Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal PolypsPhase 2NCT04783389
A Study to Evaluate CBP-201, Rademikibart, in Adult Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
A Phase 2 study testing CBP-201 in people with Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, run by Connect Biopharm LLC at 68 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the effect of CBP-201, rademikibart, in adult patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
- What is being tested?
- CBP-201
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 68 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2021to 10 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female and male patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years at the time of screening.
- Patients who are diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis with bilateral polyps despite treatment with systemic corticosteroid within the past 2 years and/or medical contraindication/intolerance to systemic corticosteroids. The polyps have a minimum bilateral nasal polyps score (NPS) of 5 out of a maximum score of 8 with at least a score of 2 for each nostril at screening and baseline evaluated by endoscopy.
- Nasal congestion/blockade/obstruction with moderate or severe symptom severity (Nasal Congestion Score of > 2) at screening and a weekly average severity of > 1 at time of randomization.
- Patients using a documented stable dose of nasal mometasone at least 200 mcg/day, or an equivalent daily dose of another inhaled nasal corticosteroid (INCS), for at least 28 days before randomization and willing to continue the dose for the duration of the study. Note: For patients who are using an alternative INCS product other than mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) prior to the screening visit, the investigator must switch the patient to MFNS at V1.
- Patients willing to enter Patient Diary daily symptom assessments and maintain stable dosing with MFNS with a compliance of at least 70% in the 7 days preceding randomization. Note: Patients must use nasal mometasone at least 200 mcg/day, or equivalent, for at least 28 days before randomization, which can include days prior to screening with supportive documentation. Run-in can be 7-31 days with the compliance determined in the week prior to dosing.
- Male patients who are non-sterilized and sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential agree to use highly effective contraception from randomization until 8 weeks after last dose.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Female patients of childbearing potential who are sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner should have a confirmed negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin test at Visit 1 and agrees to use highly effective contraception from signing of informed consent throughout the duration of the study and for 8 weeks after last dose.
- Patient is able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent form (ICF) prior to any study related procedures being performed.
- Willing and able to comply with all study visits and study-related procedures, in the opinion of the Investigator.
Who cannot join
- -
- A patient who meets any of the following criteria will be ineligible to participate in this study:
- Patients unable to use MFNS.
- Patients who are taking or have taken the following prohibited therapies as specified:
- Systemic steroids within 28 days prior to screening,
- Other nonbiologic investigational drugs within 60 days (or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer) of screening,
Show all 38Show fewer
- Intranasal corticosteroid drops or corticosteroid-administering devices (eg, OptiNose device or stents) within 28 days prior to screening,
- Non-steroidal immunosuppressants (eg, cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, sirolimus, tacrolimus) within 60 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, of screening,
- Any monoclonal antibody therapy (eg, benralizumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab, reslizumab, dupilumab) or investigational biologic drug for asthma or other diseases within 60 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, of screening,
- Leukotriene antagonists/modifiers within 7 days prior to screening for patients who were not on continuous treatment for ≥ 30 days prior to screening,
- Allergen immunotherapy for patients who were not on maintenance treatment for at least 90 days prior to screening
- Patients who did not respond favorably to previous dupilumab treatment (eg, therapy failure or patient experienced an adverse reaction to treatment).
- Patients who have undergone any nasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months before screening; or have a history of sinus or nasal surgery modifying the structure of the nose such that assessment of NPS is not possible, or have had uncontrolled epistaxis requiring surgical or procedural intervention, including nasal packing.
- Patients with conditions/concomitant diseases making them non evaluable at screening or for the primary efficacy endpoint such as: antrochoanal polyps, nasal septal deviation that would occlude at least 1 nostril, acute sinusitis, nasal infection or upper respiratory infection at screening or within 2 weeks before screening, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa; known or suspected diagnosis of cystic fibrosis; chronic granulomatous disease and granulomatous vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's Granulomatosis), eosinophilic granulomatous with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome), Young's syndrome, primary dyskinetic ciliary syndromes (eg, Kartagener's syndrome) or other dyskinetic ciliary syndromes.
- Signs or a CT scan suggestive of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis.
- Patients with co-morbid asthma are excluded if:
- Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤ 50% of normal predicted value OR
- An exacerbation within 90 days prior screening that required hospitalization (> 24 hours) OR
- Are on a daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) higher than 1000 mcg fluticasone or the equivalent.
