AzTrials
AzTrials

Infection ControlBGCTSNCT04783025

A Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) With WHO Guidelines for Staff in Residential Care Homes

A study testing Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) in people with Infection Control and COVID-19, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

188 healthcare personnel from 20 residential care homes (RCHs) will be recruited to assess the effect of 2-week implementation of Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) on RCH staffs' infection control practices. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Infection Control, COVID-19
What is being tested?
Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
188 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
1 Jun 2021to 31 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthcare personnel who are working in the selected Residential care homes (RCHs)
  • Able to read Chinese, and
  • Possess an electronic device (smartphone or tablet) with which to download the BGCTS system.

Who cannot join

  • Temporary staff who are about to cease employment, be on maternity leave, or go on a long vacation during the data collection period;
  • Students or trainees (including nursing students, physiotherapy students, and health-related trainees), because training institutions are responsible for students' training, and such training may affect students' performance;
  • Volunteer personnel who come to the RCHs at a specific period (for example, to organize activities for the residents during festivals);
  • Clerical and administrative staff, kitchen staff, security staff, and engineering and facilities management staff;
  • Ambulance officers who come to the RCHs to take residents to or from hospitals.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    Hong Kong

    Angela Leung, PhD, 2766 5587, angela.ym.leung@polyu.edu.hk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: A Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) With WHO Guidelines for Staff in Residential Care Homes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

188 healthcare personnel from 20 residential care homes (RCHs) will be recruited to assess the effect of 2-week implementation of Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) on RCH staffs' infection control practices. These clusters (RCHs) will be randomly allocated to two study groups (the intervention group, IG; and the control group, CG) to assess 1. whether more staff in the IG perform infection control practices (by on-site observations) than the staff in the CG after receiving BGCTS and 2. whether more staff in the IG have infection control knowledge, positive attitudes towards infection control, and self-reported compliance rates than the staff in the CG. 5 Hypothesis have been set up for this study:

H1. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will exhibit performance in complying with hand hygiene measures than those in the CG.

Read more

H2. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will exhibit performance in complying with other infection control practices than those in the CG.

H3. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will have high level of knowledge of infection control than those in the CG.

H4. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will have positive attitudes towards infection control than those in the CG.

H5. After using BGCTS, a higher proportion of the staff in the IG will have a high self-reported compliance rate with infection control measures than those in the CG.

Infection control practices conducted by RCH staffs will be measured through unobtrusive on-site non-participatory observations. RCH staffs' knowledge, attitudes about infection control practice, and self-reported infection control practices will be assessed via an electronic quiz.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Residents in residential care homes are at a high risk of being infected by COVID-19 due to the advanced age, associated co-morbidities, and state of dependence of the residents . According to the licensing requirements for RCHs in Hong Kong, a registered nurse is designated as an Infection Control Officer (ICO) to coordinate matters related to the prevention and handling of infectious diseases in each RCH. During the pandemic, the ICOs disseminate the COVID-19 guidelines, which were developed by the Centre for Health Protection (CHP) under the Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong government, to all staff in RCHs . Whether the staff understand and can correctly interpret the contents and adopt the guidelines into practice is unclear. There is nothing in the literature about the infection control training given by ICOs to the staff in RCHs.

Innovations:

The key innovation in this study is the adoption of the concept of gamification in COVID-19 infection control training. The investigators apply elements of game design (short video clips/interactive video games in the form of quizzes) in non-game environments (RCHs) within non-game contexts (infection control training). Gamification is widely used as an educational tool in different disciplines. For example, in the current study, one of the simulated situations is visitor management to avoid the entry of COVID-19 in RCHs. Sequential allocation in visitor management could be utilized in the gamified training programme, to allow learners the chance to practice in a virtual environment. The inappropriate management of visitors could lead to the spread of COVID-19 infections in an RCH, and learners could have a second chance to do better in a virtual environment.

Gamified training offers many benefits, the major one of which is that it allows learners to learn at a convenience time and place. The use of gamification restructures the experience of a traditional boring activity into something enjoyable, interactive, and competitive, with the result that learners can remain active and engaged throughout the learning process. In addition, training with the use of games can improve compliance with decided behaviour. Learners were found to have developed new skills and/or new habits via gamified training.

