Esophagus CancerPhase 2CRISECNCT04776590
Chemoradiotherapy Plus Immunotherapy Followed by Surgery for Esophageal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Tislelizumab in people with Esophagus Cancer and Neoadjuvant Therapy, run by Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended as standard therapy for resectable esophageal cancer. The recurrence rate after surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is about 35%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophagus Cancer, Neoadjuvant Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Tislelizumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 28 Jan 2021to 15 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Main Inclusion Criteria:
- Pathologically diagnosed as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
- Initially diagnosed as thoracic esophageal cancer
- resectable or potantially resectable
- II-IVA according to AJCC 8th edition;
- KPS≥70
- Adequate organ function
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Tislelizumab Followed by Surgery for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Prospective, Single Arm, Pilot Study
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended as standard therapy for resectable esophageal cancer. The recurrence rate after surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is about 35%. Whether achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is significantly associated with recurrence after surgery. It is reported that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy improved survival compared with chemotherapy alone in first line therapy of advanced esophageal cancer. We hypothesize that the addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is helpful to improving pathologic complete response and survival.
- Conditions
- Esophagus Cancer, Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Being tested
- Tislelizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TislelizumabDrug
neoadjuvant immunotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tislelizumab arm | Experimental | Radiotherapy: PTV 41.4Gy in 23 Fractions,5 days per week; Chemotherapy: Paclitaxel (Albumin bound) (100mg per square meter of body-surface area weekly) and Caboplatin (area under the curve of 2 mg per milliliter per minute weekly) for 5 weeks, concurrent with radiotherapy; Immunotherapy: Tislelizumab (200mg per 3 weeks) Receives: Drug: Tislelizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pathologic complete response rate
Pathologic complete response rate
Measured: 1 day on which pathologic results is reported
Secondary outcomes (2)
Disease free survival
Disease free survival
Measured: 2 years after surgery
overall survival
overall survival
Measured: 2 years after enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2021
- Study start28 Jan 2021
- Primary completion11 Mar 2023
- Study completion15 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophagus CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BeiGene
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, kunyu yang, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
- Investigators
- Kunyu Yang, MD, Principal investigator, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04776590
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ESC001
- Acronym
- CRISEC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S, He J. Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2011. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Feb;27(1):2-12. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.01.06.
PubMed 25717220Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, Allen MS, Chen LQ, Hunter JG, Kesler KA, Law S, Lerut TE, Reed CE, Salo JA, Scott WJ, Swisher SG, Watson TJ, Blackstone EH. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00901.x.
PubMed 19196264Rice TW, Chen LQ, Hofstetter WL, Smithers BM, Rusch VW, Wijnhoven BP, Chen KL, Davies AR, D'Journo XB, Kesler KA, Luketich JD, Ferguson MK, Rasanen JV, van Hillegersberg R, Fang W, Durand L, Cecconello I, Allum WH, Cerfolio RJ, Pera M, Griffin SM, Burger R, Liu JF, Allen MS, Law S, Watson TJ, Darling GE, Scott WJ, Duranceau A, Denlinger CE, Schipper PH, Lerut TE, Orringer MB, Ishwaran H, Apperson-Hansen C, DiPaola LM, Semple ME, Blackstone EH. Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: pathologic staging data. Dis Esophagus. 2016 Oct;29(7):724-733. doi: 10.1111/dote.12520.
PubMed 27731547van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A; CROSS Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
PubMed 22646630Mariette C, Balon JM, Piessen G, Fabre S, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP. Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease. Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1616-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11228.
PubMed 12655517Dresner SM, Griffin SM. Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg. 2000 Oct;87(10):1426-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01541.x.
PubMed 11044172Liu Q, Cai XW, Wu B, Zhu ZF, Chen HQ, Fu XL. Patterns of failure after radical surgery among patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: implications for the clinical target volume design of postoperative radiotherapy. PLoS One. 2014 May 12;9(5):e97225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097225. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24820177Oppedijk V, van der Gaast A, van Lanschot JJ, van Hagen P, van Os R, van Rij CM, van der Sangen MJ, Beukema JC, Rutten H, Spruit PH, Reinders JG, Richel DJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Hulshof MC. Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 10;32(5):385-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.2186. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
PubMed 24419108Law S, Fok M, Chow S, Chu KM, Wong J. Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Aug;114(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70147-8.
PubMed 9270638Ancona E, Ruol A, Santi S, Merigliano S, Sileni VC, Koussis H, Zaninotto G, Bonavina L, Peracchia A. Only pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves significantly the long term survival of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: final report of a randomized, controlled trial of preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone. Cancer. 2001 Jun 1;91(11):2165-74.
PubMed 11391598Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, Clark PI, Langley RE. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 20;27(30):5062-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2083. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
PubMed 19770374Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, Mortimer J, Estes NC, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Kocha W, Minsky BD, Roth JA, Willett CG; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; USA Intergroup. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3719-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4760.
