AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT04768413

Evaluation of a Non-face to Face Multidisciplinary Health Care Model in a Population With Rheumatoid Arthritis

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud at 2 sites in Colombia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This research work proposes the evaluation of the implementation of a tele-orientation program and tele-consultation to the adult population with RA attended at a specialized rheumatology center in Bogota, Colombia, over a period of three months, by means of a observational, analytical, cohort, prospective study that… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Teleconsultation either by phone or by computer consultation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to analysis and Care modalities. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to analysis
How many people
200 participants
Where
2 sitesColombia
Study dates
1 Jun 2020to 30 Jun 2021
How long will I take part?
9 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Rheumatoid Arthritis patients regularly followed in a in a specialized rheumatology center in Bogota, Colombia

Who may be able to join

  • Quantitative and qualitative approach. Patients over 18 years of age with confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis International Classification of Diseases: M069, M059, M060, treated at a reference center for these pathologies in the city of Bogotá.
  • Quantitative approach Patients with access to information and communication technologies
  • Qualitative approach: Patients seen in the teleconsultation modality on at least two occasions.
  • Qualitative approach: Patients attended in the face-to-face consultation modality on at least two occasions.
  • Qualitative approach: Health professionals who have carried out at least 25 teleconsultations directed at patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a reference center for these pathologies in the city of Bogotá.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who due to their cognitive conditions do not have the ability to provide reliable information necessary for the development of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Pedro Santos Moreno, MD: Rhe contact

+573208094232

pedrivansamo@hotmail.com

Adriana Rojas -Villarraga, MD; Rhe contact

+573187117073

sarojas@fucsalud.edu.co

Colombia2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • BIOMAP IPS Centro de Atención Integral en Artritis Reumatoide

    Bogota, Cundinamarca, 250017

    PEDRO SANTOS - MORENO, MD;Rhe, +573208094232, pedrivansamo@hotmail.com

    ADRIANA ROJAS-VILLARRAGA, MD;Rhe, +573187117073, sarojas@fucsalud.edu.co

    Recruiting
  • Colombia Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud-FUCS

    Bogota, Cundinamarca, 250017

    ADRIANA ROJAS-VILLARRAGA, MD;Rhe, +573187117073, sarojas@fucsalud.edu.co

    Recruiting

Other trials in Colombia

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of a Non-face to Face Multidisciplinary Health Care Model in a Population With Rheumatoid Arthritis Highly Vulnerable to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease

This research work proposes the evaluation of the implementation of a tele-orientation program and tele-consultation to the adult population with RA attended at a specialized rheumatology center in Bogota, Colombia, over a period of three months, by means of a observational, analytical, cohort, prospective study that will include mixed methods for collecting information (quantitative and qualitative)

Read the detailed description

The evaluation of the priority implementation of a non-face-to-face multidisciplinary health care model is justified in a population highly vulnerable to COVID 19, with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a health emergency situation and in turn seeking to promote its well-being, taking into account the importance of interdisciplinary follow-up to strengthen self-care, avoid deterioration, hospital admissions and improve therapeutic adherence. This research work proposes the evaluation of the implementation of a tele-orientation program and tele-consultation to the adult population with RA attended at a specialized rheumatology center in Bogota, Colombia, over a period of three months, by means of a observational, analytical, cohort, prospective study that will include mixed methods for collecting information (quantitative and qualitative). The qualitative methods will include interviews with a subgroup of patients attending by the two models and with the professionals who care for them, with the aim of knowing the experiences and perceptions of both the patients and the professionals.

The impact that the project seeks is focused on evaluating the program's contribution to the control of RA symptoms and inflammation, avoiding progressive structural damage.

On the other hand, elements will be provided to advance towards telehealth educational interventions and their effect in improving the therapeutic adherence of patients with RA, as well as avoiding their displacement, maintaining quarantine measures and stimulating necessary self-care measures in search of mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic and counteract the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, particularly in this susceptible risk group.

Finally, this study will provide information on the characteristics of RA patients who choose telemedicine compared to face-to-face care when both are offered as usual care options during an unprecedented situation such as the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, the possibility of replication at the national level from the planning of telemedicine programs in rheumatology will be essential for contributing to the reduction of epidemiological indicators against contagion by coronavirus and the use of hospital service

Being tested
Teleconsultation either by phone or by computer consultation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to analysis, Care modalities. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to analysis
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Telemedicine, Telehealth, COVID-19, Disease Activity, Outcomes research
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Teleconsultation either by phone or by computer consultation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to analysisOther

    A group of patients who have voluntarily adhered to the clinic's tele-assisted consultation and who receive remote, multidisciplinary team care without requiring physical displacement.

  • Care modalities. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to analysisOther

    Group of patients who wish to continue with the usual face-to-face consultation, since for these patient's isolation measures allow trips to the care centers and who receive care from a multidisciplinary team on a regular basis.