- Known or suspected history of immunosuppression, including history of invasive opportunistic infections, such as aspergillosis, coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), listeriosis, pneumocystosis, or tuberculosis, despite infection resolution; or unusually frequent, recurrent or prolonged infections. Tuberculosis testing would be performed on a country-by-country basis according to local guidelines if required by regulatory authorities or ethics committees.
- Patients who have active Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or HIV infections as determined by positive results at Screening for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb); or hepatitis C (HCV) antibody; or positive HIV serology. Note: Patients who test positive for HBvAb, negative for HBsAg and subsequently confirmed positive for HBsAb, indicating resolved natural infection (confirmed by negative HBV-DNA), may participate. Patients with positive HCV may participate if subsequent viral load is confirmed negative.
- A helminth parasitic infection diagnosed within 24 weeks prior to the date of informed consent that has not been treated, or has failed to respond to, standard of care therapy.
- Evidence of infection requiring treatment with systemic antibacterials, antivirals, antifungals, antiparasitics, or antiprotozoals within 7 days before baseline, or viral infections within 14 days before screening that may not have received antiviral treatment.
- Live, attenuated vaccinations within 28 days prior to screening or planned live, attenuated vaccinations during the study.
- Pregnant or intent to become pregnant during the study, or breast-feeding women.
- Any disorder, including, but not limited to, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, infectious, endocrine, metabolic, haematological, psychiatric, or major physical impairment that is not stable in the opinion of the investigator and may affect the safety of the patient throughout the study, or influence the findings of the studies or their interpretations, or impede the patient's ability to complete the entire duration of study.
- Any clinically significant abnormal findings in physical examination, vital signs, safety lab tests during screening/run-in period, which in the opinion of the investigator, may put the patient at risk because of their participation in the study, or may influence the results of the study, or the patient's ability to complete entire duration of the study.
- Have any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Screening:
- Eosinophils >1500 cells/mm3 (or 1.5 x 10E9/L)
- Platelets <100000 cells/mm3 (or 100 x 10E9/L)
- Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) > 10 upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5 times the ULN
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 2.5 times the ULN
- Bilirubin ≥ 2 times the ULN
- History of alcohol or drug abuse within 12 months prior to the date informed consent.
- An allergy to L-histidine, trehalose or Tween (polysorbate) 80 or a history of a systemic hypersensitivity reaction, other than localized injection site reaction, to any biologic drug.
- Plans to undergo any surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia during the study.
- History of cancer: Patients who have had basal cell carcinoma, localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix are eligible provided that the patient is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 12 months prior to the date informed consent. Note: Patients who have had other malignancies are eligible provided that the patient is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 5 years prior to the date of informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
68 sites in 5 countries.
68 sites in 5 countries
United States32 sites
Connect Investigative Site 121
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0360
Connect Investigative Site 106
Austin, Texas, 75759
Connect Investigative Site 124
Bakersfield, California, 93301
Connect Investigative Site 115
Bellingham, Washington, 98225
Connect Investigative Site 130
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Connect Investigative Site 108
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Connect Investigative Site 111
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Connect Investigative Site 126
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Connect Investigative Site 123
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
Connect Investigative Site 133
Columbus, Ohio, 43235
Connect Investigative Site 104
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Connect Investigative Site 120
Houston, Texas, 77074
Connect Investigative Site 125
La Mesa, California, 91942
Connect Investigative Site 134
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Connect Investigative Site 132
Louisville, Kentucky, 40205
Connect Investigative Site 107
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Connect Investigative Site 114
Miami, Florida, 33135
Connect Investigative Site 109
Miami, Florida, 33155
Connect Investigative Site 118
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Connect Investigative Site 102
Princeton, New Jersey, 08540
Connect Investigative Site 105
Rochester, New York, 14618
Connect Investigative Site 101
Sherman, Texas, 75092
Connect Investigative Site 127
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Connect Investigative Site 129
St. George, Utah, 84790
Connect Investigative Site 116
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Connect Investigative Site 128
Temecula, California, 92592
Connect Investigative Site 113
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Connect Investigative Site 119
