Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)ASCENT K2NCT04784429
Assessing Outcomes With Microprocessor Knee Utilization in a K2 Population
A study testing Kenevo or C-Leg 4 in people with Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) and Congenital Amputation of Lower Limb, run by Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH at 90 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Two-phased randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of microprocessor controlled knee prostheses (MPK) with the impact of non-microprocessor controlled knee prostheses (NPMK) in patients with a transfemoral/knee disarticulation level amputation categorized as K2 ambulators. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury), Congenital Amputation of Lower Limb, Lower Limb Amputation Knee
- What is being tested?
- Kenevo or C-Leg 4
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- 90 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Jun 2021to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Unilateral transfemoral or knee disarticulation amputation
- Received prosthesis between 4 - 24 months prior
- Currently uses prosthesis
- K2 ambulator status
- Able to speak English or Spanish language
- Age ≥ 65 years at Baseline Assessment (one month after enrollment)
- Minimum Socket Comfort Score (SCS) of 6/10
Who cannot join
- Upper limb involvement
- Individuals ≥ 275 lbs
- Unable to provide informed consent
- History of acute or chronic residual limb breakdown
- History of 2 or more socket adjustments or replacements in the past 6 months
- Amputation of the contralateral limb
Show all 10Show fewer
- Active malignancy
- Rapidly declining health status resulting in reduced activity in the past 6 months, as determined by patient's clinician and confirmed by Clinical \& Scientific Affairs personnel
- Patient unable or unwilling to follow study procedures
- Pregnant women, institutionalized persons, and children
Trial locations and contacts
90 sites in 1 country.
90 sites in 1 country
United States90 sites
Hanger Clinic - 607 N. Jefferson Street
Albany, Georgia, 31707
Hanger Clinic - 715 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Ave NE Ste
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Hanger Clinic - 11346 S Cicero Ave
Alsip, Illinois, 60803
Hanger Clinic - 305 E Greenville St
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Hanger Clinic - 4849 Lonetree Way, STE B
Antioch, California, 94531
Hanger Clinic - 1010 Stillwater Ave, Ste 106
Bangor, Maine, 04401
Hanger Clinic - 8522 Summa Ave
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Hanger Clinic - 4505 Utica Ridge Rd
Bettendorf, Iowa, 52722
Hanger Clinic - 225 South Michigan Ave Suite B
Big Rapids, Michigan, 48038
Hanger Clinic - 1119 Professional Park Drive
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Hanger Clinic - 3065 William Street, Suite 205
Cape Girardeau, Missouri, 63703
Hanger Clinic - 866 5th Ave SE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403
Hanger Clinic - 4407 MacCorkle Ave SE
Charleston, West Virginia, 25304
Hanger Clinic - 2219 E. 7th St.
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Hanger Clinic - 2835 N Sheffield Ave, Ste 301
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Hanger Clinic - 150 St Peters Centre Blvd
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
Hanger Clinic - 1739 Blanding St.
Columbia, South Carolina, 29201
Hanger Clinic - 8000 State Highway 242, Suite 100
Conroe, Texas, 77385
Hanger Clinic - 1050 Buford Rd, Ste 106
Cumming, Georgia, 30041
Hanger Clinic - 3910 Gaston Ave STE 150
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Hanger Clinic - One Elizabeth Place Suite 300
Dayton, Ohio, 45417
Hanger Clinic - 1400 Mason Ave. Suite 103
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117
Hanger Clinic - 330 Laurel St. #1300
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Hanger Clinic - 321 Westgate Pkwy
Dothan, Alabama, 36303
Hanger Clinic - 423 Normal St.
