Eosinophilic EsophagitisECI-EoENCT04769232
Endoscopic Characterisation of Inflammation in EoE
A study testing EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis, run by University of Zurich.
Trial summary
In this study, we plan to investigate the accuracy of the EG-760Z endoscope (135x zoom) compared with standard imaging with histology as gold standard in detecting and grading inflammatory activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- What is being tested?
- EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2021to Nov 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible are patients with histology-proven EoE in whom a follow-up endoscopy is indicated. Indications for follow-up endoscopy are i) determination of the response to PPI-Trial or ii) inadequate symptomatic relief despite established therapy.
- Type of treatment, or response to, have no implications on eligibility.
- Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:
- Patient is capable of giving informed consent
- Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
- Have histology proven EoE and are due to undergo follow-up gastroscopy or are due to undergo gastroscopy to investigate dyspepsia (control group)
- Male and Female patients 18 years to 80 years of age
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to outpatient gastroscopy
- Contraindication for Non-anesthesia Provider Procedural Sedation and Analgesia: ASA class III or higher, morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m^2), severe OSAS
- Contraindications to tissue sampling: oral anticoagulation in combination with antiaggregant such as aspirin or clopidogrel,
- Patients without subcutaneous veins that allow for insertion of peripheral venous catheters
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Participation in another study with investigational drug/device within the 30 days preceding and during the present study
- Previous enrolment into the current study
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Endoscopic Characterisation of Inflammatory Activity in EoE: Comparison of Two Gastroscopes With High Magnification to the Goldstandard Histology
In this study, we plan to investigate the accuracy of the EG-760Z endoscope (135x zoom) compared with standard imaging with histology as gold standard in detecting and grading inflammatory activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).
Read the detailed description
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic-inflammatory disease of the esophagus. If left untreated, eosinophilic inflammation induces fibrosis, angiogenesis and stricture formation, finally resulting in a so called remodelling with structural and functional damage of the organ. In addition, patients with untreated EoE are permanently at risk of experiencing food impactions. It is therefore widely accepted that active EoE should be recognized and treated as such. Any treatment applied in EoE should ideally achieve two therapeutic goals: first, resolution of symptoms, and, second, control of inflammation.
However, in some cases of EoE, there is a dissociation between symptoms and histological response.
Furthermore, characteristic endoscopic findings may occur together but are not all seen in every EoE patient. As an example, in 7% to 10% of cases the esophagus may appear normal. Lastly, inflammatory infiltration of the esophageal wall may be discontinuous. In order to define endoscopic activity of EoE in a standardized fashion, the endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is usually applied.
Several endoscopic findings, including linear furrows, concentric rings, white exudates, decreased vasculature in the esophageal mucosa, esophageal strictures, and the esophagus of narrow caliber have been reported to be the characteristic findings of EoE, although neither of these is specific. According to a meta-analysis from 2012, consisting primarily of retrospective studies involving adult cohorts, the overall pooled prevalence of endoscopic findings in patients with EoE was 44% rings, 21% strictures, 9% narrow caliber esophagus, 48% linear furrows, 27% white exudates, and 41% decreased vascularity, with a wide variation in the prevalence of those endoscopic findings between each report.
Lastly, inflammatory infiltration of the esophageal wall may be discontinuous. Taken together, endoscopic recognition of EoE remains a major clinical challenge and diagnosis still relies on histological sampling which in turn renders the diagnosis prone to sampling errors.
In addition to that, it is well known that optimal control of inflammatory activity is crucial in order to prevent progression of fibrosis. Therefore, monitoring inflammatory activity (determined by the EoE histologic scoring system; EoE-HSS) is part of clinical routine in patients with EoE. As outlined above, endoscopic assessment, however, does not reliably reflect the underlying process of the disease during the index endoscopy and cannot be regarded as reliable follow-up test.
The investigators hypothesize that novel endoscopic technologies overcome the shortcomings of the standard endoscopic imaging. It is therefore planned to compare images of the esophageal mucosa using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm (Fujifilm Europe, Düsseldorf, Germany) to standard imaging with high magnification imaging. This novel endoscope acquires images with a magnification by a factor of 135. As gold standard, histological assessment of the inflammatory activity will be used.
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Being tested
- EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm
- Medical subject headings
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EG-760Z endoscope by FujifilmDevice
Within a single endoscopic procedure under propofol sedation, images of the esophageal wall will be acquired and biopsies will be taken. All patients will be examined using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm.