Torrance, California, 90503
Connect Investigative Site 112
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Connect Investigative Site 122
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74137
Connect Investigative Site 110
White Marsh, Maryland, 21162
Connect Investigative Site 117
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
China13 sites
Connect Investigative Site 307
Bengbu, Anhui, 233060
Connect Investigative Site 303
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042
Connect Investigative Site 310
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014
Connect Investigative Site 309
Jingzhou, Hubei, 434020
Connect Investigative Site 306
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Connect Investigative Site 302
Nanning, Guangxi, 530021
Connect Investigative Site 304
Qingdao, Shandong, 266033
Connect Investigative Site 301
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200031
Connect Investigative Site 312
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 201620
Connect Investigative Site 313
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004
Connect Investigative Site 311
Taiyuan, Shanxi, 30001
Connect Investigative Site 305
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710061
Connect Investigative Site 308
Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225007
Ukraine10 sites
Connect Investigative Site 501
Dnipropetrovsk, Dnipro, 49006
Connect Investigative Site 507
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, 76000
Connect Investigative Site 508
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, 76000
Connect Investigative Site 510
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, 76000
Connect Investigative Site 509
Kharkiv, Kharkiv Oblast, 61124
Connect Investigative Site 503
Kyiv, 2002
Connect Investigative Site 502
Kyiv, 3049
Connect Investigative Site 505
Kyiv, 3057
Connect Investigative Site 504
Lutsk, Volyn Oblast, 43005
Connect Investigative Site 506
Poltava, Poltava Oblast, 36038
Poland9 sites
Connect Investigative Site 404
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-879
Connect Investigative Site 401
Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 85-605
Connect Investigative Site 407
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 30-033
Connect Investigative Site 402
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 31-411
Connect Investigative Site 409
Lubin, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 59-300
Connect Investigative Site 405
Rzeszów, Podkarpackie Voivodeship, 35-055
Connect Investigative Site 408
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 00-892
Connect Investigative Site 403
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-793
Connect Investigative Site 406
Zabrze, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-800
Spain4 sites
Connect Investigative Site 604
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08208
Connect Investigative Site 602
Córdoba
Connect Investigative Site 601
Madrid, 28040
Connect Investigative Site 603
Seville, 41009
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate CBP-201 in Adult Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
This study will evaluate the effect of CBP-201, rademikibart, in adult patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP).
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of CBP-201 on a background of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in reducing endoscopic nasal polyp score (NPS) and nasal congestion/obstruction score (NCS) severity in eligible patients with CRSwNP whose disease remains inadequately controlled despite daily treatment with intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) therapy in comparison to placebo. CBP-201 is administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection. The study is divided into a treatment period of 24 weeks and a follow-up period of 8 weeks.
- Conditions
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
- Being tested
- CBP-201, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CBP-201Drug
Also called rademikibart
CBP-201 subcutaneous (SC) injection.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CBP-201 Dose 1 | Experimental | CBP-201 Dose 1 subcutaneous (SC) injection. Receives: Drug: CBP-201 |
| CBP-201 Dose 2 | Experimental | CBP-201 Dose 2 subcutaneous (SC) injection. Receives: Drug: CBP-201 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injection. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)
Change from baseline at Week 24 in endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score (NPS). Endoscopic NPS is assessed by central clinical specialist assessment of video recordings of nasal endoscopy. NPS is graded based on polyp size (recorded as the sum of the right and left nostril scores with a range of 0 to 8; higher scores indicate worse status). The scoring for each nostril is as follows: 0 No polyps, 1 Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate, 2 Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate, 3 Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or large polyps medial to the middle turbinate (i.e., reaching below the middle turbinate), 4 Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity (i.e., touching the floor of the nose). The most improvement improvement possible from baseline would be -8 and the max worsening possible is +8.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Average Daily Nasal Congestion Score (NCS)