East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, 18301
Hanger Clinic - 660 Wessel Drive
Fairfield, Ohio, 45014
Hanger Clinic - 1743 Creekside, Suite #110
Folsom, California, 95630
Hanger Clinic - 804 Kenyon Road
Fort Dodge, Iowa, 50521
Hanger Clinic - 12591 Creekside Lane
Fort Myers, Florida, 33919
Hanger Clinic - 3501 S Mercy Road
Gilbert, Arizona, 85297
Hanger Clinic - 65 Medical Park Drive, Suite 3
Helena, Montana, 59601
Hanger Clinic - 221 W. Main Street
Inverness, Florida, 34450
Hanger Clinic - 779 W. Forest Ave
Jackson, Tennessee, 38301
Hanger Clinic - 502 Princeton Rd
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37601
Hanger Clinic - 2340 E. Meyer Blvd, Building 2, Suite 394
Kansas City, Missouri, 64132
Hanger Clinic - 5027 Green Bay Rd, Suite 124
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53144
Hanger Clinic - 320 West Water St, Suite D
Kerrville, Texas, 78028
Hanger Clinic - 308 East Oak Street
Kissimmee, Florida, 34744
Hanger Clinic - 6300 Baum Dr
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37919
Hanger Clinic - 3440 Losey Blvd S
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54636
Hanger Clinic - 940 Kaliste Saloom
Lafayette, Louisiana, 70508
Hanger Clinic - St. Anthony Hospital - Medical Plaza 1, Suite 230, 11750 West 2nd Place
Lakewood, Colorado, 80228
Hanger Clinic - 7250 Peak Drive, STE 120
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Hanger Clinic - 100 Erdman Way, STE 100
Leominster, Massachusetts, 01453
Hanger Clinic - 1001 S 70th St Ste 110
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Hanger Clinic - 1516 Hudson Street, Suite 105
Longview, Washington, 98642
Hanger Clinic - 778 Riverside Drive
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Hanger Clinic - 266 Cherokee Professional Park
Maryville, Tennessee, 37804
Hanger Clinic - 6001 Landerhaven Dr Ste A
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
Hanger Clinic - 7 North Bellevue Blvd
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
Hanger Clinic - 1903 23rd Ave
Meridian, Mississippi, 39301
Hanger Clinic - 100 Milk Street, Suite 120
Methuen, Massachusetts, 01844
Hanger Clinic - 1551 Bond Street, Suite 111
Naperville, Illinois, 60563
Hanger Clinic - 6270 Naples Blvd, Bldg 1
Naples, Florida, 34109
Hanger Clinic - 704 Thimble Shoals Blvd. Suite 400-B
Newport News, Virginia, 23606
Hanger Clinic - 401 Harrison Street
Oak Park, Illinois, 60304
Hanger Clinic - 9109 Blondo Street
Omaha, Nebraska, 68134
Hanger Clinic - 17500 Burke St, Suite 100
Omaha, Nebraska, 68818
Hanger Clinic - 824 Creighton Road
Pensacola, Florida, 32504
Hanger Clinic - 3816 N. 7th St.
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014
Hanger Clinic - 4045 E Bell Rd
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Hanger Clinic - 959 Brighton Ave.
Portland, Maine, 04102
Hanger Clinic - 5809 West Norfolk Road
Portsmouth, Virginia, 23703
Hanger Clinic - 961 Matley Ln Ste 100
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Hanger Clinic - 401 SW 41st ST
Renton, Washington, 98057
Hanger Clinic - 4821 Old National Road East, Suite A
Richmond, Indiana, 47374
Hanger Clinic - 1882 Winton Road South, Suite 6
Rochester, New York, 14618
Hanger Clinic - 4001 N Mays St. Ste 1200
Round Rock, Texas, 78665
Hanger Clinic - California - 1248 32nd St
Sacramento, California, 95816
Hanger Clinic - 200 Southpark Blvd, Suite 209
Saint Augustine, Florida, 32086
Hanger Clinic - 645 East Crawford St
Salina, Kansas, 67401
Hanger Clinic - 2785 East 3300 South
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84109
Hanger Clinic - 1139 S.E. Military Dr., Suite 111
San Antonio, Texas, 78214
Hanger Clinic - New Hampshire - 7 Marsh Brook Dr Ste 201
Somersworth, New Hampshire, 03878
Hanger Clinic - 355 W Carpenter St.
Springfield, Illinois, 62702
Hanger Clinic - 1985 Main Street
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01103
Hanger Clinic - 1215A Merchant Way
Statesboro, Georgia, 30458
Hanger Clinic - 1400 College St, Ste 7
Sulphur Springs, Texas, 75482
Hanger Clinic - 13925 Meeker Blvd, Suite 5
Sun City West, Arizona, 85375
Hanger Clinic - 23451 Madison St., Suite 200, Skypark Building 7
Torrance, California, 90505
Hanger Clinic - 1001 Cromwell Bridge Rd, Suite 108
Towson, Maryland, 21286
Hanger Clinic - 502 Council Circle
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Hanger Clinic - 820 S Akers St, Ste 230
Visalia, California, 93227
Hanger Clinic - 17490 Hwy 3 Unit 100A
Webster, Texas, 77598
Hanger Clinic - 5502 Brush Hollow Rd.