Study groups in NCT04768413
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group AA group of patients who have voluntarily adhered to the clinic's tele-assisted consultation and who receive remote, multidisciplinary team care without requiring physical displacement.
Receives: Other: Teleconsultation either by phone or by computer consultation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to analysis
Group BGroup of patients who wish to continue with the usual face-to-face consultation, since for these patient's isolation measures allow trips to the care centers and who receive care from a multidisciplinary team on a regular basis.
Receives: Other: Care modalities. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to analysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluation of the implementation of a non-face-to-face multidisciplinary consultation model in a population of rheumatoid arthritis

    Evaluate the implementation of a non-face-to-face multidisciplinary consultation model in a population with rheumatoid arthritis, highly vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [coronavirus disease (COVID-19)] during a health emergency situation and evaluation of the effectiveness of their results.

    Measured: up to Week 12

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Epidemiological characterization

    Epidemiological characterization of the population evaluated under the multidisciplinary health care model, both in teleconsultation and face-to-face consultation.

    Measured: up to Week 12

  2. Proportion of individuals infected

    To determine the proportion of individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [coronavirus disease (COVID-19)] in those patients who regularly receive different immunosuppressive medications under the two care models (teleconsultation and face-to-face).

    Measured: up to Week 12

  3. Risk factors for infection

    Describe the risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [coronavirus disease (COVID-19)] infection in the group of patients linked to the teleconsultation model and in those with regular face-to-face care.

    Measured: up to Week 12

  4. Risk factors for hospitalization

    Describe the risk factors for hospitalization associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [coronavirus disease (COVID-19)] in the group of patients linked to the teleconsultation model and in those with regular face-to-face care.

    Measured: up to Week 12

  5. Risk factors for mortality

    Describe the risk factors for mortality associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [coronavirus disease (COVID-19)] in the group of patients linked to the teleconsultation model and in those with regular face-to-face care.

    Measured: up to Week 12

  6. Average change from baseline in Disease Activity Score with 28-joint counts [DAS28] in face-to-face consultation group

    A single score on a continuous scale (0-9.4). The level of disease activity will be interpreted as remission (DAS28 <2.6), low (2.6 ≤ DAS28 < 3.2), moderate (3.2 ≤DAS28≤ 5.1), or high (DAS28 >5.1).

    Measured: up to Week 12

  7. Average change from baseline in Patient Activity Scale scores in both groups tele-assisted consultation and face-to-face consultation

    The Patient Activity Scale is calculated by multiplying the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) by 3.33 and then dividing the sum of the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, Patient global assessment (PtGA), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) by 3. Activity will be interpreted as these categories of disease activity: remission ≤0.25, low ≤3.7, moderate <8.0, and high ≥8.0.

    Measured: up to Week 12

  8. Evaluation of participant's pain using visual analogue scale [VAS] in both groups tele-assisted consultation and face-to-face consultation

    Paint measurement for any disease state 0-10 centimeters VAS by the patient

    Measured: Baseline, Week 6 and 12

  9. Evaluation of the disease activity by Doctor using visual analogue scale [VAS] in both groups tele-assisted consultation and face-to-face consultation

    Activity measurement for any disease state 0-10 centimeters VAS by the Doctor

    Measured: Baseline, Week 6 and 12

  10. Absolute and percent change in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) in both groups tele-assisted consultation and face-to-face consultation

    The questionary includes 20 daily life questions, grouped in 8 areas, each one containing two or three questions related to daily life activities. Each question is scored from 0-3. 0 means no disability, 3 score means completely disabled. The average of all responses is done. Average scores from 0-1 represent "mild to moderate difficulty", 1-2 means "moderate to severe disability", 3-2 indicates "severe to very severe disability".

    Measured: Baseline, Week 6 and 12

  11. Average change from baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire in both groups tele-assisted consultation and face-to-face consultation

    European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a self-reported health outcome which measures Quality of life (QoL) in five dimensions. An overall score is derived that measures from the least (worst) to the highest score (best). In addition, health state is measured on the vertical Visual Analogue scale (score 0 to 100) with higher scores (better health status).

    Measured: up to Week 12

  12. Evaluation of the level of therapeutic adherence using a specific Scale in both groups tele-assisted consultation and face-to-face consultation

    The four item MORISKY-GREEN-LEVINE Medication Adherence Scale (MGLS) results in a score ranging from 0 to 4. There are three levels of medication adherence based on this score: high, medium and low adherence with 0, 1-2, and 3-4 points, respectively. A dichotomous definition of adherence based on MGLS will be used with 0 points indicating perfect adherence and 1+ points indicating some level of non-adherence.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12.

  13. Evaluation of the self-care capacity using the Appraisal of Self-care Agency Scale -Revised (ASA-R) in both groups tele-assisted consultation and face-to-face consultation

    The Appraisal of Self-care Agency Scale -Revised (ASA-R; Sousa et al.) is one of the main instruments to assess self-care capacity. It consists of a total of 15 questions in 3 areas, of which the area lacking self-care agency is reversely coded. Based on a 5-point Likert scale, a higher total score signified a higher level of self-care agency.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2021
  2. Study start1 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
Target duration
9 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04768413
Sponsor's protocol ID
5171
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
27 Nov 2020
Last updated
24 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud at 2 sites in Colombia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Pedro Santos Moreno, MD: Rhe (+573208094232, pedrivansamo@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluation of the implementation of a non-face-to-face multidisciplinary consultation model in a population of rheumatoid arthritis (time frame: up to Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in