Objectives:

This study aims to assess the effect of the Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) on infection control practices, compliance rates and knowledge of standard precautions among all staff in residential care homes (RCHs).

The specific objectives and hypothesis of the study include:

  1. To assess whether more staff in the intervention group (IG) perform infection control practices (by on-site observations) than the staff in the control group (CG) after receiving the BGCTS;
  2. To assess whether more staff in the IG have infection control knowledge, positive attitudes towards infection control, and self-reported compliance rates than the staff in the CG.

Method:

This study collects data through on-site observations of infection control practices which requires resources and special training. Observations will be the primary outcome of this study. Special arrangements on conducting on-site non-participatory unobtrusive observations in RCHs will be made to ensure the validity and reliability of the results.

Unobtrusive non-participatory observations of the infection control practices of healthcare personnel will be conducted in the RCHs. Healthcare personnel will include doctors, nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, health workers, and personal care workers who are working in the RCHs. Observations will be made at baseline (before the intervention) and after the intervention (post-intervention). Observations will be made in five areas: hand hygiene, respiratory hygiene, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), environmental cleaning and disinfection, and the proper handling of used or contaminated materials. A total of 200 observation opportunities per RCH unit will be made to avoid measurement bias.

At least three cameras (webcams with recording function) will be set up in each RCH to capture the staff's hand hygiene practice. The number of cameras will be determined after site visit to the RCH. The investigators would cover substantial areas of the RCH (including most of the hand washing facilities). Prior to the initiation of camera monitoring, staff of RCHs will be clearly informed about the recording. Camera recording will be made for 2 weeks in each RCH. Each week, the research assistant will go to the RCH and download the recordings to the designated computer for the sake of protecting the security of the recording (data). The obtained video recording will be evaluated by the research nurse, who will randomly select 20 to 30-minute recording per shift for observation (morning shift, afternoon shift and night shift). To protect privacy of the RCH staff, the staff will be de-identified and anonymized before observation, and all actions will be examined in confidentiality. This is designed to minimize the Hawthorn effect due to observations (that is, healthcare personnel perform differently when being observed) because the observer's presence gradually becomes insignificant to the healthcare personnel. In an RCH unit, more than one healthcare personnel provides care to the residents. Observations will be made of the first healthcare personnel to provide direct care to the residents before the other healthcare personnel take action. There will be no interference with the care procedure during the observations.

Data analysis:

To examine the difference in the change in the primary outcome - the observational-based compliance rate for hand hygiene - from baseline to post-intervention between the IG and CG, investigators will perform a linear mixed-effects model with a log link function to control for the clustering effect at the RCH level with Time, Group, and the interaction term (Time x Group) as independent variables. A significant result in the interaction term (Time x Group) will indicate a differential change in the outcome variable between the two groups, and will support hypothesis H1.

To examine differences in the changes in the secondary outcomes, including the observational-based compliance rate with other infection control practices, self-reported compliance, knowledge, and attitude rates (Hypotheses H2 - H5), investigators will perform a separate linear mixed-effects model for each of the secondary outcomes, similar to that for the primary outcome. A significant result in the interaction term (Time x Group) will indicate a differential change in the outcome variable between the two groups.

The investigators will also perform sub-group analyses by demographic and experience data to explore whether the effect of the intervention is homogeneous with respect to the different demographic and experience characteristics of the participants. Specifically, an interaction term, Group x characteristic, will be added to the model to explore the effect of that particular characteristic on the effect of the BGCTs. Further, investigators will also examine a model by adding parameters from the BGCTS (attempts to the video-clips/pictures, the time spent, and the results of each game) as potential factors associated with the outcome.

Being tested
Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS), Usual care, infection control briefing
Keywords
COVID-19, Infection control, Training system, Gamification, Residential care homes, Healthcare personnel
Medical subject headings
COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS)Behavioural

    BGCTS is a blended training programme integrated with games and short video clips for Residential Care Home staffs to learn the principles of infection control and reinforce actions needed to stop the spread of COVID-19 within the RCHs, and to care for those residents suspected of having COVID-19. The contents of the training will refer to the evidence-based contents from The COVID-19 Risk Communication Package For Healthcare Facilities.