Change from baseline at Week 24 in average daily Nasal Congestion Score (NCS). Daily NCS wase assessed by patient diary from screening and throughout the study by using a 0 to 3 categorical scale for severity of symptoms from none to severe over the past 24 hours. The patient diary prompt: "How would you rate nasal congestion over the last 24 hours?" The answers are: 0 None,1 Minor, 2 Moderate, 3 Severe. The lowest possible weekly average is 0 and the highest possible is 3. The higher the NCS score, the worse the symptoms. Change from baseline in weekly average score is the outcome. Maximal improvement in NCS would be -3 and maximal worsening would be +3.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Secondary outcomes (15)
Change in Percentage of Maxillary Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease
CT change from baseline at Week 24 in Lund-Mackay Computed Tomography scores. To calculate the Lund-Mackay score on a CT scan of the paranasal sinuses and ostiomeatal complex, the central blinded reader assigns each sinus a score from 0-2: 0 (no abnormality), 1 (partial opacification) or 2 (complete opacification). The ostiomeatal complex is assigned a score of either 0 (not obstructed) or 2 (obstructed).The sinuses are grouped into: frontal sinus, anterior ethmoidal cells, posterior ethmoidal cells, maxillary sinus, sphenoid sinus, ostiomeatal complex. Each side is graded separately. A combined score from 0 to 24 is possible with 0 being no abnormality and 24 being complete obstruction. The maximal possible change from baseline score would be -24 and the maximal worsening from baseline score would be +24.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)
Change from baseline at Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). The UPSIT is a commercially available, validated, "scratch and sniff" smell test that has 40 items, where each item has 1 correct answer and 3 incorrect answers or "distractors". An UPSIT result is scored out of 40 where a higher score indicates better olfaction (maximum being 40) and 0 indicates the worst possible olfaction outcome. The maximal possible improvement from baseline would be +40 and the worst possible change from baseline would be a score of -40.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Visual Analogue Scale for Rhinosinusitis (VAS-RS)
Change from baseline at Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale for Rhinosinusitis (VAS-RS).
The Visual Analogue Scale for Rhinosinusitis (VAS-RS) is a 10 cm linear scale that ranges from "none" to "more than I can imagine" for each of 14 defined nasal symptoms (runny nose, loss of smell, etc). The VAS instructions direct the patient to mark a vertical line at the point that best corresponds to how bothersome their symptoms have been between visits the VAS-RS is collected. Site staff measure the distance from none to the patient's mark for each of the 14 symptoms and adds the total number of cm. The least possible score is 0 reflecting no symptoms and the maximal score is 140 reflecting the worst possible symptoms. The best possible outcome change from baseline to week 24 would be a score of -140 and the worst possible change from baseline score would be +140.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS)
Change from baseline at Week 24 in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS). The Total Nasal Symptom Score is a Patient Reported Outcome which is a total of 3 sub-question scores which are scored 0-3 (0=no symptoms, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) for Nasal Obstruction, Itching/Sneezing, and Secretion/Runny Nose. The total possible TNSS score is 9 representing the worst symptoms and the a score of 0 represents no symptoms. The worst change from baseline to Week 24 would be a score of +9 and the best possible change from baseline score would be -9.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22)
Change from baseline at Week 24 in 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a 22-item list of symptoms and social/emotional consequences related to the patient's rhinosinusitis, using a 5-point scale (0,1,2,3,4,5), where score of 0 indicates No Problem, 2 for Very Mild Problem, 3 for Mild or Slight Problem, 4 for Moderate Problem, and 5 for Problem as bad as it can be. The SNOT-22 score range is 0-110, with higher scores representing worse symptoms associated with disease. A maximum improvement or outcome from baseline would be -110 and a maximum worsening of symptoms from baseline would be +110.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Average Daily Anterior Rhinorrhea Score
Change from baseline at Week 24 in average daily anterior rhinorrhea score. Participants reported symptoms daily on an electronic diary. The diary prompt was "How would you rate your anterior rhinorrhea (the discharge draining from your nose, "runny nose") in the past 24 hours?" The participant entered a score from 0-4: 0 No noticeable discharge from my nose; 1 Minor discharge from my nose, did not require tissues; 2 Some discharge from my nose, required a few tissues; 3 Significant discharge from my nose; 4 Near constant discharge from my nose. The higher the score the worse the outcome with a range of 0-4. The maximum improvement in weekly average of daily symptoms was -4 and the maximal worsening in symptoms was +4.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Average Daily Posterior Rhinorrhea Score
Change from baseline at Week 24 in average daily posterior rhinorrhea score. Participants reported symptoms daily on an electronic diary. The diary prompt was "How would you rate your posterior rhinorrhea (postnasal phlegm dripping into your throat) in the past 24 hours?" The participant entered a score from 0-4: 0 No noticeable postnasal drip; 1 Some minor postnasal drip; 2 Moderate postnasal drip; 3 Significant postnasal drip; 4 Near constant postnasal drip.
