Spinal Muscular AtrophyDYS-SMANCT04773470
Implementation of FEES in Spinal Muscle Atrophy
A study testing Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in people with Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by University of Giessen at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The major aim of this project is to assess comprehensively frequency and extent of dysphagia and bulbar dysfunction in SMA1, 2, and 3 patients by applying FEES and validated dysphagia scores. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- What is being tested?
- Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 79 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2022to 30 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients with genetically determined 5q-linked SMA followed at the neuromuscular center Gießen
- Informed and written consent signed by the patient or a legal guardian
Who cannot join
- Physical illness that, according to its type and severity, could interfere with the planned assessments, could have an influence on the parameters to be investigated or could endanger the patient or test person during the course of the investigation.
- Pregnancy or lactation and a positive pregnancy test
- Acute suicidal tendency or external danger
- Poor general condition
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Giessen
Giessen, Hesse, 35392
About this study
Official title: Implementation of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Standardized FEES Scores in the Diagnostic Work-up of Dysphagia in Spinal Muscular Atrophy - DYS-SMA Trial
The major aim of this project is to assess comprehensively frequency and extent of dysphagia and bulbar dysfunction in SMA1, 2, and 3 patients by applying FEES and validated dysphagia scores. Further aims are to follow changes of dysphagia over time in newly diagnosed patients, and in subjects starting treatment with one of the new therapeutic SMA drugs. Special attention will be paid to subjects treated with Risdiplam. If applicable, the data will be compared between groups receiving different drugs.
Read the detailed description
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease characterized by premature degeneration of the 2nd motor neuron and a broad phenotype. SMA results from biallelic mutations in the SMN1 gene at 5q13. SMN1 encodes the SMN protein that is essential for proper function of the anterior horn cells. The estimated incidence is 1 per 6000-11 000 births. The classification of SMA is based on age at symptom onset and maximum motor function achieved. SMA1 patients develop symptoms within the first 6 months of life and do not achieve sitting without support. SMA2 patients typically show first symptoms from 6 to 18 months and never learn to walk. SMA3 patients display first clinical signs after the age of 18 months and achieve walking. Rarely, patients develop first symptoms in adulthood (SMA4). While defects in SMN1 are the cause of SMA, the severity of disease is related to the copy number of SMN2, a paralogous gene located next to SMN1 that differs from SMN1 by 5 nucleotides only. This results in a splicing defect reducing the amount of SMN protein produced by one copy of SMN2 to about 10%.
The clinical hallmarks of SMA are progressive muscle weakness and muscular atrophy. Scoliotic deformities, contractures, reduced head control, limited jaw closure, coughing difficulties, and impaired clearance of tracheal secretions are common problems. In many patients, bulbar muscle weakness including dysphagia represents a great diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.
Treatment of SMA remained purely symptomatic for many decades, but this has changed fundamentally within the last years, since several therapeutic agents have been developed targeting to correct causal disease mechanisms. Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide modifying SMN2 splicing, has been approved in the US and in Europe. Onasemnogene abeparvovec, an AAV9-mediated gene therapy, provides patients with intact SMN1 copies and has also been licensed in the US and in Europe. Finally, Risdiplam, an oral splicing modifier acting on SMN2, has been approved in the US and is currently available in Germany for SMA1 and 2 patients via a compassionate use program. Data from two recent studies, FIREFISH (SMA1) and SUNFISH (SMA2/3) have shown significant improvements in motor and bulbar functions in Risdiplam treated individuals.
Although these new therapies will substantially modify the course of disease and improve the prognosis of SMA, the treatment of clinical symptoms and their diagnosis will remain challenging. Dysphagia of variable degree often necessitating artificial feeding to prevent malnutrition and low body weight occurs in all types of SMA. Poor sucking, swallowing difficulties, and inadequate mobilization of mucous with increased risk of aspiration and pneumonia are frequent in SMA1, while restricted jaw mobility and opening as well as weakness of the jaw muscles are common in SMA2 and 3. Altogether, dysphagia represents an important factor of morbidity in SMA, and adequate diagnosis and care of this symptom are essential to maintain quality of life. To achieve this, the application of validated diagnostic methods and scales are necessary. But until now, only a few retrospective studies with small numbers of patients or case reports dealing with dysphagia in SMA are on record, and no standardized assessments using validated tests have been applied. Moreover, no larger study has systematically analyzed which percentages of SMA1, 2, and 3 patients suffer from dysphagia, and no data are available about severity of dysphagia in the single types. Furthermore, it is not known, which effects on swallowing the new therapeutic agents have.
Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is the gold standard of swallowing imaging, but has not yet been comprehensively and prospectively used for analysis of the swallowing process in SMA. In patients with neurogenic dysphagia, validated dysphagia severity scores in tandem with FEES are used since many years, and allow early detection and improved management of swallowing disorders.
- Conditions
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- Being tested
- Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
- Medical subject headings
- Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of SwallowingDiagnostic test
Endoscopical swallowing study
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Muscle Atrophy | Experimental | All patients with Spinal Muscle Atrophy type 1 to 4 Receives: Diagnostic Test: Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Secretion severity
Change in presence and severity of dysphagia examined via FEES and scored by Murray´s Secretions Severity Rating Scale Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 3 Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Dysphagia severity
Change in presence and severity of dysphagia examined via FEES and scored by Rosenbek´s Penetration-Aspiration-Scale Minimum value: 1 Maximum value: 8 Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Pharyngeal residue severity
Change in presence and severity of dysphagia examined via FEES and scored by Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale Minimum value: 1 Maximum value: 5 Higher scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Functional Oral Intake Scale
Assessment of functional oral intake over time. Scored via Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS-G, German version): Minimum value 1, maximum value 7; lower scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Severity of Dysphagia in Neuromuscular Diseases
Severity of dysphagia in neuromuscular diseases paired with necessity of oropharyngeal and endotracheal suction as measuered via Neuromuscular Disease Swallowing Status Scale; Minimum value 1, maximum value 8; lower scores mean worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Upper limb function
Assessment specifically designed for upper limb function in SMA patients: RULM-Test (Revised Upper Limb Module); minimum value 1, maximum value 37; lower values mean worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Functional motor abilites
Functional motor abilities as measured by HFSME-Test (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale). Minimum value 0, maximum value 2; lower values mean worse outcome
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2021
- Study start1 Feb 2022
- Primary completion1 Sep 2024
- Study completion30 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Muscular AtrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Giessen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Samra Hamzic, MA, Principal investigator, University Giessen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04773470
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DYSSMA1
- Acronym
- DYS-SMA
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementation of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Standardized FEES Scores in the Diagnostic Work-up of Dysphagia in Spinal Muscular Atrophy - DYS-SMA Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04773470
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DYS-SMA / DYSSMA1
- Conditions
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of GiessenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The major aim of this project is to assess comprehensively frequency and extent of dysphagia and bulbar dysfunction in SMA1, 2, and 3 patients by applying FEES and validated dysphagia scores. Further aims are to follow changes of dysphagia over time in newly diagnosed patients, and in subjects starting treatment with one of the new therapeutic SMA drugs. Special attention will be paid to subjects treated with Risdiplam. If applicable, the data will be compared between groups receiving different drugs.
Detailed description
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease characterized by premature degeneration of the 2nd motor neuron and a broad phenotype. SMA results from biallelic mutations in the SMN1 gene at 5q13. SMN1 encodes the SMN protein that is essential for proper function of the anterior horn cells. The estimated incidence is 1 per 6000-11 000 births. The classification of SMA is based on age at symptom onset and maximum motor function achieved. SMA1 patients develop symptoms within the first 6 months of life and do not achieve sitting without support. SMA2 patients typically show first symptoms from 6 to 18 months and never learn to walk. SMA3 patients display first clinical signs after the age of 18 months and achieve walking. Rarely, patients develop first symptoms in adulthood (SMA4). While defects in SMN1 are the cause of SMA, the severity of disease is related to the copy number of SMN2, a paralogous gene located next to SMN1 that differs from SMN1 by 5 nucleotides only. This results in a splicing defect reducing the amount of SMN protein produced by one copy of SMN2 to about 10%.
The clinical hallmarks of SMA are progressive muscle weakness and muscular atrophy. Scoliotic deformities, contractures, reduced head control, limited jaw closure, coughing difficulties, and impaired clearance of tracheal secretions are common problems. In many patients, bulbar muscle weakness including dysphagia represents a great diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.
Treatment of SMA remained purely symptomatic for many decades, but this has changed fundamentally within the last years, since several therapeutic agents have been developed targeting to correct causal disease mechanisms. Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide modifying SMN2 splicing, has been approved in the US and in Europe. Onasemnogene abeparvovec, an AAV9-mediated gene therapy, provides patients with intact SMN1 copies and has also been licensed in the US and in Europe. Finally, Risdiplam, an oral splicing modifier acting on SMN2, has been approved in the US and is currently available in Germany for SMA1 and 2 patients via a compassionate use program. Data from two recent studies, FIREFISH (SMA1) and SUNFISH (SMA2/3) have shown significant improvements in motor and bulbar functions in Risdiplam treated individuals.