Westbury, New York, 11590
Hanger Clinic - 410 N. Hillside, Suite 100
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
Hanger Clinic - 1399 Westgate Center Dr
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Hanger Clinic - 215 First Street North, Suite 300A
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880
Hanger Clinic - 40 Berkshire Ct STE 2
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Hanger Clinic - 1215 Plumas Street, Suite 1000
Yuba City, California, 95991
About this study
Two-phased randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of microprocessor controlled knee prostheses (MPK) with the impact of non-microprocessor controlled knee prostheses (NPMK) in patients with a transfemoral/knee disarticulation level amputation categorized as K2 ambulators.
Read the detailed description
Randomized controlled trial investigating the benefits of microprocessor controlled knee prostheses (MPK) in patients with a transfemoral or knee disarticulation level amputation categorized by Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL) as a Limited Community Ambulator (K-Level 2). There are two aims for the study. Aim 1 is to understand the effect of MPK technology for the K2 ambulator on reducing fear and anxiety of falling, improving health-related quality of life, and participation in society and activities. Aim 2 is to understand the long-term effect of MPK technology the aspects from Aim 1 as well as reducing morbidity. The trial will be conducted in two phases. Phase 1 will cover the initial 12-month period to address Aim 1, and phase 2 will monitor from 12 months to 5 years to address Aim 2.
- Conditions
- Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury), Congenital Amputation of Lower Limb, Lower Limb Amputation Knee
- Being tested
- Kenevo or C-Leg 4, Non microprocessor controlled knee (NMPK)
- Keywords
- Prosthetic knee, lower limb amputation, microprocessor controlled knee, K2
- Medical subject headings
- Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Kenevo or C-Leg 4Device
Kenevo fitted to subjects walking slower than 0.8 m/s as measured by the 2-minute Walk Test. C-Leg 4 fitted to subjects walking faster than 0.8 m/s.
Non microprocessor controlled knee (NMPK)Device
NMPK consistent with current standards of care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MPK | Experimental | Microprocessor controlled knee Receives: Device: Kenevo or C-Leg 4 |
| NMPK | Active comparator | Non-microprocessor controlled knee Receives: Device: Non microprocessor controlled knee (NMPK) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ)
This is a 14 item survey assessment originally developed with community-dwelling older adults which measures the degree to which respondents avoid activities due to their fear of falling. Responses are on a 5-point scale with 0 = completely disagree and 4 = completely agree. The total possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates a greater activity limitation and participation restriction as a result of the fear of falling.
Measured: 12 months
Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ)
This is a 14 item survey assessment originally developed with community-dwelling older adults which measures the degree to which respondents avoid activities due to their fear of falling. Responses are on a 5-point scale with 0 = completely disagree and 4 = completely agree. The total possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates a greater activity limitation and participation restriction as a result of the fear of falling.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (13)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - 29
The survey assessment comprises from 7 health domains (physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, satisfaction with social roles, and pain interference). The combined constructs serve to provide a measure of patient's quality of life. Raw scores are converted to T-scores which standardizes the scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Being above or below the standard deviation could be desirable or undesirable based on the domain being measured. Higher scores means more of the concept being measured (e.g. more fatigue).
Measured: 12 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Within the PROMIS system, this specific set of question is aimed at assessing the person's ability to perform usual social roles and activities, a construct noted to be of great significance to well-being within the World Health Organization International Classification of Function model. Four of the PROMIS-APSRA questions are included on the PROMIS-29 within the domain of 'satisfaction with social roles'. The addition of four more questions helps with the responsiveness within this specific domain. Thus the additional four questions of the PROMIS-APSRA will be administered to assess the domain of participation and activity.
Measured: 12 months
12-month fall count from bi-weekly fall journal
On a bi-weekly cadence, individuals will be asked to complete the Lower Limb Amputation Fall Survey. This survey was developed for the purpose of documenting number of falls and near-falls over a given period, as well as insight into the causality.