In all patients as part of the clinical routine 4 biopsies of the proximal and 4 biopsies of the distal esophagus will be taken.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Imaging | Active comparator | In 20 randomly assigned patients, the area of endoscopically highest activity will be biopsied as determined by standard imaging. A total of 10 biopsies will be taken in 4 sets: 1 = one single biopsy at best guess of highest activity; 2 = one single biopsy at second best guess of highest activitiy, 3 = 4 biopsies in proximal esophagus with presumed activity, 4 = 4 biopsies in distal esophagus with presumed activity. Overall qualitative (eosinophilic inflammation present vs. absent) and semi-quantitative (estimation of the number of eosinophilic neutrophils according to the following categories 1: 0, 2: 1-6, 3. 7-14, 4. 15-50, 5. :50-100, 6. > 100, together with an estimation of an absolute number of eosinophilic neutrophils) inflammatory activity will be rated for the presumed localization of maximal histologic activity and subsequently for all other 10 biopsies using this imaging modality by endoscopist. Receives: Device: EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm |
| High Magnification Imaging | Experimental | In 20 randomly assigned patients, the area of endoscopically highest activity will be biopsied as determined by high magnification imaging. A total of 10 biopsies will be taken in 4 sets: 1 = one single biopsy at best guess of highest activity; 2 = one single biopsy at second best guess of highest activitiy, 3 = 4 biopsies in proximal esophagus with presumed activity, 4 = 4 biopsies in distal esophagus with presumed activity. Overall qualitative (eosinophilic inflammation present vs. absent) and semi-quantitative (see above) inflammatory activity will be rated for the presumed localization of maximal histologic activity and subsequently all other 10 biopsies using this imaging modality by endoscopist. Receives: Device: EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
High magnification leeds to more accurate histologic sampling
High magnification by a factor of 135, using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm, enables biopsies in areas with higher degree of inflammation.
Biopsies will be analyzed by an experienced pathologist in the field of EoE. The pathologist will count the number of eosinophilic neurtophils in a high-power field (HPF). The absolut number of eosinophilic neutrophils per HPF will be compared to biopsies taken with standard imaging.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Target biopsies are non-inferior to standard biopsies
Target single biopsies with high magnification by a factor of 135, using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm, in the proximal and distal esophagus are non-inferior to goldstandard biopsies taken with a standard endoscope (4 biopsies proximally and distally) in disease monitoring.
Biopsies will be analyzed by an experienced pathologist in the field of EoE. The pathologist will count the number of eosinophilic neurtophils in a high-power field (HPF). The absolut number of eosinophilic neutrophils per HPF will be compared to biopsies taken with standard imaging.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2021
- Study startMar 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Eosinophilic EsophagitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Zurich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Luc Biedermann, Principal investigator, Universitätsspital Zürich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04769232
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-00817
- Acronym
- ECI-EoE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Straumann A. Medical therapy in eosinophilic oesophagitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct;29(5):805-814. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
PubMed 26552779Bisschops R, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Coron E, Neumann H, Pech O, Correale L, Repici A. BASIC (BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification) classification for colorectal polyp characterization with blue light imaging. Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):211-220. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121570. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
PubMed 29065437Kim HP, Vance RB, Shaheen NJ, Dellon ES. The prevalence and diagnostic utility of endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;10(9):988-96.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 May 18.
PubMed 22610003
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Endoscopic Characterisation of Inflammatory Activity in EoE: Comparison of Two Gastroscopes With High Magnification to the Goldstandard Histology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04769232
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ECI-EoE / 2020-00817
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ZurichUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, we plan to investigate the accuracy of the EG-760Z endoscope (135x zoom) compared with standard imaging with histology as gold standard in detecting and grading inflammatory activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).
Detailed description
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic-inflammatory disease of the esophagus. If left untreated, eosinophilic inflammation induces fibrosis, angiogenesis and stricture formation, finally resulting in a so called remodelling with structural and functional damage of the organ. In addition, patients with untreated EoE are permanently at risk of experiencing food impactions. It is therefore widely accepted that active EoE should be recognized and treated as such. Any treatment applied in EoE should ideally achieve two therapeutic goals: first, resolution of symptoms, and, second, control of inflammation.
However, in some cases of EoE, there is a dissociation between symptoms and histological response.
Furthermore, characteristic endoscopic findings may occur together but are not all seen in every EoE patient. As an example, in 7% to 10% of cases the esophagus may appear normal. Lastly, inflammatory infiltration of the esophageal wall may be discontinuous. In order to define endoscopic activity of EoE in a standardized fashion, the endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is usually applied.
Several endoscopic findings, including linear furrows, concentric rings, white exudates, decreased vasculature in the esophageal mucosa, esophageal strictures, and the esophagus of narrow caliber have been reported to be the characteristic findings of EoE, although neither of these is specific. According to a meta-analysis from 2012, consisting primarily of retrospective studies involving adult cohorts, the overall pooled prevalence of endoscopic findings in patients with EoE was 44% rings, 21% strictures, 9% narrow caliber esophagus, 48% linear furrows, 27% white exudates, and 41% decreased vascularity, with a wide variation in the prevalence of those endoscopic findings between each report.
Lastly, inflammatory infiltration of the esophageal wall may be discontinuous. Taken together, endoscopic recognition of EoE remains a major clinical challenge and diagnosis still relies on histological sampling which in turn renders the diagnosis prone to sampling errors.
In addition to that, it is well known that optimal control of inflammatory activity is crucial in order to prevent progression of fibrosis. Therefore, monitoring inflammatory activity (determined by the EoE histologic scoring system; EoE-HSS) is part of clinical routine in patients with EoE. As outlined above, endoscopic assessment, however, does not reliably reflect the underlying process of the disease during the index endoscopy and cannot be regarded as reliable follow-up test.