    Dosage of the intervention. Staffs are encouraged to learn each topic independently in 15 minutes. It will take a total of 120 minutes to complete all eight topics in 2 weeks. Staffs will attend two 30-minute face-to-face group sessions conducted by research nurse (and the Infection Control Officer of the RCH) to clarify concepts (one per week; after playing the games). Scores and progress bar will be shown to the staff so as a form of motivation to encourage continuous participation in the training.

  • Usual care, infection control briefingBehavioural

    Participants in the CG will receive usual care, the infection control briefing given by the Infection Control Officer (ICO) of the RCHs to all staffs. Usually the briefing is irregular, non-standardized and determined by ICOs, depending on when the ICOs receive the information about infection control practice from Centre for Health Protection of the Hong Kong government. The format and duration of this briefing is determined by the ICO. Some ICOs deliver the infection control information in the form of posters or a written document, and circulate these materials to all staffs.

Study groups in NCT04783025
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention Group (IG)ExperimentalThe participants in the IG will receive BGCTS, a blended training programme
Receives: Behavioral: Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS)
Control Group (CG)Active comparatorParticipants in the CG will receive usual care, the infection control briefing given by the Infection Control Officer (ICO) of the RCHs to all staff.
Receives: Behavioral: Usual care, infection control briefing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in unobtrusive observational-based compliance rate of infection control practices

    Observed infection control practices will be recorded through a software called eRub, developed by PolyU with a Finnish company. eRub comprises two sets of checklists: 1.hand hygiene (HH)2.infection control practice (ICP).

    Checklists are constructed based on the WHO's My 5 Moments list and COVID-19 risk communication package for healthcare facilities . The HH activities ( HH opportunities and its duration), will be rated as 'properly performed, performed, improperly performed, or missed performing'. Others infection control practices (eg. respiratory hygiene, disinfecting used surfaces/ equipment etc.), will also be rated. Staff with a rating of 'properly performed' and 'performed' will be classified as 'performed' while others will be regarded as 'not performed'.

    The content validity indices for the relevance and adequacy of the eRub items were greater than 0.83 (range, 0.83-1.00), indicating satisfactory content validity.

    Measured: T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Knowledge and attitudes towards respiratory infection (KARI)

    a 24-item self-administered survey with 12 items about knowledge and 12 items on attitudes. It covers four areas: Clinical burden and the transmission of acute respiratory infection (7 items); Personal protective equipment and hand hygiene (6 items), Facility infection prevention and control policies for acute respiratory infection (6 items), and Influenza vaccination (5 items). The last five items will be omitted because these are not relevant to the COVID-19.

    For each knowledge item, respondents will be classified as (1) 'having knowledge' if 'strongly agree' or 'agree' are answered to the positive statements and 'strongly disagree' or 'disagree' to the negative statements, or (2) 'lack of knowledge' if otherwise. For each attitude item, respondents will be classified as (1) 'positive attitudes' if 'strongly agree' or 'agree' are answered to the positive statements and 'strongly disagree' or 'disagree' to the negative statements, or (2) 'negative attitudes' if otherwise.

    Measured: T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)

  2. Self-reported Infection Control Practice (SICP)

    a 10-item self-administered survey asking healthcare personnel to indicate whether RCH staffs would always, usually, sometimes, rarely, or never perform the said actions as part of staffs' usual practice . For self-reported infection control practices, 'satisfactory' will be defined as (1) if respondents' answers are either 'always' or 'usually' to the positive statements and (2) 'sometimes', 'rarely', or 'never' to the negative statements, while 'unsatisfactory' will be defined as otherwise.

    Measured: T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)

  3. Demographic data

    Age, employment mode (full time vs part time), professional discipline (doctor, nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, health workers, personal care worker), types of working unit (nursing home, care and attention home, hostel for the elderly, respite services, infirmary care supplement), staff-to-client ratio.

    Measured: T0 (baseline)

  4. Data on experience

    Working experience in residential care homes in terms of years, working experience in other healthcare settings in terms of years, and experience in infection control training (whether the staff member has received any type of infection control training, the date of the last training session, the duration of the last training session, the contents of the last training session).