Measured: 12 months
Average daily step counts
Difference in average daily step activity count from 1 week after initial assessment compared to average daily step activity count for 1 week prior to 12-month assessment. Modern activity monitors provide the ability to translate movement from triaxial inertial measurement units into corresponding step activity with great precision.
Measured: 12 months
Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ)
This is a 14 item survey assessment originally developed with community-dwelling older adults which measures the degree to which respondents avoid activities due to their fear of falling. Responses are on a 5-point scale with 0 = completely disagree and 4 = completely agree. The total possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates a greater activity limitation and participation restriction as a result of the fear of falling.
Measured: 3 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - 29
The survey assessment comprises from 7 health domains (physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, satisfaction with social roles, and pain interference). The combined constructs serve to provide a measure of patient's quality of life. Raw scores are converted to T-scores which standardizes the scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Being above or below the standard deviation could be desirable or undesirable based on the domain being measured. Higher scores means more of the concept being measured (e.g. more fatigue).
Measured: 5 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Within the PROMIS system, this specific set of question is aimed at assessing the person's ability to perform usual social roles and activities, a construct noted to be of great significance to well-being within the World Health Organization International Classification of Function model. Four of the PROMIS-APSRA questions are included on the PROMIS-29 within the domain of 'satisfaction with social roles'. The addition of four more questions helps with the responsiveness within this specific domain. Thus the additional four questions of the PROMIS-APSRA will be administered to assess the domain of participation and activity.
Measured: 5 years
10-meter Walk Test (10mWT)
The 10mWT is a standardized test of self-selected walking speed in which patients are timed over the middle 6 meters (19.7 feet) of a 10-meter (32.8 feet) flat walkway. The self-selected walking speed is calculated in meters per second and has been discussed as a potential vital sign given its strong relationship with survival. It will serve as a marker of morbidity.
Measured: 5 years
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
The Timed Up-and-Go test is a standard basic mobility test that includes a sit-to-stand, gait initiation, walking, turning, and stand-to-sit. The test measures, in seconds, the time to stand up from an arm chair, walk a distance of 3 meters (approximately 10 feet), turn, walk back to the chair and sit down. It is a measure of function, has been used to assess the risk of falling, and will serve as a marker of morbidity.
Measured: 5 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - 29
Difference in average daily step activity count from 1 week after initial assessment compared to average daily step activity count for 1 week prior to 5-year assessment. Modern activity monitors provide the ability to translate movement from triaxial inertial measurement units into corresponding step activity with great precision.
Measured: 3 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Within the PROMIS system, this specific set of question is aimed at assessing the person's ability to perform usual social roles and activities, a construct noted to be of great significance to well-being within the World Health Organization International Classification of Function model. Four of the PROMIS-APSRA questions are included on the PROMIS-29 within the domain of 'satisfaction with social roles'. The addition of four more questions helps with the responsiveness within this specific domain. Thus the additional four questions of the PROMIS-APSRA will be administered to assess the domain of participation and activity.
Measured: 3 years
10-meter Walk Test (10mWT)
The 10mWT is a standardized test of self-selected walking speed in which patients are timed over the middle 6 meters (19.7 feet) of a 10-meter (32.8 feet) flat walkway. The self-selected walking speed is calculated in meters per second and has been discussed as a potential vital sign given its strong relationship with survival. It will serve as a marker of morbidity.
Measured: 3 years
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
The Timed Up-and-Go test is a standard basic mobility test that includes a sit-to-stand, gait initiation, walking, turning, and stand-to-sit. The test measures, in seconds, the time to stand up from an arm chair, walk a distance of 3 meters (approximately 10 feet), turn, walk back to the chair and sit down. It is a measure of function, has been used to assess the risk of falling, and will serve as a marker of morbidity.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2021
- Study start11 Jun 2021
- Primary completion29 Jun 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Hanger Clinic: Prosthetics & Orthotics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andreas Kannenberg, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbHShane Wurdeman, PhD, Principal investigator, Hanger Clinic: Prosthetics & Orthotics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04784429
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OB113
- Acronym
- ASCENT K2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing Outcomes With Microprocessor Knee Utilization in a K2 Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04784429
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASCENT K2 / OB113
- Conditions
- Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury), Congenital Amputation of Lower Limb, Lower Limb Amputation Knee
- Keywords
- Prosthetic knee, lower limb amputation, microprocessor controlled knee, K2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbHIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Hanger Clinic: Prosthetics & Orthotics
- Study start
- 11 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Two-phased randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of microprocessor controlled knee prostheses (MPK) with the impact of non-microprocessor controlled knee prostheses (NPMK) in patients with a transfemoral/knee disarticulation level amputation categorized as K2 ambulators.