Although these new therapies will substantially modify the course of disease and improve the prognosis of SMA, the treatment of clinical symptoms and their diagnosis will remain challenging. Dysphagia of variable degree often necessitating artificial feeding to prevent malnutrition and low body weight occurs in all types of SMA. Poor sucking, swallowing difficulties, and inadequate mobilization of mucous with increased risk of aspiration and pneumonia are frequent in SMA1, while restricted jaw mobility and opening as well as weakness of the jaw muscles are common in SMA2 and 3. Altogether, dysphagia represents an important factor of morbidity in SMA, and adequate diagnosis and care of this symptom are essential to maintain quality of life. To achieve this, the application of validated diagnostic methods and scales are necessary. But until now, only a few retrospective studies with small numbers of patients or case reports dealing with dysphagia in SMA are on record, and no standardized assessments using validated tests have been applied. Moreover, no larger study has systematically analyzed which percentages of SMA1, 2, and 3 patients suffer from dysphagia, and no data are available about severity of dysphagia in the single types. Furthermore, it is not known, which effects on swallowing the new therapeutic agents have.
Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is the gold standard of swallowing imaging, but has not yet been comprehensively and prospectively used for analysis of the swallowing process in SMA. In patients with neurogenic dysphagia, validated dysphagia severity scores in tandem with FEES are used since many years, and allow early detection and improved management of swallowing disorders.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Muscle Atrophy | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of SwallowingAll patients with Spinal Muscle Atrophy type 1 to 4 |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All patients with genetically determined 5q-linked SMA followed at the neuromuscular center Gießen
- Informed and written consent signed by the patient or a legal guardian
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Physical illness that, according to its type and severity, could interfere with the planned assessments, could have an influence on the parameters to be investigated or could endanger the patient or test person during the course of the investigation.
- Pregnancy or lactation and a positive pregnancy test
- Acute suicidal tendency or external danger
- Poor general condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of SwallowingEndoscopical swallowing study | Diagnostic test | Spinal Muscle Atrophy |
Primary outcome
Secretion severity
Time frame: Baseline
Change in presence and severity of dysphagia examined via FEES and scored by Murray´s Secretions Severity Rating Scale Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 3 Higher scores mean worse outcome
Dysphagia severity
Time frame: Baseline
Change in presence and severity of dysphagia examined via FEES and scored by Rosenbek´s Penetration-Aspiration-Scale Minimum value: 1 Maximum value: 8 Higher scores mean worse outcome
Pharyngeal residue severity
Time frame: Baseline
Change in presence and severity of dysphagia examined via FEES and scored by Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale Minimum value: 1 Maximum value: 5 Higher scores mean worse outcome
Functional Oral Intake Scale
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of functional oral intake over time. Scored via Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS-G, German version): Minimum value 1, maximum value 7; lower scores mean worse outcome
Severity of Dysphagia in Neuromuscular Diseases
Time frame: Baseline
Severity of dysphagia in neuromuscular diseases paired with necessity of oropharyngeal and endotracheal suction as measuered via Neuromuscular Disease Swallowing Status Scale; Minimum value 1, maximum value 8; lower scores mean worse outcome
Upper limb function
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment specifically designed for upper limb function in SMA patients: RULM-Test (Revised Upper Limb Module); minimum value 1, maximum value 37; lower values mean worse outcome
Functional motor abilites
Time frame: Baseline
Functional motor abilities as measured by HFSME-Test (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale). Minimum value 0, maximum value 2; lower values mean worse outcome
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Risdiplam Administered as an Early Intervention in Pediatric Participants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy After Gene Therapy
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of Risdiplam in Participants With Type I and Type II Spinal Muscle Atrophy (SMA)
Spinal Muscle Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Investigational Drug Rinzimetostat (ORIC-944) in Patients With mCRPC Who Were Previously Treated With Abiraterone Acetate (Himalayas-1)
Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
Recruiting
Assessment of a Portable Digital Device for Quantified Analysis of Markerless Walking in Volunteers With Neuromuscular Diseases or Asymptomatic Volunteers
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Samra Hamzic, MA principal investigator
University Giessen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in people with Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by University of Giessen at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Secretion severity (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2025.