The investigators hypothesize that novel endoscopic technologies overcome the shortcomings of the standard endoscopic imaging. It is therefore planned to compare images of the esophageal mucosa using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm (Fujifilm Europe, Düsseldorf, Germany) to standard imaging with high magnification imaging. This novel endoscope acquires images with a magnification by a factor of 135. As gold standard, histological assessment of the inflammatory activity will be used.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Imaging | Active comparator | Device: EG-760Z endoscope by FujifilmIn 20 randomly assigned patients, the area of endoscopically highest activity will be biopsied as determined by standard imaging. A total of 10 biopsies will be taken in 4 sets: 1 = one single biopsy at best guess of highest activity; 2 = one single biopsy at second best guess of highest activitiy, 3 = 4 biopsies in proximal esophagus with presumed activity, 4 = 4 biopsies in distal esophagus with presumed activity. Overall qualitative (eosinophilic inflammation present vs. absent) and semi-quantitative (estimation of the number of eosinophilic neutrophils according to the following categories 1: 0, 2: 1-6, 3. 7-14, 4. 15-50, 5. :50-100, 6. > 100, together with an estimation of an absolute number of eosinophilic neutrophils) inflammatory activity will be rated for the presumed localization of maximal histologic activity and subsequently for all other 10 biopsies using this imaging modality by endoscopist. |
| High Magnification Imaging | Experimental | Device: EG-760Z endoscope by FujifilmIn 20 randomly assigned patients, the area of endoscopically highest activity will be biopsied as determined by high magnification imaging. A total of 10 biopsies will be taken in 4 sets: 1 = one single biopsy at best guess of highest activity; 2 = one single biopsy at second best guess of highest activitiy, 3 = 4 biopsies in proximal esophagus with presumed activity, 4 = 4 biopsies in distal esophagus with presumed activity. Overall qualitative (eosinophilic inflammation present vs. absent) and semi-quantitative (see above) inflammatory activity will be rated for the presumed localization of maximal histologic activity and subsequently all other 10 biopsies using this imaging modality by endoscopist. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Eligible are patients with histology-proven EoE in whom a follow-up endoscopy is indicated. Indications for follow-up endoscopy are i) determination of the response to PPI-Trial or ii) inadequate symptomatic relief despite established therapy.
- Type of treatment, or response to, have no implications on eligibility.
- Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:
- Patient is capable of giving informed consent
- Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Contraindications to outpatient gastroscopy
- Contraindication for Non-anesthesia Provider Procedural Sedation and Analgesia: ASA class III or higher, morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m^2), severe OSAS
- Contraindications to tissue sampling: oral anticoagulation in combination with antiaggregant such as aspirin or clopidogrel,
- Patients without subcutaneous veins that allow for insertion of peripheral venous catheters
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EG-760Z endoscope by FujifilmWithin a single endoscopic procedure under propofol sedation, images of the esophageal wall will be acquired and biopsies will be taken. All patients will be examined using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm. In all patients as part of the clinical routine 4 biopsies of the proximal and 4 biopsies of the distal esophagus will be taken. | Device | High Magnification Imaging, Standard Imaging |
Primary outcome
High magnification leeds to more accurate histologic sampling
Time frame: 6 months
High magnification by a factor of 135, using the EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm, enables biopsies in areas with higher degree of inflammation. Biopsies will be analyzed by an experienced pathologist in the field of EoE. The pathologist will count the number of eosinophilic neurtophils in a high-power field (HPF). The absolut number of eosinophilic neutrophils per HPF will be compared to biopsies taken with standard imaging.
1 secondary outcome
Target biopsies are non-inferior to standard biopsies
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2021.
- Background: PubMed 26552779Straumann A. Medical therapy in eosinophilic oesophagitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct;29(5):805-814. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
- Background: PubMed 29065437Bisschops R, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Coron E, Neumann H, Pech O, Correale L, Repici A. BASIC (BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification) classification for colorectal polyp characterization with blue light imaging. Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):211-220. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121570. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
- Background: PubMed 22610003Kim HP, Vance RB, Shaheen NJ, Dellon ES. The prevalence and diagnostic utility of endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;10(9):988-96.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 May 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Recruiting
The Esophageal String Test as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Africans With Dysphagia in Mali and the United States
Dysphagia, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Active, not recruiting
Patient-Centered Decision Support for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study in Adult Participants With EoE to Evaluate Vonoprazan 20 mg Compared to Placebo After 12 Weeks and to Evaluate Vonoprazan 20 mg Up to 24 Weeks
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History and Genetics of Food Allergy and Related Conditions
Food Allergy, Loeys-Dietz Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
A Trial of Upadacitinib for Non-responsive Eosinophilic Esophagitis
EoE, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luc Biedermann principal investigator
Universitätsspital Zürich
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EG-760Z endoscope by Fujifilm in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis, run by University of Zurich.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bernhard Morell (0041442551111, bernhard.morell@usz.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
High magnification leeds to more accurate histologic sampling (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04769232, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2021.