AzTrials
AzTrials

Post Traumatic Stress DisorderCALM-EDNCT04769999

Computer Assisted Lessening of Intrusive Memories in the Emergency Department

A study testing Simple cognitive task in people with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, run by University of Oxford at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical staff working in frontline NHS hospital and pre-hospital departments (e.g. emergency department, intensive care unit, ambulance service) are being faced with difficult and stressful situations, which may be traumatic to them. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
What is being tested?
Simple cognitive task
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
14 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
4 Jun 2020to 30 Oct 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • aged 18 or above;
  • able to read, write and speak in English;
  • able and willing to provide informed consent and complete study procedures;
  • NHS hospital and pre-hospital clinical staff; experiencing intrusive memories, which are problematic to them (self-report);
  • reporting the occurrence of at least two intrusive memories of a work-related traumatic incident in the week prior to beginning the study;
  • able and willing to talk about the intrusive memories;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • able and willing to complete an electronic Intrusion Diary over a 2-3 week period;
  • able and willing to play Tetris on a hand-held device;
  • not currently undergoing treatment for PTSD or its symptoms.

Who cannot join

  • participants will be excluded if they have fewer than two targeted intrusive memories per week during the pre-intervention period;
  • participants will be also excluded if they start undergoing treatment for PTSD or its symptoms during the course of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom3 sites
  • South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

    Bicester

  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Oxford

  • Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust

    Reading

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Reducing Intrusive Memories of Work-Related Traumatic Events, Including Events During the COVID-19 Pandemic, in NHS Staff Using a Brief Cognitive Task Intervention

During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical staff working in frontline NHS hospital and pre-hospital departments (e.g. emergency department, intensive care unit, ambulance service) are being faced with difficult and stressful situations, which may be traumatic to them. Staff report high rates of post-traumatic stress symptoms, such as intrusive memories of these incidents, which 'pop into their mind' unexpectedly, are distressing and can impact on work performance. Currently there is a lack of tailored evidence-based interventions for staff struggling with intrusive memories of work-related traumatic events: simple, accessible, remotely-delivered interventions are needed. An intervention which has been found to be effective in reducing intrusive memories is a simple cognitive task that involves briefly bringing to mind the memory and then playing the computer game Tetris with specific ("mental rotation") instructions. This case series study aims to test the intervention in a group of 8-20 staff members working clinically in NHS hospital and pre-hospital departments. The intervention will be delivered remotely (via computer/smartphone/tablet/phone). Participants will record the number of intrusive memories daily over a 3-week period, with the intervention delivered after 1 week (with optional subsequent booster sessions). Symptoms of trauma, anxiety and depression will be assessed weekly over this period, and at 4 weeks after the intervention. It is predicted that participants will have fewer intrusive memories per day/week, and lower clinical symptoms scores, after completing the intervention than before completing the intervention. The study will also investigate how feasible and acceptable the intervention is for NHS staff. Findings will inform the next steps in developing and evaluating a digital intervention to reduce intrusive memories of work-related traumatic events in healthcare staff.

Being tested
Simple cognitive task
Medical subject headings
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Simple cognitive taskBehavioural

    A brief memory reminder cue followed by playing the computer game Tetris for 25 minutes using mental rotation instructions. Option for subsequent booster sessions (self-administered/researcher-assisted).

Study groups in NCT04769999
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Simple cognitive taskExperimentalA brief memory reminder cue followed by playing the computer game Tetris for 25 minutes using mental rotation instructions. Option for subsequent booster sessions (self-administered/researcher-assisted).
Receives: Behavioral: Simple cognitive task

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the number of intrusive memories of traumatic event

    Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event recorded by participants in a brief electronic daily diary.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-intervention, in line with case series design. The baseline period and the post-intervention period were defined separately for each intrusive memory, according to when that intrusion was first targeted with the intervention.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Changes in ratings of intrusive memory characteristics

    A bespoke self-report measure assessing ratings of intrusive memory vividness, distress (0 = not at all, 10 = extremely), duration of bothersomeness (<1 min to >60 mins), and the impact of intrusive memories on sleep (very good to very bad), concentration and disruption of task at hand (0 = not at all; 10 = a great deal), per intrusive memory reported in the brief daily diary (high scores indicating greater impact/difficulties).

    Participants are also asked to record whether they were at work when they had the intrusive memory (yes/no), the approximate time the intrusive memory popped into their mind (open-ended response), how many times they used the Tetris intervention since the last diary entry (open-ended response), and how accurately they think they completed the diary (0 = not at all accurately; 10 = extremely accurately).

    Measured: Change between baseline and post-intervention, in line with case series design

  2. Impact of Events Scale-Revised score (IES-R; Weiss & Marmar, 1997)

    The IES-R is a self-report measure with three subscales (intrusion, avoidance and hyperarousal) which is used to assess subjective distress experienced after traumatic events. It consists of 22 items, each on a scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") related to how distressing each item has been during the past week. A total maximum score is 88. Higher scores represent worse outcome.

    Measured: Weekly for 6 weeks: 2 weeks pre-intervention to 4 weeks post-intervention

  3. The Patient Health Questionnaire Depression scale (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001)

    The PHQ-9 is a brief self-report measure of depression symptoms and their severity. It consists of nine items that are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). The total maximum score is 27. Higher scores represent worse outcome.

    Measured: Weekly for 6 weeks: 2 weeks pre-intervention to 4 weeks post-intervention

  4. The Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams & Löwe, 2006)

    The GAD-7 is a brief self-report measure of symptoms of general anxiety disorder (GAD) and their severity. It consists of seven items that are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). The total maximum score is 21. Higher scores represent worse outcome.

    Measured: Weekly for 6 weeks: 2 weeks pre-intervention to 4 weeks post-intervention

  5. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse, 1989)

    The PSQI (Buysse, 1989) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. The measure consists of nine questions, which produce one global score. Higher scores represent worse outcome.

    Measured: At 1 week pre-intervention, and at 4 weeks post-intervention

  6. Change in retrospective ratings of intrusive memory characteristics over the last week

    A 10-item bespoke questionnaire assessing ratings of intrusive memories retrospectively over the last week (frequency, vividness, distress, impact on concentration, task disruption, interference with night's sleep, impact on daily functioning, and duration of bothersomeness). Six questions are rated on an 11-point scale from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("a great deal") (high scores indicating greater impact/difficulties): e.g. How much did they disrupt your concentration?; How much have your intrusive memories affected your ability to function in your daily life? Two questions are rated using discrete categories: approximately how long did the intrusive memory bother you for? (6 time categories from <1 min to >60 mins); over the last week, how many intrusive memories did you have? (7 categories from 'none (0)' to 'more (more than 50'). One question is open-ended: how have your intrusive memories affected your ability to function in your daily life in the past week? (open-ended response)

    Measured: At 1 week pre-intervention, and at 4 weeks post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Feb 2021
  2. Study start4 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion16 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04769999
Sponsor's protocol ID
R64738/RE001
Acronym
CALM-ED
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
13 Jul 2020
Last updated
25 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kubickova V, Steel C, Moulds ML, Kanstrup M, Beer S, Darwent M, Keating L, Holmes EA, Iyadurai L. Reducing the Number of Intrusive Memories of Work-Related Traumatic Events in Frontline Health Care Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Series. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 18;11:e55562. doi: 10.2196/55562.

    PubMed 39556801

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Simple cognitive task in people with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, run by University of Oxford at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the number of intrusive memories of traumatic event (time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention, in line with case series design. The baseline period and the post-intervention period were defined separately for each intrusive memory, according to when that intrusion was first targeted with the intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04769999, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in