Detailed description
Randomized controlled trial investigating the benefits of microprocessor controlled knee prostheses (MPK) in patients with a transfemoral or knee disarticulation level amputation categorized by Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL) as a Limited Community Ambulator (K-Level 2). There are two aims for the study. Aim 1 is to understand the effect of MPK technology for the K2 ambulator on reducing fear and anxiety of falling, improving health-related quality of life, and participation in society and activities. Aim 2 is to understand the long-term effect of MPK technology the aspects from Aim 1 as well as reducing morbidity. The trial will be conducted in two phases. Phase 1 will cover the initial 12-month period to address Aim 1, and phase 2 will monitor from 12 months to 5 years to address Aim 2.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MPK | Experimental | Device: Kenevo or C-Leg 4Microprocessor controlled knee |
| NMPK | Active comparator | Device: Non microprocessor controlled knee (NMPK)Non-microprocessor controlled knee |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Unilateral transfemoral or knee disarticulation amputation
- Received prosthesis between 4 - 24 months prior
- Currently uses prosthesis
- K2 ambulator status
- Able to speak English or Spanish language
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Upper limb involvement
- Individuals ≥ 275 lbs
- Unable to provide informed consent
- History of acute or chronic residual limb breakdown
- History of 2 or more socket adjustments or replacements in the past 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Kenevo or C-Leg 4Kenevo fitted to subjects walking slower than 0.8 m/s as measured by the 2-minute Walk Test. C-Leg 4 fitted to subjects walking faster than 0.8 m/s. | Device | MPK |
| Non microprocessor controlled knee (NMPK)NMPK consistent with current standards of care | Device | NMPK |
Primary outcome
Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ)
Time frame: 12 months
This is a 14 item survey assessment originally developed with community-dwelling older adults which measures the degree to which respondents avoid activities due to their fear of falling. Responses are on a 5-point scale with 0 = completely disagree and 4 = completely agree. The total possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates a greater activity limitation and participation restriction as a result of the fear of falling.
Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ)
Time frame: 5 years
This is a 14 item survey assessment originally developed with community-dwelling older adults which measures the degree to which respondents avoid activities due to their fear of falling. Responses are on a 5-point scale with 0 = completely disagree and 4 = completely agree. The total possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates a greater activity limitation and participation restriction as a result of the fear of falling.
13 secondary outcomes
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - 29
Time frame: 12 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Time frame: 12 months
12-month fall count from bi-weekly fall journal
Time frame: 12 months
Average daily step counts
Time frame: 12 months
Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ)
Time frame: 3 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - 29
Time frame: 5 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Time frame: 5 years
10-meter Walk Test (10mWT)
Time frame: 5 years
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time frame: 5 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - 29
Time frame: 3 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Time frame: 3 years
10-meter Walk Test (10mWT)
Time frame: 3 years
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)
Recruiting
Prosthetic Performance Enhancement Trial
Amputation, Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
C-STAR Movement Database
Stroke, Parkinson Disease
Recruiting
Effects of Microprocessor-controlled Prosthetic Knees on Fall-related Health Outcomes in Limited Community Ambulators
Amputation, Prosthesis User
Recruiting
Clinical Outcomes With Non-Powered vs. Powered Prosthetic Knees by K2-level Amputees
Amputation, Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of the Prosthetic System Impact on Mental Workload in Above-knee Lower Limb Amputees.
Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andreas Kannenberg, MD, PhD principal investigator
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
Shane Wurdeman, PhD principal investigator
Hanger Clinic: Prosthetics & Orthotics
90 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Kenevo or C-Leg 4 in people with Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) and Congenital Amputation of Lower Limb, run by Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH at 90 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 90 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ) (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2024.