    Measured: T0 (baseline)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Mar 2021
  2. Study start1 Jun 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
20 clusters (Residentials care homes, RCHs) involved in the study will be randomly allocated to two study groups (the intervention group, IG; and the control group, CG). All of the healthcare personnel in one cluster will receive the assigned treatment in the study group accordingly. All units in one RCH will be grouped as IG or CG. Group designations will be decided by a computer-generated randomization list using a free online generator by a statistician in the research team (DYPL) and will have no potential contact with the participants of the study. An opaque, numbered envelope containing a code generated by computerized randomizations will be prepared by a project assistant unconnected to this study. The random coding will also be concealed from the participants and outcome assessors to be involved in the assessments. A standardized checklist will be used for outcome measurements to minimize bias.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
188 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04783025
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSEARS20200903007
Acronym
BGCTS
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
25 Feb 2021
Last updated
12 May 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • World Health Organization (WHO) Western Pacific Region Office (WPRO). The COVID-19 Risk Communication Package for Healthcare Facilities. The COVID-19 risk communication package for healthcare facilities. March 2020. https://iris.wpro.who.int/handle/10665.1/14482 (accessed 6 Jun 2020).

  • Cesari M, Proietti M. Editorial: Geriatric medicine in Italy in the time of COVID-19. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(5):459-460. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1354-z. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32346679
  • Social Welfare Department. Resources of code of practice for residential care homes (Elderly Persons). Hong Kong: Social Welfare Department January 2020. https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_lr/sub_rche/id_copref/ (accessed 7 Jun 2020).

  • Center for Health Protection. Guidelines for residential care homes for the elderly or persons with disabilities for the prevention of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). 2020. https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/advice_to_rche_rchd_on_prevention_of_nid_eng.pdf (accessed 7 Jun 2020).

  • World Health Organization (WHO). World Health Organization Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. Geneva: WHO 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-guidelines-on-hand-hygiene-in-health-care (accessed 6 Jun 2020).

  • Karabay M, Kaya G, Hafizoglu T, Karabay O. Effect of camera monitoring and feedback along with training on hospital infection rate in a neonatal intensive care unit. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2019 Nov 13;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12941-019-0332-y.

    PubMed 31722715
  • Vlachopoulos D, Makri A. The effect of games and simulations on higher education: a systematic literature review. Int J Edu Tech in Higher Edu 2017;14. doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0062-1

  • Gentry SV, Gauthier A, L'Estrade Ehrstrom B, Wortley D, Lilienthal A, Tudor Car L, Dauwels-Okutsu S, Nikolaou CK, Zary N, Campbell J, Car J. Serious Gaming and Gamification Education in Health Professions: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 28;21(3):e12994. doi: 10.2196/12994.

    PubMed 30920375
  • Sardi L, Idri A, Fernandez-Aleman JL. A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. J Biomed Inform. 2017 Jul;71:31-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 20.

    PubMed 28536062
  • Hagel S, Reischke J, Kesselmeier M, Winning J, Gastmeier P, Brunkhorst FM, Scherag A, Pletz MW. Quantifying the Hawthorne Effect in Hand Hygiene Compliance Through Comparing Direct Observation With Automated Hand Hygiene Monitoring. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;36(8):957-62. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.93. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

    PubMed 25903555
  • World Health Organization (WHO). 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene. May 2009. https://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/Your_5_Moments_For_Hand_Hygiene_Poster.pdf (accessed 8 Feb 2021).

  • Leung AYM, Leung DYP, Lau TK, Liu JYW, Cheung T, Cheung DSK, Lam SC, Wong EML, Tse MMY, Molassiotis A. Efficacy of the Web-Based Gamified Infection Control Training System on Practices for Health Care Workers in Residential Care Homes: Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2025 Nov 27;13:e71593. doi: 10.2196/71593.

    PubMed 41308187

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blended Gaming COVID-19 Training System (BGCTS) in people with Infection Control and COVID-19, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Angela Leung, PhD ((852) 2766 5587, angela.ym.leung@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in unobtrusive observational-based compliance rate of infection control practices (time frame: T0 (baseline) and T2 (after the intervention at Week 3)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04783025, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in