AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseaseAMPARONCT04783129

Multidisciplinary Health Educational Program Based on Centered People Care Model in Parkinson's Disease

A study testing Education program based on 10 monthly lectures in people with Parkinson Disease, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of two similar long-term interprofessional programs, one of them delivers by in-person classes, and another delivers by online classes on the quality of life of people with Parkinson's. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease
What is being tested?
Education program based on 10 monthly lectures
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Mar 2020to Apr 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of Idiopathic Parkinson's disease Must have acess to internet.

Who cannot join

  • Severe cognitive decline Severe visual impairment Severe hearing impairment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Department of Physiotherapy, Communication Science & Disorders, Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05360-160

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Multidisciplinary Health Educational Program Based on Centered People Care Model in Parkinson's Disease: Comparison Between Remote and Face-to-face Delivery

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of two similar long-term interprofessional programs, one of them delivers by in-person classes, and another delivers by online classes on the quality of life of people with Parkinson's.

Method: People with PD will be randomized into 3 groups: (1) Face-to-face group, in which participants, in groups of 10 persons, followed a multidisciplinary health education program composed of 10 monthly face-to-face lectures; (2) Remote group, in which individuals followed the same lectures delivered by online; and (3) Control group, in which participants followed no lecture. The participants will be evaluated before (BED) and after (ABP) the education program conclusion (10 lectures). Health quality of life was adopted as a primary outcome. Independence in daily living activities, motor and non-motor symptoms severity, and global cognitive capacity was adopted as secondary measures, Besides, all participants will be asked to answer a survey to evaluate the knowledge improvement of key learning points of lectures. The results will be analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures.

Read the detailed description

Parkinson's disease is a large cause of disability worldwide. The complex combination of motor and non-motor symptoms brings an increasing impairment in functionality and, consequently, a progressively decrease in the quality of life of the people living with PD and their families. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that for health care, especially in chronic diseases, care should be centered on the person (people-centered care). This model enlarges the focus on biological aspects, including psychological and social aspects, building a multidimensional perspective on an individual, which can only be reached by integrated and interprofessional care.

According to this model, education is crucial to empower the person to occupy an active role in the health process, gaining greater control over decisions and actions affecting their health. Patient empowerment has been associated with positive health and clinical outcomes, including improved disease management, effective use of health services, improved health status, and medication adherence. However, there are several barriers for participants to attending this kind of program. Reasons for nonparticipation include mobility-reducing physical health issues, time constraints, distance, insufficient funds, lack of respite care if caring for someone else, and transportation. Thus, using a home-based video class may be one opportunity to reduce these known barriers and improve the accessibility of education programs. This delivery strategy can be beneficial for no high-income countries.

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the effects of two similar long-term interprofessional programs, one of them delivers by in-person classes, and another delivers by online classes on the quality of life of people with Parkinson's.

Method: People with a confirmed diagnosis of Idiopathic Parkinson's disease, in stage 1-4 of disease evolution according to Hoehn and Yahr classification will be randomized into 3 groups: (1) Face-to-face group (FFG), in which participants, in groups of 10 persons, followed a multidisciplinary health education program composed of 10 monthly face-to-face lectures; (2) Remote group (RG), in which individuals followed the same lectures delivered by online; and (3) Control group (CG), in which participants followed no lecture. People who have severe cognitive decline and uncorrected visual or hearing impairment will be excluded. Participants from both groups will be instructed to follow their usual routine for the treatment of the disease. The lectures on the management of motor and non-motor alterations associate with PD will be offered by a nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, neurologist, lawyer, nutritionist, and psychologist. The participants will be evaluated before (BED) and after (ABP) the education program conclusion (10 lectures). Health quality of life, adopted as a primary outcome, will be evaluated by Parkinson´s disease questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). The independence in daily living activities, motor and non-motor symptoms severity, and global cognitive capacity, adopted as secondary measures, will be evaluated by Unified Parkinson´s disease rating scale (UPDRS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), respectively. Besides, all participants will be asked to answer a survey to evaluate the knowledge improvement of key learning points of lectures. The survey consisted of 20 questions (2 per lecture) where the minimum level (score 0) indicated the absence of knowledge and maximal level (score 5) indicated the full understanding of lectures' key points. The results will be analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures considering as factor group (FFG, RG, CG) and assessment points (BED, AEP).

Being tested
Education program based on 10 monthly lectures, No intervention
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, Telehealth, People centered-care, Quality of life
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Education program based on 10 monthly lecturesOther

    The education program consist of 10 lectures on the management of motor and non-motor alterations associate with PD will be offered by a nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, neurologist, lawyer, nutritionist, and psychologist.

  • No interventionOther

    Participants will follow no education program (lecture) and will be instructed to follow their usual routine for the treatment of the disease

Study groups in NCT04783129
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Face-to-face groupExperimentalFace-to-face group (FFG), in which participants, in groups of 10 persons, followed a multidisciplinary health education program composed of 10 monthly face-to-face lectures
Receives: Other: Education program based on 10 monthly lectures
Remote groupActive comparatorRemote group (RG), in which individuals followed 10 monthly remote lectures
Receives: Other: Education program based on 10 monthly lectures
Control groupSham comparatorControl group (CG), in which participants followed no education program (lectures)
Receives: Other: No intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Health related Quality of life

    Parkinson´s disease questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39), PDQ-39 is a widely used and acknowledged disease-specific, self-reported questionnaire. It contains 39 questions covering eight distinct domains: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional wellbeing, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. The score for each question ranges from 0 to 4 points, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived problems. A change of ≥1.6 points on the PDQ-39 total score after 6 months represents a minimally clinically important difference

    Measured: baseline and immediately after the end of intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in Unifed Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores

    UPDRS - Part I: Non-Motor Experiences of Daily Living which has six rater-based items and seven for patient self-assessment; UPDRS - Part II: Motor experiences of daily living, with 13 patient-based items; UPDRS - Part III: Motor examination, 18 items based on clinical tests. Each item scores from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) and total scores are obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores for each part.

    Measured: baseline and immediately after the end of intervention

  2. Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): The 30-point designed to detect mild cognitive impairment and reportedly takes <10 min to administer with scores <26 defined as abnormal.

    Measured: baseline and immediately after the end of intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2021
  2. Study start1 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Stratified, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04783129
Sponsor's protocol ID
AMPARO study
Acronym
AMPARO
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
25 Feb 2021
Last updated
5 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Education program based on 10 monthly lectures in people with Parkinson Disease, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Health related Quality of life (time frame: baseline and immediately after the end of intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in