The higher the score the worse the outcome with a range of 0-4. The maximum improvement in weekly average of daily symptoms was -4 and the maximal worsening in symptoms was +4.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Average Daily Loss of Smell Score
Change from baseline at Week 24 in average daily loss of smell score Participants reported symptoms daily on an electronic diary. The diary prompt was "How would you rate your ability to smell?" The participant entered a score from 0-3: 0 Not able to smell anything; 1 Can smell only strong odors; 2 Can smell some, but not all, odors; 3 Have no problem smelling The maximum improvement in weekly average of daily symptoms was +3 and the maximal worsening in symptoms was -3.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Daily Subject-assessed Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF)
Change from baseline at Week 24 in daily subject-assessed nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF).
Participants performed a nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) maneuver twice daily at home and recorded the result on an electronic diary device. An improvement in flow rate (L/min) is considered an improvement and a decrease in flow rate is considered a worsening of symptoms. A change from baseline improvement in flow rate would be a positive number and a worsening from baseline would be a negative number. MCID is considered to be a change from baseline of approximately 20 L/min.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Blood Level of IgE
Change from baseline will be summarized with descriptive statistics in blood level of IgE.
IgE (ng/mL) was measured in blood samples sent to a central clinical laboratory.
A negative change from baseline will be considered a clinical improvement and a positive change from baseline will be considered a lack of improvement.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Peripheral Eosinophil Counts
Change from baseline will be summarized with descriptive statistics in peripheral eosinophil counts.
Eosinophil counts in the blood (reported as 10^9/L) were determined from blood samples sent to a central clinical laboratory.
A negative change from baseline will be considered a clinical improvement and a positive change from baseline will be considered a lack of clinical improvement.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)
Change from baseline will be summarized with descriptive statistics in eosinophil cationic protein (ECP).
Eosinophil cationic protein (reported as ng/mL) was measured in blood samples collected from participants and sent to a central clinical laboratory for processing. An decrease in ECP will be considered an improvement in outcome and an increase will be considered a lack of improvement in clinical outcome.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Thymus and Activation-regulated Chemokine (TARC)
Change from baseline will be summarized with descriptive statistics in thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC).
TARC (reported in pg/mL) was measured in blood samples collected from participants and sent to a central clinical laboratory for processing. A decrease in TARC will be considered an improvement in clinical outcome and an increase in TARC will be considered a lack of clinical improvement.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Eotaxin-3
Change from baseline will be summarized with descriptive statistics in Eotaxin-3.
Eotaxin-3 (reported in pg/mL) was measured in blood samples collected from participants and sent to a central clinical laboratory for processing. A decrease from baseline will be considered a clinically improvement and an increase will be considered a lack of improvement.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Periostin
Change from baseline will be summarized with descriptive statistics in periostin.
Periostin (reported in ng/mL) was measured in blood samples collected from participants and sent to a central clinical laboratory for processing. A decrease from baseline will be considered a positive clinical outcome and an increase will be be considered to lack a positive outcome.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 32
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2021
- Study start16 Jun 2021
- Primary completion15 Apr 2022
- Study completion10 Jun 2022
Why it stopped: Trial was discontinued in 2022 due to COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine/Russia conflict related enrollment challenges. Discontinuation was not related to safety.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal PolypsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Connect Biopharm LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Suzhou Connect, Study director, Connect Biopharm LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04783389
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CBP-201-WW003
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 17 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate CBP-201 in Adult Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04783389
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CBP-201-WW003
- Conditions
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Trial was discontinued in 2022 due to COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine/Russia conflict related enrollment challenges. Discontinuation was not related to safety.
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Connect Biopharm LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 17 Oct 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the effect of CBP-201, rademikibart, in adult patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP).
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of CBP-201 on a background of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in reducing endoscopic nasal polyp score (NPS) and nasal congestion/obstruction score (NCS) severity in eligible patients with CRSwNP whose disease remains inadequately controlled despite daily treatment with intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) therapy in comparison to placebo. CBP-201 is administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection. The study is divided into a treatment period of 24 weeks and a follow-up period of 8 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CBP-201 Dose 1 | Experimental | Drug: CBP-201CBP-201 Dose 1 subcutaneous (SC) injection. |
| CBP-201 Dose 2 | Experimental | Drug: CBP-201CBP-201 Dose 2 subcutaneous (SC) injection. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo subcutaneous (SC) injection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Female and male patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years at the time of screening.
