (DL2) +Main Part: Berzosertib 210 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2, Safety run-in Part (Dose Level1 [DL 1]): Berzosertib 105 mg/m^2 + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 |
Primary outcome
Main Part: Objective Response Rate According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Objective response rate was defined as percentage of participants with either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) from first administration of study treatment to first observation of progressive disease (PD). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR: At least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of their diameters, and no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesion.
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time frame: Up to Cycle 1 Day 21 (each cycle is of 21 days)
DLT is defined as drug-related: Neutropenia Grade 4 for greater than (>) 7 days' duration; Febrile neutropenia (that is [i.e.] absolute neutrophil count less than (< ) 1000 per millimeter cube (mm^3) with single temperature of > 38.3°degree Celsius or a sustained temperature of greater than or equal to (>=) 38 degree Celsius for more than 1 hour; Infection (documented clinically or microbiologically) with Grades 3 or 4 neutropenia; Thrombocytopenia >= Grade 3; Grade >= 3 non-hematological AEs.
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs were defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment-related TEAEs is defined as reasonably related to the study intervention.
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Vital signs included body temperature, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and respiration rate. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical significance was decided by Investigator.
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
ECG parameters included PR interval, RR interval, QT interval, QRS duration, QTc intervals (derived using Fridericia's correction method) and heart rate. A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position after a rest of at least 5 minutes using an ECG machine. Clinical significance was decided by investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-Lead ECGs were reported.
Safety Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
The laboratory measurements included hematology and biochemistry. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities with Grade greater than or equals to (>=) 3 in laboratory values reported as TEAEs as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening; Grade 5: Death. Clinically Significance was decided by investigator.
35 secondary outcomes
Main Part: Duration of Response (DoR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time frame: From first documented objective response to PD or death due to any cause, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of death, assessed up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Measured by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 62 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Main Part: Number of Participants Who Improved, Worsened or Remained Stable in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life and Lung Cancer Specific Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 62 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Main Part: Change From Baseline in Health State as Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Component of European Quality of Life 5-dimensions 5 Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 62 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Main Part: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Main Part: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Objective Response Rate According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Duration of Response (DoR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, assessed up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment to the date of death, assessed up to 27.7 months
Safety Run-in Part: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Measured by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 64 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Safety Run-in Part: Change From Baseline in Cough, Dyspnea and Chest Pain Measured by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life and Lung Cancer Specific Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-LC13)
Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 64 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Safety Run-in Part: Change From Baseline in Health State as Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Component of European Quality of Life 5-dimensions 5 Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1), end of treatment (up to 64 weeks). Each cycle is of 21 days
Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast/Dose) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf/Dose) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 48 Hours (AUC0-48h) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24 and 48 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 48 Hours (AUC0-48h/Dose) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24 and 48 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 72 Hours (AUC0-72h) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 72 Hours (AUC0-72h/Dose) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Dose Normalized Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax/Dose) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Plasma Observed Concentration at the End of the Infusion (Ceoi) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2; Pre-dose, 1 and 1.5 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 5 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Plasma Observed Concentration Immediately Before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 5 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Accumulation Ratio for Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration [Racc(Cmax)] of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2; Pre-dose, 1 and 1.5 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 5 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Last Sampling Time (Tlast) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz) of Berzosertib
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Cycle 1 Day 2 (each cycle is of 21 days)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Trial Awareness and Transparency websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- US Medical Information website, Medical ResourcesLink provided by the sponsor.
- DDRiver websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21
Related trials for Small-cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 2
A UGT1A1 Genotype-Directed Study of Belinostat Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Tumor, Neuroendocrine
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Responsible study director
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
51 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Berzosertib and Topotecan in people with Small-cell Lung Cancer, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 51 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 51 sites in United States, China, Japan, Spain, France and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Sep 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Main Part: Objective Response Rate According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) (time frame: Time from first administration of study treatment up to 27.7 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2024.