PubMed 17704421Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, Conroy T, Bouche O, Lebreton G, Ducourtieux M, Bedenne L, Fabre JM, Saint-Aubert B, Geneve J, Lasser P, Rougier P. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1715-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0597. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
PubMed 21444866Boonstra JJ, Kok TC, Wijnhoven BP, van Heijl M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Ten Kate FJ, Siersema PD, Dinjens WN, van Lanschot JJ, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A. Chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone in patients with resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011 May 19;11:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-181.
PubMed 21595951Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM, Foo K, Zalcberg J, Simes J; Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Mar;8(3):226-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70039-6.
PubMed 17329193
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Tislelizumab Followed by Surgery for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Prospective, Single Arm, Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04776590
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRISEC / ESC001
- Conditions
- Esophagus Cancer, Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BeiGene
- Study start
- 28 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended as standard therapy for resectable esophageal cancer. The recurrence rate after surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is about 35%. Whether achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is significantly associated with recurrence after surgery. It is reported that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy improved survival compared with chemotherapy alone in first line therapy of advanced esophageal cancer. We hypothesize that the addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is helpful to improving pathologic complete response and survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tislelizumab arm | Experimental | Drug: TislelizumabRadiotherapy: PTV 41.4Gy in 23 Fractions,5 days per week; Chemotherapy: Paclitaxel (Albumin bound) (100mg per square meter of body-surface area weekly) and Caboplatin (area under the curve of 2 mg per milliliter per minute weekly) for 5 weeks, concurrent with radiotherapy; Immunotherapy: Tislelizumab (200mg per 3 weeks) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tislelizumabneoadjuvant immunotherapy | Drug | Tislelizumab arm |
Primary outcome
Pathologic complete response rate
Time frame: 1 day on which pathologic results is reported
Pathologic complete response rate
2 secondary outcomes
Disease free survival
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
overall survival
Time frame: 2 years after enrollment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2024.
- Background: PubMed 25717220Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S, He J. Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2011. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Feb;27(1):2-12. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.01.06.
- Background: PubMed 19196264Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, Allen MS, Chen LQ, Hunter JG, Kesler KA, Law S, Lerut TE, Reed CE, Salo JA, Scott WJ, Swisher SG, Watson TJ, Blackstone EH. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00901.x.
- Background: PubMed 27731547Rice TW, Chen LQ, Hofstetter WL, Smithers BM, Rusch VW, Wijnhoven BP, Chen KL, Davies AR, D'Journo XB, Kesler KA, Luketich JD, Ferguson MK, Rasanen JV, van Hillegersberg R, Fang W, Durand L, Cecconello I, Allum WH, Cerfolio RJ, Pera M, Griffin SM, Burger R, Liu JF, Allen MS, Law S, Watson TJ, Darling GE, Scott WJ, Duranceau A, Denlinger CE, Schipper PH, Lerut TE, Orringer MB, Ishwaran H, Apperson-Hansen C, DiPaola LM, Semple ME, Blackstone EH. Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: pathologic staging data. Dis Esophagus. 2016 Oct;29(7):724-733. doi: 10.1111/dote.12520.
- Background: PubMed 22646630van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A; CROSS Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
- Background: PubMed 12655517Mariette C, Balon JM, Piessen G, Fabre S, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP. Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease. Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1616-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11228.
- Background: PubMed 11044172Dresner SM, Griffin SM. Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg. 2000 Oct;87(10):1426-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01541.x.
- Background: PubMed 24820177Liu Q, Cai XW, Wu B, Zhu ZF, Chen HQ, Fu XL. Patterns of failure after radical surgery among patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: implications for the clinical target volume design of postoperative radiotherapy. PLoS One. 2014 May 12;9(5):e97225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097225. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 24419108Oppedijk V, van der Gaast A, van Lanschot JJ, van Hagen P, van Os R, van Rij CM, van der Sangen MJ, Beukema JC, Rutten H, Spruit PH, Reinders JG, Richel DJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Hulshof MC. Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 10;32(5):385-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.2186. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 9270638Law S, Fok M, Chow S, Chu KM, Wong J. Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Aug;114(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70147-8.
- Background: PubMed 11391598Ancona E, Ruol A, Santi S, Merigliano S, Sileni VC, Koussis H, Zaninotto G, Bonavina L, Peracchia A. Only pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves significantly the long term survival of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: final report of a randomized, controlled trial of preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone. Cancer. 2001 Jun 1;91(11):2165-74.
- Background: PubMed 19770374Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, Clark PI, Langley RE. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 20;27(30):5062-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2083. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
- Background: PubMed 17704421Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, Mortimer J, Estes NC, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Kocha W, Minsky BD, Roth JA, Willett CG; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; USA Intergroup. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3719-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4760.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Esophagus Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers in Barrett's Esophagus (PCAB BE Study)
Barrett Esophagus
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Beamion BCGC-1: A Study to Find a Suitable Dose of Zongertinib Used Alone and in Combination With Other Treatments to Test Whether it Helps People With Different Types of HER2+ Cancer That Has Spread
Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kunyu Yang, MD principal investigator
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tislelizumab in people with Esophagus Cancer and Neoadjuvant Therapy, run by Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pathologic complete response rate (time frame: 1 day on which pathologic results is reported). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04776590, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2024.