- Patients who are diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis with bilateral polyps despite treatment with systemic corticosteroid within the past 2 years and/or medical contraindication/intolerance to systemic corticosteroids. The polyps have a minimum bilateral nasal polyps score (NPS) of 5 out of a maximum score of 8 with at least a score of 2 for each nostril at screening and baseline evaluated by endoscopy.
- Nasal congestion/blockade/obstruction with moderate or severe symptom severity (Nasal Congestion Score of > 2) at screening and a weekly average severity of > 1 at time of randomization.
- Patients using a documented stable dose of nasal mometasone at least 200 mcg/day, or an equivalent daily dose of another inhaled nasal corticosteroid (INCS), for at least 28 days before randomization and willing to continue the dose for the duration of the study. Note: For patients who are using an alternative INCS product other than mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) prior to the screening visit, the investigator must switch the patient to MFNS at V1.
- Patients willing to enter Patient Diary daily symptom assessments and maintain stable dosing with MFNS with a compliance of at least 70% in the 7 days preceding randomization. Note: Patients must use nasal mometasone at least 200 mcg/day, or equivalent, for at least 28 days before randomization, which can include days prior to screening with supportive documentation. Run-in can be 7-31 days with the compliance determined in the week prior to dosing.
Key exclusion criteria (38 listed)
- -
- A patient who meets any of the following criteria will be ineligible to participate in this study:
- Patients unable to use MFNS.
- Patients who are taking or have taken the following prohibited therapies as specified:
- Patients who did not respond favorably to previous dupilumab treatment (eg, therapy failure or patient experienced an adverse reaction to treatment).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CBP-201Also: rademikibartCBP-201 subcutaneous (SC) injection. | Drug | CBP-201 Dose 1, CBP-201 Dose 2 |
| PlaceboPlacebo subcutaneous (SC) injection. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change from baseline at Week 24 in endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score (NPS). Endoscopic NPS is assessed by central clinical specialist assessment of video recordings of nasal endoscopy. NPS is graded based on polyp size (recorded as the sum of the right and left nostril scores with a range of 0 to 8; higher scores indicate worse status). The scoring for each nostril is as follows: 0 No polyps, 1 Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate, 2 Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate, 3 Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or large polyps medial to the middle turbinate (i.e., reaching below the middle turbinate), 4 Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity (i.e., touching the floor of the nose). The most improvement improvement possible from baseline would be -8 and the max worsening possible is +8.
Change in Average Daily Nasal Congestion Score (NCS)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change from baseline at Week 24 in average daily Nasal Congestion Score (NCS). Daily NCS wase assessed by patient diary from screening and throughout the study by using a 0 to 3 categorical scale for severity of symptoms from none to severe over the past 24 hours. The patient diary prompt: "How would you rate nasal congestion over the last 24 hours?" The answers are: 0 None,1 Minor, 2 Moderate, 3 Severe. The lowest possible weekly average is 0 and the highest possible is 3. The higher the NCS score, the worse the symptoms. Change from baseline in weekly average score is the outcome. Maximal improvement in NCS would be -3 and maximal worsening would be +3.
15 secondary outcomes
Change in Percentage of Maxillary Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Visual Analogue Scale for Rhinosinusitis (VAS-RS)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Average Daily Anterior Rhinorrhea Score
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Average Daily Posterior Rhinorrhea Score
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Average Daily Loss of Smell Score
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change in Daily Subject-assessed Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Blood Level of IgE
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Peripheral Eosinophil Counts
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Thymus and Activation-regulated Chemokine (TARC)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Eotaxin-3
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 32
Change From Baseline in Periostin
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 32
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Oct 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GSK5784283 (Felcorekibart) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
Nasal Polyps
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Treated With Intranasal Corticosteroids (CONTRAST-NP)
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
RecruitingPhase 4
Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate Changes in Symptoms in Adult Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis Initiating Treatment With Tezepelumab
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Recruiting
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) With and Without Nasal Polyps
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Suzhou Connect study director
Connect Biopharm LLC
68 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing CBP-201 in people with Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, run by Connect Biopharm LLC at 68 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 38 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 68 sites in United States, China, Ukraine, Poland, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) (time frame: From Baseline to Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2023.